idonothave
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 07, 2015, 12:46:40 PM |
|
if both 127.0.0.1:9332 and 192.168.0.4:9332 give You the same result then I would try another browser, if still the same I would try another version of python and rechecked whole installation process
|
|
|
|
Duce
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 07, 2015, 02:53:47 PM |
|
I have not seen this before and would like to know if anybody knows what this is. I did a search in this blog for any info but did not find any. I am running the Relay but did not see any association. ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) 2015-01-07 06:43:15.305684 Sending 415 shares to 198.167.143.123:49545
|
|
|
|
windpath
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 07, 2015, 03:19:42 PM |
|
I have not seen this before and would like to know if anybody knows what this is. I did a search in this blog for any info but did not find any. I am running the Relay but did not see any association. ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) 2015-01-07 06:43:15.305684 Sending 415 shares to 198.167.143.123:49545 It's a recently launched node updating its p2pool share chain.
|
|
|
|
Duce
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 07, 2015, 03:23:29 PM |
|
I have not seen this before and would like to know if anybody knows what this is. I did a search in this blog for any info but did not find any. I am running the Relay but did not see any association. ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) 2015-01-07 06:43:15.305684 Sending 415 shares to 198.167.143.123:49545 It's a recently launched node updating its p2pool share chain. Thanks
|
|
|
|
Prelude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 07, 2015, 04:57:36 PM |
|
Not sure I'd say perfectly? The still default to 8192 queue size and large amounts of stales. I got mine down to about 3.4% stales, which is almost twice as bad as my SP20s at 1.8% stale. Thanks for the ck firmware link, didn't know about that, will have to try it. M Definitely give the firmware a try, you'll get better results. You'll want to follow this to set queue to 0: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=796839.msg9243760#msg9243760I also add --scan-time 1 --expiry 1 along with lowering queue to 0 and adding --lowmem. Quite a pain in the ass to do every time the machine goes down, but worth it IMO.
|
|
|
|
jonnybravo0311
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1023
Mine at Jonny's Pool
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 07, 2015, 05:29:40 PM |
|
Not sure I'd say perfectly? The still default to 8192 queue size and large amounts of stales. I got mine down to about 3.4% stales, which is almost twice as bad as my SP20s at 1.8% stale. Thanks for the ck firmware link, didn't know about that, will have to try it. M Definitely give the firmware a try, you'll get better results. You'll want to follow this to set queue to 0: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=796839.msg9243760#msg9243760I also add --scan-time 1 --expiry 1 along with lowering queue to 0 and adding --lowmem. Quite a pain in the ass to do every time the machine goes down, but worth it IMO. CK has stated a few times that the --scan-time and --expiry parameters are useless, so you really don't need to bother with them. I hadn't tried --lowmem before, so I can't tell what value it adds if any. The biggest bang for the buck is setting --queue to 0, instead of their default 8192.
|
Jonny's Pool - Mine with us and help us grow! Support a pool that supports Bitcoin, not a hardware manufacturer's pockets! No SPV cheats. No empty blocks.
|
|
|
yslyung
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1500
Merit: 1002
Mine Mine Mine
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 07, 2015, 07:00:48 PM |
|
weird recent block #337952 ... it's found by antpool ? is that part of the p2pool network ? no pay from this block yet.
after the block was found, my pool went a little cuckoo, started to get some weird msg's (didnt copy sorry) after couple of minutes it went back to normal but my rejected hashrate spiked up !
|
|
|
|
Prelude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 07, 2015, 07:16:52 PM |
|
Not sure I'd say perfectly? The still default to 8192 queue size and large amounts of stales. I got mine down to about 3.4% stales, which is almost twice as bad as my SP20s at 1.8% stale. Thanks for the ck firmware link, didn't know about that, will have to try it. M Definitely give the firmware a try, you'll get better results. You'll want to follow this to set queue to 0: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=796839.msg9243760#msg9243760I also add --scan-time 1 --expiry 1 along with lowering queue to 0 and adding --lowmem. Quite a pain in the ass to do every time the machine goes down, but worth it IMO. CK has stated a few times that the --scan-time and --expiry parameters are useless, so you really don't need to bother with them. I hadn't tried --lowmem before, so I can't tell what value it adds if any. The biggest bang for the buck is setting --queue to 0, instead of their default 8192. Good to know, guess I'll stop adding them. lowmem seems to help a little I think, give it a try. CK seems to think it's useful for S4s.
|
|
|
|
windpath
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 07, 2015, 08:22:18 PM |
|
weird recent block #337952 ... it's found by antpool ? is that part of the p2pool network ? no pay from this block yet.
after the block was found, my pool went a little cuckoo, started to get some weird msg's (didnt copy sorry) after couple of minutes it went back to normal but my rejected hashrate spiked up !
