So Otillio1330 lost his bitcoin payment because GOOGLE served him an ad to a crypto scammer site???

I tested it, it's privnote.co that is mangling the addresses, another scam site.

Wow. Seems like there could be recourse for a small-claims case against Google, to me. Doesn't that make them accessory to the scam???

Mostly when a big win happens like this for lower ranked players they lose a match in the next two rounds. He will be playing against Lopez that is really old but has too much experience on grass and his serve is really good so i think he might win this match against Hanfmann.

I think with everyone’s reliance on social media and lack of using things like cryptography to ensure their identities, AI will be able to overwhelm platforms with misinformation, scam attempts, and impersonations to the point that people won’t be able to trust anything or anyone they see online. Events could be faked, relationships, even history could be altered at a scale where humans are powerless to fight all the disinformation. I honestly don’t think we have a chance against it, but this is a problem for the next generation.

There is another one in Mallorca but only Tsitsi there worth mentioning. Top players aren't playing in week before Wimbledon unless they need matches like Tsitsi.

As a financial advisor my first recommendation is not to not take advice from those whom aren’t themselves licensed financial advisors. I’m not saying there aren’t people out there, or even in this thread that don’t have good advice to give, but you just don’t know if they actually know what they are talking about and so that’s a scary proposition to trust just anyone.

I often hear from my clients “my coworker said I should do this” and I can tell you that 99% of the time that advice given is awful and incorrect.

No one here can give you a truly good answer unless we knew your entire financial situation. Without knowing that, giving advice would come from an incomplete space.

I often offer to help people on here (for free), so if you’d like some help, feel free to DM me.

Cheers

As far as I'm aware of, one cannot lose their bitcoin investment as long as they do not sell it a lower price. We all know bitcoin's price has been increasing each and every year passed. We've seen it at $1k and a couple of years later it jumped to almost $20k, then a couple more years later it jumped to $60k. So, if you do the math, there is a good possibility that bitcoin may surpass that level in 2024 especially that we are approaching for another bitcoin halving which was known to be a bullish even in crypto space.
Again, no one is gonna lose as long as they are not selling at a lower price. New investors must learn how to be patient and make more research about bitcoin and it's historical run. It is also advised to invest what they can afford to lose as we never know when will bitcoin pumps again - so during the bear season you can consider your bitcoin holdings as partially loss until it recovers again. A total loss is when you sell it a lower price.

When you buy Bitcoin hen the price is 100k$ then how much will you sell it back to make profit because at that time the price of Bitcoin might not exceed 100k$ and if the price didn't not exceed that amount you will become a loser in the business so how does the vendors do at that time?

this is old news
it was talked about a few days ago with a similar thing.. whereby coins that were generated in 2009. were spent into exchanges like mtgox and the stash in mtgox from 2013 is now moving due to the bankruptcy administration..

whales are people holding 100k plus. like M.saylor, or other entities that OWN their stash..

this however is not a whale, but a shark.. and also its a mtgox stash. thus not an individual owner but a small part of mtgox total hoard stuck in bankruptcy administration

this event is not a sell-off. its just a re-organisation of the mtgox stash ready to pass out to creditors in the future (moving from cold to hot wallets so to speak)

Lot 1 - 0.001
Lot 2 - 0.001

as far as I could see, I think he's a really strong player even physically (he's 1.90 meters tall).
But very often I have seen in his matches a total sense of "surrendering" when the result was not in favor.
Probably now he has matured and understood his real abilities.

I read articles declaring proudly that he "will be dangerous at Wimbledon"
I don't know, I have many doubts about it, I don't think he can get beyond the quarter-finals ...

Changing the coaching team and became a father might give him a breath of fresh air to perform better, and actually he's a pretty good player, especially for his serve which can be said to be more solid than Zverev in this tournament, and his serve gave a lot of points for him to finally secure the title champion here.

They are still on there way to me….I have only made 50 of these and will raffle one each week until I run out!

Yes, the surprises continued and finally he was able to become the champion in this tournament, and throughout his journey here it was relatively only when he beat Struff and in the final against Rublev he got quite a tight resistance, Zverev in the semifinals was even difficult to break this player's serve, and this became Bublik's second ATP title, and extraordinary achievement for a player like him because he also often appears inconsistent and this is the first ATP 500 title.

And Alcaraz at ATP Queen's was very solid, even though he looked nervous on his last serve to kill the match but he was able to control the situation quickly and only two sets, so that proved he was experiencing rapid growth