Bitcoin Forum
March 29, 2017, 11:26:36 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.14.0  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3171 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 408 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 360 (9.1%)
Total Voters: 3937

Pages: « 1 ... 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 [329] 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 ... 1111 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [150+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 4051127 times)
OlgaA524
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54



View Profile
April 22, 2013, 05:43:14 PM
 #6561


So what you are saying is - it is better to have 1 fast worker then fast worker and a slow worker? Hmm... maybe that explains how my return varies from block to block for up to 30% even though I do not turn off my workers and their speed doesn't change. Under current algorithm it seem to be better to assign slower workers to some PPS pool   Huh

Or assign your worker to the same account...

K.

Not sure what you mean. I have 3 workers on the same account.

18rWR6S4onARe8AQ1RgG4iGWKas3R97k4T - donations are most welcome
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1490786796
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1490786796

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1490786796
Reply with quote  #2

1490786796
Report to moderator
1490786796
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1490786796

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1490786796
Reply with quote  #2

1490786796
Report to moderator
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
April 22, 2013, 05:46:11 PM
 #6562


So what you are saying is - it is better to have 1 fast worker then fast worker and a slow worker? Hmm... maybe that explains how my return varies from block to block for up to 30% even though I do not turn off my workers and their speed doesn't change. Under current algorithm it seem to be better to assign slower workers to some PPS pool   Huh

Or assign your worker to the same account...

K.

Not sure what you mean. I have 3 workers on the same account.

Worker accaunt...
Kruncha
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420


Winter is coming...


View Profile
April 22, 2013, 05:49:55 PM
 #6563


So what you are saying is - it is better to have 1 fast worker then fast worker and a slow worker? Hmm... maybe that explains how my return varies from block to block for up to 30% even though I do not turn off my workers and their speed doesn't change. Under current algorithm it seem to be better to assign slower workers to some PPS pool   Huh

Or assign your worker to the same account...

K.

Not sure what you mean. I have 3 workers on the same account.

I thought it was made clear that the latest hashes/shares submittled had the highest score? it says it on his website (migration control if i'm not mistaken).

K.
OlgaA524
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54



View Profile
April 22, 2013, 05:54:17 PM
 #6564


So what you are saying is - it is better to have 1 fast worker then fast worker and a slow worker? Hmm... maybe that explains how my return varies from block to block for up to 30% even though I do not turn off my workers and their speed doesn't change. Under current algorithm it seem to be better to assign slower workers to some PPS pool   Huh

Or assign your worker to the same account...

K.

Not sure what you mean. I have 3 workers on the same account.

I thought it was made clear that the latest hashes/shares submittled had the highest score? it says it on his website (migration control if i'm not mistaken).

K.

right, but do slower workers really affect the fastest one by bad luck??? I did not see confirmation for that.

I was under the impression that each worker's contribution is computed independently and they added up to total w/o affecting each other.


18rWR6S4onARe8AQ1RgG4iGWKas3R97k4T - donations are most welcome
Kruncha
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420


Winter is coming...


View Profile
April 22, 2013, 06:26:16 PM
 #6565


So what you are saying is - it is better to have 1 fast worker then fast worker and a slow worker? Hmm... maybe that explains how my return varies from block to block for up to 30% even though I do not turn off my workers and their speed doesn't change. Under current algorithm it seem to be better to assign slower workers to some PPS pool   Huh

Or assign your worker to the same account...

K.

Not sure what you mean. I have 3 workers on the same account.

I thought it was made clear that the latest hashes/shares submittled had the highest score? it says it on his website (migration control if i'm not mistaken).

K.

right, but do slower workers really affect the fastest one by bad luck??? I did not see confirmation for that.

I was under the impression that each worker's contribution is computed independently and they added up to total w/o affecting each other.



Really?, have you spent time observing? - I don't think it's bad, but, it is the way it is, full stop.

K.
OlgaA524
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54



View Profile
April 22, 2013, 06:35:04 PM
 #6566


So what you are saying is - it is better to have 1 fast worker then fast worker and a slow worker? Hmm... maybe that explains how my return varies from block to block for up to 30% even though I do not turn off my workers and their speed doesn't change. Under current algorithm it seem to be better to assign slower workers to some PPS pool   Huh

Or assign your worker to the same account...

K.

Not sure what you mean. I have 3 workers on the same account.

I thought it was made clear that the latest hashes/shares submittled had the highest score? it says it on his website (migration control if i'm not mistaken).

K.

right, but do slower workers really affect the fastest one by bad luck??? I did not see confirmation for that.

I was under the impression that each worker's contribution is computed independently and they added up to total w/o affecting each other.



Really?, have you spent time observing? - I don't think it's bad, but, it is the way it is, full stop.

K.

Well Kruncha you are not helping, I am sorry but none of your answers made any sense or any point

18rWR6S4onARe8AQ1RgG4iGWKas3R97k4T - donations are most welcome
agento2
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21


View Profile
April 22, 2013, 06:41:12 PM
 #6567

Would it be possible to get the current round duration on the account page?

