Bitcoin Forum
December 16, 2017, 09:45:20 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 [60] 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 ... 146 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Tau-Chain and Agoras Official Thread: Generalized P2P Network  (Read 274817 times)
ICOcountdown.com
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630


View Profile WWW
July 09, 2016, 11:57:44 PM
 #1181

who is this guy with 1,909,779.85 IDNI?  Shocked

The Rotschilds?  Cheesy

http://omnichest.info/lookupadd.aspx?address=1DUb2YYbQA1jjaNYzVXLZ7ZioEhLXtbUru


You've probably done, but could you please post the main address where all the premined IDNI's are allocated?

looks like bittrex' wallet.
the unsold tokens are still in the issuer's address

Ok.
I couldnt find that address.
Now I've found it I see it was just in front of my eyes...  Cheesy


If someone has the same problem as I do, stop looking for it!
Here you got it  Cheesy

http://omnichest.info/lookupadd.aspx?address=14gF3Up7wdRdkxAL4GgQLdnM8CThgDUSHR

35,416,899.87 in the issuer address

Yes this is the distribution fund address. Remember everyone you can still buy Agoras directly from the foundation if you want:

http://www.idni.org/pre-sale

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1513460720
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513460720

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513460720
Reply with quote  #2

1513460720
Report to moderator
1513460720
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513460720

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513460720
Reply with quote  #2

1513460720
Report to moderator
tmp2
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25


View Profile
July 10, 2016, 06:28:22 AM
 #1182

if i am not mistaken , ohad mentioned few months ago that there is going to be a new website interface ?
what is the status of the new website ? is it in progress ?
ICOcountdown.com
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630


View Profile WWW
July 10, 2016, 06:35:57 AM
 #1183

if i am not mistaken , ohad mentioned few months ago that there is going to be a new website interface ?
what is the status of the new website ? is it in progress ?


The new website will be released soon. They are more focused on the development of the entire system at the moment.

ccedk_pr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630

http://icoo.io ICOO Power of Creation!


View Profile WWW
July 11, 2016, 02:45:01 PM
 #1184

We are pleased to announce that OMNI and its assets have been added to OpenLedger, media will cover this incoming weeks.

The assets are OPEN.OMNI, OPEN.MAID, OPEN.AGRS, OPEN.AMP, the Tether OPEN.EURT as the first place anywhere, and OPEN.USDT.

You may enter a market simply following this link to

https://bitshares.openledger.info/?r=openledger#/market/OPEN.BTC_OPEN.AGRS

Accessing any other markets simply exchange OPEN.AGRS with any of the above mentioned and you have just accessed a new BTC market on OpenLedger.

Follow us on socials for latest news and updates

Facebook :: LinkedIn ::Twitter

ICOcountdown.com
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630


View Profile WWW
July 12, 2016, 10:06:47 AM
 #1185

We are pleased to announce that OMNI and its assets have been added to OpenLedger, media will cover this incoming weeks.

The assets are OPEN.OMNI, OPEN.MAID, OPEN.AGRS, OPEN.AMP, the Tether OPEN.EURT as the first place anywhere, and OPEN.USDT.

You may enter a market simply following this link to

https://bitshares.openledger.info/?r=openledger#/market/OPEN.BTC_OPEN.AGRS

Accessing any other markets simply exchange OPEN.AGRS with any of the above mentioned and you have just accessed a new BTC market on OpenLedger.

Follow us on socials for latest news and updates

Facebook :: LinkedIn ::Twitter



Thanks ronny Wink

On a positive note dumps are happening less and less frequently now.


maco144
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34


View Profile
July 14, 2016, 09:00:41 PM
 #1186

Ohad your post on facebook today about compilers seems like a major shift from what you've been working on. An advancement (potentially?) for sure, but a lot of new work to focus on. Would you care to summarize more of your thoughts on it here?
ohad
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 878

http://idni.org


View Profile WWW
July 14, 2016, 10:06:32 PM
 #1187

Ohad your post on facebook today about compilers seems like a major shift from what you've been working on.
An advancement (potentially?) for sure, but a lot of new work to focus on.

not shift at all but realizing the logical properties of the representation i concluded is the way to go for our low-level implementation design. the design didn't change and change isn't considered. but if we could have additional security layer in the form of verified jit compiler, it worth considering which additional implications this might imply. such verified compiler wouldn't be possible without very recent advances over the last decade.
if things will look as i guess they can look, then the compiler-construction tool will be even simpler and smaller than the compiler itself. it might even make things that were possible to be done pre-genesis, to be done post-genesis. e.g. extra language features.
but it's still too soon to draw conclusions. i still need to study this subject more.

