Bitcoin Forum
December 07, 2016, 06:39:19 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 [95] 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 ... 376 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1050 TH] BitMinter.com [1% PPLNS,Pays TxFees +MergedMining,Stratum,GBT,vardiff]  (Read 775662 times)
Shermo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 268



View Profile
October 12, 2012, 10:29:52 AM
 #1881

Seems the site and pool server went down briefly and now seems really sluggish...
1481135959
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481135959

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481135959
Reply with quote  #2

1481135959
Report to moderator
1481135959
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481135959

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481135959
Reply with quote  #2

1481135959
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481135959
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481135959

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481135959
Reply with quote  #2

1481135959
Report to moderator
1481135959
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481135959

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481135959
Reply with quote  #2

1481135959
Report to moderator
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
October 12, 2012, 11:03:12 AM
 #1882

A bit of russian DDoS attack on the web server currently taking place. Sorry for the instability. Mining looks fine so far, though.

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
Shermo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 268



View Profile
October 12, 2012, 11:10:21 AM
 #1883

Looking at the stats my home machines using cgminer seem to be fine. I only noticed because my work PC went quiet all of a sudden, it is using the BitMinter Java client with the port 80 switch... so I guess that doesn't use long polling as it keeps running out of work?

[EDIT]
Work PC seems to be OK now actually, it was working and then dropping but it seems to be going steady again now Smiley
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
October 12, 2012, 11:40:04 AM
 #1884

Looking at the stats my home machines using cgminer seem to be fine. I only noticed because my work PC went quiet all of a sudden, it is using the BitMinter Java client with the port 80 switch... so I guess that doesn't use long polling as it keeps running out of work?

Sure it uses long polling, or it would cause a lot of rejects. But it goes through the web server. Not recommended unless you really need to use port 80 because that's all your firewall allows.

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
October 13, 2012, 02:24:52 PM
 #1885

Small server update today:
  • Increase shift size (PPLNS with N=4x difficulty). This should reduce variance for part-time mining and if you have some downtime on your rigs.
  • Implemented getwork "midstate" extension. Most miners support this now. It reduces bandwidth a little and also CPU usage on the server.
  • Small speedup for long poll
  • Small speedup in checking proofs of work

Only shaved a few percent off the server CPU usage this time, but every bit helps. Smiley

EDIT: most browsers  Cheesy of course I meant most miners support this now. Also, if your livestats don't show shift progression correctly (100% when only half done), try clearing your browser cache and reloading the page.

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
Digigami
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 460


View Profile
October 13, 2012, 10:29:31 PM
 #1886

sweet Smiley
QuantumFoam
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 130


View Profile
October 14, 2012, 03:19:12 AM
 #1887

Noticed my hash rate has increased by about 5Mh/s per gpu ever since the recent server changes. Smiley
Shermo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 268



View Profile
October 14, 2012, 09:45:22 AM
 #1888

The pool seems to be running really sweetly with all the recent changes, my efficiency is over 500% now on my single GPU system, and my rejects are very very low compared to before Smiley Great work DrHaribo!
loshia
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372


View Profile
October 14, 2012, 03:05:12 PM
 #1889

The pool seems to be running really sweetly with all the recent changes, my efficiency is over 500% now on my single GPU system, and my rejects are very very low compared to before Smiley Great work DrHaribo!
+1
You are the man DOC:)

Please help the Led Boy aka Bicknellski to make us a nice Christmas led tree and pay WASP membership fee here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=643999.msg7191563#msg7191563
And remember Bicknellski is not collecting money from community;D
Mobius
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 957



View Profile
October 14, 2012, 03:14:43 PM
 #1890

When will you implement var diff for miners?
ralree
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518


Manateeeeeeees


View Profile
October 14, 2012, 05:38:49 PM
 #1891

  • 170,100 shares accepted since last cgminer restart
  • 139 rejects

That's 0.08%!  Cheers!

1MANaTeEZoH4YkgMYz61E5y4s9BYhAuUjG
QuantumFoam
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 130


View Profile
October 14, 2012, 07:33:34 PM
 #1892

(5s):2480.2 (avg):2486.0 Mh/s | Q:7925  A:88271  R:112  HW:0  E:1114%  U:34.7/m

Pretty sweet
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
October 14, 2012, 07:59:36 PM
 #1893

Great to hear the new server changes are working out Smiley

Yes, variable difficulty will be coming soon. I'm currently working on some changes to support multiple mining servers. I thought that might be a good idea to do first as it will make it easier to test var diff.

