Bitcoin Forum
September 26, 2016, 01:56:22 AM *
News: Due to DDoS attacks, there may be periodic downtime.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3151 (80.4%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.2%)
Total Voters: 3915

Pages: « 1 ... 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 [323] 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 ... 1104 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3853504 times)
nybbler905
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 213



View Profile
April 18, 2013, 05:38:11 PM
 #6441

It was running for around an hour. What the proxy says:


2013-04-18 19:18:28,233 INFO proxy client_service.handle_event # New job 77 for
prevhash 2368d700, clean_jobs=False
2013-04-18 19:18:30,467 INFO proxy getwork_listener._on_authorized # Worker 'Gim
peline.worker1' asks for new work
2013-04-18 19:18:34,500 INFO proxy getwork_listener._on_authorized # Worker 'Gim
peline.worker1' asks for new work
2013-04-18 19:18:38,530 INFO proxy getwork_listener._on_authorized # Worker 'Gim
peline.worker1' asks for new work
2013-04-18 19:18:42,578 INFO proxy getwork_listener._on_authorized # Worker 'Gim
peline.worker1' asks for new work
2013-04-18 19:18:46,625 INFO proxy getwork_listener._on_authorized # Worker 'Gim
peline.worker1' asks for new work
2013-04-18 19:18:50,671 INFO proxy getwork_listener._on_authorized # Worker 'Gim
peline.worker1' asks for new work
2013-04-18 19:18:54,703 INFO proxy getwork_listener._on_authorized # Worker 'Gim
peline.worker1' asks for new work
2013-04-18 19:18:58,733 INFO proxy getwork_listener._on_authorized # Worker 'Gim
peline.worker1' asks for new work
2013-04-18 19:19:02,842 INFO proxy getwork_listener._on_authorized # Worker 'Gim
peline.worker1' asks for new work
2013-04-18 19:19:06,890 INFO proxy getwork_listener._on_authorized # Worker 'Gim
peline.worker1' asks for new work
2013-04-18 19:19:10,921 INFO proxy getwork_listener._on_authorized # Worker 'Gim
peline.worker1' asks for new work
2013-04-18 19:19:14,967 INFO proxy getwork_listener._on_authorized # Worker 'Gim
peline.worker1' asks for new work
2013-04-18 19:19:27,608 INFO proxy client_service.handle_event # New job 78 for
prevhash 2368d700, clean_jobs=False
2013-04-18 19:19:31,640 INFO proxy getwork_listener._on_authorized # Worker 'Gim
peline.worker1' asks for new work
2013-04-18 19:19:35,671 INFO proxy getwork_listener._on_authorized # Worker 'Gim
peline.worker1' asks for new work
2013-04-18 19:19:39,717 INFO proxy getwork_listener._on_authorized # Worker 'Gim
peline.worker1' asks for new work
2013-04-18 19:19:43,765 INFO proxy getwork_listener._on_authorized # Worker 'Gim
peline.worker1' asks for new work
2013-04-18 19:19:47,858 INFO proxy getwork_listener._on_authorized # Worker 'Gim
peline.worker1' asks for new work
2013-04-18 19:19:51,937 INFO proxy getwork_listener._on_authorized # Worker 'Gim
peline.worker1' asks for new work
2013-04-18 19:19:58,655 INFO proxy getwork_listener._on_authorized # Worker 'Gim
peline.worker1' asks for new work
2013-04-18 19:20:02,687 INFO proxy getwork_listener._on_authorized # Worker 'Gim
peline.worker1' asks for new work
2013-04-18 19:20:06,733 INFO proxy getwork_listener._on_authorized # Worker 'Gim
peline.worker1' asks for new work


Edit When I try the default miner it works fine, but I don't have a ati card. I have a Nvida Geforce 9800 GTX

Hate to say it, it's running fine....
the proxy needs to have the wording better this line is confirmation of job 78 NOT having a hash in it

2013-04-18 19:19:27,608 INFO proxy client_service.handle_event # New job 78 for
prevhash 2368d700, clean_jobs=False

Just takes time and patience and all of us to count our blessings that Slush's is back up for us to mine on.

