[ANN][VRC] VeriCoin Proof of Stake-Time Currency | New Roadmap Released

[smoothie]

Hey guys,

It is sad to see such a low value for VRC.  However we are not just motivated by price and this is why we aren't anonymous and haven't walked away.  The most important part of being successful is not giving up and it is the thing most people do. This is a reset, if you must sell so be it.  If you want to build the future, we will be here with the community, working to build it!  If we don't give up, we have already beat most of the competition.  

Words mean very little. Let's see where you are and vericoin is in 1 year from now.

[ELMER_FUD]

Hey guys,

It is sad to see such a low value for VRC.  However we are not just motivated by price and this is why we aren't anonymous and haven't walked away.  The most important part of being successful is not giving up and it is the thing most people do. This is a reset, if you must sell so be it.  If you want to build the future, we will be here with the community, working to build it!  If we don't give up, we have already beat most of the competition.  

Words mean very little. Let's see where you are and vericoin is in 1 year from now.

No matter where he is, at least he will still have integrity and won't be burdened by the negative Karma that's associated with having to constantly spread FUD on other altcoin message boards (unlike some people, who many in the altcoin community seem to loathe).

On the other hand, it's pretty telling to me that this little VeriCoin team seems to be that great of a threat to the other altcoins that they have to send bashers over here to try and scare new investors away.  When you think about it though, it's actually kind of cool.  If VeriCoin was really as dead in the water as so many of the bashers try to say it is then why would they spend so much of their time here?   

[Shinraven]

Hey guys,

It is sad to see such a low value for VRC.  However we are not just motivated by price and this is why we aren't anonymous and haven't walked away.  The most important part of being successful is not giving up and it is the thing most people do. This is a reset, if you must sell so be it.  If you want to build the future, we will be here with the community, working to build it!  If we don't give up, we have already beat most of the competition.  

Words mean very little. Let's see where you are and vericoin is in 1 year from now.

[warr1979]

Hey guys,

It is sad to see such a low value for VRC.  However we are not just motivated by price and this is why we aren't anonymous and haven't walked away.  The most important part of being successful is not giving up and it is the thing most people do. This is a reset, if you must sell so be it.  If you want to build the future, we will be here with the community, working to build it!  If we don't give up, we have already beat most of the competition.  

Real talk hard to see the prices this low.  It sucks!! But!!! I believe in the development team ya are working busting your ass I'm staying I'm supporting!! So please later in the week bust out the big news and enjoy your vacation recharge them batteries and bust it with all the new cool things coming our way.   Cause once the price can rise I can veribit my back side to a vacation!!  Point being I still believe as long as ya three are working vericoin will prosper!!

[TomHolden]

Read it here: http://cryptomen.com/2014/08/an-economist-comments-on-vericoin/

ReTweet: https://twitter.com/BrunoPro79/status/499586582450831360[/center]

It's great that this is being circulated, but I would have been rather happier if you'd checked with me first before republishing this. Given the choice, I would have preferred that you just linked to the original article, as I do not want this to end up coming above my personal homepage on google. (The least you could do is to link to my personal homepage, and to the original article there.) I'm also a bit irked that it's being published with someone else's bitcoin address at the bottom. Perhaps it's naive to expect any control over content once it's online though.

[ELMER_FUD]

"And right here let me say one thing: After spending many years in Wall Street and after making and losing millions of dollars I want to tell you this: It never was my thinking that made the big money for me. It always was my sitting. Got that? My sitting tight! It is no trick at all to be right on the market. You always find lots of early bulls in bull markets and early bears in bear markets.

I’ve known many men who were right at exactly the right time, and began buying and selling stocks when prices were at the very level which should show the greatest profit. And their experience invariably matched mine – that is, they made no real money out of it. Men who can both be right and sit tight are uncommon. I found it one of the hardest things to learn. But it is only after a stock operator has firmly grasped this that he can make big money. It is literally true that millions come easier to a trader after he knows how to trade than hundreds did in the days of his ignorance.

The reason is that a man may see straight and clearly and yet become impatient or doubtful when the market takes its time about doing as he figured it must do. That is why so many men in Wall Street, who are not at all in the sucker class, not even in the third grade, nevertheless lose money. The market does not beat them. They beat themselves, because though they have brains they cannot sit tight."

-  Edwin Lefèvre (via Jesse Livermore), Reminiscences of a Stock Operator, p. 57

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0471770884

[Morb]

"And right here let me say one thing: After spending many years in Wall Street and after making and losing millions of dollars I want to tell you this: It never was my thinking that made the big money for me. It always was my sitting. Got that? My sitting tight! It is no trick at all to be right on the market. You always find lots of early bulls in bull markets and early bears in bear markets.

