Bitcoin Forum
December 10, 2016, 12:58:53 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 [125] 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 ... 376 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1050 TH] BitMinter.com [1% PPLNS,Pays TxFees +MergedMining,Stratum,GBT,vardiff]  (Read 776123 times)
LazyOtto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476


View Profile
February 02, 2013, 04:34:15 PM
 #2481

I'm using Stratum.

Increasing the diff level could cut the/my *outgoing* number of packets in half or by a fourth.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
lenny_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 953



View Profile
February 02, 2013, 04:41:25 PM
 #2482

I'm using Stratum.

Increasing the diff level could cut the/my *outgoing* number of packets in half or by a fourth.

If you're using Stratum your bandwidth usage is already low, comparing to GetWork, which is still used by a lots of people. Diff on Stratum is sorted automatically based on your hashrate, to keep your bandwidth usage as same, low level, regardless of the hashing power. If you want to have static diff, changes has to be made to Stratum protocol itself, which may not be greatest idea, as it is working now as indented (dynamically).
LazyOtto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476


View Profile
February 02, 2013, 04:57:07 PM
 #2483

I'm using Stratum.

Increasing the diff level could cut the/my *outgoing* number of packets in half or by a fourth.

If you're using Stratum your bandwidth usage is already low, comparing to GetWork, which is still used by a lots of people. Diff on Stratum is sorted automatically based on your hashrate, to keep your bandwidth usage as same, low level, regardless of the hashing power. If you want to have static diff, changes has to be made to Stratum protocol itself, which may not be greatest idea, as it is working now as indented (dynamically).
"If you're using Stratum your bandwidth usage is already low, comparing to GetWork"
Yes, I know.

"Diff on Stratum is sorted automatically based on your hashrate"
No. This is not inherent to Stratum. This is how BitMinter is setting vardiff.

"If you want to have static diff, changes has to be made to Stratum protocol itself"
False. Again, this is not inherent to Stratum.

You are making authoritative sounding responses without fully understanding the subject matter.
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
February 02, 2013, 05:07:46 PM
 #2484

The server choosing the difficulty to go with the work it hands out is supported by all the mining protocols in use (Stratum, GBT, getwork).

Variable difficulty means that this difficulty is not a constant number. At BitMinter this is determined (at the moment) purely from the hashrate of your worker.

The lower difficulty on your work the more often you find proofs of work. Good thing is that it keeps your daily variance low. Bad side of it is adding to your outgoing bandwidth usage, the server's incoming bandwidth and the server's CPU load.

In the future I am thinking about letting users influence the difficulty by preference, within reason.

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
LazyOtto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476


View Profile
February 02, 2013, 05:12:49 PM
 #2485

The server choosing the difficulty to go with the work it hands out is supported by all the mining protocols in use (Stratum, GBT, getwork).

Variable difficulty means that this difficulty is not a constant number. At BitMinter this is determined (at the moment) purely from the hashrate of your worker.

The lower difficulty on your work the more often you find proofs of work. Good thing is that it keeps your daily variance low. Bad side of it is adding to your outgoing bandwidth usage, the server's incoming bandwidth and the server's CPU load.

In the future I am thinking about letting users influence the difficulty by preference, within reason.

Yes.

"In the future I am thinking about letting users influence the difficulty by preference, within reason."

Thank you.

And I'm requesting the ability to specifically set a minimum diff. IOWs, a 'floor' diff. While the pool still preserves full ability / power to, defensively, dynamically, increase the in effect diff based on per miner hashrate.

Thanks for your consideration.
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
February 02, 2013, 09:58:38 PM
 #2486

Small website update:

  • Added v1.3.1 under "tools" -> "bitminter client". Use it if you want to run v1.3.1 without auto updating. Auto update normally happens whenever you restart the client, if there is a new version available.
  • Show "your score" with 4 decimal places instead of 2 in the livestats, both under "current round" and "latest shifts"
  • Added new app under "tools" -> "third party apps": Bitcoin Mining Monitor, a Google Chrome extension
  • Added Phraust's API wrapper on the API page
  • Added franklin's API wrapper on the API page

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
lenny_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 953



View Profile
February 03, 2013, 12:00:16 AM
 #2487

I'm using Stratum.

