cbuchner1
|
 |
February 16, 2014, 11:34:41 PM |
|
anyone else's YAC deposits to bter.com not showing up as well? I wonder if they've kept their wallet code up to date...
Yesterday's was delayed, and today's has been processing for about 15 hours. It shows, but won't commit... I think they might have hardforked off at around block 420000  I've contacted their support address. Hopefully this will get resolved.
|
|
|
|
Miki77
|
 |
February 17, 2014, 12:17:44 AM |
|
On cryptsy soon? Does anyone know?
|
|
|
|
|
cryptrol
|
 |
February 17, 2014, 01:28:00 PM |
|
We have gone from decentralized currencies to centralized exchange tyranny 
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1
|
 |
February 17, 2014, 02:29:54 PM Last edit: February 17, 2014, 02:39:55 PM by cbuchner1 |
|
The deposit issue at bter.com I posted about a little earlier was resolved by their support staff. FYI, I've built a 20 kHash/s miner from nVidia cards. Each of these MARS cards has two GTX 760 cores on it, each doing about 3.3 kHash/s http://imgur.com/a/5PEvA~900 Watts @ 20 kHash/s I am currently running it throttled to 16 kHash/s because of thermal issues. I will have to add some extra fans to keep the two rightmost cards from melting. I am not going to use risers. ~770 Watts @ 16 kHash/s Christian
|
|
|
|
sairon
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
One does not simply mine Bitcoins
|
 |
February 17, 2014, 05:42:24 PM |
|
We have gone from decentralized currencies to centralized exchange tyranny  Indeed. I just had to put this in my sig. 
|
GPG key ID: 5E4F108A || BTC: 1hoardyponb9AMWhyA28DZb5n5g2bRY8v
|
|
|
Thirtybird
|
 |
February 17, 2014, 05:54:11 PM |
|
The deposit issue at bter.com I posted about a little earlier was resolved by their support staff. FYI, I've built a 20 kHash/s miner from nVidia cards. Each of these MARS cards has two GTX 760 cores on it, each doing about 3.3 kHash/s http://imgur.com/a/5PEvA~900 Watts @ 20 kHash/s I am currently running it throttled to 16 kHash/s because of thermal issues. I will have to add some extra fans to keep the two rightmost cards from melting. I am not going to use risers. ~770 Watts @ 16 kHash/s Christian I'm glad yours has - mine is still processing... That's one fast YAC machine! I've got two machines that together output what you've got... Power consumption is a tad lower though 
|
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
 |
February 17, 2014, 07:41:03 PM |
|
I'm at 7kh/s on my main pc...4 r7 240 2gb's. They suck compared to yours Thirtybird :p
|
|
|
|
Joe_Bauers
|
 |
February 17, 2014, 07:50:29 PM Last edit: February 18, 2014, 03:01:55 AM by Joe_Bauers |
|
|
|
|
|
Thirtybird
|
 |
February 17, 2014, 07:53:56 PM |
|
I'm at 7kh/s on my main pc...4 r7 240 2gb's. They suck compared to yours Thirtybird :p
Ya, and I don't know why... What you were showing to me looked like not enough memory was being allocated, but your TC and LG were the same. I've got the 4 GB sapphire, but everything I was giving you was based on using only 1.6 GB of memory (single thread), and matched what Beave was doing on his 2GB cards with the same results - 2.5KH/sec.
|
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
 |
February 17, 2014, 08:33:04 PM |
|
I'm at 7kh/s on my main pc...4 r7 240 2gb's. They suck compared to yours Thirtybird :p
Ya, and I don't know why... What you were showing to me looked like not enough memory was being allocated, but your TC and LG were the same. I've got the 4 GB sapphire, but everything I was giving you was based on using only 1.6 GB of memory (single thread), and matched what Beave was doing on his 2GB cards with the same results - 2.5KH/sec. I'm using windows 8 64bit...I'll try linux just for the heck of it. I found 13.11 beta was slightly better but still bad, 1.75kh/s kinda sucks. Maybe the cards are faulty? :/ I'm at a loss...
