Bitcoin Forum
December 05, 2016, 06:47:03 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 [100] 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 ... 376 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1050 TH] BitMinter.com [1% PPLNS,Pays TxFees +MergedMining,Stratum,GBT,vardiff]  (Read 775314 times)
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
October 26, 2012, 10:38:50 PM
 #1981

prices freefalling but difficulty still skyrocketing.

There is no direct correlation on price vs difficulty.

Meh, I tend to disagree. But, to each his own.

There most certainly is correlation in that price effects difficulty. Difficulty however, does not effect price.

http://bitcoinx.com/charts/chart_large_lin.png

An actual quantitative correlation? I ask only because I'd like to know how you calculated it.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
1480963623
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480963623

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480963623
Reply with quote  #2

1480963623
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1480963623
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480963623

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480963623
Reply with quote  #2

1480963623
Report to moderator
1480963623
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480963623

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480963623
Reply with quote  #2

1480963623
Report to moderator
jamesg
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330


AKA: gigavps


View Profile
October 26, 2012, 10:53:36 PM
 #1982

An actual quantitative correlation? I ask only because I'd like to know how you calculated it.

Maybe my language was a little too strong. From my personal observation over the last 14 months of mining, I've seen correlation in that the price of bitcoin effects what happens with the difficulty. There is also significant lag between price movement and the difficulty following.

I suspect that if the price falls any further, mining will become unprofitable for some and difficulty will decrease. This may be offset a bit with miners starting to realize that we are in the final month of 50 btc blocks.
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
October 26, 2012, 11:01:08 PM
 #1983

An actual quantitative correlation? I ask only because I'd like to know how you calculated it.

Maybe my language was a little too strong. From my personal observation over the last 14 months of mining, I've seen correlation in that the price of bitcoin effects what happens with the difficulty. There is also significant lag between price movement and the difficulty following.

I suspect that if the price falls any further, mining will become unprofitable for some and difficulty will decrease. This may be offset a bit with miners starting to realize that we are in the final month of 50 btc blocks.

I don't disagree with you and what you write makes sense, but there must be some kind of simple correlation analysis that can be done. If you (or anyone else) can save me a bit of google-time to tell me what it is I'd be grateful.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
October 27, 2012, 05:40:04 PM
 #1984

Another mint race coming up next weekend with some nice trinkets from Isokivi for prizes.

Check it out: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=120864.0

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
WhitePhantom
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 349



View Profile
October 27, 2012, 05:46:06 PM
 #1985

Awesome, looking forward to it!  I never wear any of those items except for cufflinks at the occasional wedding, but I'd probably find an excuse to wear BTC gear like this.
Digigami
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 460


View Profile
October 27, 2012, 06:56:20 PM
 #1986

Whohoo Mint Race!
PsychoticBoy
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442


Parental Advisory Explicit Content


View Profile
October 27, 2012, 09:22:16 PM
 #1987

21 blocks allready today, It`s a new record!  Grin
We still have time for more  Cheesy

Greetz



abeaulieu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 295



View Profile
October 27, 2012, 10:29:55 PM
 #1988

An actual quantitative correlation? I ask only because I'd like to know how you calculated it.

Maybe my language was a little too strong. From my personal observation over the last 14 months of mining, I've seen correlation in that the price of bitcoin effects what happens with the difficulty. There is also significant lag between price movement and the difficulty following.

I suspect that if the price falls any further, mining will become unprofitable for some and difficulty will decrease. This may be offset a bit with miners starting to realize that we are in the final month of 50 btc blocks.

I don't disagree with you and what you write makes sense, but there must be some kind of simple correlation analysis that can be done. If you (or anyone else) can save me a bit of google-time to tell me what it is I'd be grateful.

Google search yielded this historical data (you may have access to some better data but this okay for me)
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmcTCtjBoRWUdHVRMHpqWUJValI1RlZiaEtCT1RrQmc#gid=0

I am most interested in data after the bubble so I grabbed the dates from 9/13/11 to 10/16/12. I dumped that data into a spreadsheet and created a scatter plot of difficulty vs price. Here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Al7wzGJVtBaQdFpObzVuZWI4OU1PMkdDY3ptYkZNZFE#gid=0

You can already see the positive-linear relationship in the graph. For some reason Google spreadsheet does not allow you to add a trendline so I threw it into excel and got a linear equation of:

y = 5E-06x - 2.1471
And an r-squared coefficient of
R² = 0.8541

Which means there is a pretty substantial, positive correlation between the difficulty and the market value of a bitcoin.
jamesg
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330


AKA: gigavps


View Profile
October 27, 2012, 10:34:39 PM
 #1989

Which means there is a pretty substantial, positive correlation between the difficulty and the market value of a bitcoin.

