|
zx9r
|
 |
August 16, 2011, 09:46:27 AM |
|
It is obvious that the pool have some issues with the rejected/invalid shares. Too much people concerning with the same problem this days.
I have moved 50% of my 2 Ghash to another pool, will move also the other 50% or come back again depending if the problem gets solved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Gods or Kings. Only Bitcoin
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gr0bi42
|
|
August 16, 2011, 03:24:39 PM |
|
It is obvious that the pool have some issues with the rejected/invalid shares. Too much people concerning with the same problem this days.
I have moved 50% of my 2 Ghash to another pool, will move also the other 50% or come back again depending if the problem gets solved.
@slush Still have this high reject ratio using phoenix/cgminer with your pool. Come on... your are unable to tell the reason? Why do I have to stick with the *slower* poclbm then I'm mining with your pool? With poclbm I'm loosing about 250MH/s. I cannot believe that I'm the only one. Once again: with the lastes cgminer or phoenix I have tons of rejects. With poclbm not. I get the rejects only with your pool. Deepbit, Arsbit, Eligius, Guild, mtred... all are working. It's NOT a network issue. I guess your pool is in some way not compatible with some optimization of the more recent miner-software. What is the cause of the reject??? |
Donations are welcome: 1Btf3BqUegfe5iFdWsgfBf1Ew3YsAvsrLT
|
|
|
Gabi
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008
If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat
|
|
August 16, 2011, 06:02:18 PM |
|
Time to tell my experience with slush and stale
Now guiminer is saying 1902 shares accepted and 7 invalid. That make like 0.03% of stale with slush. An AWESOME thing
|
|
|
|
|
gr0bi42
|
|
August 16, 2011, 06:46:01 PM |
|
Time to tell my experience with slush and stale
Now guiminer is saying 1902 shares accepted and 7 invalid. That make like 0.03% of stale with slush. An AWESOME thing
You forgot to mention one important thing... the guiminer backend! If I'm mining at slush with poclbm I have the same very low reject ratio. I have only problems with "newer" mining software like phoenix (svn 118) or cgminer 1.5.4. Both are a lot faster than poclbm... for instance: 5870: poclbm 432 MH/s, phoenix 451 MH/s, cgminer ~445MH/s. |
Donations are welcome: 1Btf3BqUegfe5iFdWsgfBf1Ew3YsAvsrLT
|
|
|
|
jkminkov
|
|
August 17, 2011, 06:28:43 AM |
|
Umm, this seems odd to me. The round lasted nearly 2 hours and all I got was 0.01??? In previous rounds of the nearly the same length the reward was 2 to 3 times that much.
1:59:54 3094337 0.01812518
you would not ask that question if pool had normal stats, like submited shares column after duration on block history |
.:31211457:. 100 dollars in one place talking - Dudes, hooray, Bitcoin against us just one, but we are growing in numbers!
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
August 17, 2011, 07:32:20 AM |
|
What is the cause of the reject???
gr0bi42, I don't know why you have such high stale ratio. There isn't anything what I'm hiding... What phoenix version _exactly_ do you use? I'll try this version on my machines, maybe there is some change in phoenix... |
|
|
|
|
gr0bi42
|
|
August 17, 2011, 10:04:10 AM |
|
What is the cause of the reject???
gr0bi42, I don't know why you have such high stale ratio. There isn't anything what I'm hiding... What phoenix version _exactly_ do you use? I'll try this version on my machines, maybe there is some change in phoenix... I'm using the latest version from SVN-repository. It's revision 118. With cgminer 1.5.3 or 1.5.4 I have the same problems. Sometimes it works for some time, but at some moment things get worse... With poclbm I have an estimated reward of ~0.12. The I use cgminer or phoenix the reward is about 0.08, if the reject ratio is *normal* bad. But sometimes the reject ratio goes up to 80-90% rejects on some of my miners, while others still perform well. It's strange. |
Donations are welcome: 1Btf3BqUegfe5iFdWsgfBf1Ew3YsAvsrLT
|
|
|
|
zx9r
|
|
August 17, 2011, 10:18:34 AM |
|
I think you should try stable version that is 116 at the moment and see what happens. Try with phatk2 also.
|
|
|
|
|
|
zx9r
|
|
August 17, 2011, 10:24:24 AM |
|
I would like to show info for one of my rigs for the last 24 hours:
Temp Fan% (rpm) Load Rate Accept/Invalid Status
0: 74c 82% (3858+) 98% 392 Mhs 7550/110 (1.44%) api2.bitcoin.cz
1: 73.5c 70% (3458+) 99% 394 Mhs 5038/18 (0.36%) bitcoins.lc
2: 72.5c+ 70% (3491+) 99% 393 Mhs 5059/19 (0.37%) bitcoins.lc
The reject/invalid shares are as usual... 1.44% for slush, 0.37% for bitcoins.lc... ok, nothing new
BUT the total number of submitted shares are about 50% higher in favor of slush. I dont think it had been some network issue or bitcoins.lc downtime but I can be 100% sure of that. Am I the only one ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
pekv2
|
|
August 17, 2011, 02:53:14 PM |
|
Time to tell my experience with slush and stale
Now guiminer is saying 1902 shares accepted and 7 invalid. That make like 0.03% of stale with slush. An AWESOME thing
Yea! Ain't it. I'm lovin it. 2968 accepted 13 stale. |
|
|
|
|
allinvain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1080
|
|
August 18, 2011, 07:48:19 AM |
|
So I take it guiminer with poclbm is still the best to use for this pool?
|
|
|
|
Callius
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
August 18, 2011, 10:24:23 AM
Last edit: August 18, 2011, 11:09:24 AM by Callius |
|
never mind I fixed my problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CyberPhunk
|
|
August 18, 2011, 11:59:45 PM |
|
What's the status on 8 decimal payouts?
Just wondering
|
|
|
|
lxFlasHxl
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
August 19, 2011, 12:17:16 AM |
|
not a bad mining pool.
|
|
|
|
|
allinvain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1080
|
|
August 19, 2011, 01:35:41 PM |
|
 Today my total reward (unconfirmed + confirmed) actually went down! I thought this was not possible. Slush, did you recalculate round rewards or something?
|
|
|
|
|
CyberPhunk
|
|
August 19, 2011, 04:28:40 PM |
|
there was an invalid block, so that might have caused it.
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
August 19, 2011, 11:39:23 PM |
|
Today my total reward (unconfirmed + confirmed) actually went down! I thought this was not possible. Slush, did you recalculate round rewards or something? As CyberPhunk said, "unconfirmed" reward dropped a bit because of invalid block. |
|
|
|
|
m3ta
|
|
August 20, 2011, 01:45:55 AM |
|
There's definitely something wrong, and not only the rejections.
Block 141689 just took more than 3 hours, I was looking at it, and made sure everything was fine until it finished.
My "estimated" varied between 0.010 and 0.016 while it was ongoing, but when i checked stats a while after it finished, my reward is 0.
Really?....
|
|
|
|
kohlersc
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
August 21, 2011, 11:36:36 PM |
|
Was it 0 immediately after? There is about a 20 minute lag time from the end of one block finishing before the processing and the amount shown is correct. If you are refreshing a lot you will see processing, followed by none, then your award going up and up till about 20-25 minutes total after that block has been found.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CyberPhunk
|
|
August 22, 2011, 12:44:29 AM |
|
hmm, can't access the site atm, issues?
|
|
|
|
|
