Tursk
Member
Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
|
|
June 12, 2013, 08:41:10 AM |
|
Why does Slush's scoring system punish heavily for adding another worker?
See below how my reward was wayy smaller from block #18526 after adding mighty 600 MH worker at 2013-06-12 07:07. My other 200 MH worker reward from block #18525 was 0.096% of next block's reward which had 200 MH worker running non-stop but 600 MH worker running only the last 12 minutes. Block 18527 had both my workers running.
# Block found at Duration Total shares Your shares Your BTC reward Block # Block value Validity 18527 2013-06-12 07:46:05 0:26:42 4758169 287 0.00128216 241071 25.08490896 92 confirmations left 18526 2013-06-12 07:19:23 3:52:04 43322066 780 0.00000042 241068 25.33501327 89 confirmations left 18525 2013-06-12 03:27:19 0:39:17 7372985 117 0.00043630 241039 25.12242555 60 confirmations left
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to get the maximum amount of activity points possible, you just need to post once per day on average. Skipping days is OK as long as you maintain the average.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
demigo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
June 12, 2013, 08:44:58 AM |
|
the same problem
18527 2013-06-12 07:46:05 0:26:42 4758169 805 0.00414194 241071 25.08490896 89 potvrzení zbývá 18526 2013-06-12 07:19:23 3:52:04 43322066 7004 0.00000121 241068 25.33501327 86 potvrzení zbývá 18525 2013-06-12 03:27:19 0:39:17 7372985 1225 0.00369648 241039 25.12242555 57 potvrzení zbývá 18524 2013-06-12 02:48:02 4:42:35 53459272 8491 0.00362433 241033 25.03670000 51 potvrzení zbývá
|
|
|
|
mikimoto
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
June 12, 2013, 08:46:17 AM |
|
same here:
18526 2013-06-12 07:19:23 3:52:04 43322066 17683 0.00000268 241068 25.33501327 85 confirmaciones pendientes 18525 2013-06-12 03:27:19 0:39:17 7372985 3044 0.00966817 241039 25.12242555 56 confirmaciones pendientes 18524 2013-06-12 02:48:02 4:42:35 53459272 21672 0.01090996 241033 25.03670000 50 confirmaciones pendientes 18523 2013-06-11 22:05:27 1:15:25 14487253 5731 0.01006198 240997 25.52886700 14 confirmaciones pendientes
|
|
|
|
Paulizei
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
June 12, 2013, 08:58:45 AM |
|
Why does Slush's scoring system punish heavily for adding another worker?
This is not by design. The block will get recalculated and you then should see a reward around 0.0012, I estimate
|
|
|
|
el_rlee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1600
Merit: 1014
|
|
June 12, 2013, 09:10:13 AM |
|
Got nothing for 18526 2013-06-12 07:19:23 3:52:04 43322066 none none 241068 25.33501327 79 confirmations left
Slush should really over work his scoring system
|
|
|
|
biz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
June 12, 2013, 09:13:17 AM |
|
#18526 is repairing...
|
|
|
|
Tursk
Member
Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
|
|
June 12, 2013, 09:15:17 AM |
|
Why does Slush's scoring system punish heavily for adding another worker?
This is not by design. The block will get recalculated and you then should see a reward around 0.0012, I estimate Yes, I think you're right. Now it's showing none reward, so apparently recalculation is on.
|
|
|
|
biz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
June 12, 2013, 09:26:34 AM |
|
#18526 seems to be recalculated as it should be at my end.
|
|
|
|
aurel57
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 12, 2013, 11:34:05 AM |
|
Wow over 17000 GH/S
|
|
|
|
EasyQuest
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 198
Merit: 100
Brony Bitcoin, Litecoin Miner
|
|
June 12, 2013, 11:36:20 AM |
|
Wow the pool jumped 4 TH/s from last night (at my time). ASICs, someone is ether testing or just hope on to slush.
I really want a chart to see the highest hashers not just block finders.....
|
|
|
|
valladex
Member
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
|
|
June 12, 2013, 11:46:30 AM |
|
17000 GH/s hopefully we might find a few more blocks now. 1-2 good days to 3-4 bad days is no fun.
|
|
|
|
pitpony
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
June 12, 2013, 11:46:49 AM |
|
Total network hash rate has jumped by nearly 10% to over 154Thash/s since last night. Diff estimated to increase to over 18 million by Sunday.
|
|
|
|
HellDiverUK
|
|
June 12, 2013, 12:09:36 PM |
|
All hands to the Litecoin pumps tbh.
|
|
|
|
Tamis
|
|
June 12, 2013, 12:44:04 PM |
|
Total network hash rate has jumped by nearly 10% to over 154Thash/s since last night. Diff estimated to increase to over 18 million by Sunday.
Now this is interesting ! Asicminer activating a lot of new block erupters out of the factory ? I wanted to invest in asic but as I said in another post I think that very soon 50gh/s will be the minimum to hash so I will refrain and sadly just watch very soon :/
|
|
|
|
bspurloc
|
|
June 12, 2013, 12:54:40 PM |
|
Wow over 17000 GH/S
yeah 17278.250 Ghash/s and an extremely lame reward on that last block!
|
|
|
|
BTCvFiat
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
June 12, 2013, 01:03:06 PM |
|
Throwing 250-300 mhash/s is kind of pointless with figures as low as this =X
18531 2013-06-12 12:43:26 3:23:57 44489992 739 0.00024174 241115 25.10480000 98 confirmations left
Previous block was kinder
18530 2013-06-12 09:19:29 0:53:55 9964643 211 0.00061439 241092 25.07820010 75 confirmations left
|
Tips? Reply/PM or send coins to: BTC: 17hVfLh3AUWWqxzo2UeVDmevntSfpc2wqB - LTC: LTbyb2dPBsPMbs1sXT5db1wainGuJ61xSV - WDC: WjEvTJtj5QGNHzXSJCJLcRYJeHzaRhRGtM
|
|
|
Tamis
|
|
June 12, 2013, 01:13:49 PM |
|
Throwing 250-300 mhash/s
Is that with a HD 5850 ?
|
|
|
|
desired_username
|
|
June 12, 2013, 01:19:04 PM |
|
Total network hash rate has jumped by nearly 10% to over 154Thash/s since last night. Diff estimated to increase to over 18 million by Sunday.
The estimate is already at 18.5M according to bitcoindifficulty.comInteresting times
|
|
|
|
Tamis
|
|
June 12, 2013, 01:40:14 PM Last edit: June 12, 2013, 01:59:39 PM by Tamis |
|
17480.092 Ghash/s and climbing.... :
edit : 17628.289 Ghash/s in a few minutes this is crazy !
|
|
|
|
Trongersoll
|
|
June 12, 2013, 02:07:16 PM |
|
Odd that even though our hash rate is up, we don't seem to be finding blocks much faster.
|
|
|
|
|