Bitcoin Forum
December 09, 2016, 01:44:41 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 [85] 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 ... 376 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1050 TH] BitMinter.com [1% PPLNS,Pays TxFees +MergedMining,Stratum,GBT,vardiff]  (Read 775928 times)
loshia
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372


View Profile
September 14, 2012, 01:11:37 PM
 #1681

Thanks Doc!
Good job. I like the way you keep us updated

Best

Please help the Led Boy aka Bicknellski to make us a nice Christmas led tree and pay WASP membership fee here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=643999.msg7191563#msg7191563
And remember Bicknellski is not collecting money from community;D
1481291081
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481291081

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481291081
Reply with quote  #2

1481291081
Report to moderator
1481291081
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481291081

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481291081
Reply with quote  #2

1481291081
Report to moderator
1481291081
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481291081

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481291081
Reply with quote  #2

1481291081
Report to moderator
The Bitcoin software, network, and concept is called "Bitcoin" with a capitalized "B". Bitcoin currency units are called "bitcoins" with a lowercase "b" -- this is often abbreviated BTC.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
narousberg
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
September 15, 2012, 04:38:49 PM
 #1682

what is wrong with the statistics?

DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
September 15, 2012, 05:34:04 PM
 #1683

what is wrong with the statistics?

I restarted the backend and they started over blank. Only lasts a couple minutes after a restart.

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
squid
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112


View Profile
September 15, 2012, 05:43:56 PM
 #1684

what is wrong with the statistics?

I restarted the backend and they started over blank. Only lasts a couple minutes after a restart.


DrHaribo you are such a boss. I don't think I could ever mine on any other server. Cheesy
Shermo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 268



View Profile
September 16, 2012, 09:42:43 AM
 #1685

Seems the server is down again... not having much luck lately! At least this has taught me to sort out a backup pool!

Hopefully it will be back up soon Smiley
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
September 16, 2012, 09:58:16 AM
 #1686

Pool is running as normal again.

I put the new version into production and it didn't run very well so I switched back. Have located an issue that I'm looking at now. Unfortunately it's very difficult to test parallel execution of code. Perhaps in the future I can set up a test server and get enough miners testing there to lure out race conditions and other nasty bugs that are difficult to test for.

Sorry for the momentary server hickup. Back to our usual mining.

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
Shermo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 268



View Profile
September 16, 2012, 11:30:45 AM
 #1687

Could you set it up on an alternate subdomain perhaps? Such as test.bitminter.com ?
biddicoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 239



View Profile
September 16, 2012, 01:00:03 PM
 #1688

If its no joke, there is a Asic Miner in your pools list ;-)

 Cry  my graphic cards  Cry
Fefox
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 161



View Profile
September 16, 2012, 02:28:45 PM
 #1689

(5s):53075.6 (avg):52148.8 Mh/s | Q:192  A:15005  R:0  HW:0  E:7815%  U:715.7/m
 TQ: 0  ST: 37  SS: 0  DW: 71  NB: 1  LW: 22125  GF: 5  RF: 0  WU: 718.8



WooHoo  Grin RollNTime working!
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
September 16, 2012, 02:34:02 PM
 #1690

Thanks, squid, I always wanted to be a "boss". Grin

Shermo, yes, something like that. Smiley

New server software is now running, with rollntime support for all miners as long as you have a bit of hashrate and stay above very low efficiency.

Kano explained earlier how you see this in cgminer: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=27062.msg1175441#msg1175441

Also you should see reduced network traffic from mining.

This new version splits requests into two types. Miners with OK efficiency are served by 7 CPU cores as quickly as possible. Miners with very low efficiency are served by a single CPU core. This would be CPU miners, buggy miner programs and DoS attackers. Normally the slow queue will be fast enough, but if there are too many requests there then they will slow each other down. Unless it is very extreme it should not affect the rest of the pool.

The new version is running smoothly. GPUmax runs and other big miners are at high efficiency.

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
Shermo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 268



View Profile
September 16, 2012, 06:25:01 PM
 #1691

The efficiency on my system has gone from about 88% to 98%... I only have a ATI 6870 though, no FPGA here Sad

[EDIT]
Now up to 172% efficiency Smiley
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
September 16, 2012, 07:22:03 PM
 #1692

BitMinter client v1.3.0 just released: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=31163.msg1196221#msg1196221

Also, some users are having more rejects after rollntime was switched on. If you are having problems, please let me know which miner you are running and how many rejects you get (over some time, like a long block). Then we can look into improving it.

Rejects on the namecoin side are ridiculously high now. I suspect this is because of a combination of rollntime plus some miners ignoring long polls with namecoin block changes. They will continue using rollable work that is stale on the namecoin side perhaps several minutes after a namecoin block change, which will result in many many rejects.

When using GPUmax this is exactly what happens with the namecoin rejects, as GPUmax only observes bitcoin block changes.

Not sure it's worth bothering with much, though, as namecoins are not worth much anymore.