Thanks abeaulieu. That was almost completely above my pay grade.

* gigavps watches the plane fly over his head...  Wink
biddicoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 239



View Profile
October 28, 2012, 07:58:35 AM
 #1990

24 Blocks yesterday  Grin 

nice nice
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2012, 02:30:00 PM
 #1991

Google search yielded this historical data (you may have access to some better data but this okay for me)
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmcTCtjBoRWUdHVRMHpqWUJValI1RlZiaEtCT1RrQmc#gid=0

I am most interested in data after the bubble so I grabbed the dates from 9/13/11 to 10/16/12. I dumped that data into a spreadsheet and created a scatter plot of difficulty vs price. Here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Al7wzGJVtBaQdFpObzVuZWI4OU1PMkdDY3ptYkZNZFE#gid=0

You can already see the positive-linear relationship in the graph. For some reason Google spreadsheet does not allow you to add a trendline so I threw it into excel and got a linear equation of:

y = 5E-06x - 2.1471
And an r-squared coefficient of
R² = 0.8541

Which means there is a pretty substantial, positive correlation between the difficulty and the market value of a bitcoin.

Thanks for the good work, abeaulieu. It does look like a good correlation, there. It inspired me to look a little further back and I got the following plots, the first linear and the second log-log. They are quite interesting, yes? I won't go further off-topic here discussing covariance and correlation coefficients, perhaps we should start a thread in the mining speculation board? (it's late for me and I don't have time to write an introductory piece).

Suffice it to say that the correlation seems to be less strong if you include the pre-bubble data, so I'd be cautious relying on such a correlation for future planning. My guess is that there might be a more stable correlation between log(diff(BTCUSD)) and log(diff(Difficulty)), with a time lag.




Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2012, 04:45:32 PM
 #1992

Testing is up on port 9000 again. This time testing dynamic difficulty (aka var diff or variable difficulty).

Please help testing: mint.bitminter.com port 9000

Difficulty is from 1 to 128 (powers of 2). The default is diff 2 unless your miner sends X-Mining-Hashrate in which case the default is based off of that. After this the diff updates every minute based on your hashrate.

The target is set to 15 proofs of work per minute. That's one result sent in every 4 seconds. The server will adjust the difficulty of your work to get you as close to the target rate as possible. You will need a couple GH/s to get over diff 1. No luck for me with 1.3 GH/s Cheesy

When mining at diff X you get credited X accepted work for each valid result sent in. So mining at diff 4 means your "accepted" numbers will go up by 4 for each valid result.

Like last time the livestats won't show your hashrate on the test port. But you can look at the "workers" page on the website, mine for a bit, then refresh and see that the accepted work goes up. Note that those stats are a few seconds delayed. The livestats will work better once proper multi-server support is finished on the server side.

You can't use BitMinter client for this yet, sorry, multi-server support is still on its TODO list.

Let me know how it runs. Smiley

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
ralree
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518


Manateeeeeeees


View Profile
October 28, 2012, 04:56:54 PM
 #1993

We'll see if 4GH is enough to get more diff.

1MANaTeEZoH4YkgMYz61E5y4s9BYhAuUjG
jamesg
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330


AKA: gigavps


View Profile
October 28, 2012, 05:28:11 PM
 #1994

Testing is up on port 9000 again. This time testing dynamic difficulty (aka var diff or variable difficulty).

Please help testing: mint.bitminter.com port 9000

Yay. Hopefully I can help test this in a couple days.

Difficulty is from 1 to 128 (powers of 2). The default is diff 2 unless your miner sends X-Mining-Hashrate in which case the default is based off of that. After this the diff updates every minute based on your hashrate.

Can you please explain how you decide what diff to server with X-Mining-Hashrate?

The target is set to 15 proofs of work per minute. That's one result sent in every 4 seconds. The server will adjust the difficulty of your work to get you as close to the target rate as possible. You will need a couple GH/s to get over diff 1. No luck for me with 1.3 GH/s Cheesy

Is this per worker or per user?
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2012, 06:41:15 PM
 #1995

Difficulty is from 1 to 128 (powers of 2). The default is diff 2 unless your miner sends X-Mining-Hashrate in which case the default is based off of that. After this the diff updates every minute based on your hashrate.

