MoreBloodWine
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 17, 2014, 08:12:22 PM |
|
Hey Eleuthria, sent you a PM.
Thx.
|
To be decided...
|
|
|
hurricandave
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
|
|
March 17, 2014, 09:44:36 PM |
|
Maybe it would help if the pop up balloon for 24-hour earning was changed to read "Last 24-hours of Closed Shift Earnings". I am probably one of the few people who bothered looking at that stuff in the beginning, but....
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3586
Merit: 1098
Think for yourself
|
|
March 17, 2014, 10:52:23 PM |
|
Maybe it would help if the pop up balloon for 24-hour earning was changed to read "Last 24-hours of Closed Shift Earnings". I am probably one of the few people who bothered looking at that stuff in the beginning, but....
Not a terrible idea I guess. But still folks should spend the time to learn a little about the different payout methods they are using. Most all current payout methods work on some type of sliding scale, with Proportional and Pay Per Share, being the obvious exceptions. When you stop mining you continue to get paid until all the shifts you contributed shares to are closed. So when your mining continuously the last 24 hours is a pertinent measure. Only when you first start mining or stop mining does it become less useful. Sam
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
hurricandave
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
|
|
March 17, 2014, 11:31:50 PM |
|
Yea, it's kinda hard to properly explain everything to a completely new to Bitcoin person without using an entire essay, even harder to find good reminders to put in place too jog their memory of what they read and how it relates to what they are now looking at or for.
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3586
Merit: 1098
Think for yourself
|
|
March 17, 2014, 11:42:55 PM |
|
Yea, it's kinda hard to properly explain everything to a completely new to Bitcoin person without using an entire essay, even harder to find good reminders to put in place too jog their memory of what they read and how it relates to what they are now looking at or for.
Yep, but hang in there. It will make better sense as you go along and get more experience. Also keep asking questions. The support section under "how am I paid" Has fairly concise explanation of PPLNS, if you have already seen it. Take Care, Sam https://www.btcguild.com/index.php?page=support§ion=howamipaid
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
suzukii
|
|
March 18, 2014, 01:10:51 AM |
|
...
Make sure your worker is set to Diff 8, and check your accepted shares/speed on the dashboard. If you've just set it up and it's been a while since you've been running anything on this pool, it will take a while to start earning. It's like a capacitor, where it slowly builds up a charge and once it's full it keeps pushing out. Sort of like how bitparking works...
Hi BRADLEYPLOOF. So can you or anyone waaay more knowledgable than me, ( please pardon my stupid questions I've only been doing this for about 2 months), give me a suggestion as to what my diff. level should be for BTC Guild? I have 5 Antminer S1's all dedicated to BTC Guild. They are now set at the diff. default of 2. My miners are giving me on avg. of about 170GH/s each. I've been mining with these new Antminer S1's for about 10 days now, 24hrs a day. Big Thanks.
|
Regards,
Suzukii
(Live long & ...keep mining)
Hardware: Avalon 200Gh/s 55nm | Raspberry Pi model B | Minepeon 0.2.4.3 (...was 0.2.5-pr2) | BFGMiner 3.10.0 | 28x Manhattan USB 2.0/3.0 powered Hub | 5x ASIC Block Erupter @333 MH/s | 3x BFL Jalapeño's Total ~232.7 GH/s
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3586
Merit: 1098
Think for yourself
|
|
March 18, 2014, 01:21:20 AM |
|
...
Make sure your worker is set to Diff 8, and check your accepted shares/speed on the dashboard. If you've just set it up and it's been a while since you've been running anything on this pool, it will take a while to start earning. It's like a capacitor, where it slowly builds up a charge and once it's full it keeps pushing out. Sort of like how bitparking works...
Hi BRADLEYPLOOF. So can you or anyone waaay more knowledgable than me, ( please pardon my stupid questions I've only been doing this for about 2 months), give me a suggestion as to what my diff. level should be for BTC Guild? I have 5 Antminer S1's all dedicated to BTC Guild. They are now set at the diff. default of 2. My miners are giving me on avg. of about 170GH/s each. I've been mining with these new Antminer S1's for about 10 days now, 24hrs a day. Big Thanks. 170 Ghs should probably be set to a base difficulty of 128. If you have all 5 on one worker then it should be 512.
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
suzukii
|
|
March 18, 2014, 01:26:20 AM |
|
...
Make sure your worker is set to Diff 8, and check your accepted shares/speed on the dashboard. If you've just set it up and it's been a while since you've been running anything on this pool, it will take a while to start earning. It's like a capacitor, where it slowly builds up a charge and once it's full it keeps pushing out. Sort of like how bitparking works...
