Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 09:37:23 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 [86] 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 »
1701  Economy / Long-term offers / Re: How to Identify a Ponzi on: September 02, 2012, 11:17:50 PM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=105285.0

My list of current Ponzi's
1702  Economy / Long-term offers / Re: Starfish BCB - Loans and Deposits on: September 02, 2012, 11:14:49 PM
I thought it would be useful to seek some clarification about what it would take for Starfish to achieve the mythical Micon seal of approval.  What that turned out to be was essentially revealing the details of every piece of business that I transact in bitcoinland. 

Nothing Mythical about it.  Anyone offering to borrow more money at 1% per week after having already borrowed ~$200k USD and with a positive balance sheet appears to be a scam.  I am willing to debate this with you.  Please answer me the following question about your balance sheet:

Quote from: PatrickHarnett
July 2012 activity (updated 1 August 2012)
 - 14 loans repaid  (approx 7800BTC)
 - 32 loans current (approx 8800 BTC)
 - 66 deposits (total approx 15400)
 - deposits repaid during the month (at call) >3600

Total liabilities (Deposits + other commitments) = 19,700
Total assets (cash, BTC, investments) = 37,100
Net assets 17,400BTC

this seems to me that you claim to owe 19,700 BTC to current depositors.  
you claim to have 37,100 BTC between cash / BTC / investments

Q:  Why would you ever need to borrow another satoshi at 1% if you have 17,400 BTC profit ?
1703  Economy / Long-term offers / Re: Bryan Micon's List of Non-BCST Ponzi's Still Running (with credit rating) on: September 02, 2012, 09:50:53 PM
Clearly, the "How to Identify a Ponzi" post wasn't clear enough. The very first "hint" that something "might" be a ponzi was: > 50% APR.

Indeed, it makes no sense to ask people to lend you money at those ridiculously high rates. It's literally pissing away money. Even credit card companies' usury rates are nowhere near as bad.

So, props to Micon for trying to make it clearer. Too bad nobody will listen, as usual.


I ask you to join me Metal.

This culture of blatant scamming is embarrassing legit BTC operations like SealsWithClubs.  We can't be known as the scam-currency and expect to grow.
Do you accept that some people borrow and pay back BTC at 10% per month in the lending section?

Do you accept that someone could borrow BTC for 1%/week, lend it out for 2.5% per week, then pay it back?

These are very good questions and are key to understanding these scams:  

1)  Yes, I fully accept that there are a handful of legitimate users borrowing at these high rates (more than 1% per week, 10% for a 1 month loan, etc)

2)  however, there are not nearly enough of them (go add up a month's worth) to support the giant sizes of these high interest borrowing scams.  Vescudo alone has $25k USD on deposit with him.  RustyRyan has $6k USD on deposit.  PatrickHarnett has $100k+ with him.

Everyone says "look guys - people borrow at X% per week So I borrow at (X-1)% per week from you, handle all the BS, and we'll share the profits"  At the current size of this community, you could do this for a few hundred coins per month and make a very small profit.

Judging by PatrickHarnett's amateur-hour "My First Balance Sheet" for Starfish:
Quote from: PatrickHarnett

July 2012 activity (updated 1 August 2012)
 - 14 loans repaid  (approx 7800BTC)
 - 32 loans current (approx 8800 BTC)
 - 66 deposits (total approx 15400)
 - deposits repaid during the month (at call) >3600

Total liabilities (Deposits + other commitments) = 19,700
Total assets (cash, BTC, investments) = 37,100
Net assets 17,400BTC

looks like he is loaning out $88k USD currently.  Seems like the community couldn't support a fraction of this.
1704  Economy / Long-term offers / Re: ★ VESCUDERO's Risk-free Weekly Term deposits at 1.5% ★ on: September 02, 2012, 09:32:47 PM
This is yet another $100k+ scam

Did you even look at the OP? Where do you gather these statistics?

ok you guys got me, off by a decimal.  Only $25k scam.