I’ve known many men who were right at exactly the right time, and began buying and selling stocks when prices were at the very level which should show the greatest profit. And their experience invariably matched mine – that is, they made no real money out of it. Men who can both be right and sit tight are uncommon. I found it one of the hardest things to learn. But it is only after a stock operator has firmly grasped this that he can make big money. It is literally true that millions come easier to a trader after he knows how to trade than hundreds did in the days of his ignorance.

The reason is that a man may see straight and clearly and yet become impatient or doubtful when the market takes its time about doing as he figured it must do. That is why so many men in Wall Street, who are not at all in the sucker class, not even in the third grade, nevertheless lose money. The market does not beat them. They beat themselves, because though they have brains they cannot sit tight."

-  Edwin Lefèvre (via Jesse Livermore), Reminiscences of a Stock Operator, p. 57

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0471770884

I have been trying to learn that lesson for the last few months.  Hopefully I get it right sooner or later.

[ELMER_FUD]

Read it here: http://cryptomen.com/2014/08/an-economist-comments-on-vericoin/

ReTweet: https://twitter.com/BrunoPro79/status/499586582450831360[/center]

It's great that this is being circulated, but I would have been rather happier if you'd checked with me first before republishing this. Given the choice, I would have preferred that you just linked to the original article, as I do not want this to end up coming above my personal homepage on google. (The least you could do is to link to my personal homepage, and to the original article there.) I'm also a bit irked that it's being published with someone else's bitcoin address at the bottom. Perhaps it's naive to expect any control over content once it's online though.

It looks to me like amesterdamer simply reposted the article so you should probably take that up with the people over at cryptomen.com

http://cryptomen.com/about-cryptomen/

[TomHolden]

Read it here: http://cryptomen.com/2014/08/an-economist-comments-on-vericoin/

ReTweet: https://twitter.com/BrunoPro79/status/499586582450831360[/center]

It's great that this is being circulated, but I would have been rather happier if you'd checked with me first before republishing this. Given the choice, I would have preferred that you just linked to the original article, as I do not want this to end up coming above my personal homepage on google. (The least you could do is to link to my personal homepage, and to the original article there.) I'm also a bit irked that it's being published with someone else's bitcoin address at the bottom. Perhaps it's naive to expect any control over content once it's online though.

It looks to me like amesterdamer simply reposted the article so you should probably take that up with the people over at cryptomen.com

http://cryptomen.com/about-cryptomen/

Ahh, sorry amesterdamer, I'd assumed you were associated with them. Sorry again.

[Reavon]

I published a PDF on my thoughts i had several weeks ago

check out my veritalk.info post .

http://veritalk.info/index.php/topic,101.0.html


have a nice day

[ELMER_FUD]

"And right here let me say one thing: After spending many years in Wall Street and after making and losing millions of dollars I want to tell you this: It never was my thinking that made the big money for me. It always was my sitting. Got that? My sitting tight! It is no trick at all to be right on the market. You always find lots of early bulls in bull markets and early bears in bear markets.

I’ve known many men who were right at exactly the right time, and began buying and selling stocks when prices were at the very level which should show the greatest profit. And their experience invariably matched mine – that is, they made no real money out of it. Men who can both be right and sit tight are uncommon. I found it one of the hardest things to learn. But it is only after a stock operator has firmly grasped this that he can make big money. It is literally true that millions come easier to a trader after he knows how to trade than hundreds did in the days of his ignorance.

The reason is that a man may see straight and clearly and yet become impatient or doubtful when the market takes its time about doing as he figured it must do. That is why so many men in Wall Street, who are not at all in the sucker class, not even in the third grade, nevertheless lose money. The market does not beat them. They beat themselves, because though they have brains they cannot sit tight."

-  Edwin Lefèvre (via Jesse Livermore), Reminiscences of a Stock Operator, p. 57

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0471770884

I have been trying to learn that lesson for the last few months.  Hopefully I get it right sooner or later.

It took Jesse Livermore several years to learn it.  That was back after the turn of the last century, years before he started making enormous sums of money.  He allegedly made over $100M during the stock market crash of 1929 and was at one point one of the wealthiest men in the world.

[sdmathis]

Read it here: http://cryptomen.com/2014/08/an-economist-comments-on-vericoin/

ReTweet: https://twitter.com/BrunoPro79/status/499586582450831360[/center]

It's great that this is being circulated, but I would have been rather happier if you'd checked with me first before republishing this. Given the choice, I would have preferred that you just linked to the original article, as I do not want this to end up coming above my personal homepage on google. (The least you could do is to link to my personal homepage, and to the original article there.) I'm also a bit irked that it's being published with someone else's bitcoin address at the bottom. Perhaps it's naive to expect any control over content once it's online though.

