|
dmwardjr
|
 |
March 08, 2015, 03:19:12 PM |
|
When you set back to default settings on the S3 is that by putting 0725 in the voltage?
I'm assuming it is the default. I really don't know for certain on the older S3's before the S3+ came out. I do know that is the default on the S3+ models. I know this because I got two S3's of the last batch (batch 11) with the January, 2015 firmware and they were default at 0725. I went ahead and put my old S3's at 0725 volts. Then shut it down and turn it back on. EDIT: I've been up all night doing taxes. It is 10:20am and I have not had sleep since 2:30pm yesterday. It's night night for me (bed time). |
BTC ADDRESS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rupy
|
|
March 08, 2015, 05:43:01 PM |
|
@kkurtmann Well, it's just simpler to have everything synchronize over on port, now you need two solutions: 1 webserver and then 1 socketserver with memory leaks, file descriptor leaks, thread management, etc. Basically it's the way we should all go; microservices HTTP-only is a good standard so firewalls and scaling works the same way everywhere, language agnostic, so we can focus on the product with different tools; because developers want them, not because some guy with a suit & tie had a bad morning and needed complexity to keep his job.
Also if you wan't mining to work on port 80 you need it to be HTTP. |
BANKBOOK GWT Wallet & no-FIAT Billing API
|
|
|
Rudler
Member
 Offline
Activity: 119
Merit: 10
|
|
March 09, 2015, 06:50:59 AM |
|
Bloody hell.....1 day, 4:50:16 again and again.....?!
And Poolluck at 0%!!
Whats up? Too much pooljumpers?
This sucks all the time!
|
|
|
|
|
SargeR33
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
★Bitin.io★ - Instant Exchange
|
|
March 09, 2015, 06:57:05 AM |
|
HUGE block for 11PH. Where did this pool BW.COM come from? They appeared over night and have some big power. Oh and its a Chinese pool and google translate doesn't translate the page.
|
|
|
|
bigbitmine
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Big Bit Mine
|
|
March 09, 2015, 09:25:41 AM |
|
HUGE block for 11PH. Where did this pool BW.COM come from? They appeared over night and have some big power. Oh and its a Chinese pool and google translate doesn't translate the page.
Click the flag top right dude. Changes it to English. |
|
|
|
Mikestang
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 09, 2015, 07:34:10 PM |
|
HUGE block for 11PH. Where did this pool BW.COM come from? They appeared over night and have some big power. Oh and its a Chinese pool and google translate doesn't translate the page.
They are located in the same physical structures as AntPool: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=969823.0 |
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1000
Poor impulse control.
|
|
March 10, 2015, 04:15:07 AM |
|
HUGE block for 11PH. Where did this pool BW.COM come from? They appeared over night and have some big power. Oh and its a Chinese pool and google translate doesn't translate the page.
