Stoneysilence
Member

Offline
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
|
 |
May 07, 2013, 05:45:10 AM |
|
I've been getting some BSOD when i run the latest version for a while. Not sure if it's cudaminer or something else but just figured i'd post to see if anyone else was getting them?
Not here. What are your system specs?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on crypto sites. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
Caesar V
|
 |
May 07, 2013, 05:47:12 AM |
|
I've been getting some BSOD when i run the latest version for a while. Not sure if it's cudaminer or something else but just figured i'd post to see if anyone else was getting them?
I'm getting them too, not sure if its cause graphic card is working too hard or cause of the miner. Using gtx 570.
|
|
|
|
3devilred
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 07, 2013, 07:24:49 AM |
|
some of you have noticed an increase in speed by opening the browser? ? happens to me with chrome version 26.0.1410.64 m, up from 118 kh / s to 132 kh / s. and ' normal this thing ? ? hello
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
 |
May 07, 2013, 09:41:13 AM |
|
some of you have noticed an increase in speed by opening the browser? ? happens to me with chrome version 26.0.1410.64 m, up from 118 kh / s to 132 kh / s. and ' normal this thing ? ? hello
Are you running cudaminer with -i 0 ? Christian
|
|
|
|
crunchy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 07, 2013, 01:55:36 PM Last edit: May 07, 2013, 02:07:03 PM by crunchy |
|
sorry to say but the latest releases dont work as well as the 17-04 version.
The card (GTX 660 Ti) does not run as fast AND gives "Result does not validate on CPU" whenever i use a later version then 17-04.
tried all kinds of configs and i will stay with 17-04 version @ 160 kH/s with flags -i 0 -C 2 -m 1 -l 70x4. This same config runs awfull with the new versions.
I'm using win8 64 bit with the Nvidia 314.22 drivers.
Now i am wondering about UEFI systems that have a UEFI graphics BIOS (the windows 8 secure boot thingy), did you take these systems in consideration ??
Or should there be no problem at all with any kind of GPU bioses ?
Greetings
edit: sorry forgot to mention the cards clock speeds : core @ 1058 mem @ 6008 wich are stockspeeds. sometimes goes to corespeed of 1071 thereabout, regulated by nvidiaboost. no oc'ing. its an ASUS GTX 660 Ti 2gig standard model DC2
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
 |
May 07, 2013, 01:59:39 PM |
|
Interesting. I have a PC where I can run a 660Ti with 186kHash/s (after slight OC) just fine. Windows 7, 32 bit there. I will dig out my launch config later.
No special handling of UEFI, as my code doesn't interface with any APIs that go that deep. It sits on top of the CUDA runtime APIs and that is supposed to shield me from low level stuff like that.
|
|
|
|
CumpsD
|
 |
May 07, 2013, 03:10:10 PM |
|
Are there plans to get this into cgminer? 
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
 |
May 07, 2013, 03:17:19 PM |
|
Are there plans to get this into cgminer?  Not from my side. The stuff is open source, fork it, spoon it, do whatever you like 
|
|
|
|
CumpsD
|
 |
May 07, 2013, 03:38:00 PM |
|
I'll throw a stick in the cgminer thread, you never know 
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
 |
May 07, 2013, 04:11:51 PM |
|
Nice
|
|
|
|
Hektek
|
 |
May 07, 2013, 05:48:53 PM |
|
Does anyone have a Step by Step manual to install Cudaminer on an Ubuntu System ?
best regards
|
|
|
|
zim79
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 07, 2013, 06:56:15 PM |
|
Interesting. I have a PC where I can run a 660Ti with 186kHash/s (after slight OC) just fine. Windows 7, 32 bit there. I will dig out my launch config later.
No special handling of UEFI, as my code doesn't interface with any APIs that go that deep. It sits on top of the CUDA runtime APIs and that is supposed to shield me from low level stuff like that.
what settings did you use ? All I can get at the moment is 170kHash/s max, I did use -l 42x8 and it gave me 1034kHash though something went wrong as my gpu was still idle. While I like this program I think the new version is a little bit unstable, so I had to switch to the old version.
|
|
|
|
Lacan82
|
 |
May 07, 2013, 07:42:48 PM |
|
Interesting. I have a PC where I can run a 660Ti with 186kHash/s (after slight OC) just fine. Windows 7, 32 bit there. I will dig out my launch config later.