You are perfectly within your rights. That's plagiarism, plain and simple. It would be best for everyone if the owner of the site removes your content immediately. Otherwise, you may have to file a DCMA complaint with the web host.

[amesterdamer]

Read it here: http://cryptomen.com/2014/08/an-economist-comments-on-vericoin/

ReTweet: https://twitter.com/BrunoPro79/status/499586582450831360[/center]

It's great that this is being circulated, but I would have been rather happier if you'd checked with me first before republishing this. Given the choice, I would have preferred that you just linked to the original article, as I do not want this to end up coming above my personal homepage on google. (The least you could do is to link to my personal homepage, and to the original article there.) I'm also a bit irked that it's being published with someone else's bitcoin address at the bottom. Perhaps it's naive to expect any control over content once it's online though.

It's the link that's running on twitter, you have something to complain do it over www.cryptomen.com // https://www.facebook.com/groups/cryptomen/ because they published, I only retweeted as everyone else.

[TomHolden]

Read it here: http://cryptomen.com/2014/08/an-economist-comments-on-vericoin/

ReTweet: https://twitter.com/BrunoPro79/status/499586582450831360[/center]

It's great that this is being circulated, but I would have been rather happier if you'd checked with me first before republishing this. Given the choice, I would have preferred that you just linked to the original article, as I do not want this to end up coming above my personal homepage on google. (The least you could do is to link to my personal homepage, and to the original article there.) I'm also a bit irked that it's being published with someone else's bitcoin address at the bottom. Perhaps it's naive to expect any control over content once it's online though.

It's the link that's running on twitter, you have something to complain do it over www.cryptomen.com // https://www.facebook.com/groups/cryptomen/ because they published, I only retweeted as everyone else.

Yes, sorry amesterdamer. I wrongly assumed you were associated with the site.

[amesterdamer]

Yes, sorry amesterdamer. I wrongly assumed you were associated with the site.

Nop, I'm not in anyway - Check you PM

[CryptomenCEO]

Hello Mr. Holden, can you please contact me support@cryptomen.com, this article has been submitted to us like this.

We are promoting it. We have a tipjar system so if you get a lot of views, you will be rewarded, can you give us the original content link so we can add the source. It is really important for us.

We want this blog to be "ethical"! It was in the list of article to recommend and link OUT to, with external link. It is your text, you choose what you do with it.

You can contact us at support@cryptomen.com

Sorry for this confusion,

J.F. Hotte
CEO CRYPTOMEN
www.cryptomen.com

[Shinraven]

Bought some more 

[sdmathis]

Hello Mr. Holden, can you please contact me support@cryptomen.com, this article has been submitted to us like this.

We are promoting it. We have a tipjar system so if you get a lot of views, you will be rewarded, can you give us the original content link so we can add the source. It is really important for us.

We want this blog to be "ethical"! It was in the list of article to recommend and link OUT to, with external link. It is your text, you choose what you do with it.

You can contact us at support@cryptomen.com

Sorry for this confusion,

J.F. Hotte
CEO CRYPTOMEN
www.cryptomen.com

The ethical thing is to not print the article without the author's permission. I'm sure that you are familiar with international copyright law. I'm also sure that you already know that you are in violation of that law.

[TomHolden]

Hello Mr. Holden, can you please contact me support@cryptomen.com, this article has been submitted to us like this.

We are promoting it. We have a tipjar system so if you get a lot of views, you will be rewarded, can you give us the original content link so we can add the source. It is really important for us.

We want this blog to be "ethical"! It was in the list of article to recommend and link OUT to, with external link. It is your text, you choose what you do with it.

You can contact us at support@cryptomen.com

Sorry for this confusion,

J.F. Hotte
CEO CRYPTOMEN
www.cryptomen.com

I've already emailed both your personal and your support address. The content was originally at http://www.tholden.org/files/CommentsOnVeriCoin.pdf

[yoshiwatusi]

Hello Mr. Holden, can you please contact me support@cryptomen.com, this article has been submitted to us like this.

We are promoting it. We have a tipjar system so if you get a lot of views, you will be rewarded, can you give us the original content link so we can add the source. It is really important for us.

We want this blog to be "ethical"! It was in the list of article to recommend and link OUT to, with external link. It is your text, you choose what you do with it.

You can contact us at support@cryptomen.com

Sorry for this confusion,

J.F. Hotte
CEO CRYPTOMEN
www.cryptomen.com

I've already emailed both your personal and your support address. The content was originally at http://www.tholden.org/files/CommentsOnVeriCoin.pdf

to be fair to cryptomen, it was nice that i can just click on a link.. the original reddit link and the link itselfs have to ask me to download a pdf first (some readers are cautious and are turned off by stuff from unverified sources).. anyways, good article..