Bitcoin Forum
December 03, 2016, 02:01:02 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3160 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.1%)
Total Voters: 3924

Pages: « 1 ... 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 [1040] 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 ... 1105 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3926307 times)
dimitar111
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2


View Profile
March 21, 2015, 12:09:32 PM
 #20781

Today I was standing up some new miners, and went in to create a unique worker for it so I could monitor it separately, but the workers are all only showing "x" as the password and I was never given the option to create a password for this worker. Do all the workers use the same password? or am I doing something wrong? Thanks for humoring a noob...
Mining password is actually a misnormer, so what if somone mines using your worker .... not that you'd be defrauded in any way!
So the answer(s) to your question(s), YES, x is the password for all workers and NO you do not need a password.
ok tnx a lot
1480773662
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480773662

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480773662
Reply with quote  #2

1480773662
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1480773662
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480773662

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480773662
Reply with quote  #2

1480773662
Report to moderator
1480773662
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480773662

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480773662
Reply with quote  #2

1480773662
Report to moderator
1480773662
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480773662

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480773662
Reply with quote  #2

1480773662
Report to moderator
edonkey
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994



View Profile
March 21, 2015, 02:52:30 PM
 #20782

I love the new site updates! It's a very crisp and clean look.

Took me a few minutes to figure out how to increase the detail level on the dashboard, but once done I'm happy with it.

Yeah, I like the new look.  Now if we can get an iPhone app....

Great job slush

You might want to look into "BTC Miner" iOS app from Daniel Banasik. I'm using it and it works fine with Slush's pool.

There are others, but that's the one I'm using now.

I also use the "slush-block-notification" python script to send me an email when the pool finds a block. I had to modify the script to get it to work on the Mac. It would be nice if that was a pool option instead.

Was I helpful?   BTC: 18wQtEDmhur2xAd3oE8qgrZbpCDeuMsdQW   LTC: LbqLtkZ6wTSpwHHuv1tG4J7tHajGdH5QFB   DOGE: D9R5ySAP2DARpxuNKd7hN7ANmqFiGwB9G6
Darthswan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 411


View Profile
March 23, 2015, 01:09:33 AM
 #20783

Was Block ID 23696 not a real block?  It shows confirmed, but it didn't pay out?  Can anyone else confirm this? 
bigbitmine
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210


Big Bit Mine


View Profile
March 23, 2015, 01:16:08 AM
 #20784

Was Block ID 23696 not a real block?  It shows confirmed, but it didn't pay out?  Can anyone else confirm this? 

Mines showing a reward for the block.

Darthswan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 411


View Profile
March 23, 2015, 01:36:01 AM
 #20785

Was Block ID 23696 not a real block?  It shows confirmed, but it didn't pay out?  Can anyone else confirm this? 

Mines showing a reward for the block.

I see the reward for the block also, but I don't see the pay for it in confirmed reward.



This is the block in question(above).  Only way I saw this, is due to the payment that happened.



Here is the deposit from the block(above) from the 2 blocks(below)





And here is the unconfirmed reward for blocks ID 23697 and 23698


Am I missing something?  Should I make a ticket?
Darthswan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 411


View Profile
March 23, 2015, 02:01:53 AM
 #20786

Nevermind.  Slow to post.
jeffy1021
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 65


View Profile
March 24, 2015, 01:05:32 AM
 #20787

Nice streak again!

Out of curiosity, do you guys split your hashes over different pools?  I have about half on Slush and half on BTC Guild for now.  I did like the consistently of Antpool (in terms of blocks being found), but with all of the DDoS issues they have been having recently, I've been staying way.
ezeminer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756

Needs more cowbell.


View Profile
March 24, 2015, 08:00:17 AM
 #20788

Nice streak again!

Out of curiosity, do you guys split your hashes over different pools?  I have about half on Slush and half on BTC Guild for now.  I did like the consistently of Antpool (in terms of blocks being found), but with all of the DDoS issues they have been having recently, I've been staying way.
If by splitting on one device? No.
I just set backup pools incase one or two have problems...

Real-Duke
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 613

★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice


View Profile
March 24, 2015, 09:26:56 AM
 #20789

And the winner is  Cool
10 Blocks in the last 12 hours...not bad!
I have splitted my four S3 miner few weeks ago 2 at Eligius and 2 at Slush

swilla
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 79


View Profile
March 24, 2015, 09:38:24 PM
 #20790

Nice streak again!

Out of curiosity, do you guys split your hashes over different pools?  I have about half on Slush and half on BTC Guild for now.  I did like the consistently of Antpool (in terms of blocks being found), but with all of the DDoS issues they have been having recently, I've been staying way.
If by splitting on one device? No.
I just set backup pools incase one or two have problems...