Quote
Would you care to summarize more of your thoughts on it here?

screenshots here with more explanations http://imgur.com/a/dTPJP

Tau-Chain & Agoras
ICOcountdown.com
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630


View Profile WWW
July 16, 2016, 11:20:53 AM
 #1188

Ohad your post on facebook today about compilers seems like a major shift from what you've been working on. An advancement (potentially?) for sure, but a lot of new work to focus on. Would you care to summarize more of your thoughts on it here?

In the development process the logical thought of the archtitecure is malleable just like how Tauchain itself will be.

klosure
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49


View Profile
July 18, 2016, 02:40:27 AM
 #1189

Ohad your post on facebook today about compilers seems like a major shift from what you've been working on.

@ohad: can you please crosspost anything you post on Facebook here or on idni.org?
It should not be necessary to expose oneself to privacy abuse to be able to follow an open source project.
ohad
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 878

http://idni.org


View Profile WWW
July 18, 2016, 07:10:18 AM
 #1190

Ohad your post on facebook today about compilers seems like a major shift from what you've been working on.

@ohad: can you please crosspost anything you post on Facebook here or on idni.org?
It should not be necessary to expose oneself to privacy abuse to be able to follow an open source project.

all announcements are published here too ofc

Tau-Chain & Agoras
yuyu123
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39


View Profile
July 19, 2016, 05:32:09 AM
 #1191

In case the community shall give a principal agreement for the following proposal, I wish to ask Ohad, to halt the current ongoing ICO after reaching the total sale of 21 million tokens. In addition, I wish to ask Ohad to freeze the sum of 19.74 million tokens in favor of the following specified monetary plan, or any other plans which are offered and accepted by the community.  

1. Block Rewards:
It seems that the PoW consensus paradigm will be used in Agoras. Currently there is no plan to assign coins in favor of Block rewards. The mechanics of the PoW consensus without block rewards is an experiment that was never tried before in any other coin, and is considered by many to be unfeasible for implementation (even in Bitcoin in 30 years time). At first, the Agoras economy is expected to be of a relatively low market value, and to have relatively few users and transactions. I therefore predict that the underlying network will not be sufficiently secure without the use of block rewards. I suggest assigning 5% of the total number of coins, equaling the sum of up to 2.1 million tokens, to be used for block rewards. These will spread out over many years, to ensure network security. If we avoid assigning coins to this purpose now, and all the tokens offered for sale are sold, it will be needed to "print out" additional coins over the planned maximal amount of 42 million tokens.

2. The distribution of Agoras coins to Bitcoin holders, in exchange for Bitcoin burning:
Agoras will posses superior technology which will enable it to replace Bitcoin as the number 1 cryptographic currency. The probability to achieve this goal is greater if we chose to involve the Bitcoin community in the Agoras economy, and if we can create monetary continuity between the Bitcoin and Agoras market value. To achieve this, I suggest building an automated mechanism which distributes to Bitcoin holders, up to 42% of the total number of Agoras coins, equaling up to 17.64 million tokens, in exchange for the burning of up to 21 million Bitcoins. Such mechanism will be active in time and quantity limited steps. In the creation of Bitcoin, the more we move forward on the time line, the less coins are minted, for a higher value, to a larger number of users. Differing from this mechanism, I suggest that the distribution of Agoras in exchange for the burning of Bitcoins, as mentioned above, will be done in stages. During the initial stages, a small number of coins will be offered to for a reduced price, and the more we move forward on the time line, the number of coins for distribution will increase along with their price.