Current Deposits:
Code:
ID:        Depositor:           Deposit Amount:           Weekly Interest Rate:             First Deposit made:
ID_001        1sm1q                    100 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/06/24
ID_003        DeadTerra                 50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/06/24
ID_004        der_meister               50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/06/24
ID_005        gsan                     125 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/06/24
ID_006        IveBeenBit                50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/08/18
ID_007        joyyen                   100 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/06/24
ID_008        Mushoz                    10 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/06/24
ID_009        Otoh                     304 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/06/24
ID_010        pyramining               100 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/06/24
ID_012        nimda                    1.5 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/01
ID_013        1GqbET4cd6                50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/01
ID_014        Btc4Domains               50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/01
ID_017        exahash                   50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/01
ID_020        Maidak                     5 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/08/31
ID_021        SimBesh                   50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/07
ID_022        isthisreallife          17.5 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/07
ID_025        EcmSeer                   50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/07
ID_027        PatrickHarnett            50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/08
ID_028        mollison                  30 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/08
ID_029        david113                  27 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/11
ID_033        OneEyed                   50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/13
ID_034        gladamas                  25 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/13
ID_037        Onichan                   50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/13
ID_038        jaebird                   50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/14
ID_039        zebedee                   50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/14
ID_040        Xenophon                  10 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/14
ID_041        area                      50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/14
ID_043        thirdlight                10 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/14
ID_044        johnlu                    15 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/14
ID_045        cst                       20 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/14
ID_047        Soros Shorts              50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/14
ID_049        zakariax                  50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/15
ID_050        oneoctet                  50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/15
ID_051        ElRaffa                   50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/18
ID_052        slider1978                50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/18
ID_053        pepelu                    10 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/21
ID_055        asfas16123                50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/22             
ID_056        0xz[.]                    50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/22
ID_057        drrussellshane           2.5 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/22
ID_058        gabbynot                  50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/22
ID_061        Russel616                 11 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/28
ID_062        wachtwoord                50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/28
ID_063        Koekiemonster             15 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/07/30
ID_066        Jaume_Marti             5.29 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/08/04
ID_067        juggalodarkclow            5 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/08/04
ID_068        walterkronkite         21.16 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/08/04
ID_069        biteye                    50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/08/05
ID_070        phr33                     50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/08/09
ID_071        Manolo_Lucena             30 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/08/09
ID_072        flix                       5 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/08/09
ID_073        Laura_Caņete            10.3 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/08/11
ID_074        rta                       20 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/08/12
ID_075        zaj                       10 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/08/12
ID_077        Justin00                  50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/08/13
ID_079        MoinCoin               16.67 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/08/16
ID_080        1Pakis                    50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/08/19
ID_081        psy                       50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/08/19
ID_082        Boson                     10 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/08/25
ID_084        smell                     50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/08/29
ID_085        Eisenberg                 50 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/08/31
ID_086        jaspita                   10 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/09/01
ID_087        TheOtherGuy                5 BTC                     1.5%                           2012/09/02
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Bitcoins deposited:          2586.91 BTC
1705  Economy / Long-term offers / Re: ★ VESCUDERO's Risk-free Weekly Term deposits at 1.5% ★ on: September 02, 2012, 09:22:58 PM
Micon could you please  get your ass out of all these threads I like to follow? You're making it quite hard for me with all he off-topic unsubstantiated nonsense you're constantly repeating. If you do not comply I will start reporting every such post of yours to the modsto try ad get you removed from these forums instead and adviseothers to do the same.

Thank you

report me as many times as you'd like and form any vigilante force you can.

This is yet another $100k+ scam taxing the BTC community and it must be stopped.  I will be asking VEscudero very on topic questions about the fake identity he created and the scam he is running.  I was right about BCST and Gavin agrees with me : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=105288.0

1706  Other / Meta / Re: "Long-term offers" - gonna have to tackle this 1 eventually on: September 02, 2012, 09:19:16 PM
I agree with Micon. I'm embarrassed by 'Long Term Offers' and scared by 'Securities'.


1) tyvm.  I would love to have you on my podcast, DonkDown radio.  I have so many questions.

2)  I now am blaming the mods for this.  I heard Theymos invested in the giant Pirate scam.  Now Mod John says in this 1.5%/wk scam thread : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=89122.180

He is on his quest to label every worthwhile lender in this subforum as a ponzi-maker. Be happy that he approved you too.  Wink

and then quickly deletes it.

