Bitcoin Forum
October 01, 2016, 06:52:39 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.0 (New!) [Torrent]. Make sure you verify it.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3152 (80.4%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.2%)
Total Voters: 3916

Pages: « 1 ... 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 [366] 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 ... 1104 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3860160 times)
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
April 30, 2013, 07:38:37 PM
 #7301

Don't say that in public - if he falls on the way home, you'll be held responsible. Tongue

Good to hear you got it working. 3MH/s is not much and may well be because of some short time luck.
Yes it could be but it is still going up and it is almost 4 now... And it was long enough... I think...

Luckily I got that card for only 50€ and it was the cheapest of them all. And "only" 223 mhesh... So there is some luck... And it is still under warranty and you can't see anything wrong with it. But it was overclocked. Can they see that?
1475347959
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1475347959

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1475347959
Reply with quote  #2

1475347959
Report to moderator
1475347959
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1475347959

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1475347959
Reply with quote  #2

1475347959
Report to moderator
1475347959
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1475347959

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1475347959
Reply with quote  #2

1475347959
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1475347959
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1475347959

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1475347959
Reply with quote  #2

1475347959
Report to moderator
1475347959
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1475347959

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1475347959
Reply with quote  #2

1475347959
Report to moderator
wtfvanity
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


WTF???


View Profile
April 30, 2013, 08:34:17 PM
 #7302

Nobody from OVH contacted me with any official statement, they even cannot blame for "not giving them enough information". Actually I called them many times and provided them many useful information for "debugging" the issue. So far the official statement from OVH is "not our problems, secure your email better". However, I'll call them tomorrow (again).

Slush, you respond to other peoples posts, but not mine, and not my PM? I'd love to switch back to your pool but you're making it pretty hard.

If the password database is compromised, I would like to change my email and my password. Do I just need to make a new account and lose all of my stats and found block info?

          WTF!     Don't Click Here              
          .      .            .            .        .            .            .          .        .     .               .            .             .            .            .           .            .     .               .         .              .           .            .            .            .     .      .     .    .     .          .            .          .            .            .           .              .     .            .            .           .            .               .         .            .     .            .            .             .            .              .            .            .      .            .            .            .            .            .            .             .          .
PuertoLibre
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064


Master BFL Shill


View Profile
April 30, 2013, 08:47:46 PM
 #7303

Darn - unlucky enough to have missed getting even a single share of that 35 second block....
Grin I got 369 shares into the tiny window thanks to low difficulty shares. Had I used high difficulty, I would have missed it too!

17771    2013-04-30 17:34:45    0:00:35    51130    369    0.17625050    233934    25.21561000    78 confirmations left
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
April 30, 2013, 08:54:58 PM
 #7304

Darn - unlucky enough to have missed getting even a single share of that 35 second block....
Grin I got 369 shares into the tiny window thanks to low difficulty shares. Had I used high difficulty, I would have missed it too!

17771    2013-04-30 17:34:45    0:00:35    51130    369    0.17625050    233934    25.21561000    78 confirmations left

Yes but you might changed difficulty just a bit up to reduce Slush stratum load... If you got 369 shares in you are sending 10 per second. Way to much... 10 to 100 times too many... And it is a number game. Sometimes you loose sometime you win...

And I must say I would love to have your ASIC just for one block... Two days of work for me...
genpayne
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28



View Profile
April 30, 2013, 08:56:57 PM
 #7305

Darn - unlucky enough to have missed getting even a single share of that 35 second block....
Grin I got 369 shares into the tiny window thanks to low difficulty shares. Had I used high difficulty, I would have missed it too!

17771    2013-04-30 17:34:45    0:00:35    51130    369    0.17625050    233934    25.21561000    78 confirmations left

Yes but you might changed difficulty just a bit up to reduce Slush stratum load... If you got 369 shares in you are sending 10 per second. Way to much... 10 to 100 times too many... And it is a number game. Sometimes you loose sometime you win...

