josh_nc
Member
 Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
 |
October 24, 2013, 07:40:57 PM |
|
http://bitcoincharts.com/bitcoin/Count 265,677
Blocks
last 24h: 87 <<<<< Is this correct??? First time I see this since the beginning of the year....
avg. per hour: 3.63 <<<<< If this is right wow!!! It could mean diff going down for 1st time ever!!!
Difficulty 267,731,249 Next Difficulty in 435 blocks 371,623,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally
controlled
networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem
to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
btc_uzr
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
let's have some fun
|
|
October 24, 2013, 07:50:37 PM |
|
https://blockchain.info/charts/hash-ratemore than 0,5PH/s dropped off the network ?
|
..and Thou shalt spread the coin in the name of cryptography for eternity
|
|
|
Micky25
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 974
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 24, 2013, 08:12:56 PM |
|
sorry, I tripped over a wire.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ffernandex
|
|
October 24, 2013, 08:15:57 PM |
|
Yes, I have one Sat that stays rock-solid on 280...
so maybe 560 for Jupiter?...anyone got a Jup with better?
edit: still climbing WU's & Gh/s on the slo sat.... slowly
was 253/3920 now 262/3973 still going...
My hosted jupiter used to be in that range, and a couple times it even averaged +600GH/s, but now since the last FW update it's been stuck in the 400's range for at least a couple days. very very disappointing |
If you like my posts, feel free to donate!
BTC: 1L1S4wG5TNJZSX9VG3vkk2er76YHihz3Kg
|
|
|
Phoenix1969
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
LIR DEV
|
|
October 24, 2013, 08:27:49 PM |
|
264/3984 1st red mark is 0.97, second is vrm wiggle  |
|
|
|
ImI
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
|
|
October 24, 2013, 08:34:14 PM |
|
you ever heard the term "variance"? |
|
|
|
|
btc_uzr
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
let's have some fun
|
|
October 24, 2013, 08:52:45 PM |
|
you ever heard the term "variance"? Yes sir. And I'm aware what mathematical probability is and how hashrate is being approximated. |
..and Thou shalt spread the coin in the name of cryptography for eternity
|
|
|
|
dextryn
|
|
October 24, 2013, 08:58:13 PM |
|
Crap, everyone is reporting their chips running in the 45 degree range. I have one at 48, two at 55 and one at 64. I'm hashing at a pretty stable rate of around 540-550. Should I be concerned about the temps?
|
|
|
|
|
Micky25
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 974
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 24, 2013, 09:01:03 PM |
|
I have about the same and feel totaly comfortable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
dextryn
|
|
October 24, 2013, 09:05:14 PM |
|
I have about the same and feel totaly comfortable.
Ultimately I'm feeling fine too. Hash rate is great. Heck, I remember gpu mining and having 12 of them pegged at 80 for months. |
|
|
|
|
|
DPoS
|
|
October 24, 2013, 09:17:43 PM |
|
I'm not sure why you need to remove this file - I would think it would just overwrite it, but if you really want to remove it:
SSH into the machine, then:
# cd /config
# rm asic_test
The '#' is the command line prompt - don't type that.
Thank you. and yes, DPos, wouldn't the asic_test get overwritten one you load the new firmware?? little tired of proving everything for people... simple to do a test right? either upgrade and reboot twice with ,96 and see if it does that 1-2 min runthrough and reboots itself or add extra char or two in the file and see if it overwrites i believe there is logic somewhere that checks to see if the file is there and then skips the self test.. but i've been messing with bfgminer the past few days so i don't really remember exactly i usually rename the asic_test files to asic_testXX so I keep record of any changes |
|
|
|
Cablez
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
I owe my soul to the Bitcoin code...
|
|
October 24, 2013, 09:24:05 PM |
|
Is there a way to identify which physical board is being identified by the bertmod output? It says there is a board 0,2,3,4 with boards 2 and 3 being much warmer than the other two. I would assume that those would be the rear boards, correct?
|
Tired of substandard power distribution in your ASIC setup??? Chris' Custom Cablez will get you sorted out right! No job too hard so PM me for a quote
Check my products or ask a question here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=74397.0
|
|
|
soy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1013
|
|
October 24, 2013, 09:37:02 PM |
|
But I don't understand why if the warm BBB backs up Merc's why it wouldn't back up a Jupiter 4x as much.
I agree... It just doesn't make any sense... I think it's the VRM's getting cooled by playing with the cardboard, etc... as mentioned earlier.. No, in fact my arrangement probably warms the VRMs a little as I've now got a kind of wind tunnel to the ASIC module and that first passes over the BBB - note the small 120vac 3 watt at the wall fan pushing in from the far left and the two front fans. So, the ½ fan width cardboard down over the BBB might be better buy I ain't fooling with mine. ...trying to get on the dreadmill.. KnC 0: | 130.2G/135.7Gh/s | A:7589658 R:346355 HW:441631 WU:2091.4/m not sure but I may have seen a 136GH/s avg earlier. That first figure cycles up and down. about 4 mph and watching bering sea gold - gonna cash in my BTC and head up to them there hills. Stepped off the dreadmill and the internet goes down. Happened yesterday just as I got back from a jog. The local highway is being widened from 2 lane to divided highway. Fiber is run along the road. Cable was down 2 hours at least. Bummer. |
|
|
|
|
soy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1013
|
|
October 24, 2013, 09:39:38 PM |
|
just now...
