Bitcoin Forum
October 01, 2016, 03:28:30 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.0 (New!) [Torrent]. Make sure you verify it.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3152 (80.4%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.2%)
Total Voters: 3916

Pages: « 1 ... 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 [359] 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 ... 1104 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3859897 times)
Kruncha
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420


Winter is coming...


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 02:43:22 AM
 #7161

so slush, did they take the btc from the wallet? if not, then what was the point in the hack?

They took it from the hot wallet (transactions about to be paid). Thank the non-existent gods for Slush being fast enough to stop it there.

K.
1475335710
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1475335710

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1475335710
Reply with quote  #2

1475335710
Report to moderator
1475335710
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1475335710

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1475335710
Reply with quote  #2

1475335710
Report to moderator
"In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but hard to stifle." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1475335710
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1475335710

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1475335710
Reply with quote  #2

1475335710
Report to moderator
irritant
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 410


Sodium hypochlorite, acetone, ethanol


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 02:49:13 AM
 #7162

is block 233334  orphaned?  Huh

http://blockchain.info/block/000000000000003934fc954fb835673a6ca45f1f08d5008edc556fd043134561?site=slush
rsbriggs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 183


Russian:: UID 0


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 03:02:30 AM
 #7163

Or block 233321?

#            Block found at          Duration   Total shares   Your shares        Your BTC reward   Block #
17705   2013-04-26 23:11:05   2:22:43   16081978              79                  0.00000000            233321

Це́рковь бли́зко, да идти́ скли́зко, каба́к далеко́, да идти́ легко́.
irritant
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 410


Sodium hypochlorite, acetone, ethanol


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 03:11:02 AM
 #7164

Or block 233321?

#            Block found at          Duration   Total shares   Your shares        Your BTC reward   Block #
17705   2013-04-26 23:11:05   2:22:43   16081978              79                  0.00000000            233321


no that one is ours,  http://blockchain.info/block/00000000000000e55d5c9c17fbe2bc0cde364db183b6cc4aec8da0bfeca149f2?site=slush

dr3i
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 27


bitcoin apprentice


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 03:30:32 AM
 #7165

Its my 1st time to post here.
Ive been here from the time that the site was hacked and all i can say is " Slush is da mheen!" hats off to you man.  Grin


#         Block found at          Duration   Total shares   Your shares        Your BTC reward           Block #
17682   2013-04-25 17:30:10   5:15:03   32470080              135                0.00000000            233105

already confrimed but no reward?


Quit mining at the moment.
patnor1011
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 120


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 03:32:31 AM
 #7166

Or block 233321?

#            Block found at          Duration   Total shares   Your shares        Your BTC reward   Block #
17705   2013-04-26 23:11:05   2:22:43   16081978              79                  0.00000000            233321


Very small amount of shares comparing to total number of shares. Hence 0.000000 reward.
patnor1011
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 120


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 03:33:41 AM
 #7167

Its my 1st time to post here.
Ive been here from the time that the site was hacked and all i can say is " Slush is da mheen!" hats off to you man.  Grin


#         Block found at          Duration   Total shares   Your shares        Your BTC reward           Block #
17682   2013-04-25 17:30:10   5:15:03   32470080              135                0.00000000            233105

already confrimed but no reward?



The same apply to you. Too small number of shares comparing to total number of shares.
dr3i
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 27


bitcoin apprentice


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 03:35:14 AM
 #7168



The same apply to you. Too small number of shares comparing to total number of shares.


thanks for the enlightment. Smiley

Quit mining at the moment.
patnor1011
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 120


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 03:39:13 AM
 #7169

That is life... The same happened to me few times before. Then I invested in hardware to never see zeroes again Smiley
killingtime
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 04:08:10 AM
 #7170

Its my 1st time to post here.
Ive been here from the time that the site was hacked and all i can say is " Slush is da mheen!" hats off to you man.  Grin


#         Block found at          Duration   Total shares   Your shares        Your BTC reward           Block #
17682   2013-04-25 17:30:10   5:15:03   32470080              135                0.00000000            233105

already confrimed but no reward?



The same apply to you. Too small number of shares comparing to total number of shares.