Id guess it'd be sensible to change it to 10. Make it one per second, then he's unlikely to lose out! And reduces the load considerably

Available for small programming jobs. PM me a Spec and I'll give you a price!
If I have made your day - 1HectorMHoC8ZxGe6wm5pLh2Szs2gbeFvr
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
April 30, 2013, 09:02:17 PM
 #7306

Id guess it'd be sensible to change it to 10. Make it one per second, then he's unlikely to lose out! And reduces the load considerably
Yes but it is a numbers game. I lost out on last short block but got double out of this one... But it is demoralising see 0.00000000 I agree...
genpayne
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28



View Profile
April 30, 2013, 09:06:49 PM
 #7307

Id guess it'd be sensible to change it to 10. Make it one per second, then he's unlikely to lose out! And reduces the load considerably
Yes but it is a numbers game. I lost out on last short block but got double out of this one... But it is demoralising see 0.00000000 I agree...

On 369 changing it to 10 would mean one hes still updating every second. So on the 35 second at most he would lost 10 shares.
On the value of a block that high surely its not a massive issue?
End of the day its his choice but i dont think 10 would really cost anything.

Available for small programming jobs. PM me a Spec and I'll give you a price!
If I have made your day - 1HectorMHoC8ZxGe6wm5pLh2Szs2gbeFvr
nottm28
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574



View Profile
April 30, 2013, 09:36:03 PM
 #7308

Darn - unlucky enough to have missed getting even a single share of that 35 second block....
Grin I got 369 shares into the tiny window thanks to low difficulty shares. Had I used high difficulty, I would have missed it too!

17771    2013-04-30 17:34:45    0:00:35    51130    369    0.17625050    233934    25.21561000    78 confirmations left

That's a real bummer for you man I got 0.5 BTC for the 35 second round - if I were you I'd bin your avalon and get a decent asic (I'll take it off your hands for a few btc if you are desparate for the coins)...

[EDIT]

Did I say 0.5 BTC - meant 0.005...

Warning: Avalon 60Gh will only give you 0.176BTC for a 35 second block. It could be a scam!

donations not accepted
killingtime
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25


View Profile
April 30, 2013, 10:24:20 PM
 #7309

Huh, my lowly 1.6 GH/s was able to submit 13 shares.  That means you are only doing a measly 45 GH/s, and you call yourself an ASIC user?
rsbriggs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 183


Russian:: UID 0


View Profile
April 30, 2013, 11:24:13 PM
 #7310

OK - I'm really not getting how these blocks are being scored.

For two similar blocks - on this block, I got in 115 shares in 2:18 and got .00032359 for it.

17770   2013-04-30 17:34:10   2:18:03   15697265   115   0.00032359

But on this block, I got in more shares (132) in less time (2:03) and there were fewer total shares, but I got 0.000 ??

17774   2013-04-30 20:25:35   2:03:23   14233698   132   0.00000000

Це́рковь бли́зко, да идти́ скли́зко, каба́к далеко́, да идти́ легко́.
PuertoLibre
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064


Master BFL Shill


View Profile
April 30, 2013, 11:57:15 PM
 #7311

OK - I'm really not getting how these blocks are being scored.

For two similar blocks - on this block, I got in 115 shares in 2:18 and got .00032359 for it.

17770   2013-04-30 17:34:10   2:18:03   15697265   115   0.00032359

But on this block, I got in more shares (132) in less time (2:03) and there were fewer total shares, but I got 0.000 ??

17774   2013-04-30 20:25:35   2:03:23   14233698   132   0.00000000

17770   2013-04-30 17:34:10   2:18:03   15697265   137406   0.21643078   233933   25.58070000

17774   2013-04-30 20:25:35   2:03:23   14233698   123224   0.21076722   233955   25.34648117
rsbriggs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 183


Russian:: UID 0


View Profile
May 01, 2013, 12:05:39 AM
 #7312

Yes, how nice for you - you get 20 days of what I mine in each and every single block you mine.