Just as a little test... I gently just pressed on the vrm's on the slo sat, and rocked them side to side a tad with the tip of my finger. One of the vrm's gave a little "Click".
within 30 seconds, a couple cores were re-enabled in cgminer... and it has gained about 20 WU's in about 5 minutes, and 2-3 gh/s Will keep updated...
few mins later... couple more WU. 1 more gh/s
While my internet was down I shut down the miners and put a bit of cardboard between the VRMs and the ASIC cooler. I looked closely and the metal tops are epoxy'd in place with thin lines of epoxy. The snap could be one of those epoxy lines breaking. I'd like to take the tops off and see if an expensive thermal tape would help any, then re-epoxy. |
|
|
|
|
soy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1013
|
|
October 24, 2013, 09:42:23 PM |
|
soy, .90 crashed....and everything below .94 didn't work or help me...back to .95 square 1 again see what happens....
.90, knc if you are listening had great numbers for me, but not sure what why it crashed....
If they were to answer I'd guess they guess it's your power supply can't handle it. |
|
|
|
|
chrono030
Member
Offline
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
|
|
October 24, 2013, 09:46:23 PM |
|
just now...
Just as a little test... I gently just pressed on the vrm's on the slo sat, and rocked them side to side a tad with the tip of my finger. One of the vrm's gave a little "Click".
within 30 seconds, a couple cores were re-enabled in cgminer... and it has gained about 20 WU's in about 5 minutes, and 2-3 gh/s Will keep updated...
few mins later... couple more WU. 1 more gh/s
While my internet was down I shut down the miners and put a bit of cardboard between the VRMs and the ASIC cooler. I looked closely and the metal tops are epoxy'd in place with thin lines of epoxy. The snap could be one of those epoxy lines breaking. I'd like to take the tops off and see if an expensive thermal tape would help any, then re-epoxy. This seems to be very odd. I am guessing that pressing a VRM wouldnt fix an issue with 1 -4 cores being out. Has anyone else done this? I have 4 cores that seem to be consistently off. |
|
|
|
|
|
mgio
|
|
October 24, 2013, 09:48:52 PM |
|
I'm running 0.96 and I've can't get much above 500. According to eligius I am really only getting 465 or so (don't know why the big discrepancy).
Any suggestions on how to improve my hash rate? Should I try different firmware?
|
|
|
|
|
Cablez
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
I owe my soul to the Bitcoin code...
|
|
October 24, 2013, 09:54:03 PM |
|
At least you guys are hitting 500. My bad Jupiter on 0.97 doesn't break 475GH with 20%HW errors and anywhere from 24-48 cores disabled.
EDIT: temps are not that bad either with the warmest being 52deg.
|
Tired of substandard power distribution in your ASIC setup??? Chris' Custom Cablez will get you sorted out right! No job too hard so PM me for a quote
Check my products or ask a question here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=74397.0
|
|
|
|
AFox
|
|
October 24, 2013, 10:04:24 PM |
|
All the firmware's were run at least 24 hours without any reboot. For that reason firmware 0.90 to 0.93 aren't listed. | -------------------- | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.97 | | Average CGminer | 270Gh/s | 274Gh/s | 280Gh/s | 284Gh/s | | Average Pool | 275Gh/s | 263Gh/s | 278Gh/s (link) | 283Gh/s (link) | | Consumption | 485 Watts | 305 Watts | 313 Watts | 313 Watts | | Temputure | 54 & 62°C | 42 & 47°C | 42 & 47°C | 40 & 44°C | | Rejected | 1.5% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.48% | | HW | 2.81% | 0.79% | 1.08% | 1.47% | | WU | 3975/m | 3717/m | 3933/m | 4021/m |
|
|
|
|
|
DPoS
|
|
October 24, 2013, 10:19:19 PM |
|
At least you guys are hitting 500. My bad Jupiter on 0.97 doesn't break 475GH with 20%HW errors and anywhere from 24-48 cores disabled.
Well, the pool is reading ~465, so I'm going off that number. Is anyone actually getting 550+ at their pool stats? there's good modules and bad modules I put my one really good module from my troubled miner and swapped it into my good miner that had the odd 8 VRM board in it. Swapped it with the 8 VRM board now seeing solid +580 at the pool with four very good modules running .96 w/cgminer 587.63 GH/s 2004480 (99.87%) 2560 / 13824 / 0 my troubled miner has a hodgepodge of issues.. so I am running the gambit on which firmware to use with bfgminer for best case scenario |
|
|
|
|
