Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[nullius]

Crypto derivate issuers can go f*ck themselves with a length of rusty pipe, imho.

Perpend the reality that the derivatives are being regulated, not banned.  What, do you suppose that CME is being banned?

The upshot is that those who obey buy the regulators can fuck our Bitcoin markets with a rusty pipe—you know, the fine folks who are “too big to fail”—while everybody else is denied permission to do what they want with their “permissionless” bitcoins.

Just like the dollar markets, but with Blockchain!

[nullius]

May be a NO IDEA option needed

This is one of those situations in which you gotta make a choice.

There is no fence-sitting nor weaseling out with this particular question.  Either you make one of the two listed choices, or you abstain from participating indulging in a mass-hallucination that a circus entertainment be meaningful.   

 

FYFY.

[Phil_S]

Price tag: Over $1 million

I read it's $480K, but yeah... pretty expensive.

[JayJuanGee]

May be a NO IDEA option needed

This is one of those situations in which you gotta make a choice.

There is no fence-sitting nor weaseling out with this particular question.  Either you make one of the two listed choices, or you abstain from participating indulging in a mass-hallucination that a circus entertainment be meaningful.   

 

FYFY.

Look at uie.... 

Taking BitcoinGirl.Club's side in this matter.

I have noticed that you tend to be a bit of a softy (in other words, one of your weaker spots) when it comes to protecting the fairer sex.   

 

[nullius]

We heard that before.

You come off as a bit of a nutjob to be making those kinds of proclamations, eXPHorizon, even if you are attempting some kind of a joke.

The reason why I quoted him here from several other threads was to suggest “YHBT” to anyone who may try to make sense of his posts.  I did it in a humorous manner, perhaps too subtly, because complaining about that kind of thing is “feeding”.

In the thread that he started with this OP:

Hello.


I would like to buy Bitcoins at the price of 2013-14 to gain back the lost Coins. If Bitcoin is not possible to be bought than maybe Litecoin? Dogecoin? Please, i need your aid my friends. You are all i have left.

...his latest post is this:

So, who is going to Gift/Sell me my Bitcoin ? You do not know how to use it, give it back to the man that can multiply them easily

YHBT, HAND.

[Elwar]

^ Got yourself a vacant cruise ship (conveniently already registered in a tax haven)?

MS Satoshi
Oh yes, I bought a cruise ship
The Crypto Cruise Ship

I want the hostesses with miniskirt and hat WO
Also a shooting gallery
You are a born entrepreneur, I wish you good luck.

We were just talking about a shooting gallery. 

[JayJuanGee]

Price tag: Over $1 million

I read it's $480K, but yeah... pretty expensive.

More expenses in running and securing it, of course... so have to generate at least enough income, to pay for its maintenance and upkeep - including cost of staff (minimum staff? or adequate staff?) 

These days, also, there may be a need to make sure that the ventilation systems have allowed for some health assurances (virus related, of course) - harder to accomplish those kinds of assurances in enclosed and potentially frequently trafficked spaces.

[eXPHorizon]

@JJG

I don’t think Bitmex-gate is going to affect us too much. I’m still thinking that we moon in 2021, there is perhaps a chance that covid could stop us going as high as we would have but yeah, I still think we moon next year.

Now Now  LFC, the times of ATH are long gone , reminiscence of 2017 and keep it close to the heart

We heard that before.

You come off as a bit of a nutjob to be making those kinds of proclamations, eXPHorizon, even if you are attempting some kind of a joke.

May be a NO IDEA option needed

This is one of those situations in which you gotta make a choice.

There is no fence-sitting nor weaseling out with this particular question.  Either you make one of the two listed choices, or you abstain from participating.  

 

For every dollar that goes into crypto the price rises $20-$25**. The millennial generation is poised to inherit $7T and they like crypto as an investment.

Research by @fundstrat.

** Estimated in 2018, it varies between market phases, higher in a bull market.
https://twitter.com/woonomic/status/1313485412166443009?s=21

Hate that word, "crypto" whatever the fuck that means?

-1 WO smerit - for traumatizing yours truly and any other potentially sensitive WO peeps with that.    

