Volatility does not scare long-term investors and holders because it is a headache only for speculators or mid-term investors looking to profit from bitcoin over a period of a few months. For the long-term investor, bitcoin is a fairly conservative investment, where the asset grows steadily every 4 years. This applies not only to bitcoin, but also to any known altcoin whose historical chart is similar to that of bitcoin, such as ETH.

One should stay away from this dubious shitcoin, which has such a graph.



It's 20 times cheaper and trades on all sorts of low-liquid exchanges. If someone thinks it has fallen that much in price and it is a good opportunity to buy and then make money, they could be in for a big trap. Many of the tokens on this DEX have a similar graph. The token is, in fact, totally speculative and there is nothing good about it except for its owner and early investors. The rest of us will be left with this useless "funny money" and will wait for growth their whole lives.

NFT marketplaces apparently obey the same principle as centralized crypto exchanges, namely periodic change of the industry leader. OpenSea lost much of its credibility after the 2021 hype because it was a platform on which various fraudulent schemes parasitized. The emergence of a new leader was only a matter of time. Now OpenSea will have to try very hard to regain its leadership and credibility, although I am sure they will hardly succeed.

Now few people pay attention to these, boring to everyone, ways of PR from Ilon Musk. Many have already realized that DOGE is too overbought and bloated, so there is not much profit to be made there. Now there appeared many new meme-coins, which grabbed attention of crypto investors, but DOGE with its turtle growth rate is not interesting for very few people now.

And what is at the $1,290 mark? That's not a strong level to consider as a good indicator. In my opinion, we need to stick to the $1,050-$1,150 level. The price has been consolidating in this zone for a considerable time and accumulation has been taking place. Although, I tend to believe that we won't see such prices anymore and we shouldn't wait for ETH price below $1,400, which in the long term is also a good price to buy.

Now LINK is in the phase of accumulation. Powerful support at the level of $6 is well working out its function. If to buy now, it is quite possible to hope for growth up to 40-60$ in the nearest 2-3 years. This project will not bring big profit, as, say, investors in 2017, but this project certainly can not be called a scam. In general, to add to his portfolio is quite good. Not an investment advice. DYOR.

How long is this portfolio for? If it is for a very long period, XRP is obviously superfluous there. Given the initial data, I would invest most of my portfolio in ETH, it has more growth potential than BNB. If you haven't already bought these assets, now might not be the best time to buy. The market is overbought, now there might be a lull and an expected big correction as everything has been rising for 4 months.

Yes, Matic is very good for transactions and very good for NFT, but I don't think it's the right asset to implement at the national level as a means of payment just because it has low fees. Matic has too short history on the market, it's an altcoin and it's not reliable enough. It is unlikely that any country will choose any altcoin, ignoring bitcoin.

Is this the yet another shilling of the Oscar swap project and agitating the passage of KYC? You have the wrong forum, KYC can be useful for project founders as it can help avoid fraud and rug pull, only it is unlikely to benefit ordinary users, especially in the cryptocurrency industry. Cryptocurrencies are not created for us to throw away our personal data. There is no way I will send my passport data to some obscure service just because it claims that KYC is an extremely important element. It is not an extremely important element, it is an extremely dangerous element for the crypto user and should be avoided.

In my investment portfolio I have all native coins of all known blockchains, ETH, BNB, Matic, Atom, ARB, etc. These projects have very strong fundamentals and they are constantly in demand, so it turns out to be a low-risk investment, more reliable, because the demand for these blockchains is very high and the coins themselves have quite a wide spread. Although I understand that these coins will not give big profits anymore, but it can be considered as diversification, because such projects are unlikely to lose all their value.

No, I do not register on exchanges and do not pass KYC. Therefore, I will not participate in IEO. Such projects are being killed by cheaters who create huge farms and come to the projects solely for earnings. If the project will imply business model, where you can study something, read, answer questions and earn tokens on it, then I can say that such project is doomed. I would not invest in such projects for the long term, but for speculation and early investment it may not be so bad, given that it has already received support from Binance.