I have 4 s3s on slush's and 4 s3s  on kano's. Seems to be working out so far.
kkurtmann
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 475



View Profile WWW
March 26, 2015, 08:27:40 PM
 #20791

Nice streak again!

Out of curiosity, do you guys split your hashes over different pools?  I have about half on Slush and half on BTC Guild for now.  I did like the consistently of Antpool (in terms of blocks being found), but with all of the DDoS issues they have been having recently, I've been staying way.
If by splitting on one device? No.
I just set backup pools incase one or two have problems...


I have 4 s3s on slush's and 4 s3s  on kano's. Seems to be working out so far.

Which pool has paid more since you started this method?

https://www.buytrezor.com?a=55c37b866c11   well sir, I like it!
jeffy1021
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 65


View Profile
March 26, 2015, 08:46:42 PM
 #20792

Nice streak again!

Out of curiosity, do you guys split your hashes over different pools?  I have about half on Slush and half on BTC Guild for now.  I did like the consistently of Antpool (in terms of blocks being found), but with all of the DDoS issues they have been having recently, I've been staying way.
If by splitting on one device? No.
I just set backup pools incase one or two have problems...


I have 4 s3s on slush's and 4 s3s  on kano's. Seems to be working out so far.

Which pool has paid more since you started this method?

I'd like to know as well.

I currently have 4.6T total split between 3 miners using Slush, BTC Guild, and Discus Fish.  If I point everything to Discus Fish, I would get .047538 BTC / day and not worry about the pool luck factor of PPLNS.  Any reason why I shouldn't just do that?  I will say that over the past few days, I get about that much anyways...
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
March 27, 2015, 03:53:05 AM
 #20793

Nice streak again!

Out of curiosity, do you guys split your hashes over different pools?  I have about half on Slush and half on BTC Guild for now.  I did like the consistently of Antpool (in terms of blocks being found), but with all of the DDoS issues they have been having recently, I've been staying way.
If by splitting on one device? No.
I just set backup pools incase one or two have problems...


I have 4 s3s on slush's and 4 s3s  on kano's. Seems to be working out so far.

Which pool has paid more since you started this method?

I'd like to know as well.

I currently have 4.6T total split between 3 miners using Slush, BTC Guild, and Discus Fish.  If I point everything to Discus Fish, I would get .047538 BTC / day and not worry about the pool luck factor of PPLNS.  Any reason why I shouldn't just do that?  I will say that over the past few days, I get about that much anyways...
In general, PPLNS doesn't "underpay" or "overpay" you, what it does is pay you based on the pool luck less the pool fee ... i.e. when a miner does something effective to help the bitcoin network.
(the same luck for EVERY pool that actually mines blocks)
Thus the PPLNS pool has no requirement to keep (literally) many 100's of BTC in storage to pay people who want payment for completely ineffective work.
... that's what PPS does Smiley

PPS pays you based on the shares you submit so it does (literally) need many 100's of BTC in storage to ensure it can always pay the miners due to the same luck risk as the PPLNS luck payout i.e. a PPS pool gets BTC based on the same block finding as all other pools - which is what PPLNS uses to be able to always pay the miners for when a miner produces effective work (and distributes that to all the ineffective miners also)

What does that mean in terms of actual payout?
Well PPS thus requires either a pool OP who is happy to give away LOTS of BTC to the miners every time the luck is bad enough (i.e. all the miners have done nothing to help the bitcoin network - that's what a "bad luck" streak is), or a pool fee high enough to cover that block luck risk.
Thus the PPS fee should normally be higher than a PPLNS fee (or you are swimming in unsafe waters)

Thus over time a PPS pool is statistically expected to pay you less.
With PPLNS that expected payout is of course not your exact, today, payout.
That's an expected average over a long time.
Over the short term (days, weeks, even months is short term for all but the largest pools) pool luck will be what you will see in the payout.
It can be higher or lower ... but is expected to average out based on the pool fee.

Pool luck is different every single time a block is found ... on every single pool.
That's the nature of bitcoin mining.

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
dkaufman
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83


View Profile
March 29, 2015, 05:27:19 AM
 #20794

I rented some hash power at WestHash tonight (just a little bit: 100TH :-) and pointed the order at Slush's pool tonight and it got auto-canceled after about 15 minutes.

The "Pool verificator" said Slush's pool was compatible, but right after the order started the order status page kept saying something like "pool connection problems, pool diff too low, minimum difficulty is 127" which is a problem, since i have the worker configured for 1024 difficulty pool-side.

Then it started hashing and managed to get up to about 30TH before the order suddenly got auto-canceled.  it refunded the charges, which is good at least.  I was able to do this last week on CKPool (kano.is)...

Is slush's pool known to work with westhash rented rigs?  Is it incompatible?

From this it looks like it should be supported:

Which mining pools are supported?
https://www.westhash.com/index.jsp?p=faq#faqb2

thanks in advance for any insight, tips or tricks!