For example:

In the first stage:
100,000 Agoras coins will be distributed in exchange for the burning of Bitcoins, according to an exchange rate representing a market value of about 210,000 Bitcoins for the entire Agoras economy. Such stage will be valid until the completion of the specified quota, or the completion of 6 months after the genesis block.

In the second stage:
270,000 Agoras coins will be distributed in exchange for the burning of Bitcoins, according to an exchange rate representing a market value of about 231,000 Bitcoins for the entire Agoras economy. Such stage will be valid until the completion of the specified quota, or the completion of 7 months after the genesis block.

In the third stage:
474,000 Agoras coins will be distributed in exchange for the burning of Bitcoins, according to an exchange rate representing a market value of about 254,000 Bitcoins for the entire Agoras economy. Such stage will be valid until the completion of the specified quota, or the completion of 8 months after the genesis block.

And so on…
Agoras coins which will not be distributed will be destroyed.

The initial price of Agoras, in the distribution phase in exchange for Bitcoin burning, needs to be significantly higher than the price paid by investors in the ICO, yet significantly lower than the price which represents the entire market value of the Bitcoin economy. For example: a price which represents a market value of about 210,000 Bitcoins to the entire Agoras economy.

Due to our ambition, that Agoras will replace Bitcoin as the number 1 cryptographic coin, and reach a higher market value, the final distribution phase price, must be significantly higher than the price which represents the entire value of the Bitcoin economy. For example: a price which represents a market value larger than 50 million Bitcoins to the entire Agoras economy.

I propose that the above mentioned distribution mechanism will transfer the Agoras coins only after 1000 confirmations where reached for the Bitcoin burning transaction (or any other prolonged period). This is necessary, in order to reduce the usage of such mechanism for short term speculations, and mostly, in order to reduce the lack of trust in the Bitcoin network. It might be that certain miners will try to hurt the mechanism by approving a burn transaction and afterwards move to a different chain which does not approve this transaction.



Questions and answers:

Q:
Why you suggest to freeze 19.74 million tokens and not a different number?
A:
In the post in which Ohad presents the conditions of the ICO for Agoras (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=736447.msg10403838#msg10403838), he designates 50% of the tokens for the ICO, and 3% of the tokens for funding post genesis development of Agoras. He does not present designation for the additional 47% which equals 19.74 million tokens.

Q:
What will happen if the ICO sells less than 21 million tokens?
A:
I suggest keeping a relative amount of 47% of the total number of Agoras coins for the suggested monetary plans. If only 10 million tokens are sold, respectively, I suggest assigning to the monetary plans only 9.4 million tokens.

Q:
What shall happen after all block reward coins are distributed?
A:
The same problem also exists in Bitcoin. The coins assigned for block rewards will be spread out over many years. For example: over the period of 40 years. In 40 years time one of the following solutions will probably be implemented:

1. Agoras will not exist and will not be needed.
2. Agoras coins will be of significant value, and the underlying network will sustain a large number of transactions, so it will be possible to base network security on commissions alone.
3. The consensus mechanism will be changed to PoS.
4. A different consensus mechanism than PoW or PoS will be found and implemented.
5. If none of the above specified scenarios materializes, and no other solution will be found, we will be forced to "print out" a small number of additional coins, in order to assign them to block rewards for additional years to come.

Q:
The tokens suggested to be frozen will not be offered for sale in the ICO, and thus less money in raised for development.
A:
Not necessarily. There are still 14 million tokens for sale and this is a vast amount. Ohad can update the tokens price to reach optimization so enough funds are raised for the sake of development.

Q:
I principally agree to the freezing of tokens for future monetary use, but not to the presented plans and numbers.
A:
 The current suggestion is only to freeze the specified tokens until the community makes a future decision over Tau, what to do with them. Tau will provide tools to create a better decision mechanism than what is presently available. All presented figures are purely intuitive, without mathematical optimization, and are aimed for demonstration purposes only. The community will be able to perform optimization for these figures over Tau.

