plasmoske
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 251
The realist
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2013, 01:19:18 PM |
|
I'm pissed off now for sure. .97 SLOWED 2 of 3 SATURNs wtfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff enjoy?... yeah, right.
You knew the risks when you chose to update it ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) If you're not prepared for doom, just leave it the way it is.
|
|
|
|
bronan
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2013, 01:22:18 PM |
|
Phoenix just wait a couple of minutes to settle again. At first i was seeing ultra low speeds as well but after like 15 minutes it was showing steady about the same numbers on average hash rate, however i would like to know what the impact is from higher WU on the pool. On the pool its still not settled and jumps from 240 to 340 Gh so i think that needs to settle in time as well
|
|
|
|
Phoenix1969
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
LIR DEV
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2013, 01:24:12 PM |
|
I'm pissed off now for sure. .97 SLOWED 2 of 3 SATURNs wtfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff enjoy?... yeah, right.
You knew the risks when you chose to update it ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) If you're not prepared for doom, just leave it the way it is. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FEZKNiFy.png&t=665&c=NYuh4APTDtUVIw)
|
|
|
|
trepex
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2013, 01:25:04 PM |
|
After 85 minutes on 0.97 I can confirm that - the flushworks is much better now - the average performance is better than on 0.96 (at least with very good cooling) - I would say 2-3 more Gh/s
cgminer version 3.4.0 - Started: [2013-10-23 11:58:39] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (5s):206.4G (avg):277.0Gh/s | A:313088 R:1792 HW:24626 WU:4027.0/m ST: 2 SS: 0 NB: 16 LW: 351664 GF: 0 RF: 0 Connected to mint.bitminter.com diff 256 with stratum as user ******* Block: 000595984690bae0... Diff:268M Started: [13:17:35] Best share: 458K -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [P]ool management [ S ]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit KnC 0: | 282.7G/277.3Gh/s | A:313088 R:1536 HW:24630 WU:4027.7/m --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Temperatures reported by bertmod on my Saturn: 36,5 and 36C. All cores up.
|
|
|
|
sickpig
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2013, 01:25:28 PM |
|
so eventually you were able to resurrect your dead die through enablecore.bin?
|
Bitcoin is a participatory system which ought to respect the right of self determinism of all of its users - Gregory Maxwell.
|
|
|
jelin1984
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1004
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2013, 01:29:30 PM Last edit: October 23, 2013, 02:10:04 PM by jelin1984 |
|
check a lot before install new firmware
|
|
|
|
sickpig
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2013, 01:33:55 PM |
|
i think so yes
I'm glad have you already upgraded to 0.97?
|
Bitcoin is a participatory system which ought to respect the right of self determinism of all of its users - Gregory Maxwell.
|
|
|
plasmoske
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 251
The realist
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2013, 01:35:50 PM |
|
recommended. not required.
Your miners were working very well before yet you still decided to tinker with it anyway by updating the firmware.
The main rule of thumb when updating any drivers/firmware for anything is that things can break or go wrong.
|
|
|
|
Rampion
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2013, 01:38:19 PM |
|
recommended. not required.
Your miners were working very well before yet you still decided to tinker with it anyway by updating the firmware.
The main rule of thumb when updating any drivers/firmware for anything is that things can break or go wrong.
This. If ain't broken...
|
|
|
|
Phoenix1969
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
LIR DEV
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2013, 01:39:45 PM |
|
recommended. not required.
Your miners were working very well before yet you still decided to tinker with it anyway by updating the firmware.
The main rule of thumb when updating any drivers/firmware for anything is that things can break or go wrong.
recommended. not required.
Your miners were working very well before yet you still decided to tinker with it anyway by updating the firmware.
The main rule of thumb when updating any drivers/firmware for anything is that things can break or go wrong.
I don't really appreciate the satire, especially since the two were underperforming to begin with... so everyone should just not update anything cause you said so, eh? Even when KNC recommends it.. . I hope it happens to you as well.
|
|
|
|
plasmoske
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 251
The realist
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2013, 01:43:08 PM |
|
I don't see any satire at all in my posts
Anyone is free to do whatever. Just know there are risks in doing so.
