|
Crypt_Current
|
 |
November 20, 2012, 09:13:02 PM |
|
Howdy,
I received my regular payout (got a notification email as usual) about two hours ago, but it still has not even shown up in block explorer. This is unusual; is there any obvious reason for this that I am not aware of?
hmmm, maybe the info is not accurate? just like with blockchain.info blockexplorer.com has generally served me well in showing transactions that my client had not caught up with yet... But this time, well I just have never seen blockexplorer.com lag like this before. It has been over three hours now and still, no sign of this transaction on blockexplorer.com even. Just extremely unusual, and making me very curious. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crypt_Current
|
|
November 20, 2012, 09:17:56 PM |
|
http://blockexplorer.com/address/1Jub25y7Mj4kTrrY9uYpvrwcK3KUpASjmUThe 1Jub25y7Mj4kTrrY9uYpvrwcK3KUpASjmU is my payout address. I received my usual notification email about the payout (this time in the amount of 0.5096738 BTC) about three hours ago, and if you click the link above, you will see no record of this amount (would be at or near the bottom of the page). Every time before (since I began mining a little over a year ago) it would only be a matter of minutes at most from the time I received the notification email, to the time blockexplorer.com would show a record of the transaction. I have never seen anything like this in the history of my mining experience. I hope nothing is wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Crypt_Current
|
|
November 20, 2012, 09:23:00 PM |
|
http://blockexplorer.com/address/1Jub25y7Mj4kTrrY9uYpvrwcK3KUpASjmUThe 1Jub25y7Mj4kTrrY9uYpvrwcK3KUpASjmU is my payout address. I received my usual notification email about the payout (this time in the amount of 0.5096738 BTC) about three hours ago, and if you click the link above, you will see no record of this amount (would be at or near the bottom of the page). Every time before (since I began mining a little over a year ago) it would only be a matter of minutes at most from the time I received the notification email, to the time blockexplorer.com would show a record of the transaction. I have never seen anything like this in the history of my mining experience. I hope nothing is wrong. 4 hours ago actually; still nothing  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crypt_Current
|
|
November 20, 2012, 10:07:14 PM |
|
Cool; yeah no worries. I looked at my client in passing a few minutes ago and noticed the payout is there and everything is fine. I did not know that blockexplorer.com sometimes has this problem of getting stuck! For some reason, the no-frills plain look of blockexplorer was interpreted by me as "more official looking" than blockchain.info, so I had come to mainly trust it. Now going forward I will check that trust with the alternate source. Thank you Slush for giving this trivial matter such prompt attention! |
|
|
|
|
kkurtmann
|
|
November 21, 2012, 04:48:12 PM |
|
im getting a lot of stales with this latest version 2012-11-18 out of 4000 accepted i have 6 stales. the earlier version i got zero stales out of over 100,000 accepted |
|
|
|
|
slush
|
|
November 21, 2012, 04:53:33 PM |
|
im getting a lot of stales with this latest version 2012-11-18 out of 4000 accepted i have 6 stales. the earlier version i got zero stales out of over 100,000 accepted
Does GUIminer now report stales? Can you send me a screenshot of your issue? I can say for sure that you did not have 0 stales per 100k accepted before :-). |
|
|
|
|
slush
|
|
November 24, 2012, 12:30:08 AM |
|
People asked me how to disable namecoin mining. It was impossible until now, but now you can just empty namecoin address and save the form. After confirming the email, you won't hear about namecoin anymore...
|
|
|
|
|
slush
|
|
November 24, 2012, 03:17:03 AM |
|
As I promised months ago, in effect since block #209295, pool is now giving transaction fees to miners!I decided to implement such feature only to Stratum pool, so if you want to collect transaction fees, please use some miner with native Stratum support (latest GUIminer, cgminer, bfgminer, poclbm) or use your preferred miner with Stratum proxy. Setting up Stratum mining will take literally 5 minutes and you will get lower stales and now transaction fees! |
|
|
|
Panda Mouse
Member
 Offline
Activity: 88
Gliding...
|
|
November 24, 2012, 06:30:19 AM |
|
As I promised months ago, in effect since block #209295, pool is now giving transaction fees to miners!I decided to implement such feature only to Stratum pool, so if you want to collect transaction fees, please use some miner with native Stratum support (latest GUIminer, cgminer, bfgminer, poclbm) or use your preferred miner with Stratum proxy. Setting up Stratum mining will take literally 5 minutes and you will get lower stales and now transaction fees! It works very well, I can confirm. Thanks Slush. Panda Mouse. |
|
|
|
|
eleuthria
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
|
|
November 24, 2012, 06:36:02 AM |
|
As I promised months ago, in effect since block #209295, pool is now giving transaction fees to miners!I decided to implement such feature only to Stratum pool, so if you want to collect transaction fees, please use some miner with native Stratum support (latest GUIminer, cgminer, bfgminer, poclbm) or use your preferred miner with Stratum proxy. Setting up Stratum mining will take literally 5 minutes and you will get lower stales and now transaction fees! Wait...GUIminer was finally updated for Stratum!? Why haven't I heard this breaking news. |
|
|
|
|
|
bitdaniel
|
|
November 24, 2012, 11:15:06 AM |
|
It works very well, I can confirm. Thanks Slush.
Panda Mouse.
How can i see if it is working? (= |
|
|
|
|
|
slush
|
|
November 24, 2012, 11:58:00 AM |
|
If you mean guiminer - it prints "diverging to stratum" or something similar to console.
|
|
|
|
|
slush
|
|
November 24, 2012, 12:01:57 PM |
|
Wait...GUIminer was finally updated for Stratum!? Why haven't I heard this breaking news.
Well, latest guiminer contains updated poclbm with stratum support. As far as 80% of users are using poclbm backend, i tried to simplify the statement... Full stratum implementation for guiminer is nontrivial and I'm lacking the time to do it properly. |
|
|
|
eleuthria
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
|
|
November 24, 2012, 04:46:40 PM |
|
Wait...GUIminer was finally updated for Stratum!? Why haven't I heard this breaking news.
Well, latest guiminer contains updated poclbm with stratum support. As far as 80% of users are using poclbm backend, i tried to simplify the statement... Full stratum implementation for guiminer is nontrivial and I'm lacking the time to do it properly. Yeah, I knew it wouldn't work with all GUIminer kernels since that would require a working phoenix implementation. But like you said, almost everybody on GUIminer uses poclbm since that's the default kernel. It's still great news, since I've noticed far more users on GUIminer than I originally thought. |
|
|
|
|
|
d1mn
|
|
November 26, 2012, 04:36:14 PM |
|
rejects over 1% wtf?   |
|
|
|
|
slush
|
|
November 26, 2012, 04:43:02 PM |
|
rejects over 1% wtf? There may be more factors involved, but I definitely recommend you to use Stratum interface. |
|
|
|
|
d1mn
|
|
November 26, 2012, 09:53:27 PM |
|
There may be more factors involved, but I definitely recommend you to use Stratum interface.
4000 acc. and only 3 rej. cool) thanks |
|
|
|
|
digital
|
|
November 27, 2012, 03:55:57 PM |
|
I'd be willing to bet that in about 26 hours, we'll get a flood of people on this thread with a post count of less than 10 asking why their reward just got cut in half...
|
If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20 50051.100 53668.0 53788.0 53571.0 53571.0 52212.0 50729.0 114804.0 115468 78106 69061 58572 54747
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