They are located in the same physical structures as AntPool: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=969823.0That thread doesn't mention them being located with AntPool. Is there another post you meant that does? |
|
|
|
Mike0029
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
March 14, 2015, 07:42:03 PM |
|
I still don't fully understand mining, so pardon my ignorance if this has been answered or addressed already, or if this is in the wrong thread. Thanks for any insight into the issue. I use Slush pool as my primary BTC mining pool, and I currently run 2 underclocked Antminer S1's on the pool at 130 GH/s. As far as I know, Slush pool DOES NOT merge mine any alt coin of sorts, so this is where my problem arises... I know that the Bitcoin network difficulty is at 47427554950 and I would need a "BestShare" greater than that number to find a block. One of my Antminer S1's report a "FoundBlock" and this isn't the first time this has happened at Slush pool for me, however my "BestShare" is only 66,379,851... My main questions are: Why does this happen? Does Slush actually merge mine and just not tell the users? Is my Antminer S1 just being glitchy? Does the "1" under "Stale" explain this? I did a little bit of research and the only altcoin that I found that can be merge mined with BTC AND has a difficulty below 66,379,851 is i0coin... Did my miner find an i0coin block, because it is possible to "merge mine" with Bitcoin? Here is an image for reference: http://s21.postimg.org/9rdz8c737/Found_Block.jpgThanks again for any help! ~Mike |
|
|
|
|
bigbitmine
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Big Bit Mine
|
|
March 14, 2015, 07:45:06 PM |
|
I still don't fully understand mining, so pardon my ignorance if this has been answered or addressed already, or if this is in the wrong thread. Thanks for any insight into the issue. I use Slush pool as my primary BTC mining pool, and I currently run 2 underclocked Antminer S1's on the pool at 130 GH/s. As far as I know, Slush pool DOES NOT merge mine any alt coin of sorts, so this is where my problem arises... I know that the Bitcoin network difficulty is at 47427554950 and I would need a "BestShare" greater than that number to find a block. One of my Antminer S1's report a "FoundBlock" and this isn't the first time this has happened at Slush pool for me, however my "BestShare" is only 66,379,851... My main questions are: Why does this happen? Does Slush actually merge mine and just not tell the users? Is my Antminer S1 just being glitchy? Does the "1" under "Stale" explain this? I did a little bit of research and the only altcoin that I found that can be merge mined with BTC AND has a difficulty below 66,379,851 is i0coin... Did my miner find an i0coin block, because it is possible to "merge mine" with Bitcoin? Here is an image for reference:  Thanks again for any help! ~Mike Hi, Haven't a clue personally. Hopefully someone will provide an answer but this forum is like a ghost town lately. Sounds like most home miners have gone into hiding or retirement. |
|
|
|
|
pekatete
|
|
March 14, 2015, 07:50:53 PM |
|
I still don't fully understand mining, so pardon my ignorance if this has been answered or addressed already, or if this is in the wrong thread. Thanks for any insight into the issue. I use Slush pool as my primary BTC mining pool, and I currently run 2 underclocked Antminer S1's on the pool at 130 GH/s. As far as I know, Slush pool DOES NOT merge mine any alt coin of sorts, so this is where my problem arises... I know that the Bitcoin network difficulty is at 47427554950 and I would need a "BestShare" greater than that number to find a block. One of my Antminer S1's report a "FoundBlock" and this isn't the first time this has happened at Slush pool for me, however my "BestShare" is only 66,379,851... My main questions are: Why does this happen? Does Slush actually merge mine and just not tell the users? Is my Antminer S1 just being glitchy? Does the "1" under "Stale" explain this? I did a little bit of research and the only altcoin that I found that can be merge mined with BTC AND has a difficulty below 66,379,851 is i0coin... Did my miner find an i0coin block, because it is possible to "merge mine" with Bitcoin? Here is an image for reference: Thanks again for any help! ~Mike Looking at your image, you may have slush as your main pool, but your S1 has also been mining elsewhere during the session it reports a block as having been found (i.e your second pool). If indeed one of your secondary pools is an altcoin one, then that is where you found the block (as clearly your best share is not big enough to be a BTC block). Additionally, I do not believe that a stale share can also be flaged as a found block, so that is that with that. |