Orphan race, AntPool won. That is our first orphan in 37 days, not to shabby....
|
|
|
|
MissouriMiner
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 07, 2015, 08:30:15 PM |
|
weird recent block #337952 ... it's found by antpool ? is that part of the p2pool network ? no pay from this block yet.
after the block was found, my pool went a little cuckoo, started to get some weird msg's (didnt copy sorry) after couple of minutes it went back to normal but my rejected hashrate spiked up !
Orphan race, AntPool won. That is our first orphan in 37 days, not to shabby.... Bummer. It is strange that AntPool has not yet reconciled on their side. Their pool be confused! ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs25.postimg.org%2Fpxlfr3sun%2FSNAG_1305.png&t=665&c=hbHHEkfPCr6MQA)
|
|
|
|
windpath
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 07, 2015, 08:48:38 PM |
|
weird recent block #337952 ... it's found by antpool ? is that part of the p2pool network ? no pay from this block yet.
after the block was found, my pool went a little cuckoo, started to get some weird msg's (didnt copy sorry) after couple of minutes it went back to normal but my rejected hashrate spiked up !
Orphan race, AntPool won. That is our first orphan in 37 days, not to shabby.... Bummer. It is strange that AntPool has not yet reconciled on their side. Their pool be confused! ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs25.postimg.org%2Fpxlfr3sun%2FSNAG_1305.png&t=665&c=hbHHEkfPCr6MQA) That is definitely a bug (or 2)... 1. No possible way to have 5 blocks with 0 confirmations. 2. 337952 shows with 0 transactions (25 BTC reward), however it was a large block, 2,493 transactions...
|
|
|
|
Duce
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 07, 2015, 09:15:40 PM |
|
I can't resist... a bug you say, why it is "Ant" pool. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
idonothave
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 07, 2015, 09:31:20 PM |
|
weird recent block #337952 ... it's found by antpool ? is that part of the p2pool network ? no pay from this block yet.
after the block was found, my pool went a little cuckoo, started to get some weird msg's (didnt copy sorry) after couple of minutes it went back to normal but my rejected hashrate spiked up !
antpool provides their own "opensource version" of p2pool, which differs from the original mainly with the fact it is not paying transaction fees to the miners.
|
|
|
|
idonothave
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 07, 2015, 09:42:06 PM |
|
Not sure I'd say perfectly? The still default to 8192 queue size and large amounts of stales. I got mine down to about 3.4% stales, which is almost twice as bad as my SP20s at 1.8% stale. Thanks for the ck firmware link, didn't know about that, will have to try it. M Definitely give the firmware a try, you'll get better results. You'll want to follow this to set queue to 0: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=796839.msg9243760#msg9243760I also add --scan-time 1 --expiry 1 along with lowering queue to 0 and adding --lowmem. Quite a pain in the ass to do every time the machine goes down, but worth it IMO. CK has stated a few times that the --scan-time and --expiry parameters are useless, so you really don't need to bother with them. I hadn't tried --lowmem before, so I can't tell what value it adds if any. The biggest bang for the buck is setting --queue to 0, instead of their default 8192. Good to know, guess I'll stop adding them. lowmem seems to help a little I think, give it a try. CK seems to think it's useful for S4s. just add this line at the end of /config/cgminer.conf: "queue" : "1" and if You want to set queue from shell use: /usr/bin/cgminer-api "setconfig|queue,1" (You can also let ssh do it remotely) I did not find any difference between queue 0 and 1 in results and I do not use --lowmem
|
|
|
|
IYFTech
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 07, 2015, 09:45:25 PM |
|
weird recent block #337952 ... it's found by antpool ? is that part of the p2pool network ? no pay from this block yet.
after the block was found, my pool went a little cuckoo, started to get some weird msg's (didnt copy sorry) after couple of minutes it went back to normal but my rejected hashrate spiked up !
antpool provides their own "opensource version" of p2pool, which differs from the original mainly with the fact it is not paying transaction fees to the miners. It also does not use the p2pool share chain and is completely borked. Don't touch it.