Can you please explain how you decide what diff to server with X-Mining-Hashrate?

Normally your measured hashrate is used. X-Mining-Hashrate, if available, is only used in the beginning when the server has not yet measured your hashrate.

The target is set to 15 proofs of work per minute. That's one result sent in every 4 seconds. The server will adjust the difficulty of your work to get you as close to the target rate as possible. You will need a couple GH/s to get over diff 1. No luck for me with 1.3 GH/s Cheesy

Is this per worker or per user?

This is per worker.

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
jamesg
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330


AKA: gigavps


View Profile
October 28, 2012, 06:51:06 PM
 #1996

Normally your measured hashrate is used. X-Mining-Hashrate, if available, is only used in the beginning when the server has not yet measured your hashrate.

Is there any way to keep using X-Mining-Hashrate after the initial go? This would allow larger miners to have 1 worker but not suffer from higher share variance for the entire farm.
Isokivi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


Items flashing here available at btctrinkets.com


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2012, 06:59:40 PM
 #1997

Normally your measured hashrate is used. X-Mining-Hashrate, if available, is only used in the beginning when the server has not yet measured your hashrate.

Is there any way to keep using X-Mining-Hashrate after the initial go? This would allow larger miners to have 1 worker but not suffer from higher share variance for the entire farm.
Is there something preventing you from connecting multiple rigs to the same worker ?

Bitcoin trinkets now on my online store: btc trinkets.com <- Bitcoin Tiepins, cufflinks, lapel pins, keychains, card holders and challenge coins.
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2012, 07:28:53 PM
 #1998

Is there any way to keep using X-Mining-Hashrate after the initial go? This would allow larger miners to have 1 worker but not suffer from higher share variance for the entire farm.

The problem with X-Mining-Hashrate is that you can make your computer(s) send whatever value you wish.

There's a conflict of interest here. Lower difficulty means less daily variance for the miner, which most miners prefer. But lower difficulty also means higher load on the server. If all miners could choose their own difficulty then most would choose diff 1 and the pool would need many more servers, which would be rather expensive. We are doing fine on 1 server right now with difficulty 1 for everyone. But that will no longer work once ASICs are out.

I think the HHTT pool is on to something. At that pool the lower difficulty you choose the more you must pay to the pool. That said, they do look a bit expensive and it makes no sense for small miners (choose between huge fees or huge variance).

I am considering adding a perk that gives you half the difficulty you would otherwise have. It could be a very cheap one. I also thought about a perk that would allow you to choose the difficulty freely, but then a single big miner could perhaps take down a server by choosing diff 1.

Organofcorti has some nice numbers on work difficulty and the accompanying variance: http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/2012/10/71-variable-pool-difficulty.html

I guess it comes down to; how much load can the server handle and how much variance is acceptable for the miners? Any opinions on the variance part?

And yes, you can reduce difficulty by using multiple worker accounts. And if I make change it to be per user account rather than worker account, then you can just create many user accounts. I would prefer to avoid this. So I would want the "normal usage" to give a variance that is good enough. I would also prefer for small miners to be able to mine without choosing between huge fees or huge variance.

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
Krak
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 591



View Profile WWW
October 28, 2012, 07:36:00 PM
 #1999

I am considering adding a perk that gives you half the difficulty you would otherwise have. It could be a very cheap one. I also thought about a perk that would allow you to choose the difficulty freely, but then a single big miner could perhaps take down a server by choosing diff 1.
I like this idea. Just get Stratum enabled and the big miners won't be a problem. Smiley

BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2012, 08:18:14 PM
 #2000

Just get Stratum enabled and the big miners won't be a problem. Smiley

Stratum and GBT will be better at getting work than getwork with rollntime. Rollntime was already a big improvement, Stratum and GBT will improve this a little further. But that is all.

The server already spends most of its time verifying proofs of work from miners. Unfortunately Stratum and GBT will have zero impact on this.

So we will need variable difficulty whether it is over getwork, getblocktemplate (GBT) or Stratum.

For big ASIC miners you need two things:
  • More efficient work generation: rollntime (OK), GBT or Stratum (better)
  • More effiicient proofs of work: higher difficulty

Next up after var diff now is GBT and Stratum. I'll probably add GBT first. I know a lot of you are using cgminer which only supports Stratum. But GBT is so much easier to add when you already have a well-tuned engine for getwork with JSON-RPC over HTTP. It makes sense to grab the low hanging fruit first.

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
Pages: « 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 [100] 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 ... 376 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!