Bitcoin Forum
April 28, 2017, 10:35:01 AM *
News: If the forum does not load normally for you, please send me a traceroute.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 [41] 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] sph-sgminer: multi-coin multi-algorithm GPU miner | added MaruCoin  (Read 457999 times)
ocminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722



View Profile WWW
April 03, 2014, 09:26:15 PM
 #801

i got it like this.. still dont work i tried it without export and with is still dont work im trying it on win 7 64 bit
Code:
export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1
sgminer -k groestlcoin -o stratum+tcp://grs.suprnova.cc:5544 -u nick.1 -p 1 -I 19 -w 256 --scan-time 1 --no-submit-stale -g 1 --gpu-engine 1150 --gpu-memclock 1500,1500,1500,1500 --thread-concurrency 16320 --lookup-gap 2 --gpu-powertune 10 --gpu-fan 85

uh okay, someone else has to chime in how that works under win7, i can only tell for linux, but if sgminer is telling that MAX_ALLOC is not set, you're usually missing that export ...

suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet
https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1493375701
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493375701

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1493375701
Reply with quote  #2

1493375701
Report to moderator
1493375701
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493375701

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1493375701
Reply with quote  #2

1493375701
Report to moderator
Pleskac
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112


View Profile
April 03, 2014, 09:30:46 PM
 #802

i normaly writed these in cmd.. and it saved values but it somehow dont work now.. ?! GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100 is ok but
GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1 is not ..:-/

edit : i just realized there was something like setgfx before GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1 cant remember i will check that and post it here if noone finds it first

CASH - EjsXgwEESw7QtNdLrhzVBxJjVJpa6a7ST5
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=424421.0
badman74
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532


View Profile
April 03, 2014, 09:33:30 PM
 #803

i got it like this.. still dont work i tried it without export and with is still dont work im trying it on win 7 64 bit
Code:
export GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1
sgminer -k groestlcoin -o stratum+tcp://grs.suprnova.cc:5544 -u nick.1 -p 1 -I 19 -w 256 --scan-time 1 --no-submit-stale -g 1 --gpu-engine 1150 --gpu-memclock 1500,1500,1500,1500 --thread-concurrency 16320 --lookup-gap 2 --gpu-powertune 10 --gpu-fan 85

uh okay, someone else has to chime in how that works under win7, i can only tell for linux, but if sgminer is telling that MAX_ALLOC is not set, you're usually missing that export ...
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
works in win 7

haggis
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 975


View Profile
April 03, 2014, 10:27:40 PM
 #804

Hey guys,

I just started mining Darkcoin and everything is fine. Significantly lower temps + power consumption Smiley

As my R290s are watercooled, the system is totaly noiseless. But by mining X11 I hear my GPUs "scratching" permanently. Normally, at scrypt, I sometimes hear this only for a short time at startup but never during the mining process.

Can someone confirm this? Is this something I should care about regarding the health of my cards? Would be nice to get rid of this (annoying) sound as I run the rig in my office Wink

Join the Elastic revolution!  Elastic - The Decentralized Supercomputer
ELASTIC ANNOUNCEMENT THREAD | ELASTIC SLACK | ELASTIC FORUM
mfqrs3
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Activity: 324


View Profile
April 03, 2014, 10:55:42 PM
 #805

Hey guys,

I just started mining Darkcoin and everything is fine. Significantly lower temps + power consumption Smiley

As my R290s are watercooled, the system is totaly noiseless. But by mining X11 I hear my GPUs "scratching" permanently. Normally, at scrypt, I sometimes hear this only for a short time at startup but never during the mining process.

Can someone confirm this? Is this something I should care about regarding the health of my cards? Would be nice to get rid of this (annoying) sound as I run the rig in my office Wink

Yes, you are right. It sounds like inductors noise, whining, and it's only with this algo. And it doesn't sound good for our HW Wink
apple_talk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 328



View Profile
April 03, 2014, 11:07:28 PM
 #806

running latest SPH-SGMINER .98 version for dark coin & getting no monitor.

rebuild so many times with updated ADL SDL .h files.

290 & 290X GPUs

when using sgminer 4.1.0 (in scrypt), no issues with hardware monitoring, temp, fan.


did you run:

autoreconf -fvi
./configure CFLAGS="-O2 whatever you depend on"
make

??

I also Ran test cmd
aticonfig --adapter=1 --od-getclocks && aticonfig --adapter=1 --od-gettemperature
This confirms hardware is working.


Used this

./autogen.sh
./configure --enable-opencl --disable-adl
make
make install



Also tried...
./autogen.sh
./configure CFLAGS="-O3" --enable-opencl --enable-adl
make
make install



Not CFLAGS="-O3 ...."

CFLAGS="-O2 ..." !!!!

Pls try exactly this, without anything more or less.

This all is only working if you copied the ADL-Header files from your ADL-Download into sgminer/ADL_SDK (Build-Directory).

then in your build-directory run:

autoreconf -fvi
./configure CFLAGS="-O2 -Wall -march=native"
make


that's it.