Fundamental buy pressure from new HODLers is undeniable right now. But for short term traders, sell walling on derivative and spot exchanges shows whales are in price suppression mode. It may whipsaw randomly a bit, but the long game will win.

https://twitter.com/woonomic/status/1313489686317461507?s=21

Ok. .. this one makes up for your earlier faux pas.

We (that's you and me, #nohomo) are back to neutral territory.

 

I too am sure that i do come off as an nutjob, however it is the truth.

[OutOfMemory]

Crypto derivate issuers can go f*ck themselves with a length of rusty pipe, imho.

Perpend the reality that the derivatives are being regulated, not banned.  What, do you suppose that CME is being banned?

The upshot is that those who obey buy the regulators can fuck our Bitcoin markets with a rusty pipe—you know, the fine folks who are “too big to fail”—while everybody else is denied permission to do what they want with their “permissionless” bitcoins.

Just like the dollar markets, but with Blockchain!

Yes, and that makes them (bitcoin derivates) even worse.

[explorer]

^ Got yourself a vacant cruise ship (conveniently already registered in a tax haven)?

MS Satoshi
Oh yes, I bought a cruise ship
The Crypto Cruise Ship

I want the hostesses with miniskirt and hat WO
Also a shooting gallery
You are a born entrepreneur, I wish you good luck.

We were just talking about a shooting gallery. 

Skeet shooting off the starboard bow, commencing 16:00 daily!

[Last of the V8s]

https://twitter.com/ColeGarnerBTC/status/1313241838875226112?s=20 +thread
loads of new addresses recently because China pumped 'cryptoassets' as good investments.
methinks the hopium is strong with this one

meanwhile https://twitter.com/coryklippsten/status/1313528667318874112?s=20 +video
 'our inside man', Brian,

said he doesn't think there will be a digital dollar in 4-5 years.  Said stablecoins are already the digital dollar.  Said the role of the government isn't to build tech.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

Don’t make life to difficult for our headmaster of the WO 

I pronounce no vote. Now do the percentage, not the job for the head master  😜

May be a NO IDEA option needed

This is one of those situations in which you gotta make a choice.

There is no fence-sitting nor weaseling out with this particular question.  Either you make one of the two listed choices, or you abstain from participating indulging in a mass-hallucination that a circus entertainment be meaningful.   

 

FYFY.

Look at uie.... 

Taking BitcoinGirl.Club's side in this matter.

I have noticed that you tend to be a bit of a softy (in other words, one of your weaker spots) when it comes to protecting the fairer sex.   

 

LOL JG

[Last of the V8s]

https://twitter.com/fiatcurrency/status/1313553029166174215

no more stimulus negotiations till after the election - btc down a tad, stonks follow suit

[JayJuanGee]

[edited out]

I too am sure that i do come off as an nutjob, however it is the truth.

Well, at least you admit to some kind of "nutjob" status, but I am not sure if that would make you a better troll / shill than the average troll/shill or not?



Many troll/shills won't fucking admit to those kinds of things or even cooperate in providing much if any information about their lil selfies, but I will concede too that troll/shills come in a variety of flavors, and sometimes these mostly unhelpful participants will take some kind of unique posting approach in order to attempt to garner some sympathies from some members who might be somewhat sympathetic to troll/shills or entertained by their nonsense.

Since you are still new here, there could be a chance that you might grow up a bit, and then start to contribute to the thread and the forum?  There have been some members who had gone through such transition... so anything is possible... unlikely, but sure.. possible [insert alien meme here].

Don’t make life to difficult for our headmaster of the WO  

I pronounce no vote. Now do the percentage, not the job for the head master  😜

May be a NO IDEA option needed

This is one of those situations in which you gotta make a choice.

There is no fence-sitting nor weaseling out with this particular question.  Either you make one of the two listed choices, or you abstain from participating indulging in a mass-hallucination that a circus entertainment be meaningful.  

 

FYFY.

Look at uie....  

Taking BitcoinGirl.Club's side in this matter.

I have noticed that you tend to be a bit of a softy (in other words, one of your weaker spots) when it comes to protecting the fairer sex.  

 

LOL JG

I understand that you are a daddy.. but sure nullius may not have realized that (whether subconsciously or otherwise), but now, your response pushing me towards elaborating more than I originally intended.

