[4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool

[zard_cz]

replace the ; in the command with \;
all semicolons need to be escaped, otherwise bash treats them as separate commands

[Spadowsky]

replace the ; in the command with \;
all semicolons need to be escaped, otherwise bash treats them as separate commands

Like this? api2.bitcoin.cz:8332/\;askrate=10 -k  let me try

That does it thanks a lot

[bitpop]

I cant connect!
api is only taking 2 connections and api2 is taking 10.
I need 2 more!

[zx9r]

I cant connect!
api is only taking 2 connections and api2 is taking 10.
I need 2 more!

I have 3 workers, each one running in a 5850 with phoenix/phatk and all pointing to api2.

I have just seen that two of them have the same amount of submitted shares after 48 hours (last reboot), but one of them have 3 times less than the other two in the same time. May be a problem connecting to the pool ?

BTW, what is an approximate "right" value for stale/invalid shares ? I'm having about 1.5%

[bitpop]

bump

[slush]

api2.bitcoin.cz isn't letting all of my miners connect. it took me hours to figure out to try api.bitcoin.cz
you should really say why api2 exists, newer server vs second server for more connections

Actually there's no difference between api.bitcoin.cz and api2.bitcoin.cz. Your miners should work with both URLs. Can you try some network tools to analyze connection between you and servers? Ping, traceroute, telnet (mainly if server let you open the connection to put any request).

[slush]

I have 3 workers, each one running in a 5850 with phoenix/phatk and all pointing to api2.

I have just seen that two of them have the same amount of submitted shares after 48 hours (last reboot), but one of them have 3 times less than the other two in the same time. May be a problem connecting to the pool ?

BTW, what is an approximate "right" value for stale/invalid shares ? I'm having about 1.5%

Do you see any error messages in the 'bad' miner? Idling messages or higher stale ratio? If it is just lower miner performance, it might be some hardware issue. But hard to say without more info...

1.5% is in expected range.

[zx9r]

I have 3 workers, each one running in a 5850 with phoenix/phatk and all pointing to api2.

I have just seen that two of them have the same amount of submitted shares after 48 hours (last reboot), but one of them have 3 times less than the other two in the same time. May be a problem connecting to the pool ?

BTW, what is an approximate "right" value for stale/invalid shares ? I'm having about 1.5%

Do you see any error messages in the 'bad' miner? Idling messages or higher stale ratio? If it is just lower miner performance, it might be some hardware issue. But hard to say without more info...

1.5% is in expected range.

Seems to be more stable for the las 24 hours. No idea what happened before:

  Temp    Fan% (rpm)    Load  Rate     Accept/Invalid   Status
0: 70.5c   80% (3744-)   97%   383 Mhs  7312/109 (1.47%) api2.bitcoin.cz
1: 67.5c   70% (3400+)   99%   389 Mhs  7529/132 (1.72%) api2.bitcoin.cz
2: 68.5c   70% (3466+)   99%   389 Mhs  7500/104 (1.37%) api2.bitcoin.cz

Total: 1162.54 Mhash/s  22341 accepted, 345 invalid (1.52%)

[EskimoBob]

I can not figure out why I can't  access http://mining.bitcoin.cz/ web page from my laptop but it works OK from my PC (same network)
I can access http://www.bitcoin.cz/ from both computers (and all the other web pages out there too).

Any ideas?

[bitpop]

I have 3 workers, each one running in a 5850 with phoenix/phatk and all pointing to api2.

I have just seen that two of them have the same amount of submitted shares after 48 hours (last reboot), but one of them have 3 times less than the other two in the same time. May be a problem connecting to the pool ?

BTW, what is an approximate "right" value for stale/invalid shares ? I'm having about 1.5%

Do you see any error messages in the 'bad' miner? Idling messages or higher stale ratio? If it is just lower miner performance, it might be some hardware issue. But hard to say without more info...

1.5% is in expected range.

Bad miners simply do not connect at all. Ever. Miner before that would get ZERO connection until i switched from api2 to api.. Pinging them works great though.

[progre55]

Why is the reject rate THAT hight? so far, I have 49 accepted and 39 rejected!

[slush]

Bad miners simply do not connect at all. Ever. Miner before that would get ZERO connection until i switched from api2 to api.. Pinging them works great though.

What miner are you using? There were such troubles with phoenix older than 1.50...

[slush]

Why is the reject rate THAT hight? so far, I have 49 accepted and 39 rejected!

I don't have enough info, but - of course - it does not sounds healthy . What miner parameters are you using? Something might be wrong here...

[progre55]

Why is the reject rate THAT hight? so far, I have 49 accepted and 39 rejected!

I don't have enough info, but - of course - it does not sounds healthy . What miner parameters are you using? Something might be wrong here...

