We still have no idea what CZ is a actually doing behind the closed door (at least not the most shady stuff). Sure, he doesn't seem as reckless and cocky as SBF but just a six months ago Sam was seen as 2nd coming of Christ by a large portion of crypto community and guy who will save crypto industry and we can see how that ended.

If fall of MtGox and FTX didn't teach anyone anything, so won't fall of a small and unknown exchange like Beaxy. I know some people that lost money in FTX and Celsius and they are still storing large amount of money on Binance so what else to say. At least in Beaxy case people will have time to actually withdraw their money (or at least that's what they say).


Binance was giving away Lamborghini? Lol I didn't know that. Those marketing "techniques" are usually reserved for the worst possible ponzi scams.

Relax buddy, I don't think that you will get perma banned for something like this (and I don't think that you should if this was the only time you forgot to include reference). Few years ago maybe, but lately mods became more lenient to similar cases so chances for you bearing any consequence are slim to none. Then again, that's just my opinion.

By the way, when you are copy/pasting someone else's text, its not enough (at least it shoulnd't be) to just share reference link at the bottom as you should also make a clear difference your own words, and the one that you copied. Just sharing sharing reference link is enough not to get banned, but its a bad posting style.

Probably trying to appear more knowledgeable than he is and pick few merits while doing so.


Of course he understands, just yesterday he was bullshitting to some newbie how plagiarism is bad and importance of proper referencing etc.

Doesn't this type of topic where people are trying to guess what will happen on April 1st kinda ruins the experience? Imho, better just wait and see what theymos prepared than speculate about it.

As the title says, another exchange has been closed and this time its Beaxy. I can't say I heard about them before but allegedly they have been around since 2017 and are (were) based in the Unites States. If anyone has any money there, you have 30 days to withdraw it says SEC.

Da su mu pokucali na vrata i upozorili na mixere, mislim da bi on vec zabranio sve mixer signature kampanje. Ovo mi se vise cini kao mjera da se zasititi forum, tako da se ne moze reci da je itko od forumskih zaposlenika aktivno promovirao mixere.

Pricam napamet jer nisam strucnjak, ali s obzirom koliko amerikanci pritiscu sve sto ima veze sa bitcoinom mozda ne bi bilo lose premjestiti forum negdje drugdje sa labavijom regulacijom.


Koliko sam ja malo gledao, nacin funkcioniranja je relativno slican CM, a zeli se postici jos veca anonimnost te na kraju i decentralizacija. U svakom slucaju, drago mi je da se pojavljuju novi mixeri unatoc sranjima sa CM.

Bas sam i ja bacio oko na spreadsheet i da, ocekivao sam vecu kvalitetu jer koliko vidim samo par nekadasnjih CM clanova se odlucilo prijaviti te je dosta prosjecnih i ispodprosjecnih clanova uspjelo upasti u kampanju. Vjerojatno je vise razloga za to: od cinjenice da neki ex clanovi CM ne zele u mixere, do toga da nas je dosta tek uslo u nove kampanje pa ljudi nisu htjeli odmah preskakati u novu. Jos jedan bitan faktor je sto je kampanja nova, jako dobro placa te prima puno clanova sto automatski povlaci za sobom upitnost trajanja kampanje.

Situacija me malo podsjeca na BC koji je takodjer primao jako puno clanova i placao jako dobro za ondasnje prilike (vecina kampanja je tada placala $50 tjedno za Hero/Lege a jedino je CM strsio i bio izvan konkurencije), te unatoc tome su inicijalno uspjeli privuci samo par dobrih clanova ali su kroz pametno vodjenu kampanju tijekom koje su konstantno micali losije clanove dosli do jako kvalitetne jezgre koja je u medjuvremenu pala na kvaliteti jer nas je dosta otislo u CM a zamjene imho nisu na razini.


Koliko ja znam nema. Trebao sam napisati novi post ali sam bio lijen te sam samo editirao postojeci.  

This is purely my speculation, but I think its more about being careful in case government knocks on the door rather than already getting some warning because if there was something like that it would be logical to ban mixer signature campaigns alltogether and not just restrict it to forum staff.

So, today I played on Livecasino for the first time using those 125 free spins I got via signature campaign and playing Wanted Dead or a Wild game.

For the first ~70 spins I got maybe 40 cents back, and then I ask my wife to do some spins, hoping that she will be more lucky than me. She was more lucky, managed to get into some sort of free 10 rounds bonus (can't remmber how is it called exactly) and in the end I end up with a little bit over $6 dollars so I think that next time I'll let her do all the spins.

You do understand that's his not his first account and this topic is nothing but a merit fishing attempt and a pretty bad one (he managed to scoop one from you though)? I mean, where did you see that a genuine newbie who just created account day ago gives other newbies advices on what to do on forum?

