I made something similar , but strictly for litecoin mining on cpu's. Its a windows service designed to run semi stealthy =) It also has a command and control element for remote managing miners. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=50464.0
|
|
|
I personally use these on my fpga rigs - one of these 1000 watt babies will easily power 8-10 54Gh/s bASICS
There you have it guys, thats the power estimation, now we know its NOT "up to 10 27GH bASIC" devices. So, power consumption is anywhere between 1.85w/GH to 2.31w/GH
|
|
|
dont know if anyone has noticed this so far, but here is a very rough estimated power usage for the bASIC unit, https://www.bitcoinasic.net/index.php?route=product/allgiven "up to 10 bASIC" units, we dont know if that refers to the 27 or 54gh one... either way. Best case, its 1.85watts/GH, using the 54gh as reference. Worse case, 3.7watts/GH .. using 27GH as reference. If the mining units dont use the 5v line from PSU at all, then estimate bout 50-100watts off the 1kw Also an unknown is weather that 1kw unit would be powering said motherboard / cpu / RAM setup behind the bASIC If so then take another 40-70watts off that 1kw So, given an avg of the 2 mentioned items above, lets assume up to 850watts for bASIC's left over.. brings consumption down to 1.57w/GH for the 54gh Interesting..
|
|
|
Love the function of the new site. Question..when will the other types of payout(other than pp & dwolla) be "available" or does "unavailable" just mean what the old site said when it stated "funds not available for payout" on a particular type ... and just had to wait.. Thanks
No unavailable is just a placeholder as they are disabled. They will be up as quickly as possible. I wanted to get them up last night but I crashed. 60 hour weeks + another 4-5 hours a night coding FC4B. I just want to do a little more testing on the development server before promoting them to production. The new site provides a better platform for showing funding info. Currently funds availability is only shown when selecting a payment option but some improved display options are coming. TL/DR: "Soon". SWEET thanks for the update! =)
|
|
|
Love the function of the new site. Question..when will the other types of payout(other than pp & dwolla) be "available" or does "unavailable" just mean what the old site said when it stated "funds not available for payout" on a particular type ... and just had to wait.. Thanks
|
|
|
I actually like the look of the old site =) but new one is good too!
Thanks. Most of my experience is back end processes. I thought about just having it done via SSH. Wonder how popular that would be? you@orders.fastcash4bitcoins.com $ rate $10.72
you@orders.fastcash4bitcoins.com $ new -m P -q 130 -a you@email.com #12345 130 BTC @ $10.72 = $1,393.60 1NVNa27xWhx9oweepKUWwUjesXHBRreU38 Created: 10/31/2012 15:57 Expires: 10/31/2012 16:12
you@orders.fastcash4bitcoins.com $ check 12345 Status: Confirmed (130 BTC received, 3+ confirmations) PayPal payment pending: $1,303.60
you@orders.fastcash4bitcoins.com $ bye
LOL, that looks fun! ... although still need web front end for non techies =)
|
|
|
I actually like the look of the old site =) but new one is good too!
|
|
|
now, I think the contest should be continued for bASIC preorders round 2 =P
|
|
|
there seems to be no way I can make it so I won ... even if it was my birthday week ... dagnabit Unless we can convince Tom to just give away MMQ's to everyone!! I agree, everyone who participated this round and for 4 weeks should get a MMQ =P They say marketing is the most expensive investment in a business or should be... haha!
|
|
|
Hurricane not helping the launch of the site; I lost power yesterday and I have limited connectivity now. Development continues. No firm ETA due to the delay and uncertainty. It is my top priority so it will be up a soon as possible.
Just wanted to thank you for your hard work and for this awesome site Hope its back up soon! I second that!!!
|
|
|
Actually, I never looked at the error in debug output, it went by too fast. I just noticed when HW error was thrown in normal mode, it said "HW error, invalid nonce"
I got the HW errors to vanish @ 170mhz RAM.... if it doesnt work at 150mhz RAM, your RAM is most likely completely fuxxored. I still strongly suspect mining...somehow damages 5970's RAM.
|
|
|
Ive had a problem similar to this, but my 5970(one gpu) flagged HW errors bout 25% of the time. Mine is because the RAM gradually got worse and worse. By lowering the RAM from 300 to 170, the HW errors are gone, for now. Are your HW errors "invalid nonce" errors? thats what mine appear as for the shares in cgminer. Im willing to bet theres not a single ounce of RAM good on that GPU thats flagging the bad errors.
|
|
|
Any luck on updating the links, thank
The stealth miner version w/ C&C link should work now. Ive updated to poolers latest miners as well, in the installer.
|
|
|
OK been poking at this and when I push it out to a computer it won't start.... it reports back to the C&C but it always says stopped.
Changed with changerec and it has number of threads = to number of processors on various machines and even if I make it just 1 thread it will not start... any ideas?
Naelr
HA! Hey guys, I didnt realize there was still interest in this script so Ive semi abandoned the project. But, what I have done is update the packages on the download links(at least the C&C version) and included newest miners. To answer your question changerec, if you were trying to run this on a 32bit machine. For some reason my AV kept deleting the 32bit minerd from the script, and that would cause the service to constantly die after starting. It should work now, well untill my AV decides to delete it again. Ive updated the miners w/ most recent versions from pooler, so perhaps the AV wont think they are infections anymore.
|
|
|
Ah, so are you having to go to an account system now? I liked not having to do that as well. Either way, Im sure it will be good. Since I found your service, Ive always loved it. Shame on those who ruin something awesome cuz they gotta abuse the system...
|
|
|
Any eta on the site? I really love the service. Your the only one this simple and fees this low.
|
|
|
I hope Coinlabs have more aces in their sleeves. Otherwise this is a doomed project, and it has been doomed from the start. There is simply no way Coinlab would make any money at all, let alone millions they would need to recoup "investments" on any of the mentioned above initiatives. Not in environment where specialized hardware that is by two orders of magnitude more efficient and is widely available.
+1 Before ASICs, Coinlab idea was awesome! After ASICs, I don't see how Coinlab can still operate and make money unless they plan to use that GPU power for other purposes. As per your point, I thought that was their goal, to basically have our GPU's do HPC work for projects they contract with other companies that need HPC work. Think of us GPU owners being an amazon compute instance. They would pay us GPU owners in BTC for the work attributed to their HPC contracts.
|
|
|
I think, once power numbers are revealed on more products, that will be a good time to choose who to order from.
|
|
|
|