Why are the bitcointalk mods on the side of the scammers?

3) I have intentionally never touched the GBLSE or MPEX as it seems like the SEC should be all over that soon.  It is clearly inevitable given the SEC's history of aggressive action towards unlicensed securities.  .onion that thing ASAP if you ever want to see it again.

4)  I don't know how it took me and everyone else this long to figure this out, but the current crop of "Long Term Offers" and formerly "Lending" had nothing to do with lending - they are all *borrowing*   Maybe a forum with subforums of different borrowing %? 

Sticky at top of 500% APR borrowing forum that says "In the course of human history, every entity borrowing at 500%+ APR has been a scam of some sort up until now" ?

1707  Economy / Long-term offers / Re: ★ VESCUDERO's Guaranteed Weekly Term deposit at 2% ★ on: September 02, 2012, 08:55:03 PM

yes, please justify your fake accounts more.  They make them seem less fake.

Come on guy, What are you taking about?

This is a standard Ponzi scheme as well.  

Vescudero - please explain what your core business unit does to make enough money to pay 2% per week in interest.

Borrowing at a lower interest rate rather than the interest I apply for lending, this does not qualify as a Ponzi scheme.

Before accusing me of having fake accounts or running a Ponzi scheme, please do your due diligence and provide evidence, otherwise keep spam out of this thread.


EDIT: As anyone you can see in my bitcoinary profile my twitter account is not exactly brand new (Dec 2008), I have more than one hundred friends in my facebook account and more than 400 connections in my LinkedIn profile.
He is on his quest to label every worthwhile lender in this subforum as a ponzi-maker. Be happy that he approved you too.  Wink

1)  Wow.  I had heard that Theymos deposited to Pirate, and now John is here defending a 1.5% per week "insured" "lender" Huh there is no Lending here.  Only borrowing.

2)  John - please, I beg of you - please show this thread to a CPA, anyone over 60 that is solvent, a Laywer, Doctor, Accountant, Banker, Mortgage broker - please do not listen to me and please ask a person that understands finance that you trust.  I can 100% promise you they will look at this thread and the others contained here and instantly dismiss them as scams.

1708  Economy / Long-term offers / Re: Who Pays What? on: September 02, 2012, 08:48:42 PM
I don't like when people push other people around especially when it's someone as trusted and respected as Patrick. Stop fucking about Micon and go back to your little ponzi/witch hunt thread where you belong, you are not wanted in these parts of the forums. Stop picking on Patrick, you will only find foes.
//DeaDTerra


DeaDTerra - I am not picking on Patrick.  Patrick made outrageous & misleading statements in this thread that are once again going to lead to a large number of BTC users scammed out of their coins.  On the heels of BCST I think you should listen to me, I make a very clear point:

Here is an actual credit ratings:


Quote from: PatrickHarnett
   User_name      Weekly      Monthly      Since      Credit Rating      Notes      Link   
   RustyRyan   3.00%      -      28-Jul-12      A-      10 coin/4 week minimum, weekly payout      https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=96163.0   

The fact that you give an "A-" rating to a guy in business for less than 2 months offering to borrow as much money as possible at 3% per week is offensive to any man of science  

Why the mods decide to sticky misinformation like this is beyond me.
1709  Economy / Long-term offers / Re: Honest Bob's thread of ponzi ponzi ponzi rustyryan on: September 02, 2012, 08:45:45 PM
I'd call ponzi if it weren't for the A- credit rating from PatrickHarnett. My money's still staying away, though.

I'm not going to tell anyone what to do with their money, but I'd advise they don't send it to Rusty.

Patrick, do you have his ID?

I only have 10BTC with RustyRyan.  The longevity of his deposits is yet to be seen, and that is why the rating is lower than a comparable person that has been around for six months.  Maybe I should have used a 1-10 scale - would that have been better?

ID was not provided.  I received this question a few days ago and I recommended that person seek it directly.  The system can not force of compel deposit takers to provide all of the details, nor is there some third party audit or regulation in place to protect the unwise.  If you want to deposit with him and are unsure - ask RustyRyan the questions - that's what he is there for.