|
|
|
|
Beave162
|
 |
February 17, 2014, 08:45:01 PM |
|
I'm at 7kh/s on my main pc...4 r7 240 2gb's. They suck compared to yours Thirtybird :p
Ya, and I don't know why... What you were showing to me looked like not enough memory was being allocated, but your TC and LG were the same. I've got the 4 GB sapphire, but everything I was giving you was based on using only 1.6 GB of memory (single thread), and matched what Beave was doing on his 2GB cards with the same results - 2.5KH/sec. I'm using windows 8 64bit...I'll try linux just for the heck of it. I found 13.11 beta was slightly better but still bad, 1.75kh/s kinda sucks. Maybe the cards are faulty? :/ I'm at a loss... What is the make of your 2GB cards? If it is Sapphire, then we know the problem.
|
YaCoin: YL5kf54wPPXKsXd5T18xCaNkyUsS1DgY7z BitCoin: 14PFbLyUdTyxZg3V8hnvj5VXkx3dhthmDj
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
 |
February 17, 2014, 08:59:29 PM |
|
I'm at 7kh/s on my main pc...4 r7 240 2gb's. They suck compared to yours Thirtybird :p
Ya, and I don't know why... What you were showing to me looked like not enough memory was being allocated, but your TC and LG were the same. I've got the 4 GB sapphire, but everything I was giving you was based on using only 1.6 GB of memory (single thread), and matched what Beave was doing on his 2GB cards with the same results - 2.5KH/sec. I'm using windows 8 64bit...I'll try linux just for the heck of it. I found 13.11 beta was slightly better but still bad, 1.75kh/s kinda sucks. Maybe the cards are faulty? :/ I'm at a loss... What is the make of your 2GB cards? If it is Sapphire, then we know the problem. Exactly...Sapphire 2gb R7 240. Suggestions?
|
|
|
|
Beave162
|
 |
February 17, 2014, 11:34:00 PM |
|
I'm at 7kh/s on my main pc...4 r7 240 2gb's. They suck compared to yours Thirtybird :p
Ya, and I don't know why... What you were showing to me looked like not enough memory was being allocated, but your TC and LG were the same. I've got the 4 GB sapphire, but everything I was giving you was based on using only 1.6 GB of memory (single thread), and matched what Beave was doing on his 2GB cards with the same results - 2.5KH/sec. I'm using windows 8 64bit...I'll try linux just for the heck of it. I found 13.11 beta was slightly better but still bad, 1.75kh/s kinda sucks. Maybe the cards are faulty? :/ I'm at a loss... What is the make of your 2GB cards? If it is Sapphire, then we know the problem. Exactly...Sapphire 2gb R7 240. Suggestions? Ugh Sapphire is terrible... you were going for the bargain deal. Try single thread with lookup gap of 3 and raw intensity of 1272. I am getting over 2 khash/s with XFX under those settings (2GB). Of course, it is an xfx card. I wouldn't be surprised if you don't get anywhere close to that with Sapphire 
|
YaCoin: YL5kf54wPPXKsXd5T18xCaNkyUsS1DgY7z BitCoin: 14PFbLyUdTyxZg3V8hnvj5VXkx3dhthmDj
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
 |
February 18, 2014, 12:51:29 AM Last edit: February 18, 2014, 01:11:05 AM by ivanlabrie |
|
I'm at 7kh/s on my main pc...4 r7 240 2gb's. They suck compared to yours Thirtybird :p
Ya, and I don't know why... What you were showing to me looked like not enough memory was being allocated, but your TC and LG were the same. I've got the 4 GB sapphire, but everything I was giving you was based on using only 1.6 GB of memory (single thread), and matched what Beave was doing on his 2GB cards with the same results - 2.5KH/sec. I'm using windows 8 64bit...I'll try linux just for the heck of it. I found 13.11 beta was slightly better but still bad, 1.75kh/s kinda sucks. Maybe the cards are faulty? :/ I'm at a loss... What is the make of your 2GB cards? If it is Sapphire, then we know the problem. Exactly...Sapphire 2gb R7 240. Suggestions? Ugh Sapphire is terrible... you were going for the bargain deal. Try single thread with lookup gap of 3 and raw intensity of 1272. I am getting over 2 khash/s with XFX under those settings (2GB). Of course, it is an xfx card. I wouldn't be surprised if you don't get anywhere close to that with Sapphire  I'll give it a shot...the XFX cooler looks way better. Max clocks on that one? Also, do you know if they make a 4gb variant? Thanks  EDIT: Beave you're the man... 2.12kh/s, much better now :p
|
|
|
|
Beave162
|
 |
February 18, 2014, 02:10:13 AM |
|
I'll give it a shot...the XFX cooler looks way better. Max clocks on that one? Also, do you know if they make a 4gb variant? Thanks  EDIT: Beave you're the man... 2.12kh/s, much better now :p Surprising! You are welcome. I'm getting 2.35kh/s on the XFX now but only 2.04 for the U--share rate. I have 1100 on the gpu clock and 1050 on the memory clock. As far as I know, Sapphire is the only one who makes the 4GB as far as I know.
