Bitcoin Forum
September 26, 2016, 10:29:50 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.0 (New!) [Torrent]. Make sure you verify it.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3151 (80.4%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.2%)
Total Voters: 3915

Pages: « 1 ... 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 [284] 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 ... 1104 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3853706 times)
Owndapwn
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36



View Profile
November 29, 2012, 10:33:04 PM
 #5661

Slush's pools is most profitable for me, so I really appreciate work done by him, but I always want for something better :-)

That's the spirit of innovation!
There's always room for improvement, so don't overlook flaws. Revel in finding them.


Speaking of which, Slush, do you think you'll be capitalizing on the LiteCoin frenzy and start up a LTC pool to run alongside BTC?
Something like two tabs that replace the single My Account. My LiteCoin and My BitCoin?
I've been using OzCoin, but it'd be nice to simplify things.

Words
1474885790
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474885790

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474885790
Reply with quote  #2

1474885790
Report to moderator
1474885790
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474885790

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474885790
Reply with quote  #2

1474885790
Report to moderator
1474885790
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474885790

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474885790
Reply with quote  #2

1474885790
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1474885790
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474885790

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474885790
Reply with quote  #2

1474885790
Report to moderator
1474885790
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474885790

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474885790
Reply with quote  #2

1474885790
Report to moderator
1474885790
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474885790

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474885790
Reply with quote  #2

1474885790
Report to moderator
tinman951
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 149


View Profile
November 30, 2012, 03:19:34 AM
 #5662

Yay I found my second block!
Sadly I wasn't using stratum because diablominer doesn't do it and guiminer has never worked well with my two gpus.

I've spent hours trying to figure this out since slush posted the extra payout on the 27th.  Guess I will abandon diablominer and find another because it will happen again in another 6 months.

Free micro bitcoins: http://www.bitvisitor.com/?ref=1DFw1VncjVhqdg6GWoQ6Qtc5ncR5RHXxfP
Donate BTC: 18b94MMTWd7bWaUWcq7VHmizgswP2dK6fM
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
November 30, 2012, 10:59:36 AM
 #5663

tinman, pool isn't giving transaction fees to the finder of the block, but fees are calculated proportionally for Stratum miners. So you didn't miss anything and installing stratum miner still gives you the benefit of tx fees :-).

elrodvoss
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 87


View Profile
November 30, 2012, 11:07:47 AM
 #5664

Odd Question and most likely a simple answer.

I understand that the 210,000 block has come and gone and that the rewards for blocks are now only 25 coins rather then 50.  So simple math should show that my work reward is now halved.

IE:  2778 mHash/s
      3438908 Difficulty
      0.405 Coins per day
      0.033 Coins per hour

But in the last 24 hours, I have seen less then half of my normal reward for work.  I was lucky enough to have my threshold sent almost exactly at midnight  and from past experience Slush has always been spot on with my reward calculator. So I do not understand why my currently standing rewards are sitting at:  0.049 after 5 hours of work   With the above figures, that have held true for the last 8 months, I should be at 0.15.

Now these figures do not include "Unconfirmed Reward", cause those have never in my experience showed add to the total.  The above math has always been with "Confirmed Reward", and I could always forecast payouts within an hour or two.

I can understand a 50% cut cause of the 210,000 block, but im currently sitting at 85% cut after the 210,000 block.

So can anyone explain why my rewards have dropped 68% past the normal halving?  Or is this just a case that after a week, everything will balance out?






slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
November 30, 2012, 11:11:46 AM
 #5665

So can anyone explain why my rewards have dropped 68% past the normal halving?  Or is this just a case that after a week, everything will balance out?

Natural variance. You should not judge anything using so short time frame.

digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
November 30, 2012, 03:20:38 PM
 #5666

Odd Question and most likely a simple answer.

I understand that the 210,000 block has come and gone and that the rewards for blocks are now only 25 coins rather then 50.  So simple math should show that my work reward is now halved.