Increasing the diff level could cut the/my *outgoing* number of packets in half or by a fourth.

If you're using Stratum your bandwidth usage is already low, comparing to GetWork, which is still used by a lots of people. Diff on Stratum is sorted automatically based on your hashrate, to keep your bandwidth usage as same, low level, regardless of the hashing power. If you want to have static diff, changes has to be made to Stratum protocol itself, which may not be greatest idea, as it is working now as indented (dynamically).
"If you're using Stratum your bandwidth usage is already low, comparing to GetWork"
Yes, I know.

"Diff on Stratum is sorted automatically based on your hashrate"
No. This is not inherent to Stratum. This is how BitMinter is setting vardiff.

"If you want to have static diff, changes has to be made to Stratum protocol itself"
False. Again, this is not inherent to Stratum.

You are making authoritative sounding responses without fully understanding the subject matter.

Sorry about that, I am not an expert, not even trying to make "authoritative sounding responses", whatever it means Smiley For me, it was Stratum who changes my miner difficulty - same on BitMinter and same on p2pool, I though that's it's feature. On stratum proxy you have option --real-target to force diff1, otherwise it will be dynamic diff.
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
February 03, 2013, 12:15:37 AM
 #2488

Sorry about that, I am not an expert, not even trying to make "authoritative sounding responses", whatever it means Smiley For me, it was Stratum who changes my miner difficulty - same on BitMinter and same on p2pool, I though that's it's feature. On stratum proxy you have option --real-target to force diff1, otherwise it will be dynamic diff.

No worries. With the Stratum vs. GBT war going on there is a lot of misinformation and it is easy to get confused.

I held back var diff for getwork to give hashpower.com a chance to support that first, that's why there was var diff only for GBT and Stratum at first.

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
BitcoinOxygen
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336



View Profile WWW
February 03, 2013, 11:51:25 AM
 #2489


I held back var diff for getwork to give hashpower.com a chance to support that first, that's why there was var diff only for GBT and Stratum at first.


Currently does hashpower support VarDiff ?

Regards
BitcoinOxygen

BTCOxygen PPS Mining Pool 2% Fee  <<<  Join Now
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
February 03, 2013, 01:58:05 PM
 #2490

Currently does hashpower support VarDiff ?

From what I understand they do.

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
camolist
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868


View Profile WWW
February 04, 2013, 02:02:27 PM
 #2491

It has come to my attention that bitbond is mining at this pool


You do know he has stolen 95000 shares of 2mh since the first week of october (something like 6,000 btc) from users??

See this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=140945.0


After reading I'll be interested in if he is allowed to continue mining at your pool

WhitePhantom
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 349



View Profile
February 04, 2013, 09:31:56 PM
 #2492

It has come to my attention that bitbond is mining at this pool


You do know he has stolen 95000 shares of 2mh since the first week of october (something like 6,000 btc) from users??

See this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=140945.0


After reading I'll be interested in if he is allowed to continue mining at your pool
Wow...

Doc, my personal thoughts are that if it is possible (that's a big if, I assume), amazingrando should be booted from the pool.  BitMinter has too great of a reputation to willingly allow an admitted scammer to continue as its biggest miner.
However, I will also support you if you decide that it is not the place of a pool operator to police the mining community.  That's a very valid argument.

Sure, amazingrando makes it sound like he's well-intentioned and unlucky rather than a scammer, but he did breach their contract.  It sounds like the only people who didn't get screwed were the ones who had a physical, notarized contract.

When my dad went in on BFL gear with me, I told him up front that we may very well both lose money and that there were no guarantees.  It appears that amazingrando was not so wise when he tried to attract investors.
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
February 04, 2013, 10:00:25 PM
 #2493

It has come to my attention that bitbond is mining at this pool


You do know he has stolen 95000 shares of 2mh since the first week of october (something like 6,000 btc) from users??