I'll state it again, the WPW thread is a collection of information that provides a starting point for people to do some of their own research.  It saves me answering a lot of questions that I was receiving by pm because I was getting asked for recommendations of where to place funds.  Also, without an attempt by anyone to do this (even if I get called names for doing so), it would be blank, and having an alternative could be quite useful.

Patrick,
 
Here is one of your actual credit ratings:


Quote from: PatrickHarnett
   User_name      Weekly      Monthly      Since      Credit Rating      Notes      Link   
   RustyRyan   3.00%      -      28-Jul-12      A-      10 coin/4 week minimum, weekly payout      https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=96163.0   

The fact that you give an "A-" rating to a guy in business for less than 2 months offering to borrow as much money as possible at 3% per week is offensive to any man of science 

Why the mods decide to sticky misinformation like this is beyond me.
1710  Economy / Long-term offers / Re: Who Pays What? on: September 02, 2012, 08:31:39 PM
Update 28-Aug-2012: Added RustyRyan.  The rating is lower than some of the others because he is new and has a small deposit business, but this will improve over time.
Update 30-Aug-2012: Added vescudero.
Update 2-Sep-2012: Initial credit rating for Namworld and BTC-Bond added.

Disclaimers:
1: This OP is being updated as there are a large number of changes taking place with rates this month (August).
2: all reasonable care has been taken to extract valid information and present it fairly.  Issuers or eagle-eyed users can either post at the bottom of this thread or pm me to advise changes/corrections.  Being listed here is not an endorsement and depositors are expected to undertake their own due diligence before entrusting their coins with someone.

Deposit Takers
   User_name      Weekly      Monthly      Since      Credit Rating      Notes      Link   
   RustyRyan   3.00%      -      28-Jul-12      A-      10 coin/4 week minimum, weekly payout      https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=96163.0   
   smart/ziggy      -      11.1%      May-11      AA-      Bank book          https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=81357.0   
   vescudero      1.50%      -      Jun-12      AA-      weekly payments, deposits up to 50BTC      https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=89122.0   
   Chungenhung      1.36%      6.0%      Jan-12      AA      50 coin minimum      https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=56853.0   
   Starfish BCB      1.00%      4.4%      Jan-12      AA      On call, 1 coin minimum      https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=61262.0   
   Kluge      0.97%      4.25%      Mar-12      AAA      32 day deposit      https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=67446.0   

New Deposit Takers
   User_name      Weekly      Monthly      Since      Credit Rating      Notes      Link   


GLBSE fixed interest instruments  Information currently out of date - being updated 17-Aug-2012
   __Issuer__      __Instrument__      Weekly      5-day price      Issued Volume      Verified   Notes      Link   
   Teek      TEEK.B      3.00%       0.0871        2,000       No   Fixed interest , not guaranteed      https://glbse.com/asset/view/TEEK.B   
   ChaangNoi      TYGRR.BOND-B      2.00%       0.0990        40,000       No   GLBSE has "blank" contract      https://glbse.com/asset/view/TYGRR.BOND-B   
   Kluge      BDK.BND      1.00%       0.1010        26,367       Yes   Fixed interest - C.R. "AA"      https://glbse.com/asset/view/BDK.BND   
   Teek      TEEK.A      0.30%       0.9440        10,000       No   Guaranteed      https://glbse.com/asset/view/TEEK.A   
   Namworld      BTC-Bond      0.50%       0.0100        12,400       Yes   Fixed interest - C.R. "A-"      https://glbse.com/asset/view/BTC-BOND   


Other semi-fixed interest instruments

   __Issuer__      __Instrument__      Weekly      Notes      Link   


For an excellent table of GLBSE returns/yields, please refer to stochastic's thread in "securities" https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=74711.0


