I would like to see this logo at the top of the OP thread, and on the new wallet version eventually... also on the forum thread. It would be in the Community's interest to establish a COMM specialist forum soon , in order to well-organize topics as the community grows larger.
|
|
|
anyone else see its minting?
Mine does as well, but during sync I got 5 transactions which got no confirms, after sync new transactions (with slightly different amounts) came in which where synced. Looks a bit odd to me, but maybe when I'll read a paper about how PoS works I'll understand... During sync mined stake usually gets orphaned anyway (happens after sync sometimes as well). Don't worry, if a mined stake is not accepted once, the block returns to its place in the wallet queue and keeps it's coin age: it still qualifies, so you will get the relevant stake when it hits another block later.
|
|
|
COMM is moving towards listing on better exchanges.
Nice and slowly does it ! Keep the price low for a while so that distribution with be wider.
|
|
|
I just realised, that this thread is growing rapidly. 288 pages in less than two weeks. Can't say COMM has nonactive community.
Yes, this is going to be a key factor in growth of COMM. .. and was part of the original concept . There is a big positive to the 'lost' coins, and that is that it will stop speculators pumping COMM. The experienced Crypto users know that it is greedy short-termists who can damage a coin the most. ...The price will stay steady at a lower level for longer, without destructive speculation, and the growth will reflect true value from the Community Projects.
|
|
|
I have a technical question due to POS. I have got 1mln of COMM to addres XXXXXXX and after that I created second addres YYYYYY that I sent coins I bought on exchange. So I have 1mln + 'amount I bought' but not associated with one address but 2 different addresess on the same wallet. Should I send this coins (that I bought) to the address I got 1mln from initial distribution or leave it like that?
Doesn't really matter, but having all in one address means slightly less complications. COMM has a min coin age of just 1 day, so moving coins is not such an issue as with other PoS coins. But the amount of coins mined will be the same yes? The total amount will be the same over time, yes. However it is sometimes a good idea to get larger blocks because your wallet is competing on the network with other wallets to mine stake: The 'weight' of a block determines the priority of mining, but it is still just a probability. As your coins get older they get more 'weight', and bigger blocks have more weight of course. All the small blocks will eventually stake their correct amounts anyway , but they might take a bit longer (and use more CPU power pro rata)
|
|
|
ECC is heading towards being the most widely listed (on exchanges) alt coin. That is an important cachet. Adding to payment options on many sites is coming next. Proof of Stake coins are definitely the future, and ECC is not just one of them, but is explaining the reasons they are better than PoW, and bringing that message to the world.
|
|
|
I have a technical question due to POS. I have got 1mln of COMM to addres XXXXXXX and after that I created second addres YYYYYY that I sent coins I bought on exchange. So I have 1mln + 'amount I bought' but not associated with one address but 2 different addresess on the same wallet. Should I send this coins (that I bought) for the address I got 1mln from initial distribution or leave it like that?
yes. with the increasing difficulty, it might take a while before the amount you bought start to give minted coin (well if you bought 2millions, it will be fast), it is linked to its weight compared to the total amount of coin (?) So you are saying I should send all my own coins to the one address on my wallet? Is it possible to send coins to yourself in the meaning of having all on one address? You could send all to one address, or you could import address to the same wallet.
|
|
|
I have a technical question due to POS. I have got 1mln of COMM to addres XXXXXXX and after that I created second addres YYYYYY that I sent coins I bought on exchange. So I have 1mln + 'amount I bought' but not associated with one address but 2 different addresess on the same wallet. Should I send this coins (that I bought) to the address I got 1mln from initial distribution or leave it like that?
Doesn't really matter, but having all in one address means slightly less complications. COMM has a min coin age of just 1 day, so moving coins is not such an issue as with other PoS coins.
|
|
|
what are the future plans for this coin?
COMM will be one of the most widely adopted Alt Coins. The speculators are being taken out , and it will be promoted by experienced Crypto people. COMM is whatever you , the Community, want, whatever you put in.
|
|
|
But I still feel this coin should be re-launched because of the 200m 'lost' coins. Relaunch it and then give away the coins fairly, once they have been distributed fairly then it may stand somewhat of a chance, right now it will die because of the lost coins.
No need to change the name. No need to change the website, or anything for that matter. Just bring up the coin in its original form (100% premine) and start again. It would be a more fair distribution now as a lot more people know about it, and most certainly extend the distribution to a lot more than 500. Find how many active members of the community exist, get the total number of coins and divide it by #members.
So who is with me on the re-launch? or are we going to promote a coin that could potentially see a huge dump in the future when the dev sell that 20% in one day? He may have genuinely lost them, by why take that risk when it's so easy to launch a new coin? As I said, the coin already exists, it just can be reset, the website already exists, just update the wallet to the new one, the community already exists...
relaunch??? not a good idea i think, how about those who buy the coins in the exchange? the coins is doing fine, we will just monitor the lost coins as much as we can. Yes, COMM is doing fine. The most important thing is to let evolution occur , accidents and all. Those who try to put everything in a box, and think they can predict future effects are usually proven wrong.
|
|
|
But I still feel this coin should be re-launched because of the 200m 'lost' coins. Relaunch it and then give away the coins fairly, once they have been distributed fairly then it may stand somewhat of a chance, right now it will die because of the lost coins.
No need to change the name. No need to change the website, or anything for that matter. Just bring up the coin in its original form (100% premine) and start again. It would be a more fair distribution now as a lot more people know about it, and most certainly extend the distribution to a lot more than 500. Find how many active members of the community exist, get the total number of coins and divide it by #members.
