gr0bi42
|
 |
August 16, 2011, 06:46:01 PM |
|
Time to tell my experience with slush and stale
Now guiminer is saying 1902 shares accepted and 7 invalid. That make like 0.03% of stale with slush. An AWESOME thing
You forgot to mention one important thing... the guiminer backend! If I'm mining at slush with poclbm I have the same very low reject ratio. I have only problems with "newer" mining software like phoenix (svn 118) or cgminer 1.5.4. Both are a lot faster than poclbm... for instance: 5870: poclbm 432 MH/s, phoenix 451 MH/s, cgminer ~445MH/s.
|
Donations are welcome: 1Btf3BqUegfe5iFdWsgfBf1Ew3YsAvsrLT
|
|
|
jkminkov
|
 |
August 17, 2011, 06:28:43 AM |
|
Umm, this seems odd to me. The round lasted nearly 2 hours and all I got was 0.01??? In previous rounds of the nearly the same length the reward was 2 to 3 times that much.
1:59:54 3094337 0.01812518
you would not ask that question if pool had normal stats, like submited shares column after duration on block history
|
.:31211457:. 100 dollars in one place talking - Dudes, hooray, Bitcoin against us just one, but we are growing in numbers!
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
 |
August 17, 2011, 07:32:20 AM |
|
What is the cause of the reject???
gr0bi42, I don't know why you have such high stale ratio. There isn't anything what I'm hiding... What phoenix version _exactly_ do you use? I'll try this version on my machines, maybe there is some change in phoenix...
|
|
|
|
gr0bi42
|
 |
August 17, 2011, 10:04:10 AM |
|
What is the cause of the reject???
gr0bi42, I don't know why you have such high stale ratio. There isn't anything what I'm hiding... What phoenix version _exactly_ do you use? I'll try this version on my machines, maybe there is some change in phoenix... I'm using the latest version from SVN-repository. It's revision 118. With cgminer 1.5.3 or 1.5.4 I have the same problems. Sometimes it works for some time, but at some moment things get worse... With poclbm I have an estimated reward of ~0.12. The I use cgminer or phoenix the reward is about 0.08, if the reject ratio is *normal* bad. But sometimes the reject ratio goes up to 80-90% rejects on some of my miners, while others still perform well. It's strange.
|
Donations are welcome: 1Btf3BqUegfe5iFdWsgfBf1Ew3YsAvsrLT
|
|
|
zx9r
|
 |
August 17, 2011, 10:18:34 AM |
|
I think you should try stable version that is 116 at the moment and see what happens. Try with phatk2 also.
|
|
|
|
zx9r
|
 |
August 17, 2011, 10:24:24 AM |
|
I would like to show info for one of my rigs for the last 24 hours:
Temp Fan% (rpm) Load Rate Accept/Invalid Status 0: 74c 82% (3858+) 98% 392 Mhs 7550/110 (1.44%) api2.bitcoin.cz 1: 73.5c 70% (3458+) 99% 394 Mhs 5038/18 (0.36%) bitcoins.lc 2: 72.5c+ 70% (3491+) 99% 393 Mhs 5059/19 (0.37%) bitcoins.lc
The reject/invalid shares are as usual... 1.44% for slush, 0.37% for bitcoins.lc... ok, nothing new
BUT the total number of submitted shares are about 50% higher in favor of slush. I dont think it had been some network issue or bitcoins.lc downtime but I can be 100% sure of that. Am I the only one ?
|
|
|
|
pekv2
|
 |
August 17, 2011, 02:53:14 PM |
|
Time to tell my experience with slush and stale
Now guiminer is saying 1902 shares accepted and 7 invalid. That make like 0.03% of stale with slush. An AWESOME thing
Yea! Ain't it. I'm lovin it. 2968 accepted 13 stale.
|
|
|
|
allinvain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1083
|
 |
August 18, 2011, 07:48:19 AM |
|
So I take it guiminer with poclbm is still the best to use for this pool?
|
|
|
|
Callius
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
 |
August 18, 2011, 10:24:23 AM Last edit: August 18, 2011, 11:09:24 AM by Callius |
|
never mind I fixed my problem.
|
|
|
|
CyberPhunk
|
 |
August 18, 2011, 11:59:45 PM |
|
What's the status on 8 decimal payouts?
Just wondering
|
|
|
|
lxFlasHxl
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
 |
August 19, 2011, 12:17:16 AM |
|
not a bad mining pool.
|
|
|
|
allinvain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1083
|
 |
August 19, 2011, 01:35:41 PM |
|
 Today my total reward (unconfirmed + confirmed) actually went down! I thought this was not possible. Slush, did you recalculate round rewards or something?
|
|
|
|
CyberPhunk
|
 |
August 19, 2011, 04:28:40 PM |
|
there was an invalid block, so that might have caused it.
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
 |
August 19, 2011, 11:39:23 PM |
|
 Today my total reward (unconfirmed + confirmed) actually went down! I thought this was not possible. Slush, did you recalculate round rewards or something? As CyberPhunk said, "unconfirmed" reward dropped a bit because of invalid block.
|
|
|
|
m3ta
|
 |
August 20, 2011, 01:45:55 AM |
|
There's definitely something wrong, and not only the rejections. Block 141689 just took more than 3 hours, I was looking at it, and made sure everything was fine until it finished. My "estimated" varied between 0.010 and 0.016 while it was ongoing, but when i checked stats a while after it finished, my reward is 0.
Really?....
|
|
|
|
kohlersc
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
 |
August 21, 2011, 11:36:36 PM |
|
Was it 0 immediately after? There is about a 20 minute lag time from the end of one block finishing before the processing and the amount shown is correct. If you are refreshing a lot you will see processing, followed by none, then your award going up and up till about 20-25 minutes total after that block has been found.
|
|
|
|
CyberPhunk
|
 |
August 22, 2011, 12:44:29 AM |
|
hmm, can't access the site atm, issues?
|
|
|
|
fassadlr
Member

Offline
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
|
 |
August 22, 2011, 06:50:23 AM |
|
I've been getting a lot miner idle messages since last Friday, anyone else experiencing the same issues?
|
|
|
|
pekv2
|
 |
August 22, 2011, 12:44:25 PM |
|
I've been getting a lot miner idle messages since last Friday, anyone else experiencing the same issues?
Everything is fine for me.
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
 |
August 22, 2011, 09:43:22 PM |
|
My "estimated" varied between 0.010 and 0.016 while it was ongoing, but when i checked stats a while after it finished, my reward is 0.
Did it "repair" for you? As was mentioned above, there is some delay between round end and processing all block rewards... AFAIk there was no problem at this time.
|
|
|
|
|