Credit Rating Data
.   .   Liabilities /   Business transaprancy   Liabilities /   Current_liabilities /   Business Size   Business Size   Time in    Weighted   .   .      
Who   __When__   monthly income   Assessment   Assets   Liquid_Assets   Funds managed   Customers   "business"    Score   Modifiers   Overall      
Starfish BCB   13-Jul-12   4.35   Transparent   66.0%   56.5%   53876 129   8   .   +3   .      
Rating    Scores   5   6   5   5   6   4   5   5.14   +3   AAA      
chungenhung   13-Aug-12   2.00   .   25.0%   80.0%   16000   20   8   .   +0   .      
Rating    Scores   6   .   6   5   6   2   5   5   .   AA      
Smart/ZiggyStar   13-Jul-12   11.60   Trading/opaque   70.2%   67.5%   8258   20?40   12   .   +2         
Rating    Scores   3   2   5   5   5   2   6   4.0   +2   AA-      
Ineedausername   22-Jul-12   1.08   .   18.2%   18.6%   35640   .   8   .   +1   .      
Rating    Scores   6   .   6   6   6   .   5   5.8   +1   AA+      
Kluge   22-Jul-12   7.12   .   45.0%   20.4%   8996   .   7   .   +3   .      
Rating    Scores   4   .   6   6   5   .   5   5.2   +3   AAA      
RustyRyan   29-Jul-12   1.17   Mining/loans   11.3%   3.8%   350   15   1   .   +2   .      
Rating    Scores   6   3   6   6   1   1   0   3.29   +2   A-      
vescudero   29-Jul-12   3.02   Opaque   20.7%   36.0%   2550   83   2   .   +2   .      
Rating    Scores   5   2   6   6   4   4   1   4   -   AA-      
BTC-Bond   02-Sep-12   0.43   Holdings disclosed   2.2%   0.3%   32   3.2   1   .   +2   .      
Rating    Scores   6   5   6   6   0   0   0   3   +2   A-      


Also reference https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=81542.msg1100627#msg1100627 for some general guidance.
Notes: Some deposit takers use 30-days rather than one month.  The calculation convert weekly to monthly by [(1+r)^(52/12)-1] and similarly, monthly rates are converted back to weekly.

Quoting for when all of these fall apart. 

Patrick should not be giving credit ratings, and they certainly should not be stickied here.
1711  Economy / Long-term offers / Re: ★ VESCUDERO's Risk-free Weekly Term deposits at 1.5% ★ on: September 02, 2012, 08:03:44 PM
My real name is Victor Escudero, I am a CAcert assurer and I have nothing to hide. Reputation and trust are of utmost importance in my day-to-day job as well as in my personal life. If you have any doubt about deposit your money with me, I encourage you to check my GnuPG signatures, see my #bitcoin-otc ratings, check my professional profile at LinkedIn, visit my personal website, Twitter account, Facebook account, bitcoinary profile or simply read my previous posts in the bitcointalk.org forum.[/color]


Hi Vescudero.

Since you have nothing to hide, I see on your LinkedIN profile that you work for Altran.  A friend of mine is a consultant for them.  What division of Altran do you work in?  Where are you stationed?

you tweeted on Jun 29th that you were going to speak in a Panel of Experts.  Did you ever do that?

Quote from: @VEscudero
Victor Escudero ‏@VEscudero
I'm gonna be one of the speakers in the next Panel of Experts organized by itSMF #itsmfes: Role of the Service Manager. http://bit.ly/LFR6li
Collapse
 Reply  Retweet  Favorite
11:39 AM - 29 Jun 12 · Details
1712  Economy / Lending / Re: Bryan Micon's List of BTC Ponzi Schemes that should not be listed as "Lending" on: September 02, 2012, 10:56:15 AM
So in the wake of the Pirate BCST debacle, there are still tons of scams running, so it's time to clean up everything:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=105285.0

1713  Other / Meta / Re: "Long-term offers" - gonna have to tackle this 1 eventually on: September 02, 2012, 10:55:17 AM
this is not the correct name for high-interest borrowing scams

The section is for long-term offers, not just HYIPs.

Having forum staff decide whether specific investments are dangerous is definitely something I don't want. Exact rules for what constitutes a HYIP could be defined, but services that don't meet the HYIP definition probably won't be that much safer than HYIPs. And interest rates in the Bitcoin ecosystem are much higher than traditional interest rates, so it's difficult to determine the correct limit. I think a policy of caveat emptor makes the most sense.


