Bitcoin Forum
December 03, 2016, 06:49:58 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3160 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.1%)
Total Voters: 3924

Pages: « 1 ... 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 [405] 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 ... 1105 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3925781 times)
ewitte
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98


View Profile
May 13, 2013, 10:27:21 AM
 #8081

The pool has seemed ok since the move can't fault for difficulty increase or luck.  We had really bad luck shortly after in came back up then really good luck.  Now we are in really bad luck again.  After the current block if we get 1-2 more we are under 60% Sad

Donations
BTC - 13Lgy6fb4d3nSYEf2nkgBgyBkkhPw8zkPd
LTC - LegzRwyc2Xhu8cqvaW2jwRrqSnhyaYU6gZ
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1480747798
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480747798

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480747798
Reply with quote  #2

1480747798
Report to moderator
1480747798
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480747798

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480747798
Reply with quote  #2

1480747798
Report to moderator
rsbriggs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 183


Russian:: UID 0


View Profile
May 13, 2013, 11:24:38 AM
 #8082

Come on guys, sitting there refreshing the score when it finishes processing and reporting "LOOK ANOTHER ONE" and ultimately "OH! IT'S OK NOW" is as unproductive as I can imagine, in fact it can only serve to put people off the pool.

That

OK.  Would you care to explain these results for set of miners doing 1.8Gh/s and connected 24x7 with cgminer???

18011   2013-05-13 11:08:28   1:49:26   15381772   1215   0.00441004   235990   25.32340000    98 confirmations left
18010   2013-05-13 09:19:02   3:23:32   27970291   none   none              235980   25.54710101    88 confirmations left
18009   2013-05-13 05:55:30   0:37:57   5241181    none   none              235954   25.09833800    62 confirmations left
18008   2013-05-13 05:17:33   2:14:34   18510235   2632   0.00000000      235946   25.34290000    54 confirmations left
18007   2013-05-13 03:02:59   1:59:17   16473280   2550   0.00323839      235925   25.02000000    33 confirmations left
18006   2013-05-13 01:03:42   0:04:40   633490        109   0.00437391      235911   25.06273800    19 confirmations left

Це́рковь бли́зко, да идти́ скли́зко, каба́к далеко́, да идти́ легко́.
GuiltySpark343
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98



View Profile
May 13, 2013, 11:41:31 AM
 #8083

Thanks!   That edit works to fix connection problem.  But code needs work, slush items like estimated reward don't work as is.

I tweaked it a bit on mine to give:


I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
Ƀ:17wbDetEw2aESM5oWXbm5ih9NSdDruyWNT
GuiltySpark343
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98



View Profile
May 13, 2013, 11:44:18 AM
 #8084

OK.  Would you care to explain these results for set of miners doing 1.8Gh/s and connected 24x7 with cgminer???

Can you try a tracert command to the Slush server you are using? Open a Command window, and type tracert ADDRESS and see if it gets stuck anywhere along the line. Maybe you have dropped packets and so have trouble getting work or sending shares back?

I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
Ƀ:17wbDetEw2aESM5oWXbm5ih9NSdDruyWNT
lsvpa
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26


View Profile
May 13, 2013, 11:53:29 AM
 #8085

I just wanted to add to this whole "having problems" trend lately that I have not had any issues with block payouts whatsoever, so i don't think it's a universal problem.
rsbriggs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 183


Russian:: UID 0


View Profile
May 13, 2013, 12:05:13 PM
 #8086

OK.  Would you care to explain these results for set of miners doing 1.8Gh/s and connected 24x7 with cgminer???

Can you try a tracert command to the Slush server you are using? Open a Command window, and type tracert ADDRESS and see if it gets stuck anywhere along the line. Maybe you have dropped packets and so have trouble getting work or sending shares back?

Blocked somehow - other than my local router, all show

  4     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  5     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  6     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  7     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  8     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  9     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 10     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 11     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 12     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 13     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 14     *        *        *     Request timed out.

But not a connectivity issue - can ping just fine

C:\Users\Rachael>ping 56.192.78.3

Pinging 56.192.78.3 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 56.192.78.3: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 56.192.78.3: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255
Reply from 56.192.78.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=255
Reply from 56.192.78.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=255

Ping statistics for 56.192.78.3:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% l
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 11ms, Average = 3ms

Це́рковь бли́зко, да идти́ скли́зко, каба́к далеко́, да идти́ легко́.
irritant
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 416


Sodium hypochlorite, acetone, ethanol


View Profile
May 13, 2013, 12:20:33 PM
 #8087

OK.  Would you care to explain these results for set of miners doing 1.8Gh/s and connected 24x7 with cgminer???

