Bitcoin Forum
December 03, 2016, 02:02:02 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3160 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.1%)
Total Voters: 3924

Pages: « 1 ... 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 [329] 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 ... 1105 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3926347 times)
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
April 22, 2013, 04:44:50 PM
 #6561

Well there are some things in slush method that I couldn't find described anywhere and I figure them out or someone told me on IRC.

One if a worker goes offline for more then 30 minuts don't turn it on agen till end of a block. If you do restart it it will reset scores for all the workers. I don't get why we have this one. So I just start it with a diffident username from the working worker or put it on a backup PPS pool till the end of a block...

If you have a slow miner(CPU) it can affect your payouts dramaticly(probably because it didn't send any results in for 30 minutes). And never in a good way from my experiences(OK it could be also good but so small that I didn't notice)... I get more since I stop CPU mining with separate worker... I just add a CPU on a GPU worker and it is fine...(I know waist of electricity but I don't pay it per KWh).

So this is just my 2 cents in help for new users...
1480773722
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480773722

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480773722
Reply with quote  #2

1480773722
Report to moderator
1480773722
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480773722

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480773722
Reply with quote  #2

1480773722
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1480773722
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480773722

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480773722
Reply with quote  #2

1480773722
Report to moderator
1480773722
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480773722

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480773722
Reply with quote  #2

1480773722
Report to moderator
1480773722
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480773722

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480773722
Reply with quote  #2

1480773722
Report to moderator
Lanidarc
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48


hmmm


View Profile
April 22, 2013, 04:49:35 PM
 #6562

Slush's pool numbers looking good! Currently second most capable pool  Cheesy

Also nice to see the stratum use go to 97%


Tips for tips: 1Cy5WzZL6o58dLbqzFK9z4DxcP4prV3WkQ
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
April 22, 2013, 04:57:06 PM
 #6563

Also nice to see the stratum use go to 97%
Good and bad. NMC mining is getwork only... I like to get something exstra...
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
April 22, 2013, 05:04:02 PM
 #6564

Also nice to see the stratum use go to 97%
Good and bad. NMC mining is getwork only... I like to get something exstra...

Are you sure about NMC being getwork only? In only use stratum and NMC seems to work fine for me.
Yes they are getwork only but everyone who has NMC address gets them. Even if you don't contribute anything to solution... You get them based on a BTC rewords...
Camello_AR
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 43


A Miner Guy


View Profile
April 22, 2013, 05:06:38 PM
 #6565

Also nice to see the stratum use go to 97%
Good and bad. NMC mining is getwork only... I like to get something exstra...

Are you sure about NMC being getwork only?

NMC is mined only vía getwork, but pays to everyone that have an NMC address. In the past days with stratum gone off and miners switched to GetWork, the NMC payouts increased significatly

Donations
1GWHKbwGvAEAzgjHa1nRCrAGWPLeY3ot3r
Sorry for my english. I'm native Spanish speaker
TiborB
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83


View Profile
April 22, 2013, 05:11:36 PM
 #6566

Also nice to see the stratum use go to 97%
Good and bad. NMC mining is getwork only... I like to get something exstra...

Are you sure about NMC being getwork only?

NMC is mined only vía getwork, but pays to everyone that have an NMC address. In the past days with stratum gone off and miners switched to GetWork, the NMC payouts increased significatly

Ok, that is clear now. Thanks.

Cheers,
   T
OlgaA524
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54



View Profile
April 22, 2013, 05:24:00 PM
 #6567

Well there are some things in slush method that I couldn't find described anywhere and I figure them out or someone told me on IRC.

One if a worker goes offline for more then 30 minuts don't turn it on agen till end of a block. If you do restart it it will reset scores for all the workers. I don't get why we have this one. So I just start it with a diffident username from the working worker or put it on a backup PPS pool till the end of a block...

