Bitcoin Forum
December 11, 2016, 08:26:44 AM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3160 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.1%)
Total Voters: 3924

Pages: « 1 ... 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 [323] 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 ... 1105 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3934132 times)
tiktoc
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 176


View Profile
April 18, 2013, 08:18:38 PM
 #6441

cosurgi, thanks, I'll google it. Right now I'm designing "final" EC2 architecture so any experience in this area is valuable.
I think I found it:

http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/12/14/1851240/why-anonymous-cant-take-down-amazoncom

and I found an older one too:

http://it.slashdot.org/story/04/07/07/1811211/akamai-how-they-fought-recent-ddos-attacks

But I think that going with amazon is a good bet.

EDIT: just remember how bitomat.pl went bankrupt: he kept wallet.dat on EC2 (maybe cloud, or something, I don't remember) and reconfigured something in the servers. After restart the system was "clean". So as usual, keep backups safe Smiley

Yeah, from the control panel, the instances are delete on termination by default so it deletes the volume that used to boot the instance.
1481444804
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481444804

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481444804
Reply with quote  #2

1481444804
Report to moderator
1481444804
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481444804

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481444804
Reply with quote  #2

1481444804
Report to moderator
1481444804
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481444804

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481444804
Reply with quote  #2

1481444804
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
nybbler905
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 213



View Profile
April 18, 2013, 09:08:58 PM
 #6442

Is this still valid? or has it been updated?
-o stratum+tcp://stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333

technically yep, ya can use stratum2.bitcoin.cz or stratum3.bitcoin.cz
and yea, it's been updated to use those 2 new addresses ( still same port )

Always looking for donations even as low as 1uBTC
14XfpYPdtYiGoEiDcKrSzuvBM3ukhwANUh - BTC
LS7FEfu9ajp3NQcDjui9TSKscwQesj9i8k - LTC
LHe9g5ixMyfdtqAEHU5vErG1eQrDshBFRW -Luckycoin
wetwood
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19


View Profile
April 18, 2013, 09:12:38 PM
 #6443

Is this still valid? or has it been updated?
-o stratum+tcp://stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333

technically yep, ya can use stratum2.bitcoin.cz or stratum3.bitcoin.cz
and yea, it's been updated to use those 2 new addresses ( still same port )
are there any other flags i should be using? in GUI version you can put -v -w -f etc are we able to do same with cgminer

Cheers buddy
wetwood
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19


View Profile
April 18, 2013, 09:22:07 PM
 #6444

http://s11.postimg.org/oozklfrmr/mhs.jpg
Is this just a bug on the website. program reports 60+ on website its 5?
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
April 18, 2013, 09:27:50 PM
 #6445


Is this just a bug on the website. program reports 60+ on website its 5?

the rate reported on the website is not very accurate first off, and second it's a half hour average based on shares submitted during that time.  So if you just started a miner after over a half hour of down time it will take 30 minutes at least before is shows a fairly accurate rate.

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
wetwood
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19


View Profile
April 18, 2013, 09:28:53 PM
 #6446

Thanks digital, new to this. wanted to make sure it wasn't me making a mistake somewhere.
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
April 18, 2013, 09:29:01 PM
 #6447


Is this just a bug on the website. program reports 60+ on website its 5?

the rate reported on the website is not very accurate first off, and second it's a half hour average based on shares submitted during that time.  So if you just started a miner after over a half hour of down time it will take 30 minutes at least before is shows a fairly accurate rate.

Actually, now that i think about it, i'm not sure about the half hour part.  It might be the average for the round based on shares submitted...

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
April 18, 2013, 09:29:41 PM
 #6448

Thanks digital, new to this. wanted to make sure it wasn't me making a mistake somewhere.


np, you'll see it going up as more shares get submitted....

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
April 19, 2013, 12:25:44 AM
 #6449

hm we have 30% lower hash rates compared to before the DDOS attack, higher difficulty but 163% pool luck? something must be wrong Smiley

Nothing is wrong, pool is just lucky. Btw luck has nothing to do with difficulty change or pool hashrate, it just reflects if pool needed more or less shares to find a block than it should in average.

scouzi
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45


View Profile
April 19, 2013, 01:05:01 AM
 #6450

hm we have 30% lower hash rates compared to before the DDOS attack, higher difficulty but 163% pool luck? something must be wrong Smiley

Nothing is wrong, pool is just lucky. Btw luck has nothing to do with difficulty change or pool hashrate, it just reflects if pool needed more or less shares to find a block than it should in average.

Seems that luck is sometimes followed by bad luck. NO blocks for over 4 hours. Crank it up guys!
gbx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 219


View Profile
April 19, 2013, 01:42:49 AM
 #6451

Hash rate is coming back up.  Maybe we lost some miners or they just haven't reconnected... but we bounced back pretty quickly I thought!  Although the 2000ghash rate I saw on the upswing reminded me of the good old days not so long ago...
Lanidarc
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48


hmmm


View Profile
April 19, 2013, 01:47:31 AM
 #6452

What is the longest round you've seen? And I mean when the pool is at normal capacity...

Here's two back to back 5hr rounds just before I joined the pool:

17325    2013-04-07 10:49:25    5:05:30    30603679    none    none    230105    25.35777321    confirmed
17324    2013-04-07 05:43:55    5:09:28    31541022    none    none    230072    25.06230000    confirmed

Tips for tips: 1Cy5WzZL6o58dLbqzFK9z4DxcP4prV3WkQ
ewitte
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98


View Profile
April 19, 2013, 02:20:04 AM
 #6453

What is the longest round you've seen? And I mean when the pool is at normal capacity...