|
YaCoin: YL5kf54wPPXKsXd5T18xCaNkyUsS1DgY7z BitCoin: 14PFbLyUdTyxZg3V8hnvj5VXkx3dhthmDj
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
 |
February 18, 2014, 02:30:03 AM |
|
I'll give it a shot...the XFX cooler looks way better. Max clocks on that one? Also, do you know if they make a 4gb variant? Thanks  EDIT: Beave you're the man... 2.12kh/s, much better now :p Surprising! You are welcome. I'm getting 2.35kh/s on the XFX now but only 2.04 for the U--share rate. I have 1100 on the gpu clock and 1050 on the memory clock. As far as I know, Sapphire is the only one who makes the 4GB as far as I know. Ah, interesting...well, these are dirt cheap, not half bad. The xfx one seems like it can clock higher with the better cooler. I'll test the GT 640 4GB with cudaminer soon as well...and then the new GTX 750 and 750ti cards. Looking forward to that. Tip incoming!
|
|
|
|
Beave162
|
 |
February 18, 2014, 02:43:02 AM |
|
I'll give it a shot...the XFX cooler looks way better. Max clocks on that one? Also, do you know if they make a 4gb variant? Thanks  EDIT: Beave you're the man... 2.12kh/s, much better now :p Surprising! You are welcome. I'm getting 2.35kh/s on the XFX now but only 2.04 for the U--share rate. I have 1100 on the gpu clock and 1050 on the memory clock. As far as I know, Sapphire is the only one who makes the 4GB as far as I know. Ah, interesting...well, these are dirt cheap, not half bad. The xfx one seems like it can clock higher with the better cooler. I'll test the GT 640 4GB with cudaminer soon as well...and then the new GTX 750 and 750ti cards. Looking forward to that. Tip incoming! Thank you. It will be interesting to see how well those cards do. Seems to be a lot of options out there. And it is still profitable with the CPU! Back on Cryptsy--finally!
|
YaCoin: YL5kf54wPPXKsXd5T18xCaNkyUsS1DgY7z BitCoin: 14PFbLyUdTyxZg3V8hnvj5VXkx3dhthmDj
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
 |
February 18, 2014, 02:59:28 AM |
|
I'll give it a shot...the XFX cooler looks way better. Max clocks on that one? Also, do you know if they make a 4gb variant? Thanks  EDIT: Beave you're the man... 2.12kh/s, much better now :p Surprising! You are welcome. I'm getting 2.35kh/s on the XFX now but only 2.04 for the U--share rate. I have 1100 on the gpu clock and 1050 on the memory clock. As far as I know, Sapphire is the only one who makes the 4GB as far as I know. Ah, interesting...well, these are dirt cheap, not half bad. The xfx one seems like it can clock higher with the better cooler. I'll test the GT 640 4GB with cudaminer soon as well...and then the new GTX 750 and 750ti cards. Looking forward to that. Tip incoming! Thank you. It will be interesting to see how well those cards do. Seems to be a lot of options out there. And it is still profitable with the CPU! Back on Cryptsy--finally! Ah, good news!  I mine on my i7 too...0.87kh/s
|
|
|
|
alenevaa
|
 |
February 18, 2014, 06:07:22 AM |
|
VERSION 0.4.2I've noticed if wallet unlocked for PoS with walletpassphrase <passphrase> <timeout> true there's no need to confirmation for "Send coins" transaction. Is it bug or feature!?  ps: 0.4.0 asks passphrase in that case
|
|
|
|
|