14BAmoY3JopfDS8EJWZSgfNK2saLD4aXCt
Kruncha
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420


Winter is coming...


View Profile
April 22, 2013, 06:43:27 PM
 #6568


So what you are saying is - it is better to have 1 fast worker then fast worker and a slow worker? Hmm... maybe that explains how my return varies from block to block for up to 30% even though I do not turn off my workers and their speed doesn't change. Under current algorithm it seem to be better to assign slower workers to some PPS pool   Huh

Or assign your worker to the same account...

K.

Not sure what you mean. I have 3 workers on the same account.



I thought it was made clear that the latest hashes/shares submittled had the highest score? it says it on his website (migration control if i'm not mistaken).

K.

right, but do slower workers really affect the fastest one by bad luck??? I did not see confirmation for that.

I was under the impression that each worker's contribution is computed independently and they added up to total w/o affecting each other.



Really?, have you spent time observing? - I don't think it's bad, but, it is the way it is, full stop.

K.

Well Kruncha you are not helping, I am sorry but none of your answers made any sense or any point

Look , I'm not here to argue, I love this site. The score system works as I have observed it to work, ask Slush, he'll tell you.

K.
OlgaA524
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54



View Profile
April 22, 2013, 06:44:39 PM
 #6569


So what you are saying is - it is better to have 1 fast worker then fast worker and a slow worker? Hmm... maybe that explains how my return varies from block to block for up to 30% even though I do not turn off my workers and their speed doesn't change. Under current algorithm it seem to be better to assign slower workers to some PPS pool   Huh

Or assign your worker to the same account...

K.

Not sure what you mean. I have 3 workers on the same account.

Worker accaunt...

Hi Lucko, you saying that I can just start all my 3 workers under the same worker name?

18rWR6S4onARe8AQ1RgG4iGWKas3R97k4T - donations are most welcome
nottm28
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574



View Profile
April 22, 2013, 06:49:50 PM
 #6570


So what you are saying is - it is better to have 1 fast worker then fast worker and a slow worker? Hmm... maybe that explains how my return varies from block to block for up to 30% even though I do not turn off my workers and their speed doesn't change. Under current algorithm it seem to be better to assign slower workers to some PPS pool   Huh

Or assign your worker to the same account...

K.

Not sure what you mean. I have 3 workers on the same account.



I thought it was made clear that the latest hashes/shares submittled had the highest score? it says it on his website (migration control if i'm not mistaken).

K.

right, but do slower workers really affect the fastest one by bad luck??? I did not see confirmation for that.

I was under the impression that each worker's contribution is computed independently and they added up to total w/o affecting each other.



Really?, have you spent time observing? - I don't think it's bad, but, it is the way it is, full stop.

K.

Well Kruncha you are not helping, I am sorry but none of your answers made any sense or any point

Look , I'm not here to argue, I love this site. The score system works as I have observed it to work, ask Slush, he'll tell you.

K.

Olga, Kruncha - take it offline please...

donations not accepted
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
April 22, 2013, 06:56:01 PM
 #6571


So what you are saying is - it is better to have 1 fast worker then fast worker and a slow worker? Hmm... maybe that explains how my return varies from block to block for up to 30% even though I do not turn off my workers and their speed doesn't change. Under current algorithm it seem to be better to assign slower workers to some PPS pool   Huh

Or assign your worker to the same account...

K.

Not sure what you mean. I have 3 workers on the same account.

Worker accaunt...

Hi Lucko, you saying that I can just start all my 3 workers under the same worker name?


I do and I had no problems... Well But I'm running with 2 account. One per computer... And using cgminer(better hashes) for GPU and GUIminer for CPU... But then you don't have such good control over the workers... If you see low hashes on page you need to look at computer to see if there is a problem...

And yes I noted that if a slow miner on his own worker send one share after more then 30 minutes all workers scores for all workers are reset to 0... And if that happens at the end of the round it is really bad...  You could get almost noting because of that... I can understand resetting the worker in question bat all. I don't get that...

EDIT: cgminer takes all GPUs and run them on one worker not the same as GUI that you need worker per GPU and CPU...
Kruncha
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420


Winter is coming...


View Profile
April 22, 2013, 07:00:03 PM
 #6572


So what you are saying is - it is better to have 1 fast worker then fast worker and a slow worker? Hmm... maybe that explains how my return varies from block to block for up to 30% even though I do not turn off my workers and their speed doesn't change. Under current algorithm it seem to be better to assign slower workers to some PPS pool   Huh

Or assign your worker to the same account...

K.

Not sure what you mean. I have 3 workers on the same account.



I thought it was made clear that the latest hashes/shares submittled had the highest score? it says it on his website (migration control if i'm not mistaken).

K.

right, but do slower workers really affect the fastest one by bad luck??? I did not see confirmation for that.

I was under the impression that each worker's contribution is computed independently and they added up to total w/o affecting each other.



Really?, have you spent time observing? - I don't think it's bad, but, it is the way it is, full stop.