Tried
autoreconf -fvi
./configure CFLAGS="-O2 -Wall -march=native"
make


sgminer 4.1.0-98-ga683 - Started: [2014-04-03 15:05:52]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):1.447M (avg):2.011Mh/s | A:0  R:0  HW:0  WU:0.000/m
ST: 10  SS: 0  NB: 1  LW: 0  GF: 0  RF: 0
Connected to Pool 0 (longpoll) diff 424 as user vcoinrpc
Block: 4a9731f1...  Diff:424  Started: [15:05:51]  Best share: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management [ S ]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:                | 799.4K/997.3Kh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.000/m I:18
 GPU 1:                | 864.0K/1.098Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.000/m I:18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[15:05:48] Started sgminer 4.1.0-98-ga683
[15:05:48] Loaded configuration file /opt/ifmi/cgminer.darkcoin.conf
[15:05:49] Kernel darkcoin is experimental.
[15:05:49] Kernel darkcoin is experimental.
[15:05:49] Kernel darkcoin is experimental.
[15:05:50] Kernel darkcoin is experimental.
[15:05:50] Kernel darkcoin is experimental.
[15:05:50] Kernel darkcoin is experimental.
[15:05:50] Kernel darkcoin is experimental.
[15:05:51] Kernel darkcoin is experimental.
[15:05:51] Probing for an alive pool
[15:05:51] Network diff set to 424
[15:05:51] No suitable long-poll found for http://192.168.1.99:12345
[15:05:57] API bind to port 4028 failed - trying again in 30sec





When running sgminer...
sgminer 4.1.153-63-g10ec - Started: [2014-04-03 19:02:50]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):1.677M (avg):1.598Mh/s | A:0  R:0  HW:0  WU:1674.3/m
ST: 1  SS: 0  NB: 2  LW: 42  GF: 0  RF: 0
Connected to sf.clevermining.com (stratum) diff 512 as user XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Block: e47ee237...  Diff:48.6M  Started: [19:02:55]  Best share: 220
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management [ S ]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 0:  73.0C 2050RPM | 666.9K/909.4Kh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU: 979.0/m I:18
GPU 1:  61.0C 2410RPM | 636.0K/869.4Kh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU: 848.6/m I:18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[19:02:43] Started sgminer 4.1.153-63-g10ec
[19:02:43] Loaded configuration file /opt/ifmi/cgminer.conf
[19:02:44] Initialising kernel ckolivas.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI
[19:02:44] Initialising kernel ckolivas.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI
[19:02:44] Probing for an alive pool
[19:02:49] sf.clevermining.com difficulty changed to 512
[19:02:50] Network diff set to 46.9M
[19:02:55] API running in IP access mode on port 4028 (11)
[19:02:55] Network diff set to 48.6M
[19:02:55] Stratum from sf.clevermining.com detected new block
Pleskac
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112


View Profile
April 03, 2014, 11:15:44 PM
 #807

well thaks for that that solved the location error but still i have no accepted shares no rejected and no hardware errors... my hashrate is working and LW is increasing... i really dont see problem anywhere it doesnt give me any errors now..
Code:
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
sgminer -k groestlcoin -o stratum+tcp://grs.suprnova.cc:5544 -u nick.1 -p 1 -I 19 -w 256 --scan-time 1 --no-submit-stale -g 1 --gpu-engine 1150 --gpu-memclock 1500,1500,1500,1500 --thread-concurrency 16320 --lookup-gap 2 --gpu-powertune 10 --gpu-fan 85

CASH - EjsXgwEESw7QtNdLrhzVBxJjVJpa6a7ST5
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=424421.0
badman74
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532


View Profile
April 03, 2014, 11:40:00 PM
 #808

well thaks for that that solved the location error but still i have no accepted shares no rejected and no hardware errors... my hashrate is working and LW is increasing... i really dont see problem anywhere it doesnt give me any errors now..
Code:
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
sgminer -k groestlcoin -o stratum+tcp://grs.suprnova.cc:5544 -u nick.1 -p 1 -I 19 -w 256 --scan-time 1 --no-submit-stale -g 1 --gpu-engine 1150 --gpu-memclock 1500,1500,1500,1500 --thread-concurrency 16320 --lookup-gap 2 --gpu-powertune 10 --gpu-fan 85
if you want to use that pool i suggest using one of the pre diff patch versions as it looks like supernova pool is set up for the extra low diff shares which means they are actually calling fo super hard shares on the new miner
at the current diff it should take me at least 10 min to get a share with 17.5mh/s
net diff 85
share diff from supernova pool 3
.3 WU/m
edit: hmm my diff calc is different from yours but still should add up about the same

edit2: well it seems the IS something wrong with the diff calc....
i will try to figure it out when i get the chance

edit3: not the diff calc but there is something wrong... i know it was working before with the same setup, so not sure what could have changed

csa1234
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 215


View Profile
April 04, 2014, 04:51:12 AM
 #809

This is my results for Darkcoin on 3 x R9 280x Sapphire TOXIC:


hosting imagenes
ocminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722



View Profile WWW
April 04, 2014, 07:27:30 AM
 #810

well thaks for that that solved the location error but still i have no accepted shares no rejected and no hardware errors... my hashrate is working and LW is increasing... i really dont see problem anywhere it doesnt give me any errors now..
Code:
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
sgminer -k groestlcoin -o stratum+tcp://grs.suprnova.cc:5544 -u nick.1 -p 1 -I 19 -w 256 --scan-time 1 --no-submit-stale -g 1 --gpu-engine 1150 --gpu-memclock 1500,1500,1500,1500 --thread-concurrency 16320 --lookup-gap 2 --gpu-powertune 10 --gpu-fan 85
if you want to use that pool i suggest using one of the pre diff patch versions as it looks like supernova pool is set up for the extra low diff shares which means they are actually calling fo super hard shares on the new miner
at the current diff it should take me at least 10 min to get a share with 17.5mh/s
net diff 85
share diff from supernova pool 3
.3 WU/m
edit: hmm my diff calc is different from yours but still should add up about the same

edit2: well it seems the IS something wrong with the diff calc....
i will try to figure it out when i get the chance

edit3: not the diff calc but there is something wrong... i know it was working before with the same setup, so not sure what could have changed

Hey !

Suprnova pool is patch against various versions of fake shares, therefore the miners has to accept the INITIAL diff AND also the ascending or descending variable diff's.

If Surpnova sees your client is "too fast" for a superlow share, you'll get a higher diff quite soon, so it should make no big problem with miners IF they miner is correct and now manipulated in any way.

suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet
https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
restless
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


View Profile
April 04, 2014, 08:58:57 AM
 #811

The fact is build from 26-03 works flawlessly... so something was changed after that date
ocminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722



View Profile WWW
April 04, 2014, 09:00:11 AM
 #812

The fact is build from 26-03 works flawlessly... so something was changed after that date

Then I'd stick to that version or if I'm on a pool where the other version works, look exactly in the stats if the hashrates are plausible.

suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet
https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
fenghush
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378


www.OroCoin.co


View Profile WWW
April 04, 2014, 12:23:09 PM
 #813

Is it possible to squeeze more juice from the pure groestl, feels bit slow for a non-chained algo does it not?

.
.OROCOIN.

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █

  █
  █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
█ █ █
  █
mfqrs3
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Activity: 324


View Profile
April 04, 2014, 02:50:28 PM
 #814

Is it possible to squeeze more juice from the pure groestl, feels bit slow for a non-chained algo does it not?

Yes I agree. As we saw with heavycoin X11 algo, every week 30-40% performance improvement. Devs should release the faster miners to public Smiley
Groestl is heavly unoptimised, it runs on 5870 as fast as 280x...
phm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182


View Profile
April 04, 2014, 03:56:16 PM
 #815

Is it possible to squeeze more juice from the pure groestl, feels bit slow for a non-chained algo does it not?

Yes I agree. As we saw with heavycoin X11 algo, every week 30-40% performance improvement. Devs should release the faster miners to public Smiley
Groestl is heavly unoptimised, it runs on 5870 as fast as 280x...
How about optimizing it then? I'm waiting for git pull requests. Cheesy

My hobby: mining CPU-only coins with GPU
phm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182


View Profile
April 04, 2014, 04:01:25 PM
 #816

i mean -k groestlcoin, no accepted share for me with this argument
Just tested 2 latest builds from badman, exe inside are from 30-03 and 31-03, builds:
sgminer 4.1.0-98-ga683
sgminer 4.1.0-111-g8bb946

No accepted shares for groestl on https://grs.suprnova.cc

Build from 26-03 works flawlessly - sgminer 4.1.0-105-g9dc6e
Perhaps this build is from the patched sources? I remember that sph-sgminer did not work with some GRS stratum pool and someone created a patch solving that problem. I had no time to review and integrate these changes yet, so they are not present in my source tree.

My hobby: mining CPU-only coins with GPU
tseug
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70


View Profile
April 04, 2014, 06:22:52 PM
 #817

hey phm, any chance of including twecoin? as I mentioned in a earlier post it's sphlib based

COMM: CWjCf3Pb6vAgpRxbP2CKQQFLBXYuS7axpG
SHA: STpwADnhpYk7ZAMRmJvFDJaXSSby3LpGiu
phm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182


View Profile
April 04, 2014, 06:52:14 PM
 #818

hey phm, any chance of including twecoin? as I mentioned in a earlier post it's sphlib based
I'm working on this.

My hobby: mining CPU-only coins with GPU
tseug
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70


View Profile
April 04, 2014, 07:02:39 PM
 #819

hey phm, any chance of including twecoin? as I mentioned in a earlier post it's sphlib based
I'm working on this.
Excellent, good to hear. Thank you for the great work on this miner.

COMM: CWjCf3Pb6vAgpRxbP2CKQQFLBXYuS7axpG
SHA: STpwADnhpYk7ZAMRmJvFDJaXSSby3LpGiu
restless
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


View Profile
April 04, 2014, 07:07:30 PM
 #820

Is it possible to squeeze more juice from the pure groestl, feels bit slow for a non-chained algo does it not?
I think qubit algo has more room for improvement.
ATM a 6970 is only 3x faster than quad-core i5. Comparing vs igotic's client for myriad-qubit
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 [41] 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!