Edit: Some rejects were caused some hours ago by restarting the mining backend to get the new version up and running. That's normal and nothing to worry about. Bad thing is if you are still getting a high reject percentage.

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
September 16, 2012, 11:20:43 PM
 #1693

Every once in a while something weird happens with the new server version causing some requests to get processed very slowly. This was causing rejects above 1% for many users.

I have reverted back to the old server version to ensure trouble-free mining. I will work on fixing this and rollntime will be back soon.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
hahahafr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 241



View Profile
September 17, 2012, 12:26:33 AM
 #1694

Awesome support DrHaribo Cool

SgtMoth
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 892


buy silver!


View Profile
September 17, 2012, 08:23:04 AM
 #1695

ill be shutting my gpu's down sometime this week, after i get one more Jalapeno ordered.  it will be nice to get a small power bill again  Grin  i think ill leave one rig running and set the donation to 100% though or the good Dr could set up another worker and ill let it mine for him  Wink
WhitePhantom
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 349



View Profile
September 17, 2012, 05:45:37 PM
 #1696

  • Staggered start of devices when multiple devices are started with the button on the status line or the "total" display's start button. Should give a smoother start up of (multiple) BFL minirigs.
(quoted from other thread)
Doc, this change is awesome.  Starting up BitMinter for my two mini-rigs is a single click now instead of spending 3-4 minutes manually re-adding FPGAs as they drop offline over and over during the startup.  Thanks!
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
September 17, 2012, 06:45:25 PM
 #1697

ill be shutting my gpu's down sometime this week, after i get one more Jalapeno ordered.  it will be nice to get a small power bill again  Grin  i think ill leave one rig running and set the donation to 100% though or the good Dr could set up another worker and ill let it mine for him  Wink

Thanks - much appreciated Smiley

You can just set 100% donation and leave the last one mining. Remember to change the setting when the Jalapenos arrive.  Cheesy Alternatively the test account used by the test edition of the BitMinter client (http://bitminter.com/test) will donate everything to the pool. Username Test, workername Test, password Test (note the capital letter everywhere).

Doc, this change is awesome.  Starting up BitMinter for my two mini-rigs is a single click now instead of spending 3-4 minutes manually re-adding FPGAs as they drop offline over and over during the startup.  Thanks!

Happy to hear this works better for you. Fefox requested this feature because of the issue you describe. Not sure why it would be so messy starting all devices at the same time. But as long as this works better...

Also note that automatic rescanning for FPGAs is back in the options. This in combination with automatically starting devices when they connect (also in options) will help keep things running smoothly even if a device should drop off and come back.

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
lenny_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 953



View Profile
September 17, 2012, 10:46:29 PM
 #1698

DrHaribo, what's your plans about implementing Stratum protocol?
hahahafr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 241



View Profile
September 18, 2012, 12:04:57 AM
 #1699

Quick question: I just changed the name/pass of my workers (deleted and created new), how much time does the server need to actually recognize my new miners?
CGMiner 2.7.5 is saying:
Quote
Pool 0 slow/down or URL or credentials invalid
Unable to get work from pool 0 http://mint.bitminter.com:80
My start cmd is the exact same as before.

tcping is not helping much:
Quote
Probing 176.9.104.178:80/tcp - Port is open - time=13.651ms
Probing 176.9.104.178:80/tcp - Port is open - time=9.556ms
Probing 176.9.104.178:80/tcp - Port is open - time=9.392ms
Probing 176.9.104.178:80/tcp - Port is open - time=9.465ms
Am I alone to have this problem?

Edit: There's definitely a problem. I just tried with -u Test -p Test, either with CGMiner 2.6.6 or 2.7.5 on port 80, it still doesn't work.
Edit2: With the Java BitMinter client there's no problem, but I lose 100 MH/s by mining with it ;(

Until I deleted and created the new workers this worked fine:
Code:
cgminer -o mint.bitminter.com:80 -u hahahafr_gpu0 -p x -o mmrpc.bitparking.com:80 -u hahahafr -p x -I 9 -d 0 --gpu-vddc 1.163 --gpu-engine 890,900 --gpu-memclock 300
cgminer -o mint.bitminter.com:80 -u hahahafr_gpu1 -p x -o mmrpc.bitparking.com:80 -u hahahafr -p x -I 9 -d 1 --gpu-vddc 1.163 --gpu-engine 890,900 --gpu-memclock 300
I don't get it.

Edit3: The port 8332 doesn't work either through Tor (Deepbit works).
Edit4: BFGMiner doesn't work either.

Fixed: <username>_<workername> is the login not just <workername> Cheesy

DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
September 18, 2012, 05:49:30 AM
 #1700

DrHaribo, what's your plans about implementing Stratum protocol?

I was going to implement getblocktemplate. I don't see the point in also having Stratum. But if some miners support one and some the other, maybe I will need to support both on the server. Same with the client (after adding support for backup pools) if some pools use getblocktemplate while others use stratum.

It's always fun to have two standards for the same thing. Cheesy

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
Pages: « 1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 [85] 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 ... 376 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!