If you have a slow miner(CPU) it can affect your payouts dramaticly(probably because it didn't send any results in for 30 minutes). And never in a good way from my experiences(OK it could be also good but so small that I didn't notice)... I get more since I stop CPU mining with separate worker... I just add a CPU on a GPU worker and it is fine...(I know waist of electricity but I don't pay it per KWh).

So this is just my 2 cents in help for new users...

So what you are saying is - it is better to have 1 fast worker then fast worker and a slow worker? Hmm... maybe that explains how my return varies from block to block for up to 30% even though I do not turn off my workers and their speed doesn't change. Under current algorithm it seem to be better to assign slower workers to some PPS pool   Huh

PS. I like Slush's pool but the return does vary significantly from block to block under seemingly the same conditions from my side.

18rWR6S4onARe8AQ1RgG4iGWKas3R97k4T - donations are most welcome
Kruncha
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420


Winter is coming...


View Profile
April 22, 2013, 05:26:45 PM
 #6568

Well there are some things in slush method that I couldn't find described anywhere and I figure them out or someone told me on IRC.

One if a worker goes offline for more then 30 minuts don't turn it on agen till end of a block. If you do restart it it will reset scores for all the workers. I don't get why we have this one. So I just start it with a diffident username from the working worker or put it on a backup PPS pool till the end of a block...

If you have a slow miner(CPU) it can affect your payouts dramaticly(probably because it didn't send any results in for 30 minutes). And never in a good way from my experiences(OK it could be also good but so small that I didn't notice)... I get more since I stop CPU mining with separate worker... I just add a CPU on a GPU worker and it is fine...(I know waist of electricity but I don't pay it per KWh).

So this is just my 2 cents in help for new users...

So what you are saying is - it is better to have 1 fast worker then fast worker and a slow worker? Hmm... maybe that explains how my return varies from block to block for up to 30% even though I do not turn off my workers and their speed doesn't change. Under current algorithm it seem to be better to assign slower workers to some PPS pool   Huh

Or assign your worker to the same account...

K.
OlgaA524
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54



View Profile
April 22, 2013, 05:43:14 PM
 #6569


So what you are saying is - it is better to have 1 fast worker then fast worker and a slow worker? Hmm... maybe that explains how my return varies from block to block for up to 30% even though I do not turn off my workers and their speed doesn't change. Under current algorithm it seem to be better to assign slower workers to some PPS pool   Huh

Or assign your worker to the same account...

K.

Not sure what you mean. I have 3 workers on the same account.

18rWR6S4onARe8AQ1RgG4iGWKas3R97k4T - donations are most welcome
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
April 22, 2013, 05:46:11 PM
 #6570


So what you are saying is - it is better to have 1 fast worker then fast worker and a slow worker? Hmm... maybe that explains how my return varies from block to block for up to 30% even though I do not turn off my workers and their speed doesn't change. Under current algorithm it seem to be better to assign slower workers to some PPS pool   Huh

Or assign your worker to the same account...

K.

Not sure what you mean. I have 3 workers on the same account.

Worker accaunt...
Kruncha
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420


Winter is coming...


View Profile
April 22, 2013, 05:49:55 PM
 #6571


So what you are saying is - it is better to have 1 fast worker then fast worker and a slow worker? Hmm... maybe that explains how my return varies from block to block for up to 30% even though I do not turn off my workers and their speed doesn't change. Under current algorithm it seem to be better to assign slower workers to some PPS pool   Huh

Or assign your worker to the same account...

K.

Not sure what you mean. I have 3 workers on the same account.

I thought it was made clear that the latest hashes/shares submittled had the highest score? it says it on his website (migration control if i'm not mistaken).

K.
OlgaA524
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54



View Profile
April 22, 2013, 05:54:17 PM
 #6572


So what you are saying is - it is better to have 1 fast worker then fast worker and a slow worker? Hmm... maybe that explains how my return varies from block to block for up to 30% even though I do not turn off my workers and their speed doesn't change. Under current algorithm it seem to be better to assign slower workers to some PPS pool   Huh

Or assign your worker to the same account...