1)  "long-term offers" couldn't be a worse descriptor for what is contained there.  "Buyer Beware" is appropriate, but would need to be legislated and I can understand not wanting to

2)  These are fake deposit programs.  They are fake entities claiming they are willing to borrow btc, and lots of it, at rates way higher than sustainable.  They are blatantly stealing money (again) and giving this a sticky:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=81542.0  is just shameful.  A- rating for a 3%/wk scam?  and it's stickied once again?

3) Why not categorize these borrowing offers by APR?  if you classify them as 0-15% and then 15+ or 15-50% then 51+ then the scams would categorize themselves and no mods needed.
1714  Economy / Long-term offers / Re: Bryan Micon's List of Non-BCST Ponzi's Still Running (with credit rating) on: September 02, 2012, 10:46:58 AM
Clearly, the "How to Identify a Ponzi" post wasn't clear enough. The very first "hint" that something "might" be a ponzi was: > 50% APR.

Indeed, it makes no sense to ask people to lend you money at those ridiculously high rates. It's literally pissing away money. Even credit card companies' usury rates are nowhere near as bad.

So, props to Micon for trying to make it clearer. Too bad nobody will listen, as usual.


I ask you to join me Metal.

This culture of blatant scamming is embarrassing legit BTC operations like SealsWithClubs.  We can't be known as the scam-currency and expect to grow.
1715  Economy / Long-term offers / Re: Bryan Micon's List of Non-BCST Ponzi's Still Running (with credit rating) on: September 02, 2012, 09:31:47 AM
And back to more serious stuff - no, I will not be revealing my customer details and transactions.  I do not know of any entity that would so blatantly breach customer confidentiality in such a way.  If you wish to believe it is all a scam, reason isn't going to sway your opinion and I've already directed people to this thread for information regarding your warning.

1)  you write numbers in an OP and claim "transparency" 

2)  you give other scammers high credit ratings and somehow convinced the mods to sticky it.

3)  your shameful actions are shameful.  I will be here to disrupt your scams and debunk them at every turn. 
1716  Economy / Long-term offers / Re: Bryan Micon's List of Non-BCST Ponzi's Still Running (with credit rating) on: September 02, 2012, 08:45:35 AM
Hi PatrickHarnett's wife.  Nothing personal, just hate scams and feel the need to protect BTC.  Your husband is running a scam, and while it may be hard to accept it is the truth.

PatrickHarnett - back on topic - care to enlighten us as to where the ~$200k USD on deposit with you is working for the investors?


Quote from: PatrickHarnett
Total liabilities (Deposits + other commitments) = 13,500
Total assets (cash, BTC, investments) = 29,400
Net assets 15,900BTC

July 2012 activity (updated 1 August 2012)
 - 14 loans repaid  (approx 7800BTC)
 - 32 loans current (approx 8800 BTC)
 - 66 deposits (total approx 15400)
 - deposits repaid during the month (at call) >3600

Total liabilities (Deposits + other commitments) = 19,700
Total assets (cash, BTC, investments) = 37,100
Net assets 17,400BTC


Also how much cash?  BTC?  what are "investments" ?  can we see some Block chain verification, or real world verification on how this money is used to generate more monies?

[/quote]
1717  Economy / Long-term offers / Re: Bryan Micon's List of Non-BCST Ponzi's Still Running (with credit rating) on: September 02, 2012, 12:53:37 AM
So Micon, what else would you have PatrickHarnett disclose to show it is not a ponzi?
Anything sufficient to do these four things would be enough for me:

1) Determine that claimed profits are in fact profits from investments.


Once again JoelKatz nails it.

I will say it plainly:  I believe that PatrickHarnett is blatantly making up his statistics on number of loans, repayments, etc.  To answer the question he would have to block-chain verify these transactions.  When he posts his August stats, let's see some block-chain verified loan repayments & interest payments.