Underperforming miners eh? I thought your 3 were pretty good.
|
|
|
|
Phoenix1969
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
LIR DEV
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2013, 01:47:01 PM |
|
I don't see any satire at all in my posts
Anyone is free to do whatever. Just know there are risks in doing so.
Underperforming miners eh? I thought your 3 were pretty good.
they were 255, 265, and 275 the 255 sat is like a jup at 510... you call that good? 0.97 made it 220 it made the one with 265, now 260 the 3rd, one was 275, is 275
|
|
|
|
cet
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2013, 01:48:32 PM |
|
does anyone know how to get the web interface to connect to the cgminer api correctly? I just did an update from .95 to .97 and the miner status data doesn't display correctly. Mining Status
CGMiner Status Running (Connect to CGMiner API failed) Last Checked Avg. Hash Rate WU Difficulty Accepted HW Status
ASIC slot #1 50.0 ℃ ASIC slot #2 - ASIC slot #3 60.0 ℃ ASIC slot #4 53.0 ℃ ASIC slot #5 48.0 ℃ ASIC slot #6 -
Thanks, /cet
|
|
|
|
plasmoske
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 251
The realist
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2013, 01:50:34 PM |
|
I don't see any satire at all in my posts
Anyone is free to do whatever. Just know there are risks in doing so.
Underperforming miners eh? I thought your 3 were pretty good.
they were 255, 265, and 275 the 255 sat is like a jup at 510... you call that good? 0.97 made it 220 it made the one with 265, now 260 the 3rd, one was 275, is 275 255 265 275. For sats. Pretty good. What are your expectations? 290 290 290?
|
|
|
|
xyzzy099
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1065
Merit: 1077
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2013, 01:50:43 PM |
|
recommended. not required.
Your miners were working very well before yet you still decided to tinker with it anyway by updating the firmware.
The main rule of thumb when updating any drivers/firmware for anything is that things can break or go wrong.
This. If ain't broken... I certainly understand taking a conservative approach, especially when money is involved - but in this case, it is literally a less-than-30-second job to revert to your old firmware if you don't like the new stuff, so why not just try it? So far, it looks to me like the flushwork improvement in 0.97 is worth the effort.
|
Libertarians: Diligently plotting to take over the world and leave you alone.
|
|
|
adrd
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2013, 01:51:57 PM |
|
does anyone know how to get the web interface to connect to the cgminer api correctly? I just did an update from .95 to .97 and the miner status data doesn't display correctly. Mining Status
CGMiner Status Running (Connect to CGMiner API failed) Last Checked Avg. Hash Rate WU Difficulty Accepted HW Status
ASIC slot #1 50.0 ℃ ASIC slot #2 - ASIC slot #3 60.0 ℃ ASIC slot #4 53.0 ℃ ASIC slot #5 48.0 ℃ ASIC slot #6 -
Thanks, /cet You need to enable CGminer API and restart CGminer
|
|
|
|
Phoenix1969
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
LIR DEV
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2013, 01:56:53 PM |
|
I don't see any satire at all in my posts
Anyone is free to do whatever. Just know there are risks in doing so.
Underperforming miners eh? I thought your 3 were pretty good.
they were 255, 265, and 275 the 255 sat is like a jup at 510... you call that good? 0.97 made it 220 it made the one with 265, now 260 the 3rd, one was 275, is 275 255 265 275. For sats. Pretty good. What are your expectations? 290 290 290? No, and stop being a smart-ass, please? What I expect, is 3 machines running around 270-275, just like the specs say. 255 is crap, 265 is nominal
|
|
|
|
cet
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2013, 01:58:44 PM |
|
You need to enable CGminer API and restart CGminer
Thanks, that solved my problem. /cet
|
|
|
|
plasmoske
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 251
The realist
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2013, 01:59:26 PM |
|
Please point to me where the spec says a sat should run at 270-275.
Okay it does write that in the website but that's for the lucky. Not everyone gets those max speeds.
It should really say "runs up to a max of ###gh/s"
|
|
|
|
|
|