Do you trust the co-vid19 vaccine ?

[MCVXYZ]

I'd rather quarntine and wear a mask than be a guinea pig on a new vaccine.

Isn't it allowed to smoke after vaccination?

I don't know exactly, but as I guess it may be bad for our immunity, because it aims and trying to  damage lungs , So try  not to smoke and drink  
Smoking is bad for blood circulation system, for heart and covid-19 may have impact on it. Especially, when person is in a risk group.

[Natsuu]

I'd rather quarntine and wear a mask than be a guinea pig on a new vaccine.

Isn't it allowed to smoke after vaccination?

Does a mask smoke if you light it on fire?     

I heard smoking protects you against covid-19. Especially if you are a long-time hard-smoker. It is because you already fucked your lungs up, the virus cannot cling to your lung cells. In other means, you are already pretty dead the virus shows you mercy.

It's like being double-dead lmao, having a really damaged lungs + getting covid is like bye bye earth, see you in hell kind of thing

[BADecker]

I'd rather quarntine and wear a mask than be a guinea pig on a new vaccine.

Isn't it allowed to smoke after vaccination?

Does a mask smoke if you light it on fire?    

I heard smoking protects you against covid-19. Especially if you are a long-time hard-smoker. It is because you already fucked your lungs up, the virus cannot cling to your lung cells. In other means, you are already pretty dead the virus shows you mercy.

Well, I didn't mean to set it on fire while you were wearing it.

Of course, if you rolled it into cigarette form...

[Tash]

Bill Gates full aware of the health damage he causes but what matters is the greater than twenty times return of investments.
What is it about the word concern you don't understand?
https://youtu.be/AxdK6G-QlN0

[Natsuu]

Bill Gates full aware of the health damage he causes but what matters is the greater than twenty times return of investments.
What is it about the word concern you don't understand?
https://youtu.be/AxdK6G-QlN0

I've watched the video and it is very intriguing to be honest.

The negatives discussed in the video is the human trial used to indian and african nation by the big-pharma supported by the gates foundation. but the foundation dismissed it as there's no documents etc, only the voices of the parents.

On the other hand, the positives will be having a polio vaccine that is critical for that savage polio virus.

I don't want to side with anything in this one as this is a documentary and there's no more than supported documents presented, just assumptions and like puzzle pieces aligned to have a conclusion.

Though I sympathize to the parents who had been used by the big pharma, according to the video.

P.S. Watch the video, it might be worth your time., and its not about the covid vaccine, its about the polio vaccine

[franky1]

the video is not puzzle pieces joining up to reveal a big picture

its grabbing some lego. some glue some puzzle pieces and some paint. to make a sculpture that looks like its showing something.

saying 'all these things join together' is true. lego joins to lego. puzzle joins to puzzle. glue joins to anything.
but the end result is not showing a clear artpiece of truth. nor a single artpiece of a single material thing

yes there are bad batches. .. but the thing is. they stopped that batch and then changed.
if they really wanted to genocide africa/india.. guess what.. africa and india would be a population of 0 right now

soo lets see if there is any proof of genocide......

if you can step back from fantasy and if you look at the population statistics you will not find a population chart that suggests genocide occured like this:
     _
   /   \          /\/
_/     |_/\/\/
50 60 70 80 90 00 10 20

what you will see is a continual line upwards


^1950-2021.... no genocide dip occured

[Natsuu]

the video is not puzzle pieces joining up to reveal a big picture

its grabbing some lego. some glue some puzzle pieces and some paint. to make a sculpture that looks like its showing something.

saying 'all these things join together' is true. lego joins to lego. puzzle joins to puzzle. glue joins to anything.
but the end result is not showing a clear artpiece of truth. nor a single artpiece of a single material thing

yes there are bad batches. .. but the thing is. they stopped that batch and then changed.
if they really wanted to genocide africa/india.. guess what.. africa and india would be a population of 0 right now

soo lets see if there is any proof of genocide......

if you can step back from fantasy and if you look at the population statistics you will not find a population chart that suggests genocide occured like this:
     _
   /   \          /\/
_/     |_/\/\/
50 60 70 80 90 00 10 20

what you will see is a continual line upwards


^1950-2021.... no genocide dip occured

The mainpoint of the documentary is not about the geocide, but about the deaths of childrens and mother whose death is not even explanable because of the undocumented and unconsented vaccines used to them. I don't know anything about the legitimacy of the video but it is indeed saddening in the part of the parents of those children.