Q:
What is the actual amount of Agoras coins that will be distributed for the sake of burning Bitcoins?
A:
One of the main goals of this plan is to create monetary continuity between Bitcoin and Agoras and to facilitate Agoras as the number 1 cryptographic currency. Therefore, we wish to allocate for distribution the amount of Agoras coins in return to the burning of 21 million Bitcoins. We have a definitive proof that not all of the allocated Agoras coins will be distributed during this process due to the fact that not all 21 million Bitcoins will be burned proportionally.
The amount of Agoras coins to be distributed during this process is dependent on the future market price of the Agoras coin. It is reasonable to assume that if the market price of Agoras will be marginal, no Bitcoins will be burned in the process, and no Agoras coins will be distributed respectively. If the market price of Agoras will be high, a small amount of Bitcoins will be burned in the process and a small amount of Agoras coins will be distributed. In case the market price of Agoras will be considerably higher (representing a market value of at least 50 million Bitcoins and more), a large amount of Bitcoins will be burned and a large amount of Agoras coins will be distributed.


* thanks to mr. coinzy for translate this proposal to English.

sotisoti
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 731


View Profile
July 19, 2016, 07:08:39 AM
 #1192

In case the community shall give a principal agreement for the following proposal, I wish to ask Ohad, to halt the current ongoing ICO after reaching the total sale of 21 million tokens. In addition, I wish to ask Ohad to freeze the sum of 19.74 million tokens in favor of the following specified monetary plan, or any other plans which are offered and accepted by the community.  

1. Block Rewards:
It seems that the PoW consensus paradigm will be used in Agoras. Currently there is no plan to assign coins in favor of Block rewards. The mechanics of the PoW consensus without block rewards is an experiment that was never tried before in any other coin, and is considered by many to be unfeasible for implementation (even in Bitcoin in 30 years time). At first, the Agoras economy is expected to be of a relatively low market value, and to have relatively few users and transactions. I therefore predict that the underlying network will not be sufficiently secure without the use of block rewards. I suggest assigning 5% of the total number of coins, equaling the sum of up to 2.1 million tokens, to be used for block rewards. These will spread out over many years, to ensure network security. If we avoid assigning coins to this purpose now, and all the tokens offered for sale are sold, it will be needed to "print out" additional coins over the planned maximal amount of 42 million tokens.

2. The distribution of Agoras coins to Bitcoin holders, in exchange for Bitcoin burning:
Agoras will posses superior technology which will enable it to replace Bitcoin as the number 1 cryptographic currency. The probability to achieve this goal is greater if we chose to involve the Bitcoin community in the Agoras economy, and if we can create monetary continuity between the Bitcoin and Agoras market value. To achieve this, I suggest building an automated mechanism which distributes to Bitcoin holders, up to 42% of the total number of Agoras coins, equaling up to 17.64 million tokens, in exchange for the burning of up to 21 million Bitcoins. Such mechanism will be active in time and quantity limited steps. In the creation of Bitcoin, the more we move forward on the time line, the less coins are minted, for a higher value, to a larger number of users. Differing from this mechanism, I suggest that the distribution of Agoras in exchange for the burning of Bitcoins, as mentioned above, will be done in stages. During the initial stages, a small number of coins will be offered to for a reduced price, and the more we move forward on the time line, the number of coins for distribution will increase along with their price.


For example:

In the first stage:
100,000 Agoras coins will be distributed in exchange for the burning of Bitcoins, according to an exchange rate representing a market value of about 210,000 Bitcoins for the entire Agoras economy. Such stage will be valid until the completion of the specified quota, or the completion of 6 months after the genesis block.

In the second stage:
270,000 Agoras coins will be distributed in exchange for the burning of Bitcoins, according to an exchange rate representing a market value of about 231,000 Bitcoins for the entire Agoras economy. Such stage will be valid until the completion of the specified quota, or the completion of 7 months after the genesis block.

In the third stage:
474,000 Agoras coins will be distributed in exchange for the burning of Bitcoins, according to an exchange rate representing a market value of about 254,000 Bitcoins for the entire Agoras economy. Such stage will be valid until the completion of the specified quota, or the completion of 8 months after the genesis block.