But that doesn't answer my question.  Why, when I'm mining consistently (albeit slowly), did I get zero on block 17774 where I did better than on block 17770, which I did get paid something for?  If this is "variance" then why have I never seen this magnitude of variability when mining in other pools?

Це́рковь бли́зко, да идти́ скли́зко, каба́к далеко́, да идти́ легко́.
PuertoLibre
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064


Master BFL Shill


View Profile
May 01, 2013, 12:11:05 AM
 #7313

Yes, how nice for you - you get 20 days of what I mine in each and every single block you mine.

But that doesn't answer my question.  Why, when I'm mining consistently (albeit slowly), did I get zero on block 17774 where I did better than on block 17770, which I did get paid something for?  If this is "variance" then why have I never seen this magnitude of variability when mining in other pools?
I don't know if your miner produces logs, but it seems the scoring system will eliminate your shares worth if you get disconnected or take too long to send the next share. (I think) (I am still reading up on the scoring system.)

This may have happened to you.

Another possibility is that your calculated rewards may not have finished processing yet, hence it is all zeros.
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
May 01, 2013, 12:21:09 AM
 #7314

Yes, how nice for you - you get 20 days of what I mine in each and every single block you mine.

But that doesn't answer my question.  Why, when I'm mining consistently (albeit slowly), did I get zero on block 17774 where I did better than on block 17770, which I did get paid something for?  If this is "variance" then why have I never seen this magnitude of variability when mining in other pools?

I got this for the last block:

17775   2013-04-30 23:59:52   3:34:17   24772020   3376   0.00000052   none   233974   25.23872222    98 confirmations left

But I know why. Internet went out at the end... About 10 seconds into the new run I got it back... So you might have something like that at the start of one and end of one...

About the "variance"... Depends on a pool payout system...
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
May 01, 2013, 12:27:00 AM
 #7315

Another possibility is that your calculated rewards may not have finished processing yet, hence it is all zeros.

In that case he wouldn't see shares jet...
Entropy-uc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560


View Profile
May 01, 2013, 01:08:57 AM
 #7316

Yes, how nice for you - you get 20 days of what I mine in each and every single block you mine.

But that doesn't answer my question.  Why, when I'm mining consistently (albeit slowly), did I get zero on block 17774 where I did better than on block 17770, which I did get paid something for?  If this is "variance" then why have I never seen this magnitude of variability when mining in other pools?
I don't know if your miner produces logs, but it seems the scoring system will eliminate your shares worth if you get disconnected or take too long to send the next share. (I think) (I am still reading up on the scoring system.)

This may have happened to you.

Another possibility is that your calculated rewards may not have finished processing yet, hence it is all zeros.

I have definitely seen cases where I was doing hardware maintenance and 15s of downtime has resulted in huge penalties from slush.

If you have to restart something, it's probably better to solo mine until the next block starts given the way he penalizes you right now.
nybbler905
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 213



View Profile
May 01, 2013, 01:22:14 AM
 #7317

OK - I'm really not getting how these blocks are being scored.

For two similar blocks - on this block, I got in 115 shares in 2:18 and got .00032359 for it.

17770   2013-04-30 17:34:10   2:18:03   15697265   115   0.00032359

But on this block, I got in more shares (132) in less time (2:03) and there were fewer total shares, but I got 0.000 ??

17774   2013-04-30 20:25:35   2:03:23   14233698   132   0.00000000
it's all timing. here is from a CPU miner and 1 share on 2 different blocks ( mine )

#      Block found at           Duration     Total shares    Your shares  Your BTC reward   Block #   Block value
17775  2013-04-30 23:59:52      3:34:17      24772020       1           0.00000369        233974    25.23872222
17774  2013-04-30 20:25:35      2:03:23      14233698       1           0.00000000        233955    25.34648117

I happened to be home to watch as the 2nd share was Near The End of the round ( 80+ in Current shares CDF: )
so, i'll take it and as far as the getting 0E-8 goes, I'm waiting on some 86ooGT cards to hopefully get out of CPU mining and get a higher hash rate.
this is a ' typical ' block for me when sooo many are connected and getting shares.....