Hi BRADLEYPLOOF. So can you or anyone waaay more knowledgable than me, ( please pardon my stupid questions I've only been doing this for about 2 months), give me a suggestion as to what my diff. level should be for BTC Guild? I have 5 Antminer S1's all dedicated to BTC Guild. They are now set at the diff. default of 2. My miners are giving me on avg. of about 170GH/s each. I've been mining with these new Antminer S1's for about 10 days now, 24hrs a day. Big Thanks. 170 Ghs should probably be set to a base difficulty of 128. If you have all 5 on one worker then it should be 512. Hi OS2sam. Thanks for the replies in advance. I should've mentioned that. They're all on separate workers so I can troubleshoot them easier when one goes down. So for now I'll set them to a diff. level of 128. Correct? Would it be better if I have them all mining with one worker? PS: (I was an OS/2 v1.2 guy back in the early 90's myself).
|
Regards,
Suzukii
(Live long & ...keep mining)
Hardware: Avalon 200Gh/s 55nm | Raspberry Pi model B | Minepeon 0.2.4.3 (...was 0.2.5-pr2) | BFGMiner 3.10.0 | 28x Manhattan USB 2.0/3.0 powered Hub | 5x ASIC Block Erupter @333 MH/s | 3x BFL Jalapeño's Total ~232.7 GH/s
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3586
Merit: 1098
Think for yourself
|
|
March 18, 2014, 01:38:34 AM |
|
...
Make sure your worker is set to Diff 8, and check your accepted shares/speed on the dashboard. If you've just set it up and it's been a while since you've been running anything on this pool, it will take a while to start earning. It's like a capacitor, where it slowly builds up a charge and once it's full it keeps pushing out. Sort of like how bitparking works...
Hi BRADLEYPLOOF. So can you or anyone waaay more knowledgable than me, ( please pardon my stupid questions I've only been doing this for about 2 months), give me a suggestion as to what my diff. level should be for BTC Guild? I have 5 Antminer S1's all dedicated to BTC Guild. They are now set at the diff. default of 2. My miners are giving me on avg. of about 170GH/s each. I've been mining with these new Antminer S1's for about 10 days now, 24hrs a day. Big Thanks. 170 Ghs should probably be set to a base difficulty of 128. If you have all 5 on one worker then it should be 512. Hi OS2sam. Thanks for the replies in advance. I should've mentioned that. They're all on separate workers so I can troubleshoot them easier when one goes down. So for now I'll set them to a diff. level of 128. Correct? Would it be better if I have them all mining with one worker? PS: (I was an OS/2 v1.2 guy back in the early 90's myself). Separate workers are fine and probably a good idea for higher end devices. 128 is the minimum setting. The pool will automatically adjust it up if need be. But yes 128 would be best for a starting point. Here is a thread which explains this subject. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=274023.msg2936086#msg29360861.2, cool. Was that text based or did that have the Presentation Manager interface? I started with 2.0. Still using 4.52. Sam
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
BRADLEYPLOOF
|
|
March 18, 2014, 01:42:05 AM |
|
Hi OS2sam. Thanks for the replies in advance. I should've mentioned that. They're all on separate workers so I can troubleshoot them easier when one goes down. So for now I'll set them to a diff. level of 128. Correct?
Would it be better if I have them all mining with one worker? PS: (I was an OS/2 v1.2 guy back in the early 90's myself).
Either way I think would be okay on this one. Having multiple workers with multiple instances of bfgminer (my favorite) or some other mining software running for each worker works fine. Probably lowers variance slightly, I have no idea, I've never done the math behind it. Having all run on one worker works good too because you can have a higher difficulty (which increase share count) and use less bandwidth, although your variance can increase. 5 miners running 170 GH/s each...I wish I had anywhere near close to that to work with...I've got 5 U1's running from 9.75 -> 10.8 GH/s and that's a huge upgrade from when I started. I've never had the cash to drop on mining equipment and did it mostly because I was curious how bitcoin worked. Now that I've got more understanding on the subject, I see the best way to make bitcoin is to either sell mining equipment, or goods/services and get paid in bitcoin. Mining really isn't worth it with the cost of electricity and the insane amounts of new people coming in thinking they can make a huge profit when the difficulty is already in the billions and will only increase until either mining becomes unprofitable (you have to pay for electricity somehow and the only way currently is to turn your bitcoin into cash, as I know of no electric company that accepts payment in bitcoin) or the value of BTC decreases. I do agree that each miner on it's own worker is an easier way to find out which ones are not performing to their peak so that's more of an ease-of-use/preference kind of decision. I do think that you might make slightly more running them all on one worker though...
|
|
|
|
suzukii
|
|
March 18, 2014, 02:50:35 AM |
|
...
Make sure your worker is set to Diff 8, and check your accepted shares/speed on the dashboard. If you've just set it up and it's been a while since you've been running anything on this pool, it will take a while to start earning. It's like a capacitor, where it slowly builds up a charge and once it's full it keeps pushing out. Sort of like how bitparking works...
