|
oroboras
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 12:26:20 AM |
|
I have 3.2 and 2 avalon usb's (europe order) on the way. (I wont mention my BFL order for fear of turning slush's thread into a slanging match) ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) LOL I have 10 of the USB's coming from A+C also.... so I guess when they get here I will be closer to 4GH/S Nice. No slanging from me though - I have 32GH/s of BFL on order, to compliment my 1GH/s now, and if the bank smiles on me, 700GH/s of KnCMiner to be ordered. I will know in a couple of weeks if I will get to join the big boys or not.
|
|
|
|
EasyQuest
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 198
Merit: 100
Brony Bitcoin, Litecoin Miner
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 01:24:05 AM |
|
Calculation error?
18219 2013-05-25 23:31:47 0:33:15 4923475 4003 0.02103287 237930 25.21042000 85 confirmations left 18218 2013-05-25 22:58:32 0:25:35 3754815 3039 0.01185884 237928 25.00650000 83 confirmations left 18217 2013-05-25 22:32:57 1:00:46 8928761 7448 0.02057664 237921 25.47807000 76 confirmations left
I checked and none of my miners were down......
I notice the scoring was bugged during mining operation.
Estimated reward tanked and then recover over a period amount of time. I have seen this before which then causes these annoying reward errors people been talking about.
|
|
|
|
5120-01-518-6126
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 174
Merit: 100
< My mining rig >
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 01:55:19 AM |
|
Payout for round 18218 -- ongoing miscalc problem, low transaction fees, or just variance?
18219 --2013-05-25 23:31:47 -- 0:33:15 -- 4923475 -- 2350 -- 0.01151355 -- 237930 -- 25.21042000 -- 84 confirmations left 18218 --2013-05-25 22:58:32 -- 0:25:35 -- 3754815 -- 1814 -- 0.00691102 -- 237928 -- 25.00650000 -- 82 confirmations left .. 18216 --2013-05-25 21:32:11 -- 0:26:24 -- 3940018 -- 1850 -- 0.01299966 -- 237915 -- 25.07852000 -- 69 confirmations left ... 18213 --2013-05-25 20:25:33 -- 0:28:52 -- 4289177 -- 2142 -- 0.01138243 -- 237903 -- 25.51505422 -- 57 confirmations left
|
|
|
|
bspurloc
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 02:14:17 AM |
|
Calculation error?
18219 2013-05-25 23:31:47 0:33:15 4923475 4003 0.02103287 237930 25.21042000 85 confirmations left 18218 2013-05-25 22:58:32 0:25:35 3754815 3039 0.01185884 237928 25.00650000 83 confirmations left 18217 2013-05-25 22:32:57 1:00:46 8928761 7448 0.02057664 237921 25.47807000 76 confirmations left
I checked and none of my miners were down...... I notice the scoring was bugged during mining operation. Estimated reward tanked and then recover over a period amount of time. I have seen this before which then causes these annoying reward errors people been talking about.
18218 2013-05-25 22:58:32 0:25:35 3754815 967 0.00367753 237928 25.00650000 18217 2013-05-25 22:32:57 1:00:46 8928761 2242 0.00672909 237921 25.47807000 18216 2013-05-25 21:32:11 0:26:24 3940018 931 0.00552174 237915 25.07852000 Yeah 237928 had issues. I did not have connection issues and that is all I will say about that. Something calculated wrong on that block. topic done.
|
|
|
|
rsbriggs
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 02:51:25 AM |
|
Is some issue with score not resetting to zero at start of 18221 round or problem with estimated? Estimated score for this round being about 1/40 normal, .00010 instead .0044 ever since starting.
|
|
|
|
autonomous42
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 03:00:18 AM |
|
Is some issue with score not resetting to zero at start of 18221 round or problem with estimated? Estimated score for this round being about 1/40 normal, .00010 instead .0044 ever since starting.
