[ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows)

[does]

as any one compare that to ewbf?

[1714308256]

1714308256

[1714308256]

1714308256

[m1n1ngP4d4w4n]

as any one compare that to ewbf?

Yeah just the last 111 pages of this thread... a little bit of reading wouldn't hurt isn't it ?  

[wolverine5pl]

as any one compare that to ewbf?

have no crashes on ewb. but on this miner likes to crash for no reason

[does]

as any one compare that to ewbf?

Yeah just the last 111 pages of this thread... a little bit of reading wouldn't hurt isn't it ?  

111 pages is not a little bit of reading

so have u compared it ?

[Deathman20]

as any one compare that to ewbf?

Yeah just the last 111 pages of this thread... a little bit of reading wouldn't hurt isn't it ?  

111 pages is not a little bit of reading

so have u compared it ?

Go back and even read the last 5 pages, or 10 pages.  Yes its been compared. 

[Deathman20]

I just switched to the dstm client and having zero issues with my 1080ti.  Actually Its OCed more and clocked higher than I have ever been before!  
Before using a different miner (EWBF) I managed around 700 H/sec with just a +100 on the core.  No benefit to clocking the memory or anything else higher.  Now I can run +200 Core / +500 Mem and even run at 90% TDP and get 752 H/sec!  If I run at 100% TDP I get around 770 H/sec at these settings.  I have yet to test it further but I'm sure I could tweak it even more.  So I'd say with this at v0.5.8 you can mine at higher speeds and better output.

Could you share a screengrab of dstm window running?.. I'm trying to compare my settings... Might be because I'm using 1070's and you are on 1080ti.
thx

1060 6GB Settings/Results https://ibb.co/eJp5HR
1080TI Settings/Results     https://ibb.co/ca0ZBm

[jpl]

I just switched to the dstm client and having zero issues with my 1080ti.  Actually Its OCed more and clocked higher than I have ever been before!  
Before using a different miner (EWBF) I managed around 700 H/sec with just a +100 on the core.  No benefit to clocking the memory or anything else higher.  Now I can run +200 Core / +500 Mem and even run at 90% TDP and get 752 H/sec!  If I run at 100% TDP I get around 770 H/sec at these settings.  I have yet to test it further but I'm sure I could tweak it even more.  So I'd say with this at v0.5.8 you can mine at higher speeds and better output.

Could you share a screengrab of dstm window running?.. I'm trying to compare my settings... Might be because I'm using 1070's and you are on 1080ti.
thx

1060 6GB Settings/Results https://ibb.co/eJp5HR
1080TI Settings/Results     https://ibb.co/ca0ZBm

hmm... that speed crashes mine for some reason.  I have to keep my core clock around 140 to keep it stable.  win10 with 4 asus and 2 evga 1070's

[Deathman20]

I just switched to the dstm client and having zero issues with my 1080ti.  Actually Its OCed more and clocked higher than I have ever been before!  
Before using a different miner (EWBF) I managed around 700 H/sec with just a +100 on the core.  No benefit to clocking the memory or anything else higher.  Now I can run +200 Core / +500 Mem and even run at 90% TDP and get 752 H/sec!  If I run at 100% TDP I get around 770 H/sec at these settings.  I have yet to test it further but I'm sure I could tweak it even more.  So I'd say with this at v0.5.8 you can mine at higher speeds and better output.

Could you share a screengrab of dstm window running?.. I'm trying to compare my settings... Might be because I'm using 1070's and you are on 1080ti.
thx

1060 6GB Settings/Results https://ibb.co/eJp5HR
1080TI Settings/Results     https://ibb.co/ca0ZBm

hmm... that speed crashes mine for some reason.  I have to keep my core clock around 140 to keep it stable.  win10 with 4 asus and 2 evga 1070's

Now if I go to +250 on the 1080TI, it will crash (takes about 1 hour).  I have not hit the limit on the 1060s in this rig yet, the other one hits +230 on the core.
Might just be the stable limit for it.  Have you tried to reduce your TDP (Power Limit) at all?  I'm able to push higher clocks by dropping the power limit.

[minebomb]

with reference to 12 GPU rigs:

i have noticed using DSTM on my 12 gpu rigs that GPU number 7 and 11 are on noticeably wamer than the others by 5-10degrees.