Состоялся релиз Riecoin Core 23.04

Riecoin Core 23.04 был выпущен 29 апреля 2023 года. Если есть желание узнать больше об изменениях по сравнению с версией 22.03, можете почитать примечания к релизу.

Важно: в этой версии произошли заметные изменения, касающиеся кошельков Riecoin. Для новых пользователей Riecoin эти изменения не столь важны, но если вы уже использовали предыдущую версию Riecoin, то от вас могут потребоваться некоторые телодвижения. Если вы переходите с более старой версии, пожалуйста, внимательно прочитайте примечания к выпуску (ссылка указана чуть выше).

Если у вас есть вопросы или вы не уверены в чем-либо, сообщество будет радо помочь вам в обновлении. Как всегда, рекомендуется сделать это как можно скорее, хотя спешить тоже не стоит, просто найдите время, когда вам будет удобно разобраться в инструкции и выполнить обновление. Изменения в кошельке были совершенно исключительными, и будущие обновления скорее всего не потребуют такого вмешательства, как в этом выпуске.

Последние файлы кошелька можно загрузить здесь.

Анонс

Вот именно, незаконно.


Насколько я знаю, ни одного. Наши глобальные модераторы далеко не глупые люди, чтобы банить не разобравшись.

Каким образом это делать, не подскажете?


Имеете ввиду, не переводить мелкие суммы? Но мне приходится это делать в силу некоторых обстоятельств.

А что может помочь? Или это уже не от настроек кошелька зависит?


Да, это я уже понял. Но, например, при отправке 0.0003319 ($9.31) комиссия составляет $2.40. Не многовато ли?



Вот возле суммы комиссии висит восклицательный знак, раньше не замечал такого. При нажатии выскакивает вот такое окошко
 

Возник вопрос. У меня последнее время в кошельке неоправданно высокая комиссия на перевод, даже если я выставляю самую маленькую комиссию (в пределах 25 блоков). Мне подсказали, что это может быть связано с тем, что в кошельке баланс разбросан по адресам для сдачи. Я проверил адреса и действительно, баланс распределён по большому количеству адресов для сдачи.

Собственно вопрос, можно ли как то настроить кошелёк, чтобы использовался только один адрес для сдачи? Чтобы баланс не распылялся по большому количеству этих адресов? И возможно ли объединить уже существующий баланс на одном адресе для сдачи?

Many exchanges began to introduce KYC, also more than 100 countries created tax and regulatory rules for bitcoin, many banks integrated with bitcoin and began to offer it to clients. That is, bitcoin became more transparent and began to gradually come out of the shadows, and the wave of scams moved to altcoins and various DeFi.


Even some developers of decentralized protocols are already thinking that this industry urgently needs regulation, otherwise there will be no further development, adopting a slowdown.

I can tell you for sure that you won't make a huge amount of money even in the top 20. The point is that in the top 20 are projects that have already grown by tens and hundreds of thousands of percent. They won't grow like that anymore, well 3-7x at most in a 4 year market cycle. And that's it. What scams with developers are you talking about? Name me at least 3 projects that raised large investments from various funds and backers and that turned out to be scams? There aren't any. No need to cite the various garbage, which is placed on all sorts of dubious exchanges and DEXs. Always look at what funds invest in new projects, and then make a decision.

You contradict yourself by saying that you don't have any coins and tokens, but you have NFT. NFT is a token of the ERC-721 standard, for example, if we are talking about tokens on the Ethereum blockchain. If you have tokens, then you can have speculation with those tokens and even wash trading to create artificial demand. All these things ruin the very idea of why these tokens were created and it all comes down to trivial speculation and pump and dump schemes.

Many cannot get rich, otherwise there is not enough liquidity for everyone. Only about 100 addresses managed to get millions on PEPE investments in a few weeks, no more. This is in no way consistent with the definition of many getting rich. Many just found out about PEPE exactly when the investments of early investors turned from a few hundred dollars into several millions. Everyone else rushed to buy due to the general hype.