And my estimate is about 1700x normal. Oops.
|
|
|
|
bspurloc
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 03:11:58 AM |
|
Is some issue with score not resetting to zero at start of 18221 round or problem with estimated? Estimated score for this round being about 1/40 normal, .00010 instead .0044 ever since starting.
Ah. I see it is happening with the present block. I'm back up to almost 50% of normal as it slowly fixes itself.
|
|
|
|
rsbriggs
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 03:18:32 AM |
|
Is some issue with score not resetting to zero at start of 18221 round or problem with estimated? Estimated score for this round being about 1/40 normal, .00010 instead .0044 ever since starting.
Ah. I see it is happening with the present block. I'm back up to almost 50% of normal as it slowly fixes itself. Slowly fixing self little bit over last 1/2 hour. Maybe back close to normal if block going another 1/2 hour or longer.
|
|
|
|
EasyQuest
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 198
Merit: 100
Brony Bitcoin, Litecoin Miner
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 03:25:19 AM |
|
Weird how this has been happening for more than a month and just these past two weeks it has been happen more often than normal.....
|
|
|
|
Uliss
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 03:53:32 AM Last edit: May 26, 2013, 05:22:15 AM by Uliss |
|
Now: Approx. cluster performance (30 min average): 10433.954 Ghash/s Current server load (60 sec average): 246 getwork/s 18220 2013-05-26 02:26:32 2:54:45Current round duration: 2:49:06Yesterday - 450-500 getwork/s, found 25 blocks What server? ---------------- BitMinter now: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs020.radikal.ru%2Fi719%2F1305%2Fa9%2Ffbb83c548eb2t.jpg&t=665&c=XQaLepyY0y_6qg)
|
|
|
|
rassalas
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 04:06:43 AM |
|
Out of curiosity - is your hashing speed around 3.5-3.6GH/s?
I'm only running about 2.7GH/s hardware can probably hit closer to 3GH/s but I have cooling issues that need to be resolved. maths not my strongsuit.... kudos nottm28 Entering new workers with same credentials at the alternate serve did the trick. I did have to experiment with syntax to get valid credential submission, my poor memory or confusion with other pool standards... not important once I sorted it out Stratum server is working fine. I do have one annoying factor, Stratum is 4 characters longer then api so now my old worker names are too long to display well in a cgminer terminal that is each pool takes two lines, for my current name.wrkr. I could rename but last time I did that I lost some shares.
|
|
|
|
minerapia
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 05:56:01 AM |
|
Now: Approx. cluster performance (30 min average): 10433.954 Ghash/s Current server load (60 sec average): 246 getwork/s 18220 2013-05-26 02:26:32 2:54:45Current round duration: 2:49:06Yesterday - 450-500 getwork/s, found 25 blocks What server? ---------------- BitMinter now: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs020.radikal.ru%2Fi719%2F1305%2Fa9%2Ffbb83c548eb2t.jpg&t=665&c=XQaLepyY0y_6qg) Amount of getworks per sec is totally meaningless, its only 100-200 Ghs from total of 10401.213 Ghash/s. Also comparing couple of few last blocks to bitminter is worthless also, they ran into streak of luck after being unlucky for a moment. Bitminter has invalid block issues still running (pool admins havent updated I guess).
|
donations -> btc: 1M6yf45NskQxWXknkMTzQ8o6wShQcSY4EC ltc: LeTpCd6cQL26Q1vjc9kJrTjjFMrPhrpv6j
|
|
|
Uliss
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 06:25:00 AM |
|
Amount of getworks per sec is totally meaningless, its only 100-200 Ghs from total of 10401.213 Ghash/s.
Also comparing couple of few last blocks to bitminter is worthless also, they ran into streak of luck after being unlucky for a moment. Bitminter has invalid block issues still running (pool admins havent updated I guess).
I noticed that the more getworks, the more blocks. Sorry, this is the Google Translator...
|
|
|
|
minerapia
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 06:31:51 AM |
|
Amount of getworks per sec is totally meaningless, its only 100-200 Ghs from total of 10401.213 Ghash/s.