So who is with me on the re-launch? or are we going to promote a coin that could potentially see a huge dump in the future when the dev sell that 20% in one day? He may have genuinely lost them, by why take that risk when it's so easy to launch a new coin? As I said, the coin already exists, it just can be reset, the website already exists, just update the wallet to the new one, the community already exists...
COMM exist as it is, and it will live or die as it is. The 'lost' coins may even turn out to be a positive in the long term.... It is not possible to predict chaotic effects. Anyone who wants a relaunch is free to do it, but it will be a different coin. I have invested in over 50 different alts over the last year or so, and I can tell you that the most controversial ones (with the biggest problems and the most hate) often did best. Therefore let time tell. COMM has the right stuff IMO.
|
|
|
seemingly the dev is keeping some coins to himself?
And you made a new account just to post that? That is not normal..you must suffer from some kind on mental illness Just a Troll back in another guise. Lots of effort: motivation is usually to buy some COMM cheap. I (and other sane people) merely ignore coins that I don't like. I am expecting to pick up some cheap COMM in the next few weeks.
|
|
|
Sorry for asking but I don't feel like reading through the last 100 pages of this thread - what exactly are the problems with the wallet that need fixing?
There are no problems with the wallet software. Probably what is being referred to is the loss and deletion of 196m coins. The wallet has been publicly marked. That is what I figured as well, but I keep reading about contacting devs and such to "fix" something - mine works great, stake works, stays sync'd - a far cry from what I'm used to seeing in new coins for the past month As for the lost 196million coins, I believe the OP has a link to the wallet that contained these coins, which appears to still contain these coins (and should forever, assuming the wallet was truly lost). Whats the BFD? It provides some material for Trolls and Whingers to give us entertainment. I myself believe that this sort of controversy is good for a coin's early distribution: it keeps price down for a while to give would-be buyers a better chance. Without the circus, COMM could be much more expensive already, and canny buyers don't like to chase price... In a few months time a lot more people will know about COMM
|
|
|
Sorry for asking but I don't feel like reading through the last 100 pages of this thread - what exactly are the problems with the wallet that need fixing?
There are no problems with the wallet software. Probably what is being referred to is the loss and deletion of 196m coins. The wallet has been publicly marked.
|
|
|
277 Pages on this thread in less than 2 weeks. ..that is pretty good going. The Community is off to a good start, and that is the number one factor in success. Everything else is less important.
When you have a willing and skillful community, any problems can be solved, and growth is assured.
COMM is a Pure Proof of Stake coin with good early distribution.
|
|
|
and you know why i upload images?
All the images are tagged with ecc eccoin words...So that the google engine can find them easier... that is a small form of publicity... publicity means better distribution... better aknowledgment...better community...
what the heck even funnier community...
There isnt a single thread in btcointalk with people making jokes or spending some time.. everywhere trollers ,whiners...crybabies... and complaints...
Well we dont want that here.... thats what a community is.. sharing...sharing even problems that dont have to do directly with coins.. thats when a strong community is founded...
That's right... All threads are full of 'trollers ,whiners...crybabies... and complaints...' Cherry picking ? Good luck Unfair ? Life's like that Dumping ? Great: out with the weak hands, more distribution. That stuff is just short termism, and won't matter this time next year. The dev. is hard working, and most of the community is properly committed.
|
|
|
Is not supposed to receive stack interests daily? I've not received a single comm since the 4th april, when I received my initial 1000k coins, those are still there.
The wallet is unlocked and updated (v.1.3.0), maybe am I missing something?
Did you leave it open for a day or so ? What is your CPU ? The minting of stake is a mining process, and is probabilistic, and faster with more processing power.. There is a chance stake could mint in the first minute of opening, but equally, might not happen for 10 hours.
|
|
|
Something about multipool: Creating multipool was inspirated by BC, and it works fine for them as we see. But Im not sure if they have contract with other existing multipools like waffle etc... I thing they have multipool with their own power so miners r connecting only to blackcoinpool, not to waffle. It is a big difference. I appreciate Adrianos work but I thing that at this time we have no sufficient power by miners, so we decided to be part of an existing multipool to push price up. Its all about current price of comm. Situation can by changed when comm will be listed at mintpal. Price will be probably higher than now and mine scrypt coins via other existing pools will be more profitable. Then we will see more and more miners who want to get profits from comm and they will join to the pool. But is need to create our own pool, not just be part of an existing one. And next thing is, that it takes too long to get comms from mining at waffle. About week ? There is no API to exchanges yet to automatically convert btc to comms, becasue comms r listen now just on poloniex, as one "serious" existing exchange. So people cant get their comms daily, but its done manually. There is a lot of work yet to create own working real comm multipool, not just be part of an existing one with 2% fees. Correct me if Im wrong...
It is essential to have a pool that pays in COMM exclusively... otherwise the multipool can actually depress the price of COMM. I do see the need for another pool, but only temporarily.. should be moving now for an exclusive owned pool.
|
|
|
If we want coin to succeed in it's best way, we have to generate ideas about some new original service.
Jep, Otherwise it will be a simple pump and dump. A new original service would be the best thing but quite hard to achieve, maybe the dev has something planned? Otherwise we could try to get more places and services to accept COMM as payment. Naturally it's hard to achieve but I think the star to follow is something that could be useful for the community, like little services that everyone could do or something similar - Faucets, games, gambling etc. are quite achievable. - Businesses accepting COMM will probably only succeed when we're listed on a decent exchange. - Something original from other coins; don't really see how we at this moment can offer something else than the rest. Yes.. Just keep throwing ideas in. These are very early stages.. one thing at a time. Probably having another exchange or two will help. Distribution has hardly started (phase 1 in the IPO, and there are many more phases)
|
|
|
|