It could also be useful to have a couple more servers when ASICs turn up. Wink

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
jamesg
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330


AKA: gigavps


View Profile
October 14, 2012, 08:18:50 PM
 #1894

Great to hear the new server changes are working out Smiley

Yes, variable difficulty will be coming soon. I'm currently working on some changes to support multiple mining servers. I thought that might be a good idea to do first as it will make it easier to test var diff.

It could also be useful to have a couple more servers when ASICs turn up. Wink

Are you sure you would even need extra servers with variable diff? You already have rollNTime support so the most requests coming to the pool server are share submissions. With a variable diff solution that uses X-Mining-Hashrate you could greatly reduce the pools current load. You could also fall back to the server calculating the var diff to keep share submission below a maximum threshold of say 24 shares per minute.

I guess my main point is that IMHO it is a higher priority to have variable difficulty working with either GBT or stratum than to have multiple pool servers. You might never need an extra pool server with these other pieces in place.
Krak
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 591



View Profile WWW
October 14, 2012, 11:35:06 PM
 #1895

Are you sure you would even need extra servers with variable diff? You already have rollNTime support so the most requests coming to the pool server are share submissions. With a variable diff solution that uses X-Mining-Hashrate you could greatly reduce the pools current load. You could also fall back to the server calculating the var diff to keep share submission below a maximum threshold of say 24 shares per minute.

I guess my main point is that IMHO it is a higher priority to have variable difficulty working with either GBT or stratum than to have multiple pool servers. You might never need an extra pool server with these other pieces in place.
Yeah, but a US server would be nice. I can easily hit < 0.01% rejects on MaxBTC just because my ping to their server is ~30ms.

BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
October 15, 2012, 12:57:59 AM
 #1896

Are you sure you would even need extra servers with variable diff? You already have rollNTime support so the most requests coming to the pool server are share submissions. With a variable diff solution that uses X-Mining-Hashrate you could greatly reduce the pools current load. You could also fall back to the server calculating the var diff to keep share submission below a maximum threshold of say 24 shares per minute.

I guess my main point is that IMHO it is a higher priority to have variable difficulty working with either GBT or stratum than to have multiple pool servers. You might never need an extra pool server with these other pieces in place.
Yeah, but a US server would be nice. I can easily hit < 0.01% rejects on MaxBTC just because my ping to their server is ~30ms.
The ping time factor is overrated. I've tried different servers from the same pool located at 250ms and 50ms ping times and the reject rate was identical. On the other hand, changes to the pool setup itself cause larger changes to the reject rate.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Zeek_W
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322



View Profile
October 15, 2012, 01:49:00 AM
 #1897

I wish there was a way to redeem NMC natively within the bitminter site instead of screwing around getting an NMC wallet lol

▓▓▓ BITMIXER.IO ▓▓▓▓▓▓ High Volume Bitcoin MIXER ▓▓▓
Any change sir? BTC=18bYsY9V7YWmT1xtvKqTB59EpSpDkc3dLJ
abeaulieu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 295



View Profile
October 15, 2012, 01:53:31 AM
 #1898

I wish there was a way to redeem NMC natively within the bitminter site instead of screwing around getting an NMC wallet lol

I just use an online wallet here to trade to BTC. It's really not too cumbersome.
https://exchange.bitparking.com/main
Zeek_W
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322



View Profile
October 15, 2012, 01:59:05 AM
 #1899

I wish there was a way to redeem NMC natively within the bitminter site instead of screwing around getting an NMC wallet lol

I just use an online wallet here to trade to BTC. It's really not too cumbersome.
https://exchange.bitparking.com/main

DERP  - I checked on there a while ago and didn't even notice the online wallet facepalm.jpg.

Thankyou very much!

▓▓▓ BITMIXER.IO ▓▓▓▓▓▓ High Volume Bitcoin MIXER ▓▓▓
Any change sir? BTC=18bYsY9V7YWmT1xtvKqTB59EpSpDkc3dLJ
WhitePhantom
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 349



View Profile
October 15, 2012, 06:13:20 AM
 #1900

I wish there was a way to redeem NMC natively within the bitminter site instead of screwing around getting an NMC wallet lol
I created an account at Vircurex and generated a NMC address there.  I just deposit my NMC from BitMinter to that address and then trade them for BTC.
Pages: « 1 ... 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 [95] 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 ... 376 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!