Bah, this should still have received around 0.0001, unless you did those 135 shares towards the beginning and then stopped mining.  As such, your score decay would've zeroed it out.
5120-01-518-6126
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 175


< My mining rig >


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 04:32:52 AM
 #7171

Bah, this should still have received around 0.0001, unless you did those 135 shares towards the beginning and then stopped mining.  As such, your score decay would've zeroed it out.

Seems like it should get at least a nano-coin, unless those shares aged, like you said.

For anyone newbier than me:  share aging is designed to discourage pool jumping.  See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1976.msg50002#msg50002 for how it works.

Sometimes an honest miner loses connectivity, has a reboot that takes longer than expected, inadvertently terminates the mining app, etc., and ends up with zeroes -- just part of the adventure  Smiley
Lanidarc
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48


hmmm


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 07:30:52 AM
 #7172

On a total side note.....
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2013/04/26/business-bitcoin-tax.html

Which means i've got to start generating reports for the end of this year (this is my first year bitcoin mining and barely have over 0.01 BTC so far, not counting the pool)

May have to get Slush to send me a T4-BTCI form at the end of the year ( revenue canada income tax form lol )


OMG too freekin' funny! I was looking in the comments on this article and LMFAO'd on this:


Tips for tips: 1Cy5WzZL6o58dLbqzFK9z4DxcP4prV3WkQ
Uliss
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294



View Profile
April 27, 2013, 10:05:29 AM
 #7173

The data in the graph are behind the 1 day, today there 25.04.13

https://mining.bitcoin.cz/stats/graphs/
pitpony
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 11:43:16 AM
 #7174

"Total reward:  Unconfirmed + Confirmed " is frequently going down, thought it was me miss reading at first but it is happening, anybody know why?
nottm28
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574



View Profile
April 27, 2013, 12:41:56 PM
 #7175

"Total reward:  Unconfirmed + Confirmed " is frequently going down, thought it was me miss reading at first but it is happening, anybody know why?


You see this when a block becomes orphaned - recently we have had a few - last 2 were blocks 233158 and 233303. Before they are marked as orphaned, you see them adding to your total. Then when they are marked as orphaned, your total goes down by the amount you would have earned for that block.

Read more about orphaned blocks here https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Block_chain

donations not accepted
pitpony
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 12:44:29 PM
 #7176

Thanks, from a fellow LFC supporter Grin
nottm28
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574



View Profile
April 27, 2013, 12:51:19 PM
 #7177

Thanks, from a fellow LFC supporter Grin

No problem Smiley hope we win today.

Also, the fact that a block may be marked as orphaned is the reason we have to wait for 100 confirmations before a block is confirmed. This is a block chain rule - not something that Slush decides to impose willy nilly...

Don't know about anyone else but I am really enjoying an uneventful day!

donations not accepted
not.you
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1197


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 01:23:32 PM
 #7178

Can anyone explain the effect of worker difficulty?  I see where it asks the expected hashrate of the worker and then raises the difficulty for that worker if the hashrate is very high.  What effect does this actually have?  What effect does it have on a worker to have too high or too low of a difficulty set?  I googled but could not really find it explained.  If someone has a link or an explanation I would appreciate it.
not.you
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1197


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 01:25:24 PM
 #7179


Looks like it.  Blockchain seems to be accepting this one from BTC Guild.

http://blockchain.info/block/000000000000000f6c52a224d593c256e8509639c93892b86b32ba1f8d915bed
scouzi
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 01:34:26 PM
 #7180

Can anyone explain the effect of worker difficulty?  I see where it asks the expected hashrate of the worker and then raises the difficulty for that worker if the hashrate is very high.  What effect does this actually have?  What effect does it have on a worker to have too high or too low of a difficulty set?  I googled but could not really find it explained.  If someone has a link or an explanation I would appreciate it.

Nothing. Your submitted shares have value x difficulty. You'll see less submitted shares from cgminer but they will be multipled by the worker difficulty to calculate your score. For very very short duration consecutive blocks you may get screwed once in a while because you work did not submit any shares at a higher difficulty. n my opinion stick with the lowest granularity unless you have a large Caterpillar bitcoin mining machine.

It's basically getting paid by the shovel or by the bucket for your work.
Pages: « 1 ... 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 [359] 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 ... 1104 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!