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4200
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 07, 2015, 10:03:24 PM |
|
weird recent block #337952 ... it's found by antpool ? is that part of the p2pool network ? no pay from this block yet.
after the block was found, my pool went a little cuckoo, started to get some weird msg's (didnt copy sorry) after couple of minutes it went back to normal but my rejected hashrate spiked up !
antpool provides their own "opensource version" of p2pool, which differs from the original mainly with the fact it is not paying transaction fees to the miners. It also does not use the p2pool share chain and is completely borked. Don't touch it. But but but they advertised they were supporting decentralisation! (not)
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
IYFTech
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 08, 2015, 02:31:19 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Prelude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 08, 2015, 05:46:35 AM |
|
Not sure I'd say perfectly? The still default to 8192 queue size and large amounts of stales. I got mine down to about 3.4% stales, which is almost twice as bad as my SP20s at 1.8% stale. Thanks for the ck firmware link, didn't know about that, will have to try it. M Definitely give the firmware a try, you'll get better results. You'll want to follow this to set queue to 0: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=796839.msg9243760#msg9243760I also add --scan-time 1 --expiry 1 along with lowering queue to 0 and adding --lowmem. Quite a pain in the ass to do every time the machine goes down, but worth it IMO. CK has stated a few times that the --scan-time and --expiry parameters are useless, so you really don't need to bother with them. I hadn't tried --lowmem before, so I can't tell what value it adds if any. The biggest bang for the buck is setting --queue to 0, instead of their default 8192. Good to know, guess I'll stop adding them. lowmem seems to help a little I think, give it a try. CK seems to think it's useful for S4s. just add this line at the end of /config/cgminer.conf: "queue" : "1" and if You want to set queue from shell use: /usr/bin/cgminer-api "setconfig|queue,1" (You can also let ssh do it remotely) I did not find any difference between queue 0 and 1 in results and I do not use --lowmem I'm guessing adding it to cgminer.conf would make the setting persistent across reboots? Definitely going to do that if so.
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4200
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 08, 2015, 06:00:47 AM |
|
just add this line at the end of /config/cgminer.conf: "queue" : "1" and if You want to set queue from shell use: /usr/bin/cgminer-api "setconfig|queue,1" (You can also let ssh do it remotely) I did not find any difference between queue 0 and 1 in results and I do not use --lowmem
I'm guessing adding it to cgminer.conf would make the setting persistent across reboots? Definitely going to do that if so. Files changed in /config are permanent across reboots. In the S5 there is a file /config/user_setting which has just I'm not sure if the S4 is the same but if it is, that's all you need to modify, to say queue 1
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
idonothave
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 08, 2015, 06:03:41 AM |
|
Not sure I'd say perfectly? The still default to 8192 queue size and large amounts of stales. I got mine down to about 3.4% stales, which is almost twice as bad as my SP20s at 1.8% stale. Thanks for the ck firmware link, didn't know about that, will have to try it. M Definitely give the firmware a try, you'll get better results. You'll want to follow this to set queue to 0: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=796839.msg9243760#msg9243760I also add --scan-time 1 --expiry 1 along with lowering queue to 0 and adding --lowmem. Quite a pain in the ass to do every time the machine goes down, but worth it IMO. CK has stated a few times that the --scan-time and --expiry parameters are useless, so you really don't need to bother with them. I hadn't tried --lowmem before, so I can't tell what value it adds if any. The biggest bang for the buck is setting --queue to 0, instead of their default 8192. Good to know, guess I'll stop adding them. lowmem seems to help a little I think, give it a try. CK seems to think it's useful for S4s. just add this line at the end of /config/cgminer.conf: "queue" : "1" and if You want to set queue from shell use: /usr/bin/cgminer-api "setconfig|queue,1" (You can also let ssh do it remotely) I did not find any difference between queue 0 and 1 in results and I do not use --lowmem I'm guessing adding it to cgminer.conf would make the setting persistent across reboots? Definitely going to do that if so. Yes. As far as I know it is persistent accross reboots. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
|