[franky1]

The mainpoint of the documentary is not about the geocide, but about the deaths of childrens and mother whose death is not even explanable because of the undocumented and unconsented vaccines used to them. I don't know anything about the legitimacy of the video but it is indeed saddening in the part of the parents of those children.

have a read..
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-gates-india-idUSKBN22V27F

in short. conspiracy nuts pretend BG killed millions of kids due to a HPV jab
reality is they halted the vaccinations when 7 girls died..
reality is that 5 of the girls died from things like drowning in a quarry waterbed. pesticide ingested suicide,
snake bites and malaria
so that debunks your worry of large scale death caused by hpv..
yes condolences to families of girls that died of suicide, drowning, snakebites and malaria.. but that has nothing to do with HPV


reality of the scandal is the HPV vaccine creators should have done a phase 3 adult study before then done on kids.
due to the nature of HPV protecting kids from developing cancer as young adults. they needed to actually test kids to find its efficacy. as an adult trial of efficacy is useless
and so it was allowed to be used on kids.

the controversy is not genocidal. its that it was marketed as a approved for market use treatment. whilst reality was the kids between 2009-2011 were being observed as a trial for efficacy.
it was documented. it was just misrepresented as a 'treatment+observational study' and not 'clinical trial'
those having the hpv were informed of the symptoms/effects/adverse reactions.. they were just misrepresented the approval status where they didnt know they were test subjects

let me make this clear

india put just ~25k girls into the misrepresented study. no indian girls died.
the indian study stopped when media was showing how 'potentially'(already explained) 7 american girls died and thoughts of possible linkage to HPV cause(already debunked)

the scandal is not about deaths. nor undocumented study .. yep 24,777 is a known number of participants as there were documents

the scandal is about misrepresenting a trial as a after market approved treatment observational study

[tvbcof]

...
what you will see is a continual line upwards


^1950-2021.... no genocide dip occured

^1950-2021.... no genocide dip differential calculus learning occured

What hits me immediately is a change to a near zero 2nd derivative, and very aligned with the suggestion Rockefeller et-al programs/money really got into swing in the late 1960's and early 1970's.

The other thing which is noticeable (and common) is that the graph creator was too lazy to label the ordinate and abscissa.  At least there was a feeble attempt to provide a key.

[franky1]

you only use abscissa if you asked for a particular year. then you draw a line vertically up from that year. to the point on the chart. and then left horizontally to find the number for that year

this graph is about the scale of 1950-2021.. its not a graph of a particular year

i do find it funny how you even bothered to try finding buzzwords to sound like your a graph expert. but reality it shows you dont understand the buzzwords.. you dont even understand what the graph represents. and you did not even bother asking for specific date point you want a abscissa for

try better next time

if you cannot tell that there was no dip by looking at a graph.. and instead you want extra numbers plotted along the curve.. then you are not asking for actual relevant stuff. your just trying to be pedantic

[BADecker]

^^^ Oh, just come out and say it simple. The chart shows that not only is there an increase over the years, but that the rate itself is increasing... you know, like acceleration.

[tvbcof]

^1950-2021.... no genocide dip differential calculus learning occured

What hits me immediately is a change to a near zero 2nd derivative, and very aligned with the suggestion Rockefeller et-al programs/money really got into swing in the late 1960's and early 1970's.

The other thing which is noticeable (and common) is that the graph creator was too lazy to label the ordinate and abscissa.  At least there was a feeble attempt to provide a key.

you only use abscissa if you asked for a particular year. then you draw a line vertically up from that year. to the point on the chart. and then left horizontally to find the number for that year

this graph is about the scale of 1950-2021.. its not a graph of a particular year

i do find it funny how you even bothered to try finding buzzwords to sound like your a graph expert. but reality it shows you dont understand the buzzwords.. you dont even understand what the graph represents. and you did not even bother asking for specific date point you want a abscissa for

What part of "to label" do you not understand?  Here's the deal; you put a text label on the different axese telling the reader what the numbers represent.  It's really quite easy.

try better next time

if you cannot tell that there was no dip by looking at a graph.. and instead you want extra numbers plotted along the curve.. then you are not asking for actual relevant stuff. your just trying to be pedantic

Using standard mathematical and scientific tools in an appropriate manner is more than simply 'pedantic'.

It's pretty obvious that you have no idea what a 2nd derivative even is, so it's not at all surprising that you would fail to appreciate the significance of such an artifact approaching zero.

[tarzan2]

i thought the vaccine was just a mechanism for Bill Gates to microchip everyone? why wouldn't you say yes?

[BADecker]

i thought the vaccine was just a mechanism for Bill Gates to microchip everyone? why wouldn't you say yes?