Can you try a tracert command to the Slush server you are using? Open a Command window, and type tracert ADDRESS and see if it gets stuck anywhere along the line. Maybe you have dropped packets and so have trouble getting work or sending shares back?

Blocked somehow - other than my local router, all show

  4     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  5     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  6     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  7     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  8     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  9     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 10     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 11     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 12     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 13     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 14     *        *        *     Request timed out.

But not a connectivity issue - can ping just fine

C:\Users\Rachael>ping 56.192.78.3

Pinging 56.192.78.3 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 56.192.78.3: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 56.192.78.3: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=255
Reply from 56.192.78.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=255
Reply from 56.192.78.3: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=255

Ping statistics for 56.192.78.3:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% l
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 11ms, Average = 3ms



why don't you use stratum.bitcoin.cz ?
GuiltySpark343
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98



View Profile
May 13, 2013, 12:25:54 PM
 #8088

Odd. You pinged 56.192.78.3

However, when I use the word address

stratum.bitcoin.cz resolves to 54.215.3.100
stratum2.bitcoin.cz resolves to 54.225.116.40

Perhaps you are using older server address? What do other people resolve to?

The other thing I have read, is that because of DDoS attacks the firewall at the server has some routine that can block people from connecting. Contacting Slush with this directly seems to allow him to enter something to let you in (tho Slush seems AWOL).

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1976.msg1858637#msg1858637

I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
Ƀ:17wbDetEw2aESM5oWXbm5ih9NSdDruyWNT
rsbriggs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 183


Russian:: UID 0


View Profile
May 13, 2013, 12:39:29 PM
 #8089

I typo'ed IP address from before - part wrong and part my router.  tracert "stratum.bitcoin.cz" all still blocked.  Ping also blocked.  Yet miners are happily submitting shares.  Maybe whole network paranoid and not responding to ICMP packets due to potential DDOS?

C:\Users\Rachael>ping stratum.bitcoin.cz
Pinging stratum.bitcoin.cz [54.225.116.221] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.

Ping statistics for 54.225.116.221:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),

Found blocks   Current shares   Score           Last share at   Mhash/s*   
   0                2114           4979962.7183   0 minutes           1718.312

Maybe I am just shutting up for a few days.  If am still missing more block payouts in next days then sadly I am being move to another pool.  But really like Slush's pool - just right size.

Це́рковь бли́зко, да идти́ скли́зко, каба́к далеко́, да идти́ легко́.
sunriselad
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 63


View Profile
May 13, 2013, 01:53:42 PM
 #8090

Seems the problem is with you!

Pinging stratum.bitcoin.cz [54.225.116.221] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 54.225.116.221: bytes=32 time=133ms TTL=41
Reply from 54.225.116.221: bytes=32 time=164ms TTL=41
Reply from 54.225.116.221: bytes=32 time=344ms TTL=41
Reply from 54.225.116.221: bytes=32 time=207ms TTL=41
joolzg
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 76


View Profile
May 13, 2013, 02:00:07 PM
 #8091

OK i have 3 blocks all 15% lower than average
17983
18000
18006


but whats worrying is my average earnings

March .25
April .20
May .10

Is everyone seeing this drop in earnings, as its getting to a point of not being worth mining

joolz
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
May 13, 2013, 02:06:28 PM
 #8092

OK i have 3 blocks all 15% lower than average
17983
18000
18006


but whats worrying is my average earnings

March .25
April .20
May .10

Is everyone seeing this drop in earnings, as its getting to a point of not being worth mining

joolz


Two things are causing that, and it's completely normal.  Difficulty increases, and more miners entering the field.  And alot of those new miners are ASIC miners, which are probably causing the volatility everyone is talking about on this pool.

Everyone is freaking out over a perfectly normal occurrence.  But they don't see it that way, because their earnings are going down...