Also comparing couple of few last blocks to bitminter is worthless also, they ran into streak of luck after being unlucky for a moment. Bitminter has invalid block issues still running (pool admins havent updated I guess).
I noticed that the more getworks, the more blocks. Sorry, this is the Google Translator... Its about luck, finding block is lottery. Sometimes you have more luck and you find more blocks. Only thing that really matters is the Ghs because eventually luck is evened out. Amount of getworks/s is just old remnant regarding old getwork protocol. 98% of the pool is using stratum now.
|
donations -> btc: 1M6yf45NskQxWXknkMTzQ8o6wShQcSY4EC ltc: LeTpCd6cQL26Q1vjc9kJrTjjFMrPhrpv6j
|
|
|
bspurloc
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 06:33:08 AM Last edit: May 26, 2013, 07:58:30 AM by bspurloc |
|
Is some issue with score not resetting to zero at start of 18221 round or problem with estimated? Estimated score for this round being about 1/40 normal, .00010 instead .0044 ever since starting.
Ah. I see it is happening with the present block. I'm back up to almost 50% of normal as it slowly fixes itself. Slowly fixing self little bit over last 1/2 hour. Maybe back close to normal if block going another 1/2 hour or longer. It is happening again. this is a NEW problem that I have not seen over the few weeks. but of course I am just a complainer and shouldnt point out something like this. In the past, I have seen this happen on 2+ hour blocks and fix itself over 15minutes. this is now happening in blocks 15+ minutes and taking 30+ minutes to fix itself. I've never noticed this fix itself during confirmation because the algorithm decided the shares were decayed er, it was fixed now just reset back to 0 again.... "0.00001862 BTC" nothing to see here move along, all is well... ----- 3minutes into this new block estimated reward 0.00000001 BTC I have 130 shares in 2.65gh/s. there is no way the decay algorithm is working right within that time period and my hashrate. If I were having connection issues I would not be able to be at 130 shares
|
|
|
|
desired_username
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 08:44:49 AM |
|
This is the first anomaly I have got: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fdl.dropboxusercontent.com%2Fu%2F8310142%2Fslush.PNG&t=665&c=MLuPwA8UkSHcYA) I didn't have disconnect or miner restart. Any explanation why this particular block reward was so low compared to all the others?
|
|
|
|
Lucko
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 09:12:52 AM |
|
Block 18222, 18223 and 18218 with reset issues? And block 18220 with posible reset issues. I know I should moved miner off this pool yesterday. Why I didn't(OK I know why, I was waiting for end of block and then forgot)... Slush it is time to fix this... I hate to look at every block with microscope... EDIT: This is the first anomaly I have got: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fdl.dropboxusercontent.com%2Fu%2F8310142%2Fslush.PNG&t=665&c=MLuPwA8UkSHcYA) I didn't have disconnect or miner restart. Any explanation why this particular block reward was so low compared to all the others? Reset issues. If Slush is around it will get fix if not you are out of luck... And you will probably see same for block 18220, 18222 and 18223 unless you are one of the lucky that gain because of a reset.
|
|
|
|
vs3
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 09:14:57 AM |
|
This is the first anomaly I have got: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fdl.dropboxusercontent.com%2Fu%2F8310142%2Fslush.PNG&t=665&c=MLuPwA8UkSHcYA) I didn't have disconnect or miner restart. Any explanation why this particular block reward was so low compared to all the others? Yep, and if you look up on this very page (just about a dozen posts before yours) you'll notice that block 18218 has already been reported as being problematic. My point is - we already know that. And we're already asking the same question - why? From what we've seen so far - everyone got about half of the payout they usually/should get. Unfortunately it seems only Slush can tell us what's going on. Slush - if you read this please and actually pretty please - could you shed some light?
|
|
|
|
Paulizei
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 26, 2013, 09:24:05 AM |
|
Same here: Rewards for block 18218 only at 50% of what I'm used to.
Help please!
|
|
|
|
|