|
|
|
bigbitmine
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Big Bit Mine
|
|
March 14, 2015, 08:31:09 PM |
|
Yep, that should solve that. Good to see there's still life out there is Slushland
|
|
|
|
Mike0029
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
March 14, 2015, 09:04:10 PM |
|
I still don't fully understand mining, so pardon my ignorance if this has been answered or addressed already, or if this is in the wrong thread. Thanks for any insight into the issue. I use Slush pool as my primary BTC mining pool, and I currently run 2 underclocked Antminer S1's on the pool at 130 GH/s. As far as I know, Slush pool DOES NOT merge mine any alt coin of sorts, so this is where my problem arises... I know that the Bitcoin network difficulty is at 47427554950 and I would need a "BestShare" greater than that number to find a block. One of my Antminer S1's report a "FoundBlock" and this isn't the first time this has happened at Slush pool for me, however my "BestShare" is only 66,379,851... My main questions are: Why does this happen? Does Slush actually merge mine and just not tell the users? Is my Antminer S1 just being glitchy? Does the "1" under "Stale" explain this? I did a little bit of research and the only altcoin that I found that can be merge mined with BTC AND has a difficulty below 66,379,851 is i0coin... Did my miner find an i0coin block, because it is possible to "merge mine" with Bitcoin? Here is an image for reference: http://s21.postimg.org/9rdz8c737/Found_Block.jpgThanks again for any help! ~Mike Looking at your image, you may have slush as your main pool, but your S1 has also been mining elsewhere during the session it reports a block as having been found (i.e your second pool). If indeed one of your secondary pools is an altcoin one, then that is where you found the block (as clearly your best share is not big enough to be a BTC block). Additionally, I do not believe that a stale share can also be flaged as a found block, so that is that with that. Thanks for the quick reply! I could see it being my third pool at ispace.co.uk, however that one has a "LSTime" (LastShareTime?) of Never, and the second one is just my Slush info again (I have it twice in the miner in case I change the primary pool, I can just copy and paste Slush info back into primary pool since it has been reliable for me)... Image again, showing the pool URLs: http://s9.postimg.org/din8abd23/Found_Block.jpg |
|
|
|
|
bigbitmine
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Big Bit Mine
|
|
March 14, 2015, 09:08:56 PM |
|
Don't hide your worker details. Promote them! If someone uses them all they're doing is mining for you.
Everyone should mine on Slush using worker bigbitmine.donate
Every little helps!
|
|
|
|
|
pekatete
|
|
March 14, 2015, 09:09:39 PM |
|
Looking at your image, you may have slush as your main pool, but your S1 has also been mining elsewhere during the session it reports a block as having been found (i.e your second pool). If indeed one of your secondary pools is an altcoin one, then that is where you found the block (as clearly your best share is not big enough to be a BTC block).
Additionally, I do not believe that a stale share can also be flaged as a found block, so that is that with that.
Thanks for the quick reply! I could see it being my third pool at ispace.co.uk, however that one has a "LSTime" (LastShareTime?) of Never, and the second one is just my Slush info again (I have it twice in the miner in case I change the primary pool, I can just copy and paste Slush info back into primary pool since it has been reliable for me)... Image again, showing the pool URLs:  Well, well ..... hello there! |
|
|
|
Mike0029
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
March 14, 2015, 09:31:17 PM |
|
Don't hide your worker details. Promote them! If someone uses them all they're doing is mining for you.
Everyone should mine on Slush using worker bigbitmine.donate
Every little helps!
Gotcha! I just blotched everything out, because that's what I have seen others do on these forums when they post pictures of their Antminer GUI... Here it is again, with my worker details, as you can see pool #1 and #2 are exactly the same... http://s23.postimg.org/ruyc74m1j/Found_Block.jpgSo, yeah, I have no idea what is going on... then again I don't know if "LSTime" means "LastShareTime"... that was just a guess... ~Mike0029 |
|
|
|
|
|
pekatete
|
|
March 14, 2015, 09:41:21 PM |
|
Don't hide your worker details. Promote them! If someone uses them all they're doing is mining for you.
Everyone should mine on Slush using worker bigbitmine.donate
Every little helps!