Always looking for donations even as low as 1uBTC
14XfpYPdtYiGoEiDcKrSzuvBM3ukhwANUh - BTC
LS7FEfu9ajp3NQcDjui9TSKscwQesj9i8k - LTC
LHe9g5ixMyfdtqAEHU5vErG1eQrDshBFRW -Luckycoin
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1474854982
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474854982

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474854982
Reply with quote  #2

1474854982
Report to moderator
1474854982
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474854982

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474854982
Reply with quote  #2

1474854982
Report to moderator
1474854982
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474854982

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474854982
Reply with quote  #2

1474854982
Report to moderator
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
April 18, 2013, 05:44:05 PM
 #6442


Just takes time and patience and all of us to count our blessings that Slush's is back up for us to mine on.

Uhhhmmmm....



Slush is up, im mining away just fine.  Rocking shares, gettin paid, etc.

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
lightenup
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58


View Profile
April 18, 2013, 05:53:18 PM
 #6443

hm we have 30% lower hash rates compared to before the DDOS attack, higher difficulty but 163% pool luck? something must be wrong Smiley
Lanidarc
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48


hmmm


View Profile
April 18, 2013, 05:53:48 PM
 #6444

Hi thread - just released from newbie-town!  Kiss

Many Thanks go to the Slushman for weathering the storm and bringin us back up. I've had to switch back to stratum.bitcoin.cz from stratum3.bitcoin.cz when startum3 went down a couple hours back.

With the pool down about 2.3 TH/s of miners atm, payouts are nice and fat! Especial treat since I just got my second 1.3 GH/s rig online!
boo yah  Grin

Tips for tips: 1Cy5WzZL6o58dLbqzFK9z4DxcP4prV3WkQ
cosurgi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 298


View Profile
April 18, 2013, 07:45:49 PM
 #6445

cosurgi, thanks, I'll google it. Right now I'm designing "final" EC2 architecture so any experience in this area is valuable.
I think I found it:

http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/12/14/1851240/why-anonymous-cant-take-down-amazoncom

and I found an older one too:

http://it.slashdot.org/story/04/07/07/1811211/akamai-how-they-fought-recent-ddos-attacks

But I think that going with amazon is a good bet.

EDIT: just remember how bitomat.pl went bankrupt: he kept wallet.dat on EC2 (maybe cloud, or something, I don't remember) and reconfigured something in the servers. After restart the system was "clean". So as usual, keep backups safe Smiley

jerethdaminer
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84


View Profile
April 18, 2013, 07:58:27 PM
 #6446

should i be using any extra flags guys im just using a 7970 and gui miner getting 530-550 mhash
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
April 18, 2013, 08:00:39 PM
 #6447

should i be using any extra flags guys im just using a 7970 and gui miner getting 530-550 mhash

-v -f1 -w128

You can change the 128, to 256, or 64, or some other number.  I've had different numbers work better on different cards.  But that combo of flags always works best for me.

You will definitely get more  hashes

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
wetwood
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19


View Profile
April 18, 2013, 08:14:41 PM
 #6448

Is this still valid? or has it been updated?
-o stratum+tcp://stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333
tiktoc
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 176


View Profile
April 18, 2013, 08:18:38 PM
 #6449

cosurgi, thanks, I'll google it. Right now I'm designing "final" EC2 architecture so any experience in this area is valuable.
I think I found it:

http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/12/14/1851240/why-anonymous-cant-take-down-amazoncom

and I found an older one too:

http://it.slashdot.org/story/04/07/07/1811211/akamai-how-they-fought-recent-ddos-attacks

But I think that going with amazon is a good bet.