Hi BRADLEYPLOOF. So can you or anyone waaay more knowledgable than me, ( please pardon my stupid questions I've only been doing this for about 2 months), give me a suggestion as to what my diff. level should be for BTC Guild? I have 5 Antminer S1's all dedicated to BTC Guild. They are now set at the diff. default of 2. My miners are giving me on avg. of about 170GH/s each. I've been mining with these new Antminer S1's for about 10 days now, 24hrs a day. Big Thanks. 170 Ghs should probably be set to a base difficulty of 128. If you have all 5 on one worker then it should be 512. Hi OS2sam. Thanks for the replies in advance. I should've mentioned that. They're all on separate workers so I can troubleshoot them easier when one goes down. So for now I'll set them to a diff. level of 128. Correct? Would it be better if I have them all mining with one worker? PS: (I was an OS/2 v1.2 guy back in the early 90's myself). Separate workers are fine and probably a good idea for higher end devices. 128 is the minimum setting. The pool will automatically adjust it up if need be. But yes 128 would be best for a starting point. Here is a thread which explains this subject. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=274023.msg2936086#msg29360861.2, cool. Was that text based or did that have the Presentation Manager interface? I started with 2.0. Still using 4.52. Sam Thanks. 128 it is. I ran OS/2 1.2 with PM. (Wow, I've dated myself.) I was the tech that had maintained Howard Stern's PC back then with OS/2 when he was located on 600 Madison Ave & he was plugging OS/2 on his station back when... Any-whooo thanks.
|
Regards,
Suzukii
(Live long & ...keep mining)
Hardware: Avalon 200Gh/s 55nm | Raspberry Pi model B | Minepeon 0.2.4.3 (...was 0.2.5-pr2) | BFGMiner 3.10.0 | 28x Manhattan USB 2.0/3.0 powered Hub | 5x ASIC Block Erupter @333 MH/s | 3x BFL Jalapeño's Total ~232.7 GH/s
|
|
|
suzukii
|
|
March 18, 2014, 03:00:38 AM |
|
Hi OS2sam. Thanks for the replies in advance. I should've mentioned that. They're all on separate workers so I can troubleshoot them easier when one goes down. So for now I'll set them to a diff. level of 128. Correct?
Would it be better if I have them all mining with one worker? PS: (I was an OS/2 v1.2 guy back in the early 90's myself).
... I do agree that each miner on it's own worker is an easier way to find out which ones are not performing to their peak so that's more of an ease-of-use/preference kind of decision. I do think that you might make slightly more running them all on one worker though... Hi BRADLEYPLOOF. Thanks for the suggestions. I'll try that soon. As for miners I started with a few block erupters, which I still have, then added three 5gh/s BFL cubes, then had a great income tax return (busted my butt for it last year) & bought a few Antminers. I'm going BTC crazy. It's like crack to me, (not that I've tried it.) You'll get there. Thanks for the input.
|
Regards,
Suzukii
(Live long & ...keep mining)
Hardware: Avalon 200Gh/s 55nm | Raspberry Pi model B | Minepeon 0.2.4.3 (...was 0.2.5-pr2) | BFGMiner 3.10.0 | 28x Manhattan USB 2.0/3.0 powered Hub | 5x ASIC Block Erupter @333 MH/s | 3x BFL Jalapeño's Total ~232.7 GH/s
|
|
|
hurricandave
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
|
|
March 18, 2014, 05:47:35 AM |
|
Who ever is next to the juke box, could you please put some more quarters in.
|
|
|
|
suzukii
|
|
March 18, 2014, 10:07:38 AM |
|
Who ever is next to the juke box, could you please put some more quarters in.
Oops! Didn't mean to put on "Everything I own" by Boy George.
|
Regards,
Suzukii
(Live long & ...keep mining)
Hardware: Avalon 200Gh/s 55nm | Raspberry Pi model B | Minepeon 0.2.4.3 (...was 0.2.5-pr2) | BFGMiner 3.10.0 | 28x Manhattan USB 2.0/3.0 powered Hub | 5x ASIC Block Erupter @333 MH/s | 3x BFL Jalapeño's Total ~232.7 GH/s
|
|
|
hurricandave
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
|
|
March 18, 2014, 10:10:24 AM Last edit: March 18, 2014, 10:24:42 AM by hurricandave |
|
The SAD thing is I know that song. Cover song originally by BREAD.
|
|
|
|
BRADLEYPLOOF
|
|
March 18, 2014, 11:35:18 AM |
|
Strange...I have a R.Pi hashing with 5 U1's running Rasbian with BFGMiner 3.10. Apparently, last night sometime all my miners stopped for exactly 1 shift, then started up again. I'm wondering if something was updated in BTCGuild that may have caused my connection to the site to stop for a while, or if my hardware just decided to stop for exactly 1 hour and reboot...
|
|
|
|
hurricandave
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
|
|
March 18, 2014, 12:07:00 PM |
|
I am using two different connections and last night my AT&T Uverse went down for 15 mins while my Clear G never flinched.
|
|
|
|
mdude77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 18, 2014, 12:37:09 PM |
|
I am using two different connections and last night my AT&T Uverse went down for 15 mins while my Clear G never flinched.
No problems here that I can see. M
|
I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent! Come join me!
|
|
|
joeofall
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
March 18, 2014, 03:14:11 PM |
|
hmm just wonder whois the unknow is the blockchian ?
|
|
|
|
dropt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 18, 2014, 03:49:59 PM |
|
hmm just wonder whois the unknow is the blockchian ?
Unknown is the tag for all of the people who are "unknown" to Blockchain.info. It's not one person/farm, it's multiple people/farms.
|
|
|
|
|