See this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=140945.0


After reading I'll be interested in if he is allowed to continue mining at your pool

I'd just like to clarify - the alleged theft is from bitbond's creditors, not from other miners at BitMinter.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
camolist
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868


View Profile WWW
February 05, 2013, 03:54:16 AM
 #2494

I'd just like to clarify - the alleged theft is from bitbond's creditors, not from other miners at BitMinter.

Yeah, sorry if it sounded any other way


Just that he is using crowd funded hardware to mine at this pool and not paying out the btc to the funders


He's not cheating the pool in anyway and probably making it money with that much hash power and I'm assuming the pool has some sort of fee or donation (sorry not to familiar with the pool)

Luuzer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 27


View Profile
February 05, 2013, 05:19:38 PM
 #2495

BFL revision 2 for haribo:

https://forums.butterflylabs.com/announcements/913-bitforce-sc-communication-protocol-draft-revision-2-a.html#post13010

Stay away from KNC scammers!!! KNC is the new BFL!
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974


Bitminter.com Operator


View Profile WWW
February 05, 2013, 10:37:02 PM
 #2496

I just got home from a trip to Sweden. Mailbox is full of support requests. And I have a lot going on at my other two jobs as well. So bear with me if things are a bit slow right now.

It has come to my attention that bitbond is mining at this pool
You do know he has stolen 95000 shares of 2mh since the first week of october (something like 6,000 btc) from users??

I've never even heard of bitbond before.

Doc, my personal thoughts are that if it is possible (that's a big if, I assume), amazingrando should be booted from the pool.  BitMinter has too great of a reputation to willingly allow an admitted scammer to continue as its biggest miner.
However, I will also support you if you decide that it is not the place of a pool operator to police the mining community.  That's a very valid argument.

Admitted scammer or alleged scammer? Legally binding agreement and his identity is known? If so, isn't there a better place to deal with this? I'll have a look at those links though. This is the first I hear of any of this.


Nice to see things moving forward at BFL. Smiley

▶▶▶ Bitminter.com - Your trusted mining pool since 2011.
camolist
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868


View Profile WWW
February 07, 2013, 05:55:13 AM
 #2497

I've never even heard of bitbond before.

Admitted scammer or alleged scammer? Legally binding agreement and his identity is known? If so, isn't there a better place to deal with this? I'll have a look at those links though. This is the first I hear of any of this.

I'm going by secondhand info (though it's from a forum "staff" member) that the mining is happening on your pool
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=140945.msg1502746#msg1502746

theres a scam vote thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=136803.0

my scam claim
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=140945.0

and a thread by the user himself
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=141139.0

which outlines in his own words the numerous ways he is breaking the contract


he doesn't say "i'm a scammer!" but he outlines what and why he is doing which all goes against the contract



philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582


I charge NOTHING for current signature.


View Profile
February 07, 2013, 02:54:35 PM
 #2498

TO BE honest I do feel sympathy towards your problem, but I read all the info he posted. Frankly  I would be hard pushed to call him a scammer. I would call him a businessman with a failed plan that is still trying to fix the problem. Now in 2-4 months when he gets some asics you could call him a scammer if he does not pay out.

 I do wish you and the others luck in getting money back, but it seems to me he may payout in the long run. If he really was a scammer he would have vanished a while back. If you succeed in getting him banned from a pool or all pools he can mine as an independent at least this way he is out in the open. 

██     Please support sidehack with his new miner project Send to :

1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr

 
 ██
Turbor
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008


BitMinter


View Profile WWW
February 07, 2013, 10:50:27 PM
 #2499

The end of GLBSE changed everything. We should leave that out of here. He's been a loyal miner the last months.

camolist
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868


View Profile WWW
February 12, 2013, 10:14:46 PM
 #2500

The end of GLBSE changed everything. We should leave that out of here. He's been a loyal miner the last months.


wait...are you serious? a loyal miner?

he is using hardware paid for by others. and not paying the users that paid for it

of course he is a loyal miner he is rolling in the btc using other peoples hashpower


can you rethink what you just said there?

Pages: « 1 ... 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 [125] 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 ... 376 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!