 I FIND THIS REALLY STRANGE.

Any suggestions?

Thanks in advance

[Mortis]

Will there be something done also about the non correctly working flags?

I did try setting --farm-recheck 200 - this decreases the pool hash dramatically. A little decrease in hash when I use only --cl-global-work 16384 was also observed.

[jpl]

I just switched to the dstm client and having zero issues with my 1080ti.  Actually Its OCed more and clocked higher than I have ever been before!  
Before using a different miner (EWBF) I managed around 700 H/sec with just a +100 on the core.  No benefit to clocking the memory or anything else higher.  Now I can run +200 Core / +500 Mem and even run at 90% TDP and get 752 H/sec!  If I run at 100% TDP I get around 770 H/sec at these settings.  I have yet to test it further but I'm sure I could tweak it even more.  So I'd say with this at v0.5.8 you can mine at higher speeds and better output.

Could you share a screengrab of dstm window running?.. I'm trying to compare my settings... Might be because I'm using 1070's and you are on 1080ti.
thx

1060 6GB Settings/Results https://ibb.co/eJp5HR
1080TI Settings/Results     https://ibb.co/ca0ZBm

hmm... that speed crashes mine for some reason.  I have to keep my core clock around 140 to keep it stable.  win10 with 4 asus and 2 evga 1070's

Now if I go to +250 on the 1080TI, it will crash (takes about 1 hour).  I have not hit the limit on the 1060s in this rig yet, the other one hits +230 on the core.
Might just be the stable limit for it.  Have you tried to reduce your TDP (Power Limit) at all?  I'm able to push higher clocks by dropping the power limit.

Yep, did that.  
I can usually set pwr to 90/ temp 74/ core clock 140/ and mem clock 450 to 550 max  ... but lower it to core clock 135 when away so it's stable.
Thanks again, just making sure I (lol.. edit.. )  don't f up my settings!

[jpl]

dstm starts with,.. "server sets difficulty to"/... which seems to cause problems.  Seems to base it only upon 'initial' launch,. and not AB settings.. testing...

[Canosgmk]

Hey folks.  

im trying to switch from nanopool to slushpool.

Nothing is working with slushpool.  

error im getting:
connected to zec.slushpool.com:4444 failed

I am thinking it is slushpool issue, but want to touch a feather here in case i missed something.

I have tried the following:

miner --server zec.slushpool.com --user USERNAME.workername1 --pass z --port 4444

miner --server zec.slushpool.com --user WALLET.workername1 --pass z --port 4444

miner --server us.zec.slushpool.com --user USERNAME.workername1 --pass z --port 4444

miner --server eu.zec.slushpool.com --user WALLET.workername1 --pass z --port 4444

miner --server us1.zec.slushpool.com --user USERNAME.workername1 --pass z --port 4444

miner --server eu1.zec.slushpool.com --user WALLET.workername1 --pass z --port 4444

this is the only help they offer:
https://slushpool.com/help/get-started/getting_started_zcash

[toptek]

Hey folks.  

im trying to switch from nanopool to slushpool.

Nothing is working with slushpool.  

error im getting:
connected to zec.slushpool.com:4444 failed

I am thinking it is slushpool issue, but want to touch a feather here in case i missed something.

I have tried the following:

miner --server zec.slushpool.com --user USERNAME.workername1 --pass z --port 4444

miner --server zec.slushpool.com --user WALLET.workername1 --pass z --port 4444

miner --server us.zec.slushpool.com --user USERNAME.workername1 --pass z --port 4444

miner --server eu.zec.slushpool.com --user WALLET.workername1 --pass z --port 4444

miner --server us1.zec.slushpool.com --user USERNAME.workername1 --pass z --port 4444

miner --server eu1.zec.slushpool.com --user WALLET.workername1 --pass z --port 4444

this is the only help they offer:
https://slushpool.com/help/get-started/getting_started_zcash

try might work

Code:

miner --server us-east.zec.slushpool.com --user USERNAME.workername1 --pass z --port 4444 

and set up a account with worker names it seems to work better that way .

I Mine on slushpool. with dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.5.8  an no issue ....