You mean like 6b92e6ad01b05c5a004a8425df2534d7465dcf9d11c78a139cf1813071f1cf15

or this receiving address: 1KSp4tdijUq4ghqWNmHBE9BiddqEGPLmHA

no, like all of these: 

Quote from: PatrickHarnett
Total liabilities (Deposits + other commitments) = 13,500
Total assets (cash, BTC, investments) = 29,400
Net assets 15,900BTC

July 2012 activity (updated 1 August 2012)
 - 14 loans repaid  (approx 7800BTC)
 - 32 loans current (approx 8800 BTC)
 - 66 deposits (total approx 15400)
 - deposits repaid during the month (at call) >3600

Total liabilities (Deposits + other commitments) = 19,700
Total assets (cash, BTC, investments) = 37,100
Net assets 17,400BTC


Also how much cash?  BTC?  what are "investments" ?  can we see some Block chain verification, or real world verification on how this money is used to generate more monies?
1718  Economy / Long-term offers / Re: Bryan Micon's List of Non-BCST Ponzi's Still Running (with credit rating) on: September 02, 2012, 12:36:50 AM
So Micon, what else would you have PatrickHarnett disclose to show it is not a ponzi?
Anything sufficient to do these four things would be enough for me:

1) Determine that claimed profits are in fact profits from investments.


Once again JoelKatz nails it.

I will say it plainly:  I believe that PatrickHarnett is blatantly making up his statistics on number of loans, repayments, etc.  To answer the question he would have to block-chain verify these transactions.  When he posts his August stats, let's see some block-chain verified loan repayments & interest payments.
1719  Economy / Long-term offers / Re: Bryan Micon's List of Non-BCST Ponzi's Still Running (with credit rating) on: September 02, 2012, 12:29:00 AM

I also dont think Starfish is a ponzi, although any faith I might have had in Patrick and particularly his judgement is long gone. Dont know the others, wont comment.

nope, total Ponzi for Starfish / PatrickHarnett

1%/wk to borrow money is still crack prices, still yields you owing giant interest as scam builds, and he is even making up increasing numbers month-over-month to show you the business is growing.    This one is a slow Ponzi.  


btc is different than USD. What do you think of 0.5%/week? Total scam in anything denominated in USD right? But fastcash4bitcoins.com took out a loan like this. This is a reputable business with proven business model, do you think it's unreasonable for unproven entities to pay slightly more interest in loans? To accuire btc cost upwards of 4% if you deal with shitbag companies like bitinstant that pay their employees slave wages with no benefits and no insurance, so the interest isn't that unreasonable. Patrick is very transparent as well. How many ponzi disclose their total deposit?

1) BTC is only a different currency, same principles of economics apply and are modified accordingly (i.e. taking in to account the deflationary nature)

2) the culture of "unproven business models" must stop.  If you are selling drugs and need to buy precursor, you are likely browsing this forum in TOR anyway, so post the pix when you buy it. Mining? show the rig.  Growing weed and need lights? borrow, buy, and post pix of grow setup.  I thought for sure there would be a SR bond on GLBSE by now.  There now exists a culture of "just send me BTC, I do something, and much like everyone else in this sub-forum I cannot tell you what I'm doing, but I'll pay you 1-3% per week and even though I'm profitable, I always need new money.  Businesses usually take on rounds of funding.  Seed money - start the business, then it grows.  How could someone doing something profitable keep needing more and more new investment?

3)  Just because Patrick posts a list he made up of loans outstanding doesn't make him "very transparent" - do we have block chain results for all these loans and paybacks?
1720  Economy / Long-term offers / Re: Bryan Micon's List of Non-BCST Ponzi's Still Running (with credit rating) on: September 02, 2012, 12:14:52 AM
Micon, you are missing your poker scam site from the list. LOL
 

It is my poker site and it isn't a scam.

I think he was referring to DonkDown or TheMiconSystem (an infobook a guy paid me to use likeness / make material for in 2005-7)

At this stage there are very few people I would do business with.  SealsWithClubs & FreeMoney are currently the gold standard for trustworthiness in this community.  

Attacks on others' credibility is deflection from the real issue - There are so many scams in this sub-forum right on the heels of BCST and it's time to clean them up.
Pages: « 1 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 [86] 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!