So the 'purpose' of WO now is to 'taunt' me with 'un-obtainable Women',
Unobtainable? Here in the real world, I’ve had at least one girlfriend with a prettier face than the girls in those photos
(whatever popular celebrities—I don’t care), albeit not quite as good a body
(but then, she was 100% real—and function matched form: she was talented, bodily). I remember her particularly, because I was flat broke when we met—impoverished to the point of lacking basic survival necessities. Interesting times.
This one is unobtainable:
(maybe I need a Cat...Cat people tell me life is better with a Cat...at least you give up the idea of any control in the household with a Cat)...
You cannot escape the nature of woman by trading her for a pussy.
That which inspires respect in woman, and often enough fear also, is her nature, which is more “natural” than that of man, her genuine, predatory, cunning flexibility, her tiger-claws beneath the glove, her naïveté in egoism, her untrainableness and innate wildness, the incomprehensibleness, extent, and deviation of her desires and virtues. That which, in spite of fear, excites one’s sympathy for the dangerous and beautiful cat, “woman,” is that she seems more afflicted, more vulnerable, more necessitous of love, and more condemned to disillusionment than any other creature. Fear and sympathy: it is with these feelings that man has hitherto stood in the presence of woman, always with one foot already in tragedy, which rends while it delights...
Quote works better out of context:
Females are easier IME.
Jay: Insightful comments that will probably inspire a short essay.