And so on…
Agoras coins which will not be distributed will be destroyed.

The initial price of Agoras, in the distribution phase in exchange for Bitcoin burning, needs to be significantly higher than the price paid by investors in the ICO, yet significantly lower than the price which represents the entire market value of the Bitcoin economy. For example: a price which represents a market value of about 210,000 Bitcoins to the entire Agoras economy.

Due to our ambition, that Agoras will replace Bitcoin as the number 1 cryptographic coin, and reach a higher market value, the final distribution phase price, must be significantly higher than the price which represents the entire value of the Bitcoin economy. For example: a price which represents a market value larger than 50 million Bitcoins to the entire Agoras economy.

I propose that the above mentioned distribution mechanism will transfer the Agoras coins only after 1000 confirmations where reached for the Bitcoin burning transaction (or any other prolonged period). This is necessary, in order to reduce the usage of such mechanism for short term speculations, and mostly, in order to reduce the lack of trust in the Bitcoin network. It might be that certain miners will try to hurt the mechanism by approving a burn transaction and afterwards move to a different chain which does not approve this transaction.



Questions and answers:

Q:
Why you suggest to freeze 19.74 million tokens and not a different number?

A:
In the post in which Ohad presents the conditions of the ICO for Agoras (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=736447.msg10403838#msg10403838), he designates 50% of the tokens for the ICO, and 3% of the tokens for funding post genesis development of Agoras. He does not present designation for the additional 47% which equals 19.74 million tokens.


Q:
What will happen if the ICO sells less than 21 million tokens?

A:
I suggest keeping a relative amount of 47% of the total number of Agoras coins for the suggested monetary plans. If only 10 million tokens are sold, respectively, I suggest assigning to the monetary plans only 9.4 million tokens.


Q:
What shall happen after all block reward coins are distributed?

A:
The same problem also exists in Bitcoin. The coins assigned for block rewards will be spread out over many years. For example: over the period of 40 years. In 40 years time one of the following solutions will probably be implemented:

1. Agoras will not exist and will not be needed.
2. Agoras coins will be of significant value, and the underlying network will sustain a large number of transactions, so it will be possible to base network security on commissions alone.
3. The consensus mechanism will be changed to PoS.
4. A different consensus mechanism than PoW or PoS will be found and implemented.
5. If none of the above specified scenarios materializes, and no other solution will be found, we will be forced to "print out" a small number of additional coins, in order to assign them to block rewards for additional years to come.

Q:
The tokens suggested to be frozen will not be offered for sale in the ICO, and thus less money in raised for development.
A:
Not necessarily. There are still 14 million tokens for sale and this is a vast amount. Ohad can update the tokens price to reach optimization so enough funds are raised for the sake of development.

Q:
I principally agree to the freezing of tokens for future monetary use, but not to the presented plans and numbers.

A:
 The current suggestion is only to freeze the specified tokens until the community makes a future decision over Tau, what to do with them. Tau will provide tools to create a better decision mechanism than what is presently available. All presented figures are purely intuitive, without mathematical optimization, and are aimed for demonstration purposes only. The community will be able to perform optimization for these figures over Tau.

I am opposed to the idea of burning Bitcoin. We are not counterparty anyway.
steveds
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966


View Profile
July 19, 2016, 07:47:11 AM
 #1193

lmfao...i was about to shit in my pants when i saw satoshi posting in this thread...lol then i saw it was sotisoti Tongue
yuyu123
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39


View Profile
July 19, 2016, 09:25:38 AM
 #1194



I am opposed to the idea of burning Bitcoin. We are not counterparty anyway.

contrary to Counterparty, which is complementary product to bitcoin, Agoras can be alternative coin to bitcoin and can replace it, so burning Bitcoin for Agoras is much more sensible than in Counterparty issue. 
ohad
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 878

http://idni.org


View Profile WWW
July 19, 2016, 09:30:48 AM
 #1195

yuyu123 discussed those ideas with me few times, and i promised him that i'll respect the community's opinion. my plan (unless we all decide otherwise) is to let those considerations arise over tau, and we collaboratively build agoras using it (this is exactly what tau is built for, collaborative social&sw dev platform). coupled with that, the belief that once we reach that stage of developing agoras together, there will still be left many coins for sale, probably more than 50%, which will happen either naturally or by raising the price.