Here's two back to back 5hr rounds just before I joined the pool:

17325    2013-04-07 10:49:25    5:05:30    30603679    none    none    230105    25.35777321    confirmed
17324    2013-04-07 05:43:55    5:09:28    31541022    none    none    230072    25.06230000    confirmed

I've seen several over 8 may have been a 12 in there.  Was unstable a few weeks wasn't looking all that closely.

Donations
BTC - 13Lgy6fb4d3nSYEf2nkgBgyBkkhPw8zkPd
LTC - LegzRwyc2Xhu8cqvaW2jwRrqSnhyaYU6gZ
fourd00rgtz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 144


View Profile
April 19, 2013, 02:46:18 AM
 #6454

they all balance out.

last week we had a 10s block and then 2 or 3 later a 2s block.

jerethdaminer
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84


View Profile
April 19, 2013, 02:56:12 AM
 #6455

not when you get no shares in said 10 second block Sad
Lanidarc
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48


hmmm


View Profile
April 19, 2013, 02:57:05 AM
 #6456

they all balance out.

last week we had a 10s block and then 2 or 3 later a 2s block.

Yea I totally remember that! I managed to get 1 single share in each of those -- got a whole fat bit-cent for one of them!

17371    2013-04-09 07:57:02    0:00:02    2486    1    0.01013451    230426    25.32750321    confirmed
17369    2013-04-09 07:46:03    0:13:38    1638468    247    0.00359697    230425    25.01540000    confirmed
17368    2013-04-09 07:32:25    2:03:31    14878237    2384    0.00374702    230419    25.09605321    confirmed
17367    2013-04-09 05:28:54    0:43:38    3921392    625    0.00289388    230403    25.21300322    confirmed
17365    2013-04-09 04:45:16    0:00:10    3559    1    0.00702936    230396    25.14230000    confirmed

Tips for tips: 1Cy5WzZL6o58dLbqzFK9z4DxcP4prV3WkQ
abracadabra
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 946



View Profile
April 19, 2013, 03:16:28 AM
 #6457

I'm using cgminer 2.11.3, 2.11.4 and 2.10.5 on several rigs.
I assume that using http://api.bitcoin.cz:8332 should autoswitch me over to the stratum port. And it appears that in the past that was always the case.
Has something changed recently?  When I logged into my account today, the profile page had a big warning about my miners connecting via getwork.

Do I now have to force port 3333? is 8332 only getwork?

nybbler905
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 213



View Profile
April 19, 2013, 04:07:50 AM
 #6458

I just migrated pool to another datacentre (longer story later...). There are three loadbalancers behind every of following DNS:

stratum.bitcoin.cz
stratum2.bitcoin.cz
stratum3.bitcoin.cz

So nine machines are filtering the traffic right now. Balancers behind stratum.bitcoin.cz seems to be dead from the attack, but time to time I see some accepted connection. Once the connection is established, it will be kept by the balancer (that's nice advantage of Stratum protocol).

Please try these URLs in your miners, some of them will, at least after few tries, work for you.
some one may want to copy this in to a sticky some place.... the Stratum servers ( yes plural ) have changed and yes Port 3333 and not any thing else for Stratum ( getwork will cost ya 10% fee otherwise )


Always looking for donations even as low as 1uBTC
14XfpYPdtYiGoEiDcKrSzuvBM3ukhwANUh - BTC
LS7FEfu9ajp3NQcDjui9TSKscwQesj9i8k - LTC
LHe9g5ixMyfdtqAEHU5vErG1eQrDshBFRW -Luckycoin
PetrovMichael
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36


View Profile
April 19, 2013, 04:54:44 AM
 #6459

... before APR 16 i saw access time [73ms] [78ms]...
I'm keeping all this very seriously...

Slush, thank you ! today much better [62ms] [77ms] max [78ms]

tracert stratum.bitcoin.cz [94.23.174.94]

  1     1 ms     1 ms     1 ms  192.168.1.1 [192.168.1.1]
  2    20 ms    20 ms    20 ms  ...pool.ukrtel.net
  3    20 ms    20 ms    20 ms  10.50.19.74 [10.50.19.74]
  4    44 ms    44 ms    44 ms  xe-11-1-0.bar1.Budapest1.Level3.net [212.162.26.5]
  5    55 ms    56 ms    56 ms  4.69.141.250
  6    56 ms    58 ms    55 ms  ae-73-73.csw2.Frankfurt1.Level3.net [4.69.163.6]
  7    55 ms    54 ms    55 ms  ae-2-70.edge5.Frankfurt1.Level3.net [4.69.154.73]
  8    69 ms    68 ms    68 ms  fra-5-6k.fr.eu [91.121.131.5]
  9    66 ms    66 ms    67 ms  rbx-g2-a9.fr.eu [178.33.100.254]
 10    66 ms    66 ms    66 ms  vss-2-6k.fr.eu [91.121.131.89]
 11    69 ms    69 ms   166 ms  94-23-174-94.ovh.net [94.23.174.94]

Otaci
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34


View Profile
April 19, 2013, 11:41:11 AM
 #6460

During the recent DDOS I switched to BTCGuild for a while. I'm back here now. One feature that they have which is pretty nice is the "Inactive Miner Notification". It sends an e-mail when a miner becomes inactive for over x minutes. Any chance of having a similar feature in this pool?
Pages: « 1 ... 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 [323] 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 ... 1105 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!