K.

Well Kruncha you are not helping, I am sorry but none of your answers made any sense or any point

Look , I'm not here to argue, I love this site. The score system works as I have observed it to work, ask Slush, he'll tell you.

K.

Olga, Kruncha - take it offline please...


If that's your answer, why bother posting?

k.
Kruncha
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420


Winter is coming...


View Profile
April 22, 2013, 07:05:03 PM
 #6573

I've noticed a lot of harsh behavior against new users, is bitcoin not about the distribution of new wealth, or is it just a lie?

K.
OlgaA524
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54



View Profile
April 22, 2013, 07:26:52 PM
 #6574



Hi Lucko, you saying that I can just start all my 3 workers under the same worker name?


I do and I had no problems... Well But I'm running with 2 account. One per computer... And using cgminer(better hashes) for GPU and GUIminer for CPU... But then you don't have such good control over the workers... If you see low hashes on page you need to look at computer to see if there is a problem...

And yes I noted that if a slow miner on his own worker send one share after more then 30 minutes all workers scores for all workers are reset to 0... And if that happens at the end of the round it is really bad...  You could get almost noting because of that... I can understand resetting the worker in question bat all. I don't get that...

EDIT: cgminer takes all GPUs and run them on one worker not the same as GUI that you need worker per GPU and CPU...

Thanks Lucko, I will try that Smiley

Currently I have 3 workers assigned to worker_1, worker_2 and worker_3, none of them goes to sleep for 30 minutes normally, sometimes they just go offline while I am away and cannot attend them but it is really rare, not even once a day.

The speed ratio for workers is like this (in 1 minute approximately)

worker_1: 10 shares  (~ 600 MHash)
worker_2: 1 share     (~ 60 MHash)
worker_3: 3 shares    (~180 MHash)

I will try to play with arrangements, see if one worker results in more stable outcome of the block.


18rWR6S4onARe8AQ1RgG4iGWKas3R97k4T - donations are most welcome
jerethdaminer
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84


View Profile
April 22, 2013, 07:38:22 PM
 #6575

no support needed but if the irc is also a meeting place for slushes army of miners to well converse i may lurk Sad i like communitythings
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
April 22, 2013, 08:31:46 PM
 #6576



Hi Lucko, you saying that I can just start all my 3 workers under the same worker name?


I do and I had no problems... Well But I'm running with 2 account. One per computer... And using cgminer(better hashes) for GPU and GUIminer for CPU... But then you don't have such good control over the workers... If you see low hashes on page you need to look at computer to see if there is a problem...

And yes I noted that if a slow miner on his own worker send one share after more then 30 minutes all workers scores for all workers are reset to 0... And if that happens at the end of the round it is really bad...  You could get almost noting because of that... I can understand resetting the worker in question bat all. I don't get that...

EDIT: cgminer takes all GPUs and run them on one worker not the same as GUI that you need worker per GPU and CPU...

Thanks Lucko, I will try that Smiley

Currently I have 3 workers assigned to worker_1, worker_2 and worker_3, none of them goes to sleep for 30 minutes normally, sometimes they just go offline while I am away and cannot attend them but it is really rare, not even once a day.

The speed ratio for workers is like this (in 1 minute approximately)

worker_1: 10 shares  (~ 600 MHash)
worker_2: 1 share     (~ 60 MHash)
worker_3: 3 shares    (~180 MHash)

I will try to play with arrangements, see if one worker results in more stable outcome of the block.



All miners are fast enough so you shouldn't have my problems but 1 is slow enough to get big differences that in time evens out... I had one 1,2 MHash... That was slow... Sometimes it took hours...
fc10a3
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10


View Profile
April 23, 2013, 06:28:54 AM
 #6577

Anybody else notice that the stale rate has dropped very low

worker 1 9209 shares accepted 9 stale
worker 2 9107 accepted 21 stale
worker 3 10840 accepted 26 stale.

this is great!
VishwaJay
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56


"Is the DAO similar to Buddhism?"


View Profile
April 23, 2013, 09:10:55 AM
 #6578

AFAIK, it's been low for quite a while. I get about 0.5-1.0% stale. Your stale rate seems actually a little higher to me.

My opinions represent only my own views... most of the time. Sometimes I argue because I can.
SkyNet
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 77



View Profile
April 23, 2013, 10:36:50 AM
 #6579

Is the pool down?

Tips: 1JmQ78JprWePM3EapnacPFfAtTrob8ofmU
Beans
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 469


View Profile
April 23, 2013, 01:28:04 PM
 #6580

The past week I can't stay connected. cgminer is not switching to backup pools either, its all rejected shares the first time. Today it crashed cgminer on all 11 of my pc's. It just showed the program stopped responding message. I just gone done redirecting them to slush's pool a couple hours ago to see if things were working again. Guess not.. I was very impressed before, I had no issues since switching to stratum except for the past 10 days or so.
Pages: « 1 ... 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 [329] 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 ... 1111 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!