Using diablo linux, with -f 10 -v 2 -w 128
got two 6950 cards, with a combined hashrate of 666 Mh/s
had to switch to a different pool after mining for several minutes on your pool with a ratio of 82 accepts / 74 rejects

[slush]

Using diablo linux, with -f 10 -v 2 -w 128
got two 6950 cards, with a combined hashrate of 666 Mh/s
had to switch to a different pool after mining for several minutes on your pool with a ratio of 82 accepts / 74 rejects

Oh well... Diablo isn't working properly for some technical reasons; Diablo changed some stuff in his miner few weeks ago and refused to "fix" it to be backward compatible. Please use another miner (I recommend phoenix or poclbm).

[Litt]

Using diablo linux, with -f 10 -v 2 -w 128
got two 6950 cards, with a combined hashrate of 666 Mh/s
had to switch to a different pool after mining for several minutes on your pool with a ratio of 82 accepts / 74 rejects

Oh well... Diablo isn't working properly for some technical reasons; Diablo changed some stuff in his miner few weeks ago and refused to "fix" it to be backward compatible. Please use another miner (I recommend phoenix or poclbm).

I'm using poclbm and I'm getting ridiculously high reject ratio as well. Is there a limit to how much work can be turned in per worker?

I'm showing at least 60% or so of my work that is being turned in rejected by the server. It wasn't this bad when I mined at slush while back, but I then I had it with separated to each gpu per worker for monitoring at the time. Now that I'm back and trying to setup slush again, it's giving me massive rejections because I am trying to turn in work to a single worker instead.

[noob_jul11]

I'm new to SLUSH. How do I withdraw immediate? Before I continue to mine at SLUSH, I need to know if
1) If I can withdraw immediate
2) if I can withdraw all 8 decimal places of btc.

I have set it at 1.0 btc for auto payout; but now I just set it at 0.01 btc. I have more confirmed btc than the 0.01 threshold but the payout was not initiated. HELP!

[FoxMURDER]

just fyi diablo works just fine for me ...


mhash: 389,5/388,7 | accept: 528 | reject: 1 | hw error: 4

[gr0bi42]

...
Please use another miner (I recommend phoenix or poclbm).

Hmm... something is wrong with your pool.

Using cgminer or even the latest phoenix, which i turn you do recommend,  gives a very high reject ratio. Here a sample of phoenix:

Code:

[11/08/2011 22:10:40] Result: 8de61579 accepted    
[11/08/2011 22:10:40] Result: 5db3749b accepted    
[11/08/2011 22:10:53] Result: 8d544c0e rejected    
[11/08/2011 22:11:04] Result: 2c6441e8 accepted    
[11/08/2011 22:11:19] Result: 96316e6b accepted    
[11/08/2011 22:11:48] Result: 538cf092 rejected    
[11/08/2011 22:11:59] Result: b54181b1 rejected    
[11/08/2011 22:12:30] Result: 2e4c4c9c accepted    
[11/08/2011 22:12:33] Result: d3539822 accepted    
[11/08/2011 22:12:58] Result: 281068ea accepted    
[11/08/2011 22:13:05] Result: c8aa1ac6 rejected    
[11/08/2011 22:13:24] Result: 51fb1ca1 rejected    
[11/08/2011 22:13:31] Result: 37c7b8e4 accepted    
[11/08/2011 22:13:33] Result: 66ceb98a rejected    
[11/08/2011 22:13:58] Result: a8ae8e09 accepted    
[11/08/2011 22:14:03] Result: 820cb009 rejected    
[11/08/2011 22:14:04] Result: 6193ed32 accepted    
[11/08/2011 22:14:14] Result: 22feb555 accepted    
[11/08/2011 22:14:22] Result: 5318a11a rejected    
[11/08/2011 22:14:23] Result: e61b1c56 accepted    
[11/08/2011 22:14:25] Result: f3cd4c22 accepted    
[11/08/2011 22:14:26] Result: fb35e3df accepted    
[11/08/2011 22:14:31] Result: db9690de rejected    
[11/08/2011 22:15:03] Result: b2d6b790 accepted    
[11/08/2011 22:15:09] Result: 57159855 rejected    
[11/08/2011 22:15:22] Result: 1b373f95 accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:15:24] Result: a134167c accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:15:40] Result: 09c99be7 accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:15:43] Result: a6f5f619 accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:15:50] Result: fc2c5c20 accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:16:01] Result: 7c495db8 accepted     
[450.57 Mhash/sec] [54 Accepted] [10 Rejected] [RPC]

Your pool works well only with poclbm but with poclbm I have over 20Mhases/sec less. I don't know what is wrong with your pool, but it occurs only mining with your pool. Btcguild, deepbit, arsbitcoin, eligius and other smaller pools, all are working very well with reject ratios about or less than 1 percent.

[gr0bi42]

... Here a sample of phoenix: ...

At the moment even MUCH worser!!!