K.

Not sure what you mean. I have 3 workers on the same account.

I thought it was made clear that the latest hashes/shares submittled had the highest score? it says it on his website (migration control if i'm not mistaken).

K.

right, but do slower workers really affect the fastest one by bad luck??? I did not see confirmation for that.

I was under the impression that each worker's contribution is computed independently and they added up to total w/o affecting each other.


18rWR6S4onARe8AQ1RgG4iGWKas3R97k4T - donations are most welcome
Kruncha
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420


Winter is coming...


View Profile
April 22, 2013, 06:26:16 PM
 #6573


So what you are saying is - it is better to have 1 fast worker then fast worker and a slow worker? Hmm... maybe that explains how my return varies from block to block for up to 30% even though I do not turn off my workers and their speed doesn't change. Under current algorithm it seem to be better to assign slower workers to some PPS pool   Huh

Or assign your worker to the same account...

K.

Not sure what you mean. I have 3 workers on the same account.

I thought it was made clear that the latest hashes/shares submittled had the highest score? it says it on his website (migration control if i'm not mistaken).

K.

right, but do slower workers really affect the fastest one by bad luck??? I did not see confirmation for that.

I was under the impression that each worker's contribution is computed independently and they added up to total w/o affecting each other.



Really?, have you spent time observing? - I don't think it's bad, but, it is the way it is, full stop.

K.
OlgaA524
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54



View Profile
April 22, 2013, 06:35:04 PM
 #6574


So what you are saying is - it is better to have 1 fast worker then fast worker and a slow worker? Hmm... maybe that explains how my return varies from block to block for up to 30% even though I do not turn off my workers and their speed doesn't change. Under current algorithm it seem to be better to assign slower workers to some PPS pool   Huh

Or assign your worker to the same account...

K.

Not sure what you mean. I have 3 workers on the same account.

I thought it was made clear that the latest hashes/shares submittled had the highest score? it says it on his website (migration control if i'm not mistaken).

K.

right, but do slower workers really affect the fastest one by bad luck??? I did not see confirmation for that.

I was under the impression that each worker's contribution is computed independently and they added up to total w/o affecting each other.



Really?, have you spent time observing? - I don't think it's bad, but, it is the way it is, full stop.

K.

Well Kruncha you are not helping, I am sorry but none of your answers made any sense or any point

18rWR6S4onARe8AQ1RgG4iGWKas3R97k4T - donations are most welcome
agento2
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21


View Profile
April 22, 2013, 06:41:12 PM
 #6575

Would it be possible to get the current round duration on the account page?

14BAmoY3JopfDS8EJWZSgfNK2saLD4aXCt
Kruncha
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420


Winter is coming...


View Profile
April 22, 2013, 06:43:27 PM
 #6576


So what you are saying is - it is better to have 1 fast worker then fast worker and a slow worker? Hmm... maybe that explains how my return varies from block to block for up to 30% even though I do not turn off my workers and their speed doesn't change. Under current algorithm it seem to be better to assign slower workers to some PPS pool   Huh

Or assign your worker to the same account...

K.

Not sure what you mean. I have 3 workers on the same account.



I thought it was made clear that the latest hashes/shares submittled had the highest score? it says it on his website (migration control if i'm not mistaken).

K.

right, but do slower workers really affect the fastest one by bad luck??? I did not see confirmation for that.

I was under the impression that each worker's contribution is computed independently and they added up to total w/o affecting each other.



Really?, have you spent time observing? - I don't think it's bad, but, it is the way it is, full stop.

K.

Well Kruncha you are not helping, I am sorry but none of your answers made any sense or any point

Look , I'm not here to argue, I love this site. The score system works as I have observed it to work, ask Slush, he'll tell you.

K.
OlgaA524
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54



View Profile
April 22, 2013, 06:44:39 PM
 #6577


So what you are saying is - it is better to have 1 fast worker then fast worker and a slow worker? Hmm... maybe that explains how my return varies from block to block for up to 30% even though I do not turn off my workers and their speed doesn't change. Under current algorithm it seem to be better to assign slower workers to some PPS pool   Huh

Or assign your worker to the same account...