[Last of the V8s]

first the kleptocrats, now their hired goons


https://twitter.com/DavidBegnaud/status/1313526334577152000?s=20

[nullius]

I have noticed that you tend to be a bit of a softy (in other words, one of your weaker spots) when it comes to protecting the fairer sex.  

Perpend a juxtaposition which modern simpletons will not understand:

In essentially the same passage as in which Nietzsche praised the natural strength of womankind, and for example hailed Napoleon’s mother for having gained “power and ascendancy over men” through her “force of will”, he also urged European men to see Woman “as Orientals do”:  As “a possession, as confinable property”.

Thereupon, observe how the feminists with daddy issues want (or pretend to want) one part, and

reactionary manosphere twits with feminist-mommy issues

wish for the other part, and nobody integrates these concepts properly.

I dislike feeling as if I were quoting chapter and verse (Beyond Good and Evil, #238–239); I have my own ideas, thank you very much.  But then, perhaps I should leave some ambiguity about my personal opinions—let’s just say that from my high respect for women, I have learned a feminine coyness.  Moreover, it is remarkable that in the 1880s, Nietzsche’s philosophy of a beneficial antagonism between the sexes anticipated current scientific theories of sexual selection and evolutionary psychology.  He cared about heirs, you see—not so much personal heirs, but in the abstract, the evolutionary heirs of Man.

Also, in the 1880s, he condemned “modern ideas” and “the sensitive and pampered taste of a democratic century”, i.e. the Nineteenth Century.

Two different things wanteth the true man: danger and play.  Therefore wanteth he woman, as the most dangerous plaything.

[JayJuanGee]

I have noticed that you tend to be a bit of a softy (in other words, one of your weaker spots) when it comes to protecting the fairer sex.  

Perpend a juxtaposition which modern simpletons will not understand:

In essentially the same passage as in which Nietzsche praised the natural strength of womankind, and for example hailed Napoleon’s mother for having gained “power and ascendancy over men” through her “force of will”, he also urged European men to see Woman “as Orientals do”:  As “a possession, as confinable property”.

Thereupon, observe how the feminists with daddy issues want (or pretend to want) one part, and

reactionary manosphere twits with feminist-mommy issues

wish for the other part, and nobody integrates these concepts properly.

I dislike feeling as if I were quoting chapter and verse (Beyond Good and Evil, #238–239); I have my own ideas, thank you very much.  But then, perhaps I should leave some ambiguity about my personal opinions—let’s just say that from my high respect for women, I have learned a feminine coyness.  Moreover, it is remarkable that in the 1880s, Nietzsche’s philosophy of a beneficial antagonism between the sexes anticipated current scientific theories of sexual selection and evolutionary psychology.  He cared about heirs, you see—not so much personal heirs, but in the abstract, the evolutionary heirs of Man.

Also, in the 1880s, he condemned “modern ideas” and “the sensitive and pampered taste of a democratic century”, i.e. the Nineteenth Century.

Two different things wanteth the true man: danger and play.  Therefore wanteth he woman, as the most dangerous plaything.

I am surely NOT proclaiming such proclivities to be a bad thing (even if a potential weakness). 

 

   #nohomo

[Toxic2040]

1h


4h

#dyor

[Last of the V8s]

[nullius]

[...]

Two different things wanteth the true man: danger and play.  Therefore wanteth he woman, as the most dangerous plaything.

I am surely NOT proclaiming such proclivities to be a bad thing (even if a potential weakness).  

 

   #nohomo

My own pet theory is that if you (indefinite “you”—not you, Jay) are not strong enough to be the boss in a relationship with a cunning, manipulative, oftentimes quite predatory creature, then you should #gohomo.  Consider that to be Nature’s way of preventing you from pissing in the gene pool with your whiny weakling heirs.

You worthless wretch.  ...consider the health benefits of homosexuality.

A Real Man wants women.  A Real Man does not want for his women to be such safe little sweeties as the incel crowd demands that women should become for them.

Too sweet fruits—these the warrior liketh not.  Therefore liketh he woman;—bitter is even the sweetest woman.

I don’t put sugar in my coffee, I drink my liquor straight, and I don’t like “too sweet fruits” who present no challenge.

What would be the fun of having a naturally aggressive, competitive, domineering personality, if women were perfectly passive damsels who would submit to just any idiot with a penis?