Getting Started - Zcash
1. Create an account with Slush Pool

    Sign-up and wait for a confirmation email.
    Login to your account.

2. Configure Your Device

The login credentials for your miner look like this:

URL: stratum+tcp://zec.slushpool.com:4444
userID: userName.workerName

    Please note that we do not support Zcash addresses directly in the command. Use your Slush Pool userName instead.
    workerName is optional, if you do not provide any it's fine. Our system will automatically create auto worker for you.


The servers can be chosen from the following list based on your geographical location:
Servers Location    Address
USA, east coast    stratum+tcp://us-east.zec.slushpool.com:4444
Europe    stratum+tcp://eu.zec.slushpool.com:4444

and set up workser first then try they should hash with dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.5.8 miner

I know it says: Our system will automatically create auto worker for you.
I make my own any way .
 

[xaba77]

Try this:
zm --server ssl://eu.zec.slushpool.com  --port 4443 --user userName.workerName --pass workerpass

#  zm 0.5.8
#  GPU0 + GeForce GTX 1070         MB: 8192  PCI: 1:0
#  telemetry server started
#  encryption enabled
#  connected to: eu.zec.slushpool.com:4443
#  server set difficulty to: 001dca01dca01dca01dca01d...


it works for me

[valera123]

thanks for the miner ! tell me the maps 1080ti, you have in the first post next to the lines, a lot of pluses ++++++++, and I have one, two or three, is that right?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Bfals-vuLqozIeg8ukZyjU7vsnG3hsi6/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZSM-qickPd1M0Lle-0yZPbc_5ysQK14d/view?usp=sharing

[gettilee]

i was dragging the scroll bar on the right side of the cmd dtsm window to see if i was getting any error messages (been experiencing invalid shares lately) then let it resume to the current hashrate and it would drop the hashrate massively, sometimes down to single digits on all cards.

i was able to reproduce this a few times, sometimes it will be half the hashrate, sometimes it will go all the way down to single digits. it does eventually start to correct itself, but very odd.

let me know if anyone else can reproduce this.


version 5.8 of zm, windows 10 64bit, 6x 1070ti's, 4gb ram

[toptek]

anyone else have issue with dstm's  Miner on a ssl port/pool .I have no issue connecting  clay more to any pool/port that supports ssl, I have yet  to get dstm's  to connect to any ssl port/pool on my NV cards.
 I end up using the normal port.

I'm using the right GPU with the right software miner before anyone goes there.

[toptek]

Try this:
zm --server ssl://eu.zec.slushpool.com  --port 4443 --user userName.workerName --pass workerpass

#  zm 0.5.8
#  GPU0 + GeForce GTX 1070         MB: 8192  PCI: 1:0
#  telemetry server started
#  encryption enabled
#  connected to: eu.zec.slushpool.com:4443
#  server set difficulty to: 001dca01dca01dca01dca01d...


it works for me

I wish i could connect to the ssl port or any ssl port with dstm's miner , an did how you posted it , Claymore does connect with my AMD cards. while dstm's miner won't with my 2 NV rigs .

[skinlayers]

I created a Dockerfile for dstm 0.5.8.
I've found that using docker simplifies the management of my Ubuntu mining rig.
No more 'screen' or writing systemd/init scripts!

Requires https://github.com/NVIDIA/nvidia-docker

https://github.com/skinlayers/docker-dstm-zcash-cuda-miner


If you find this useful, feel free to toss some coin my way.

ETH: 0x75F4363b09166FDf8702F41502E90D21A3F2Afb9
ZEN: znY2eiUwdx9Pj4EzRkktZqRWHfEfX7o9gkW
FTC: 6nDBmQE65gy7BbcUYbYPttc9EYA7eNKN3g
ZCL: t1cSvJsEBWCipA4CY9K7oi9sKRQgb3EG76T
VIVO: VVmjio2zqGgfnvmkEU9bZcxXmFpNswusig
TZC: Tn6K9mw6bKc8R447CrpeEMazFcve8vEg1a
LBC: bXp34GVRLnQgTTid9x6nMorHYjq1GzFwz7
GBX: GTeMA2kehXf2E7DqPGEGVSsb1gQWxpg5Lx
BTC: 196h6xSrcjEPMf7jRQZbNBQcAB3twDMHE6