No special handling of UEFI, as my code doesn't interface with any APIs that go that deep. It sits on top of the CUDA runtime APIs and that is supposed to shield me from low level stuff like that.
what settings did you use ? All I can get at the moment is 170kHash/s max, I did use -l 42x8 and it gave me 1034kHash though something went wrong as my gpu was still idle. While I like this program I think the new version is a little bit unstable, so I had to switch to the old version. Anytime you switch versions you must autotune the first time. The old version's configuration could now be an incorrect one for your system
|
|
|
|
3devilred
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 08, 2013, 06:23:36 AM |
|
some of you have noticed an increase in speed by opening the browser? ? happens to me with chrome version 26.0.1410.64 m, up from 118 kh / s to 132 kh / s. and ' normal this thing ? ? hello
Are you running cudaminer with -i 0 ? Christian no! -i 1
|
|
|
|
mhps
|
 |
May 08, 2013, 06:50:55 AM |
|
Just emptied my wallet to keep you motivated  Let me make a wish: get stratumn implemented. Using the proxy causes a loss of hashpower due to stales rate ( 5%-10% at different pools).
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
 |
May 08, 2013, 08:33:03 AM |
|
what settings did you use ?
just now I am using this config on my 660Ti with 3GB of RAM -i 0 -C 2 -m 1 -l S56x8 This gives 172-174 kHash/s and with slight overclocking this can be raised to 186 kHash/s this config requires 56*8*4MB = 1792 MB of available memory on the card.
|
|
|
|
SnitraM
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 08, 2013, 11:01:46 AM |
|
cudaminer-2013-04-30.zip (3.2 MB) [1st update for the day: fixed 1D texture limit checking bug for S kernels] SHA256 sum: 2d81b52e1051a4f724e75b0e84e231293809437aa060d21b2fd3b8bfc5b711f2 Would it be possible to put the source on a site that actually let's you download it, instead of insisting on that I update my browser? Please? In addition the site also says "keep the default settings", which seems quite suspicious. I site shouldn't need specific settings. There are there so I can customize my browsing. One reason for such demands would be they need to run some code that does things that you most certainly do not want to happen (e. g. virus). For the record I _am_ using the the latest stable Debian provides, so there is no update.
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
 |
May 08, 2013, 11:20:02 AM |
|
Would it be possible to put the source on a site that actually let's you download it, instead of insisting on that I update my browser? Please?
For the record I _am_ using the the latest stable Debian provides, so there is no update.
Firefox 17.0.3 ESR here on an ancient Ubuntu 9.04. Latest flash plugin installed. Downloads just fine. Alternatively go to github to get cudaMiner. The version there is almost up to date.
|
|
|
|
K1773R
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
|
 |
May 08, 2013, 11:27:32 AM |
|
cudaminer-2013-04-30.zip (3.2 MB) [1st update for the day: fixed 1D texture limit checking bug for S kernels] SHA256 sum: 2d81b52e1051a4f724e75b0e84e231293809437aa060d21b2fd3b8bfc5b711f2 Would it be possible to put the source on a site that actually let's you download it, instead of insisting on that I update my browser? Please? In addition the site also says "keep the default settings", which seems quite suspicious. I site shouldn't need specific settings. There are there so I can customize my browsing. One reason for such demands would be they need to run some code that does things that you most certainly do not want to happen (e. g. virus). For the record I _am_ using the the latest stable Debian provides, so there is no update. no, some ppl like to help scammers/liers (owner of mega) because they think the service is good. actually all those didnt understand why HTTP got invented and how to use it  nvm, im just kidding (everything expect scammers/liers part). hes a win developer so this is above averge, normal win devs dont publish anything or prop, its rarely src too and also extreme rarely on git/http/similiar.
|
[GPG Public Key]BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1 K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM A K1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: N K1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: L Ki773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: E K1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: b K1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
 |
May 08, 2013, 12:38:20 PM |
|
I like mega because they provide a legitimate service. What I don't like a lot is their reliance on Flash to deliver download content.
Besides, I know Matthias Ortmann (aka scuz) in person. He was among those arrested on Kim Dotcoms premises when the FBI raid happened.
|
|
|
|
|