EDIT: just remember how bitomat.pl went bankrupt: he kept wallet.dat on EC2 (maybe cloud, or something, I don't remember) and reconfigured something in the servers. After restart the system was "clean". So as usual, keep backups safe Smiley

Yeah, from the control panel, the instances are delete on termination by default so it deletes the volume that used to boot the instance.
nybbler905
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 213



View Profile
April 18, 2013, 09:08:58 PM
 #6450

Is this still valid? or has it been updated?
-o stratum+tcp://stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333

technically yep, ya can use stratum2.bitcoin.cz or stratum3.bitcoin.cz
and yea, it's been updated to use those 2 new addresses ( still same port )

Always looking for donations even as low as 1uBTC
14XfpYPdtYiGoEiDcKrSzuvBM3ukhwANUh - BTC
LS7FEfu9ajp3NQcDjui9TSKscwQesj9i8k - LTC
LHe9g5ixMyfdtqAEHU5vErG1eQrDshBFRW -Luckycoin
wetwood
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19


View Profile
April 18, 2013, 09:12:38 PM
 #6451

Is this still valid? or has it been updated?
-o stratum+tcp://stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333

technically yep, ya can use stratum2.bitcoin.cz or stratum3.bitcoin.cz
and yea, it's been updated to use those 2 new addresses ( still same port )
are there any other flags i should be using? in GUI version you can put -v -w -f etc are we able to do same with cgminer

Cheers buddy
wetwood
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19


View Profile
April 18, 2013, 09:22:07 PM
 #6452

http://s11.postimg.org/oozklfrmr/mhs.jpg
Is this just a bug on the website. program reports 60+ on website its 5?
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
April 18, 2013, 09:27:50 PM
 #6453


Is this just a bug on the website. program reports 60+ on website its 5?

the rate reported on the website is not very accurate first off, and second it's a half hour average based on shares submitted during that time.  So if you just started a miner after over a half hour of down time it will take 30 minutes at least before is shows a fairly accurate rate.

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
wetwood
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19


View Profile
April 18, 2013, 09:28:53 PM
 #6454

Thanks digital, new to this. wanted to make sure it wasn't me making a mistake somewhere.
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
April 18, 2013, 09:29:01 PM
 #6455


Is this just a bug on the website. program reports 60+ on website its 5?

the rate reported on the website is not very accurate first off, and second it's a half hour average based on shares submitted during that time.  So if you just started a miner after over a half hour of down time it will take 30 minutes at least before is shows a fairly accurate rate.

Actually, now that i think about it, i'm not sure about the half hour part.  It might be the average for the round based on shares submitted...

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
April 18, 2013, 09:29:41 PM
 #6456

Thanks digital, new to this. wanted to make sure it wasn't me making a mistake somewhere.


np, you'll see it going up as more shares get submitted....

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
April 19, 2013, 12:25:44 AM
 #6457

hm we have 30% lower hash rates compared to before the DDOS attack, higher difficulty but 163% pool luck? something must be wrong Smiley

Nothing is wrong, pool is just lucky. Btw luck has nothing to do with difficulty change or pool hashrate, it just reflects if pool needed more or less shares to find a block than it should in average.

scouzi
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45


View Profile
April 19, 2013, 01:05:01 AM
 #6458

hm we have 30% lower hash rates compared to before the DDOS attack, higher difficulty but 163% pool luck? something must be wrong Smiley

Nothing is wrong, pool is just lucky. Btw luck has nothing to do with difficulty change or pool hashrate, it just reflects if pool needed more or less shares to find a block than it should in average.

Seems that luck is sometimes followed by bad luck. NO blocks for over 4 hours. Crank it up guys!
gbx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 219


View Profile
April 19, 2013, 01:42:49 AM
 #6459

Hash rate is coming back up.  Maybe we lost some miners or they just haven't reconnected... but we bounced back pretty quickly I thought!  Although the 2000ghash rate I saw on the upswing reminded me of the good old days not so long ago...
Lanidarc
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48


hmmm


View Profile
April 19, 2013, 01:47:31 AM
 #6460

What is the longest round you've seen? And I mean when the pool is at normal capacity...

Here's two back to back 5hr rounds just before I joined the pool:

17325    2013-04-07 10:49:25    5:05:30    30603679    none    none    230105    25.35777321    confirmed
17324    2013-04-07 05:43:55    5:09:28    31541022    none    none    230072    25.06230000    confirmed

Tips for tips: 1Cy5WzZL6o58dLbqzFK9z4DxcP4prV3WkQ
Pages: « 1 ... 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 [323] 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 ... 1104 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!