Tau-Chain & Agoras
Rw13enlib88
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288



View Profile
July 19, 2016, 11:46:11 AM
 #1196

yuyu123

point for you for the PoW

the other things almost makes no sense.
burning? What about the team getting paid so they can eat?
You're planning an ICO which is already started, and you want to move all the specfications.

sounds like you should create a new coin
If you make a great team and clear specifications,  I could invest in it.

yuyu123
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39


View Profile
July 20, 2016, 05:18:06 AM
 #1197

What about the team getting paid so they can eat?


I've already referred to this issue:

"
Q:
The tokens suggested to be frozen will not be offered for sale in the ICO, and thus less money in raised for development.
A:
Not necessarily. There are still 14 million tokens for sale and this is a vast amount. Ohad can update the tokens price to reach optimization so enough funds are raised for the sake of development.
"




You're planning an ICO which is already started, and you want to move all the specfications.

We have to Assign coins to be used for block rewards if we don't want to "print out" additional coins over the planned maximal amount of 42 million tokens. The second plan for distribution of Agoras coins to Bitcoin holders, in exchange for Bitcoin burning is optional, but brings us great opportunity to involve the Bitcoin community in the Agoras economy and get many more users to the new coin.

The original ICO specifications are not changing as I wrote here:

"
Q:
Why you suggest to freeze 19.74 million tokens and not a different number?

A:
In the post in which Ohad presents the conditions of the ICO for Agoras (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=736447.msg10403838#msg10403838), he designates 50% of the tokens for the ICO, and 3% of the tokens for funding post genesis development of Agoras. He does not present designation for the additional 47% which equals 19.74 million tokens.
"



sounds like you should create a new coin
If you make a great team and clear specifications,  I could invest in it.

I think the principle of monetary continuity needs to be a standard in any new cryptocurrency aiming to achieve mass adoption among the crypto community 
Rw13enlib88
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288



View Profile
July 20, 2016, 11:52:29 AM
 #1198

dude,
the only point you made was about PoW
If you wanna include PoW reward, need to agree on that first and then start discussing where it's gonna come from
1) no need to change the ICO. its ok as it is.
2) No need to give AGRS for free, it's interesting enought, so just buy them
3) 2% inflation is not necesary for itself



ohad
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 878

http://idni.org


View Profile WWW
July 20, 2016, 01:02:53 PM
 #1199

dude,
the only point you made was about PoW
If you wanna include PoW reward, need to agree on that first and then start discussing where it's gonna come from
1) no need to change the ICO. its ok as it is.
2) No need to give AGRS for free, it's interesting enought, so just buy them
3) 2% inflation is not necesary for itself

what i have in mind regarding pow is to have a "miners tax", a dynamic percentage that'll be used for mining reward, to be able to be changed with time. unlike implicit tax-by-inflation like in bitcoin. but that's only my personal opinion -- we'll do it all over tau.

Tau-Chain & Agoras
yuyu123
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39


View Profile
July 20, 2016, 08:04:14 PM
 #1200

dude,
the only point you made was about PoW
If you wanna include PoW reward, need to agree on that first and then start discussing where it's gonna come from
1) no need to change the ICO. its ok as it is.
2) No need to give AGRS for free, it's interesting enought, so just buy them
3) 2% inflation is not necesary for itself

what i have in mind regarding pow is to have a "miners tax", a dynamic percentage that'll be used for mining reward, to be able to be changed with time. unlike implicit tax-by-inflation like in bitcoin. but that's only my personal opinion -- we'll do it all over tau.


Cryptocurrency with "tax" couldn't ever be used as store of value instrument, and no exchange would add it. It is also a security and  ideological backdoor, as it is a mechanism that can take money from your wallet without having your private key.
Pages: « 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 [60] 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 ... 146 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!