Gotcha! I just blotched everything out, because that's what I have seen others do on these forums when they post pictures of their Antminer GUI... Here it is again, with my worker details, as you can see pool #1 and #2 are exactly the same...  So, yeah, I have no idea what is going on... then again I don't know if "LSTime" means "LastShareTime"... that was just a guess... ~Mike0029 I think you suspected right in the first instance. The "block" share was found on slush ..... but it was stale, i.e submitted after the work was timed-out (or after someone else had already submitted the same share)! On the stale share being logged as a found block, I believe that is a bug in cgminer (or it may indeed be by design!), but the best place to ask that question would be in the cgminer thread. I say it may be a bug because despite clearly not being logged as your best share (and is definitely higher in size than your best share), it has been marked (and logged) as a found block, despite it being stale. So yeah, head over to ckolivas' thread and throw that his way .... edit: Very strange as you seem to have good connectivity to the pool, aka only 1 stale share in 2 days + ...... very strange indeed that it had to be the found block that turned out to be timed-out! |
|
|
|
Mike0029
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
March 14, 2015, 10:10:33 PM |
|
Don't hide your worker details. Promote them! If someone uses them all they're doing is mining for you.
Everyone should mine on Slush using worker bigbitmine.donate
Every little helps!
Gotcha! I just blotched everything out, because that's what I have seen others do on these forums when they post pictures of their Antminer GUI... Here it is again, with my worker details, as you can see pool #1 and #2 are exactly the same... http://s23.postimg.org/ruyc74m1j/Found_Block.jpgSo, yeah, I have no idea what is going on... then again I don't know if "LSTime" means "LastShareTime"... that was just a guess... ~Mike0029 I think you suspected right in the first instance. The "block" share was found on slush ..... but it was stale, i.e submitted after the work was timed-out (or after someone else had already submitted the same share)! On the stale share being logged as a found block, I believe that is a bug in cgminer (or it may indeed be by design!), but the best place to ask that question would be in the cgminer thread. I say it may be a bug because despite clearly not being logged as your best share (and is definitely higher in size than your best share), it has been marked (and logged) as a found block, despite it being stale. So yeah, head over to ckolivas' thread and throw that his way .... edit: Very strange as you seem to have good connectivity to the pool, aka only 1 stale share in 2 days + ...... very strange indeed that it had to be the found block that turned out to be timed-out! Ironically this isn't the first time that one of my Ant's has shown "FoundBlock" on Slush' pool... I have only encountered this problem on that (Bitcoin) pool too... As you can tell by only being on for about 3 days, I turn my miner off every once in awhile (due to the outdated efficiency of Ant S1).... One time one of them had 2 FoundBlocks! I do believe it is a glitch though, because the "BestShare" has never been more than the Bitcoin network difficulty... Will head over to that thread and ask over there, thanks for the answers! |
|
|
|
|
SargeR33
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
★Bitin.io★ - Instant Exchange
|
|
March 14, 2015, 11:24:49 PM |
|
The most blocks one of my S3 miners has found was about 6. I think something sets it off, I don't think it is always true.
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1039
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
March 15, 2015, 12:36:36 AM |
|
In cgminer, there is a specific path and process of work from the pool to cgminer, to the device, back to cgminer and back to the pool again.
Bitmain messes with that process.
My first release I did of their S1 driver, I spent time fixing that process.
They ignored the changes.
So the simplest answer is to point out that what the Bitmain antminers show with their versions may not always be correct .......... on all their miners.
|
Pool: https://kano.is Here on Bitcointalk: Forum BTC: 1 KanoPb8cKYqNrswjaA8cRDk4FAS9eDMLU FreeNode IRC: irc.freenode.net channel #kano.is Majority developer of the ckpool code Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with full block verification on all blocks - and NO empty blocks! |
|
|
Mike0029
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
March 15, 2015, 04:13:14 PM |
|
In cgminer, there is a specific path and process of work from the pool to cgminer, to the device, back to cgminer and back to the pool again.
Bitmain messes with that process.
My first release I did of their S1 driver, I spent time fixing that process.
They ignored the changes.
So the simplest answer is to point out that what the Bitmain antminers show with their versions may not always be correct .......... on all their miners.
Thanks for the answer! Bitmain really ignored it? They have really been letting me down lately with all their sites being down due to DDoS, and now this, but that's life! My main reason for asking about it in the first place is because I was debating on trying solo mining, now I know it was a BUG (like an ANT  ) and solo mining would pretty much be pointless for me. ~Mike |
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