Soon they won't have to do vaccination for chipping people. What they will do is dump millions of microscopic machines in our water supply. When we drink these machines down, they will flow through our bodies, hook together, and become microchips.

And if they are worried about protecting themselves legally if anybody finds out, they might dump the microscopic machines into the products the potato chip manufacturers sell. This way they have a right to call it chipping.

If they were trying to chip beavers, they could grow the microscopic machines in trees.

[tarzan2]

i thought the vaccine was just a mechanism for Bill Gates to microchip everyone? why wouldn't you say yes?

Soon they won't have to do vaccination for chipping people. What they will do is dump millions of microscopic machines in our water supply. When we drink these machines down, they will flow through our bodies, hook together, and become microchips.

And if they are worried about protecting themselves legally if anybody finds out, they might dump the microscopic machines into the products the potato chip manufacturers sell. This way they have a right to call it chipping.

If they were trying to chip beavers, they could grow the microscopic machines in trees.

i cant wait!

[BADecker]

i thought the vaccine was just a mechanism for Bill Gates to microchip everyone? why wouldn't you say yes?

Soon they won't have to do vaccination for chipping people. What they will do is dump millions of microscopic machines in our water supply. When we drink these machines down, they will flow through our bodies, hook together, and become microchips.

And if they are worried about protecting themselves legally if anybody finds out, they might dump the microscopic machines into the products the potato chip manufacturers sell. This way they have a right to call it chipping.

If they were trying to chip beavers, they could grow the microscopic machines in trees.

i cant wait!

Not the trees any of the tarzans swung from.     

[BADecker]

I'm going to get jabbed with the same vaccine as many times as possible and then start a YouTube/Instagram/TikTok account about it. That ought to be fun.

People who don't believe in Jesus salvation don't have fun after they die.

[DoubleAweSeven]

i thought the vaccine was just a mechanism for Bill Gates to microchip everyone? why wouldn't you say yes?

that's why you shouldn't buy what the government offers you. Always buy from deep web.

[TwitchySeal]

i thought the vaccine was just a mechanism for Bill Gates to microchip everyone? why wouldn't you say yes?

that's why you shouldn't buy what the government offers you. Always buy from deep web.

Deep web drugs also make you feel way better than government vaccines.  Easy decision.

[Tash]

Welcome to zombie apocalypse
https://youtu.be/Ts3wmAvkl4k

From 50sec onward:
What are your thoughts on that well you heard ealier that there is no real concern about aluminum because it is such a small amount and so it really should not matter but the kind of aluminum that we put into vaccines is a different kind of aluminum that we see enviromentally, this is called a nanoparticle and nanoparticles bind really tightly to the bacteria antigens the virus antigens the food protein antigens and any other contaminants that are in the vaccines that we may not know about and we know that the biochemical properties of nanoparticles is that they are capable of entering the brain and so we have not evalueated the safety of the aluminum nanoparticle and its injection and where it goes when it gets into the body and whether it gets into the brain do vaccine ingredients belong in the brain no, do they get into the brain noone has ever studiet it but animal studies using the same chemicals that are in vaccines that we give to children directly demonstrate that the vaccine ingredients do enter the brain, we are ignoring this infromation there are scientists in europe who've actually done studies on the aluminum nanoparticle and have shown that it can persist in the brain for years and decades and so what we're seeing is a large outbreak of neurodevelopmental disabilities in adults including alzheimers and one of the main factors that they're finding in the brains of people with alzheimers is the aluminum nanoparticle thats directly related to the vaccines that we're giving, so we have never studied whether the  aluminum that we're giving in vaccines gets into the brain and we never measured whether it stays in the brain and what it does if it does stay in the brain but we do know that vaccines are supposed to cause inflammation in the body but we have more that half of our children with chronic inflamed conditions and we've never allowed ourselves to ask the question if the vaccines cause inflammation acutely do they continue to create inflammation chronically we have one in five with neurodevelopmental disabilites one in ten with ADD and ADHD one in 35 with autism one and 11 with asthma and one in 20 under the age of five with seizures and the autoimmune diseases are exponentially rising and we are finding that the viruses and the bacteria that we're injecting into the body along with the adjuvants create something called molecular mimicry which means the body sees those viruses thinking that it's foreign but actually finds pieces of those viruses that match pieces of the self and the immune system doesn't differentiate between what it's been told to reject and  itself so it will turn the immune system on itself leading to an autoimmune condition we know this about hepatitis b we know it about the gardasil vaccine and we know it about the flu vaccine and we continue to say unequivocally that the vaccines have been studied effectively and that they're safe and that's just not true.