17759    2013-04-30 01:20:57     5:01:48         34198356       3           0.00000000       233836    25.46175733

Not detered, more resolved and liking it  Cool

Always looking for donations even as low as 1uBTC
14XfpYPdtYiGoEiDcKrSzuvBM3ukhwANUh - BTC
LS7FEfu9ajp3NQcDjui9TSKscwQesj9i8k - LTC
LHe9g5ixMyfdtqAEHU5vErG1eQrDshBFRW -Luckycoin
rsbriggs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 183


Russian:: UID 0


View Profile
May 01, 2013, 03:09:13 AM
 #7318

No - there is definitely something wrong here.  I'm not being paid for any blocks anymore

17774   2013-04-30 20:25:35   2:03:23   14233698   132   0.00000000
17775   2013-04-30 23:59:52   3:34:17   24772020   145   0.00000000
17776   2013-05-01 02:25:35   2:25:43   16453036    13   0.00000000

I have moved over to another pool, and I'm not having problems there with zero returns per block, even if my share counts are low.

41  DGM  0 PPS   0.00108057
136 DGM 0 PPS   0.00110942
464 DGM 0 PPS   0.00132832
6    DGM 0 PPS   0.00068256



Це́рковь бли́зко, да идти́ скли́зко, каба́к далеко́, да идти́ легко́.
killingtime
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25


View Profile
May 01, 2013, 03:36:50 AM
 #7319

No - there is definitely something wrong here.  I'm not being paid for any blocks anymore

17774   2013-04-30 20:25:35   2:03:23   14233698   132   0.00000000
17775   2013-04-30 23:59:52   3:34:17   24772020   145   0.00000000
17776   2013-05-01 02:25:35   2:25:43   16453036    13   0.00000000

I have moved over to another pool, and I'm not having problems there with zero returns per block, even if my share counts are low.

The problem here is that these are fairly long blocks, and the scoring system works in such a way that shares done towards the end count more than at the beginning, but the flip to this is that with slow share submission at the end it could look like you were not sending anything and your score would be decaying faster than you were adding shares.  Even if this was done with the simple calc of (your shares / total shares) * 25 * 0.98, you only be looking at 0.0002.  And and average submission rate of a bit more than 1 share per minute.  While slush's pool is pretty nice for most people, I don't think it is a great solution for such a low hash rate.  You're just getting unlucky with score decay and too steep of a curve at the end.
Lanidarc
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48


hmmm


View Profile
May 01, 2013, 03:56:07 AM
 #7320

No - there is definitely something wrong here.  I'm not being paid for any blocks anymore

17774   2013-04-30 20:25:35   2:03:23   14233698   132   0.00000000
17775   2013-04-30 23:59:52   3:34:17   24772020   145   0.00000000
17776   2013-05-01 02:25:35   2:25:43   16453036    13   0.00000000

I have moved over to another pool, and I'm not having problems there with zero returns per block, even if my share counts are low.

The problem here is that these are fairly long blocks, and the scoring system works in such a way that shares done towards the end count more than at the beginning, but the flip to this is that with slow share submission at the end it could look like you were not sending anything and your score would be decaying faster than you were adding shares.  Even if this was done with the simple calc of (your shares / total shares) * 25 * 0.98, you only be looking at 0.0002.  And and average submission rate of a bit more than 1 share per minute.  While slush's pool is pretty nice for most people, I don't think it is a great solution for such a low hash rate.  You're just getting unlucky with score decay and too steep of a curve at the end.

Hmmm, if this is indeed the case, I would expect it to be fairly straightforward to have the decay rate depend on the average hash rate...? Actually expected this would be the case.

If this isn't easy to do though, I don't think Slush would put a huge effort in for tiny miners.

Tips for tips: 1Cy5WzZL6o58dLbqzFK9z4DxcP4prV3WkQ
Pages: « 1 ... 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 [366] 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 ... 1104 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!