Bas sam i ja htio pitati isto kad sam sinoc vidio post. Ja pratim metu i opcenito događanja na forumu ali stvarno nisam primjetio da se prica o tome, ali moguce da je istina jer ni jedan mod/admin ne nosi mixer signature.

Ona me u biti i ne bi cudila jer se u onoj optuznici protiv vijetnamca koji navodno stoji iza CM spominje bitcointalk te se njegovi postovi ovdje koriste kao dokaz tako da se theymos na taj nacin valjda hoce malo distancirati od mixera i zastiti forum.

edit: sad sam se sjetio da je jedan od admina i bivsih CM clanova napisao u svom services threadu da nece nositi gambling i mixer sigove pa se mozda dkbit98 referira na to.

edit2: evo i tog posta koji potvrdjuje sto je dkbit98 rekao.



A sigurno su veci su rizik nego gambling kampanje, ali mislim da ce novim mixerima kao sto je taj whirlwind ipak trebati vremena da dobiju pozornost raznoraznih sluzbi.

---

@SirJohnVonSlotty  prica se po selu da si upecao kapitalca. GG  

We are incredibly lucky to have that kind of lead considering how we played the first half. Basically no one except Kovacic showed up tonight and is playing on their level while Brozovic has been the worst player on the pitch, not playing for Inter regularly is definitely showing.

Still, I'll take this lead over us playing great and loosing. 

Charges against SBF keep piling up as now he has been accused of "conspiring to violate anti-bribery provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act." as he allegedly transfered at least $40 millions to Chinese government officials. I am not a lawyer of anything of that sorts, but that sounds damn serious to me.

Same here, it took me quite some time to answer that question. Even though I watch EPL regularly, I seriously dislike Man Utd and everything related to that club (trauma goes all the way back to 1999 CL final lol) and very rarely watch any of their games so I had to do some serious research to figure out their possible starting 11 vs Newcastle.

I can imagine how more interesting all this will get when I actually start playing against someone.

Am I the only one who finds using word "loyal" in this context a bit weird? Shouldn't "lenient" or "forgiving" be more appropriate?

---

There were in the past, but that's exactly the point of OP, why forum stopped using that measure.


Signature ban makes way more sense than perma ban (keep in mind that some plagiarists still deserve perma ban) but since latter was more convenient and there was no lack of new members, admins didn't think twice about banning someone over a copied sentence. Situation changed now, forum activity has been decreasing so they took different approach. Or they simply realized that the old way of dealing with that was too harsh.


Lol no.

Good point, there is indeed a clear difference in posting between those two accounts.


As I showed you in that other topic, several accounts already got banned for use of ChatGPT. The only difference is that Blitzboy is a high ranking account and banned ones were newbies and we know for some time that admins are less inclined to ban higher ranking accounts for one or two cases of plagiarism. Imho its a better approach than insta banning everyone who copied even a sentence (like they did in the past) as forum lost some good members that way, but there should be some punishment (e.g signature ban).

Hhampuz je upravo pokrenuo novu kampanju  whirlwind.money koja nudi do $150 tjedno sto ju cini najbolje placenom kampanjom na forumu te su dostigli ChipMixerovih $6 po postu.

Pravila su vise manje standardna, bitno je naglasiti da nema ogranicenja za pisanje na lokalnom boardu, te nema zahtjeva za pisanje u gamblingu jer rijec o mixeru te nema zahtjeva za minimalnim brojem postova tjedno. Takodjer, moguce biti u kampanji bez nosenja avatara, sto se dodatno placa.

Izgleda da se ostvaruje ono sto sam napisao neki dan, da $100 dolara tjedno postaje standard te da ce se trebati ponuditi primjetno bolja lova da se privuce kvalitetne postere.

Instead of waiting for theymos to find you someone who would be a good merit source you should choose someone among yourselves who is active and shares merit regularly and tell him to make a merit source application.

The same thing should be done for getting your own moderator, but chances of that actually hapening are slim to none as our local board (Croatian) is way more active than yours and despite that we are waiting for years to get our own local mod again after Lauda got removed.

Its no surprise that they didn't play agaisnt each other more often when you take into consideration fact that up until 2006 they were part of the same country (first Yugoslavia, then Serbia & Montenegro).

Even though Serbia is favorite here despite not so convincing win against Lithuania (2:0 looks good on paper but I wasn't impressed with their performace tbh) this game could go either way so I think I'm gonna avoid it.

Well, since @hilariousandco already banned at least two accounts due use of chatbot (1st case, 2nd case) I think that they pretty much decided what to do in those cases. Tricky part is to prove that someone actually used chatbot, but if you manage to do that I don't think that mods/admins will hesitate too much.