Code:

[11/08/2011 22:21:44] Currently on block: 140580    
[11/08/2011 22:21:49] Result: 28043e20 accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:22:07] Result: ae326f2b accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:22:15] Result: 6b222aba rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:22:16] Result: 84ece151 accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:22:28] Result: 41768598 accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:22:39] Result: 772a461c rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:22:40] Result: c737db57 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:22:46] Result: 72fb15e7 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:22:57] Result: 6f69f5c9 accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:23:01] Result: 4315794a rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:23:12] Result: 3b6b93ff rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:23:13] Result: 9bfa7ca1 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:23:26] Result: cf1a3a55 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:23:31] Result: 60e441b8 accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:23:48] Currently on block: 140581    
[11/08/2011 22:23:52] Result: 0569a1cb accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:24:13] Result: 134453a3 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:24:25] Result: 7dbc7bfd rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:24:27] Result: da314cf6 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:24:28] Result: 12e56fbc rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:24:29] Result: 30b3e304 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:24:31] Result: bb123449 accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:24:41] Result: 81ccfbf6 accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:24:41] Result: 93d8474b accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:24:44] Result: 9394b117 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:24:52] Result: f72ac644 accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:24:55] Result: 2e218500 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:24:57] Result: 8aca499a rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:25:21] Result: 032d4cc9 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:25:21] Result: 26b3ebe5 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:25:29] Result: 52235d90 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:25:39] Result: 3198ae98 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:26:03] Result: 62e21d58 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:26:23] Result: 5763f0c8 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:26:27] Result: 40322710 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:26:45] Result: bfb3b58c accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:26:45] Result: 26abecb8 accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:26:47] Result: e77b895f rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:26:50] Result: 7fa8b900 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:26:54] Result: d5ab4d8c rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:27:05] Result: f5dd2cce accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:27:05] Result: 57f860ee accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:27:14] Result: d8f0e7c0 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:27:18] Result: ceace447 accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:27:22] Result: 0834445a rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:27:23] Result: a2a29dc7 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:27:23] Result: 357e6512 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:27:35] Result: 9e81034a rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:27:40] Result: 326ba27e rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:27:50] Result: 56dbc08a rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:27:50] Result: 7399a650 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:27:59] Result: fa0829df rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:28:37] Result: f61301a4 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:28:42] Result: a9d492b5 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:28:42] Result: 2714b9fe rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:28:44] Result: 3dbdcd66 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:28:47] Result: b2492c9a rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:28:49] Result: cf79a264 accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:29:07] Result: 83c3f09a rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:29:10] Result: a770e366 accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:29:17] Result: 6bbd9049 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:29:34] Result: 22ffc8d4 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:29:51] Result: e8bccbb3 accepted     
[11/08/2011 22:30:17] Result: 87ab6686 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:30:19] Result: 2c58d265 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:30:20] Result: fc9282f5 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:30:26] Result: 7c74af61 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:30:40] Result: 19111c61 rejected     
[11/08/2011 22:31:12] Result: 0a84223a rejected      
[11/08/2011 22:31:26] Result: 662461f8 rejected      
[11/08/2011 22:31:30] Result: ed72f530 rejected      
[11/08/2011 22:31:36] Result: 34fb4f7a rejected      
[11/08/2011 22:31:40] Result: 9f63a1af rejected      
[11/08/2011 22:31:46] Result: 037a9f2f accepted      
[11/08/2011 22:31:57] Result: 96cfaa7e rejected      
[11/08/2011 22:32:08] Result: 08ef88bd rejected      
[11/08/2011 22:32:08] Result: e3770887 rejected      
[11/08/2011 22:32:15] Result: 6757c691 rejected      
[11/08/2011 22:32:19] Result: 6d31571d rejected      
[11/08/2011 22:32:22] Result: 396e0a4d rejected      
[11/08/2011 22:32:25] Result: 2d9a6821 rejected      
[11/08/2011 22:32:35] Result: 1ca3c3ff rejected      
[11/08/2011 22:32:41] Result: 3d436715 rejected      
[11/08/2011 22:32:46] Result: 10d8e0cb rejected      
[11/08/2011 22:32:55] Currently on block: 140582     
[11/08/2011 22:33:03] Result: 608d7fe6 accepted      
[11/08/2011 22:33:08] Result: 06c9c176 rejected      
[11/08/2011 22:33:10] Result: 0fcdd0d8 rejected      
[11/08/2011 22:33:16] Result: 468d0d8f rejected      
[11/08/2011 22:33:16] Result: 38997559 rejected      
[11/08/2011 22:33:24] Result: 411b706b rejected      
[11/08/2011 22:33:25] Result: c44e64e9 rejected      
[11/08/2011 22:33:37] Result: 4add7338 rejected      
[11/08/2011 22:33:39] Result: 4a5c8c97 accepted      
[415.82 Mhash/sec] [57 Accepted] [122 Rejected] [RPC]

Look at this. Almost all shares are rejected by your pool using phoenix.