IE:  2778 mHash/s
      3438908 Difficulty
      0.405 Coins per day
      0.033 Coins per hour

But in the last 24 hours, I have seen less then half of my normal reward for work.  I was lucky enough to have my threshold sent almost exactly at midnight  and from past experience Slush has always been spot on with my reward calculator. So I do not understand why my currently standing rewards are sitting at:  0.049 after 5 hours of work   With the above figures, that have held true for the last 8 months, I should be at 0.15.

Now these figures do not include "Unconfirmed Reward", cause those have never in my experience showed add to the total.  The above math has always been with "Confirmed Reward", and I could always forecast payouts within an hour or two.

I can understand a 50% cut cause of the 210,000 block, but im currently sitting at 85% cut after the 210,000 block.

So can anyone explain why my rewards have dropped 68% past the normal halving?  Or is this just a case that after a week, everything will balance out?



yeah, that's just the nature of the network.  In the past 24 hours you've been below normal, but you will have days that are way above normal too.  That's why slush has the "luck" stats on the stats page.   The 24hr luck on the stats page is at about 65%, which would likely explain the difference...

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1876


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
November 30, 2012, 03:41:05 PM
 #5667

Odd Question and most likely a simple answer.

I understand that the 210,000 block has come and gone and that the rewards for blocks are now only 25 coins rather then 50.  So simple math should show that my work reward is now halved.

......

So can anyone explain why my rewards have dropped 68% past the normal halving?  Or is this just a case that after a week, everything will balance out?



yeah, that's just the nature of the network.  In the past 24 hours you've been below normal, but you will have days that are way above normal too.  That's why slush has the "luck" stats on the stats page.   The 24hr luck on the stats page is at about 65%, which would likely explain the difference...

It's also the nature of slush's reward method. It has much higher variance than other methods.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
Thndr
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53


View Profile
December 01, 2012, 02:24:24 AM
 #5668

Do I need to do anything different to make a stratum miner version of CGminer to work?

I enter in the URL, same settings has cgminer 2.7.5 and any version with stratum support doesn't connect at all.
laughingbear
Deflationary champion
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 631


www.cryptobetfair.com


View Profile WWW
December 01, 2012, 03:16:10 PM
 #5669

Do I need to do anything different to make a stratum miner version of CGminer to work?

I enter in the URL, same settings has cgminer 2.7.5 and any version with stratum support doesn't connect at all.

Enter "localhost" in the url, once the proxy program is running
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
December 01, 2012, 04:50:46 PM
 #5670

Do I need to do anything different to make a stratum miner version of CGminer to work?

I enter in the URL, same settings has cgminer 2.7.5 and any version with stratum support doesn't connect at all.

You don't need proxy for latest cgminer at all. cgminer has native support already. You need proxy only if you have more mining rigs on the same location and you want to use only one upstream connection to the pool.

Edit: You don't need to change any settings with latest cgminer, it will detect Stratum interface automatically on startup.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
December 01, 2012, 06:55:19 PM
 #5671

I made minor website update:

* Worker list on profile page displays hashrate per worker (yay, let's celebrate!)
* Worker lists shows if worker is mining on Stratum interface
* Profile displays quite annoying deprecation warning when your miners are using getwork interface.

tinman951
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 149


View Profile
December 01, 2012, 09:59:57 PM
 #5672

Interesting thing.  I am using cgminer and things were going well but now I have had a tremendous increase in rejected shares.

stratum proxy from slush says:

2012-12-01 14:53:33,588 INFO proxy stratum_listener.submit # [153ms] Share from
'tinman951.-01' REJECTED: (-2, u'Share is above target', None)
2012-12-01 14:53:42,135 INFO proxy client_service.handle_event # New job 782d fo
r prevhash bb4d496c, clean_jobs=False

This log was recorded at 21:53 GMT/UCT timezone.
While CGminer (2.9.5-win.32) says about the same.  
I quit the two and then restarted the proxy app (from slush) then cgminer.  Seems to have fixed it.  What was it about?  How did my miner get hashes that were above the target?

