How interesting.


It's funny how people confess to crimes and don't realize it. Not exactly a crime but a clear violation of the rules. I mean, when naim027 was banned for plagiarism, not only ban evaded with his alts AnotherAlt, Crypt0S0ul, also with Paradice.in account Cratoon.


Hi, naim027, do you want us to believe that you only managed that account up to a month ago?

Well no, I have not accused you of being dishonest before and anyone can check it by reading my post. Both your answer and the word "dishonest" you use have more to do with a third person than with what I wrote.

For you to answer me like that, I better not talk to you, so welcome to my ignore list.

I left the tag but as it is neutral, it's not going to have any consequences. I simply don't knowif you are another alt of naim027, but your previous post in this thread makes me suspicious of what motives you may have. You say you were interested in mining and such but naim027 I see him capable of creating countless alts and making up millions of stories, one of which could be that.

For the rest, as I say nothing happens because of the neutral tag and if you are interested in using this forum well even less.

JollyGood gave your first merit btw so take that as positive.

After coming back to this thread, I see that, indeed, the OP is fake. First he was talking about a quarter of a million, then:


I've been reading bullshit on forums for many years and watching people make up stories, one of the most common being supposedly having a lot of money and acting like you're dumb. Leaving aside the people who win the lottery, which statistically are almost 0, people who have a lot of money is because they have earned it. They usually are not dumb, and less waste time in the forums with ego battles when the thing can be solved in an instant:


But make it ~20BTC now.

is that people spend too much time analyzing what they say and trying to dismantle their lies.

At the moment naim027 has 3 red tags in his alt that we are talking about in this thread. I'm sure little by little some more negative feedback will be added. The question is, how long will his manager keep him in the signature campaign? Lately it seems that he doesn't kick people out for a couple of red tags.


Account strength building globally, I would say, because he already has enough merits for Hero member.

Now he is in the whirlwind campaign but if in the future the campaign ceases or whatever, if he is in the top merit earners he could access Royse777's campaigns that have the green zone, with similar payout, or custom deals.

You have not read Marx's Capital, in the same way that almost no one has read it. The garbage of labor theory of value or that in that ideal communist society instead of being specialized in a job, we would change jobs just like gender fluid people change gender are just plain bullshit.


I don't know what world the panorama you paint is from, but it certainly isn't from this one. In this world we will never be equal, and that's not a bad thing, the world is the way it is. What we have to be is equal in rights and tend to try to equalize in opportunities, not in results. Although I doubt you understand what I am saying.

I don't call this drama. I call this talking about what needs to be talked about in this section. If it turns out that statistically we have proportionally more cases from a given region, let's talk about it. There may even be more naim027 alts active and participating in that local board. Let's talk about it. Otherwise, what is this section for?

I have made the context very clear from the beginning and it is that he has the same credibility as an amoeba trying to teach theoretical physics.

And on the other hand, I wasn't going to get involved in the discussion until I've seen the claim that he had helped poor people taken for granted.

In other words, a person as lying as he is, you assume that what he says is true because he posts some pictures of food in bags and a handwritten paper?

This meddlesome and manipulative guy claims to have helped poor people.


I mean that apparently he had no moral dilemma in giving loans for something that is a sin in his religion.


I am sure you missed this.

Well no, I hadn't noticed the date, although I could have guessed it, because in this section the threads move much slower.


 

Deliberately? You talked about Germany and I answered you talking about Germany, or am I missing something here?

Also, as far as I remember, laws favorable to cryptocurrencies already existed years ago, not just a year ago, which is the gap in this thread between your post and my reply. But hey, my intention was to debate, not to pose this as a battle with winners and losers.

How interesting.

So, it turns out that naim027 is now a benefactor of humanity? Could you explain this better? Do you know him in person to be able to affirm it?

So he is a plagiarist, merit abuser, ban evader and account farmer, manipulator to the extreme, who gives loans to someone to bet. Mind you, he is not giving loans to found an ethical company, he is giving loans to someone to gamble, despite the fact that gambling is supposed to be a moral conflict with his religious beliefs. It is clear that it is not against his religious beliefs to be a known gambler recognized by him or to participate in gambling signature campaigns, as far as we can see. The case of naim027 is that of lying and open mouth. If you see him open his mouth and move it, he is lying.

And now it turns out that he used the interest to help the poor.

Can you explain this better, Little Mouse?

Normally I am skeptical with this kind of stories, which are often invented or seek to gain merit. In your case, although it is something I can't verify, you sound sincere to me.

I would tell you not to obsess and to see Bitcoin as part of an overall wealth building plan. First keep an emergency cash fund of 3 to 6 months of expenses, make sure you have all your payments covered with your income (food, shelter, clothes, transportation) and then invest in Bitcoin the money you won't need for years.

It seems to me that you are going to have to explain yourself better, because as the credibility you have is 0, this is how I see your posts:

Bump.


I agree 100%.

Mods, theymos, we are still waiting for a reply on why the rules have not been applied in this case. He is now engaged, again, in trying to manipulate people in the Reputation section. As if it wasn't enough that when he gets banned he continues to create alts, to leave his main account active and go around messing around even more.

So, what? Do you think you have any credibility at all? Do you think people will stop looking for evidence to tag your alts? The pity is that the forum has a certain arbitrariness with these matters because this account from which you write should be banned, according to the rules.

I would find the statement more credible if you had used "I hope" instead of "I expect", which implies a more vain hope. Germany has had a more favorable legislation to cryptocurrencies for many years, and there has not been the copying effect you are talking about, so I do not expect it to happen, except in some specific case perhaps and for other reasons, not for copying what Germany does. In the same way, Germany is called the European locomotive because it has an economic policy different from the rest, which encourages productivity and mass competition, and France with its elephantine state or Italy with its peculiarities do not copy it.

To say that I don't understand how the system works, I would expect you to refer to several poorly written feedbacks, and not just one, but while we're at it, would someone who has been on the forum as long as you and has as much experience mind explaining it to me to see if I understand it and decide to change the wording of the feedback?

For me, simply, someone who offers that kind of service is not to be trusted, it is risky to deal with him.

I am editing this because I misunderstood before and though that you were referring to me about my feedback on Loansik12.

Yeah, well, a neutral feedback from non-DT member I don't care much about but I would add that it is not only the feedback, but also that he is the only one who opposes the flag with the arguments he gives.

Based on screenshots?


And also if it is based on screenshots. If I recall correctly you said yourself that you can trust screenshots only if you trust the user.


He can continue blah blah blahing but there is a scientific principle very suitable for these cases, Ockam's razor: the simplest explanation is the most likely one.

I already knew that. Do you know what a sarcasm is?

Hello Dimitri94. I know you live in Vladivostok, but you wouldn't happen to have a brother who lives in Bangladesh and has selflessly gifted you the account?