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
valladex
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 61



View Profile
May 13, 2013, 02:07:42 PM
 #8093

show me the luck....
OlgaA524
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54



View Profile
May 13, 2013, 02:13:15 PM
 #8094

OK i have 3 blocks all 15% lower than average
17983
18000
18006


but whats worrying is my average earnings

March .25
April .20
May .10

Is everyone seeing this drop in earnings, as its getting to a point of not being worth mining

joolz


yes the earnings are dropping seemingly faster then expected, but maybe it is just a perception. I just started mining in March, so i have no idea how it was earlier when difficulty was increasing. Though this is the way it is supposed to be by algorithm (earnings drop with time) it is a bit depressing to see the how earnings drop even when my hash increases.

18rWR6S4onARe8AQ1RgG4iGWKas3R97k4T - donations are most welcome
joolzg
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 76


View Profile
May 13, 2013, 02:15:55 PM
 #8095

OK i have 3 blocks all 15% lower than average
17983
18000
18006


but whats worrying is my average earnings

March .25
April .20
May .10

Is everyone seeing this drop in earnings, as its getting to a point of not being worth mining

joolz


Two things are causing that, and it's completely normal.  Difficulty increases, and more miners entering the field.  And alot of those new miners are ASIC miners, which are probably causing the volatility everyone is talking about on this pool.

Everyone is freaking out over a perfectly normal occurrence.  But they don't see it that way, because their earnings are going down...

Well boys its time to say goodbye, will turn off my system when i get back home tomorrow night.

I knew the difficulty made a difference but not that much and so quick.

ill cash in my BTC and sell my cards and maybe even sell my butterfly order, as i dont think the 30GH is going to be worth it once i get it

joolz

OlgaA524
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54



View Profile
May 13, 2013, 02:19:31 PM
 #8096

show me the luck....

per http://blockchain.info/pools slash's pool is in the same category as Deepbit, EclipseMC, Eligius when not so long ago Slush was doing about 10X better then those  Huh

18rWR6S4onARe8AQ1RgG4iGWKas3R97k4T - donations are most welcome
joolzg
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 76


View Profile
May 13, 2013, 02:19:42 PM
 #8097

OK i have 3 blocks all 15% lower than average
17983
18000
18006


but whats worrying is my average earnings

March .25
April .20
May .10

Is everyone seeing this drop in earnings, as its getting to a point of not being worth mining

joolz


yes the earnings are dropping seemingly faster then expected, but maybe it is just a perception. I just started mining in March, so i have no idea how it was earlier when difficulty was increasing. Though this is the way it is supposed to be by algorithm (earnings drop with time) it is a bit depressing to see the how earnings drop even when my hash increases.

same her i was expecting a slow decrease in earning as BFL have not really started dumping lots on the pools.

i increased my rate to 3GH and seen a drop from .01 to .007, so over a 25% drop and thats with a 50% increase in my mining rate


joolz
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
May 13, 2013, 02:22:00 PM
 #8098

OK i have 3 blocks all 15% lower than average
17983
18000
18006


but whats worrying is my average earnings

March .25
April .20
May .10

Is everyone seeing this drop in earnings, as its getting to a point of not being worth mining

joolz


yes the earnings are dropping seemingly faster then expected, but maybe it is just a perception. I just started mining in March, so i have no idea how it was earlier when difficulty was increasing. Though this is the way it is supposed to be by algorithm (earnings drop with time) it is a bit depressing to see the how earnings drop even when my hash increases.

The system is designed to hand out blocks at a set pace.  The reward is scheduled to be cut in half roughly every 4 years.  So when a large number of miners come on line with ASICS, and start hashing away, that increases the total network hash rate by a lot.  Which means the difficulty has to go up a lot to compensate, and keep the blocks coming at the same pace.

So it's all relative, the higher the network hash rate, the higher the difficulty and vice versa.

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
joolzg
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 76


View Profile
May 13, 2013, 02:22:32 PM
 #8099

show me the luck....

per http://blockchain.info/pools slash's pool is in the same category as Deepbit, EclipseMC, Eligius when not so long ago Slush was doing about 10X better then those  Huh

seems to me slushs pool is dying, no new miners coming online, staying static whilst other pools are going up.

maybe i will just hop over to one of the growing pools

slushs luck is just dropping all the time, we get 1 good day and then 3-4 crap days


joolz
irritant
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 416


Sodium hypochlorite, acetone, ethanol


View Profile
May 13, 2013, 02:24:14 PM
 #8100

is this a new type of attack at the pool?  the never ending flood of FUD?

lots of jrs
Pages: « 1 ... 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 [405] 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 ... 1105 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!