Free micro bitcoins: http://www.bitvisitor.com/?ref=1DFw1VncjVhqdg6GWoQ6Qtc5ncR5RHXxfP
Donate BTC: 18b94MMTWd7bWaUWcq7VHmizgswP2dK6fM
jade087
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36


View Profile
December 02, 2012, 03:59:31 AM
 #5673

Hey, so I recently switched over to Stratum mining. My rejects have gone down from 1% to 0.1% but it seems NMC mining is broken. Before I'd get ~0.02 NMC almost every round (no reward only once every 10-20 rounds); now, half of the rounds give me "none" NMC. Any ideas? Or is it just a crazy string of coincidences?
Thndr
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53


View Profile
December 02, 2012, 04:33:21 AM
 #5674

Do I need to do anything different to make a stratum miner version of CGminer to work?

I enter in the URL, same settings has cgminer 2.7.5 and any version with stratum support doesn't connect at all.

You don't need proxy for latest cgminer at all. cgminer has native support already. You need proxy only if you have more mining rigs on the same location and you want to use only one upstream connection to the pool.

Edit: You don't need to change any settings with latest cgminer, it will detect Stratum interface automatically on startup.
That's the problem. It detects it, tries to connect to it, then fails. It says my username/pass could be incorrect. However with the same settings the current version I use works over the normal protocol.

No matter if I enter the info manually with a blank config, or copy the config over, it doesn't connect.
tealover
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56


View Profile
December 02, 2012, 05:46:45 AM
 #5675

Just updated GUI Miner to 11/18/12 version, and your site still says I'm not using stratum...is there anything else I need to change?

Should I be using OpenCL or CG?



2012-12-02 00:59:56: Listener for "Newer": 02/12/2012 00:59:56, started OpenCL miner on platform 0, device 0 (Cayman)
2012-12-02 00:59:56: Listener for "Newer": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 02/12/2012 00:59:56, checking for stratum...
2012-12-02 00:59:56: Listener for "Newer": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 02/12/2012 00:59:56, diverted to stratum on api-stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333
2012-12-02 01:00:06: Listener for "Newer": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 02/12/2012 01:00:06, Failed to subscribe
2012-12-02 01:00:08: Listener for "Newer": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 02/12/2012 01:00:08, IO errors - 1, tolerance 2
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
December 02, 2012, 11:39:22 AM
 #5676

Interesting thing.  I am using cgminer and things were going well but now I have had a tremendous increase in rejected shares.

I quit the two and then restarted the proxy app (from slush) then cgminer.  Seems to have fixed it.  What was it about?  How did my miner get hashes that were above the target?

There are some edge cases during network outage/reconnections, when proxy reconnects, but cgminer doesn't know about it. This ends up with sending garbled shares. I'm currently working on fix for proxy, should be available today.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
December 02, 2012, 11:41:18 AM
 #5677

Hey, so I recently switched over to Stratum mining. My rejects have gone down from 1% to 0.1% but it seems NMC mining is broken. Before I'd get ~0.02 NMC almost every round (no reward only once every 10-20 rounds); now, half of the rounds give me "none" NMC. Any ideas? Or is it just a crazy string of coincidences?

It is just coincidence. As Stratum miner, you still collects namecoins as on getwork. Just the pool namecoin hashrate is going down with higher % of stratum miners, because stratum backend doesn't have merged mining.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
December 02, 2012, 11:43:05 AM
 #5678

No matter if I enter the info manually with a blank config, or copy the config over, it doesn't connect.

Please be sure you typed worker credentials correctly. Everything is case sensitive. If it still fails, can you report it to cgminer thread?

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
December 02, 2012, 11:45:14 AM
 #5679

Just updated GUI Miner to 11/18/12 version, and your site still says I'm not using stratum...is there anything else I need to change?

Port blocking? I really have no idea, there's not too much things which can fail during subscription. Can you report it to poclbm thread? (not GUIminer thread, but poclbm!)

Can you try it once again? I found there was load balancer misconfiguration which may introduce such problems.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
December 02, 2012, 12:15:12 PM
 #5680

If you recently had some issues during miner startup on Statum, please try it again now. I found some problem on balancer which is fixed now.

Pages: « 1 ... 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 [284] 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 ... 1104 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!