K.

Not sure what you mean. I have 3 workers on the same account.

Worker accaunt...

Hi Lucko, you saying that I can just start all my 3 workers under the same worker name?

18rWR6S4onARe8AQ1RgG4iGWKas3R97k4T - donations are most welcome
nottm28
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574



View Profile
April 22, 2013, 06:49:50 PM
 #6578


So what you are saying is - it is better to have 1 fast worker then fast worker and a slow worker? Hmm... maybe that explains how my return varies from block to block for up to 30% even though I do not turn off my workers and their speed doesn't change. Under current algorithm it seem to be better to assign slower workers to some PPS pool   Huh

Or assign your worker to the same account...

K.

Not sure what you mean. I have 3 workers on the same account.



I thought it was made clear that the latest hashes/shares submittled had the highest score? it says it on his website (migration control if i'm not mistaken).

K.

right, but do slower workers really affect the fastest one by bad luck??? I did not see confirmation for that.

I was under the impression that each worker's contribution is computed independently and they added up to total w/o affecting each other.



Really?, have you spent time observing? - I don't think it's bad, but, it is the way it is, full stop.

K.

Well Kruncha you are not helping, I am sorry but none of your answers made any sense or any point

Look , I'm not here to argue, I love this site. The score system works as I have observed it to work, ask Slush, he'll tell you.

K.

Olga, Kruncha - take it offline please...

donations not accepted
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
April 22, 2013, 06:56:01 PM
 #6579


So what you are saying is - it is better to have 1 fast worker then fast worker and a slow worker? Hmm... maybe that explains how my return varies from block to block for up to 30% even though I do not turn off my workers and their speed doesn't change. Under current algorithm it seem to be better to assign slower workers to some PPS pool   Huh

Or assign your worker to the same account...

K.

Not sure what you mean. I have 3 workers on the same account.

Worker accaunt...

Hi Lucko, you saying that I can just start all my 3 workers under the same worker name?


I do and I had no problems... Well But I'm running with 2 account. One per computer... And using cgminer(better hashes) for GPU and GUIminer for CPU... But then you don't have such good control over the workers... If you see low hashes on page you need to look at computer to see if there is a problem...

And yes I noted that if a slow miner on his own worker send one share after more then 30 minutes all workers scores for all workers are reset to 0... And if that happens at the end of the round it is really bad...  You could get almost noting because of that... I can understand resetting the worker in question bat all. I don't get that...

EDIT: cgminer takes all GPUs and run them on one worker not the same as GUI that you need worker per GPU and CPU...
Kruncha
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420


Winter is coming...


View Profile
April 22, 2013, 07:00:03 PM
 #6580


So what you are saying is - it is better to have 1 fast worker then fast worker and a slow worker? Hmm... maybe that explains how my return varies from block to block for up to 30% even though I do not turn off my workers and their speed doesn't change. Under current algorithm it seem to be better to assign slower workers to some PPS pool   Huh

Or assign your worker to the same account...

K.

Not sure what you mean. I have 3 workers on the same account.



I thought it was made clear that the latest hashes/shares submittled had the highest score? it says it on his website (migration control if i'm not mistaken).

K.

right, but do slower workers really affect the fastest one by bad luck??? I did not see confirmation for that.

I was under the impression that each worker's contribution is computed independently and they added up to total w/o affecting each other.



Really?, have you spent time observing? - I don't think it's bad, but, it is the way it is, full stop.

K.

Well Kruncha you are not helping, I am sorry but none of your answers made any sense or any point

Look , I'm not here to argue, I love this site. The score system works as I have observed it to work, ask Slush, he'll tell you.

K.

Olga, Kruncha - take it offline please...


If that's your answer, why bother posting?

k.
Pages: « 1 ... 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 [329] 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 ... 1105 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!