-dave
Prelude
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204



View Profile
March 29, 2015, 06:31:12 AM
 #20795

I rented some hash power at WestHash tonight (just a little bit: 100TH :-) and pointed the order at Slush's pool tonight and it got auto-canceled after about 15 minutes.

The "Pool verificator" said Slush's pool was compatible, but right after the order started the order status page kept saying something like "pool connection problems, pool diff too low, minimum difficulty is 127" which is a problem, since i have the worker configured for 1024 difficulty pool-side.

Then it started hashing and managed to get up to about 30TH before the order suddenly got auto-canceled.  it refunded the charges, which is good at least.  I was able to do this last week on CKPool (kano.is)...

Is slush's pool known to work with westhash rented rigs?  Is it incompatible?

From this it looks like it should be supported:

Which mining pools are supported?
https://www.westhash.com/index.jsp?p=faq#faqb2

thanks in advance for any insight, tips or tricks!

-dave

Not sure if this was issue, but with 100TH you should set a starting difficulty of about 71000. 1024 is way too low, though vardiff should have kicked it up fairly quickly.
bigbitmine
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210


Big Bit Mine


View Profile
March 29, 2015, 12:35:52 PM
 #20796

I rented some hash power at WestHash tonight (just a little bit: 100TH :-) and pointed the order at Slush's pool tonight and it got auto-canceled after about 15 minutes.

The "Pool verificator" said Slush's pool was compatible, but right after the order started the order status page kept saying something like "pool connection problems, pool diff too low, minimum difficulty is 127" which is a problem, since i have the worker configured for 1024 difficulty pool-side.

Then it started hashing and managed to get up to about 30TH before the order suddenly got auto-canceled.  it refunded the charges, which is good at least.  I was able to do this last week on CKPool (kano.is)...

Is slush's pool known to work with westhash rented rigs?  Is it incompatible?

From this it looks like it should be supported:

Which mining pools are supported?
https://www.westhash.com/index.jsp?p=faq#faqb2

thanks in advance for any insight, tips or tricks!

-dave

Not sure if this was issue, but with 100TH you should set a starting difficulty of about 71000. 1024 is way too low, though vardiff should have kicked it up fairly quickly.

I use Nicehash (Europe version) and have never had a problem.  I just set up a worker just for Nicehash with a min diff of 128 to get the ball rolling.  It currently at 33334 diff at 30TH.  Runs 24/7.  Should be jumping to 50TH soon.  Are you using the bot?

bigbitmine
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210


Big Bit Mine


View Profile
March 29, 2015, 12:38:29 PM
 #20797

Also, if you're going to rent and use on Slush I recommend you spread your BTC / hash thin so you keep mining 24/7.  If you sink your funds into loads of hashing for only a few hours you'll probably lose out if the pool is struggling with a long block.

dkaufman
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83


View Profile
March 29, 2015, 04:43:06 PM
 #20798

I use Nicehash (Europe version) and have never had a problem.  I just set up a worker just for Nicehash with a min diff of 128 to get the ball rolling.  It currently at 33334 diff at 30TH.  Runs 24/7.  Should be jumping to 50TH soon.  Are you using the bot?

Ah, that was the problem -- Westhash is for pools on this (U.S.) side of the pond :-) I switched to nicehash.com and slush seems to be working much better!

No bot, yet.  I'm still in training ... :-)

Thanks!

-dave
bigbitmine
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210


Big Bit Mine


View Profile
March 29, 2015, 05:00:32 PM
 #20799

I use Nicehash (Europe version) and have never had a problem.  I just set up a worker just for Nicehash with a min diff of 128 to get the ball rolling.  It currently at 33334 diff at 30TH.  Runs 24/7.  Should be jumping to 50TH soon.  Are you using the bot?

Ah, that was the problem -- Westhash is for pools on this (U.S.) side of the pond :-) I switched to nicehash.com and slush seems to be working much better!

No bot, yet.  I'm still in training ... :-)

Thanks!

-dave

Download the bot.  It's a game changer.  If you want any help just send me a PM.

dkaufman
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83


View Profile
March 29, 2015, 05:19:29 PM
 #20800

I use Nicehash (Europe version) and have never had a problem.  I just set up a worker just for Nicehash with a min diff of 128 to get the ball rolling.  It currently at 33334 diff at 30TH.  Runs 24/7.  Should be jumping to 50TH soon.  Are you using the bot?

Ah, that was the problem -- Westhash is for pools on this (U.S.) side of the pond :-) I switched to nicehash.com and slush seems to be working much better!

No bot, yet.  I'm still in training ... :-)

Thanks!

-dave

Ahh darn it.  I spoke too soon.  The nicehash order was auto-canceled too, after about a half an hour, saying "Action" Cancelled - placeholder order" with a link to their FAQ:

  Why was my order canceled (placeholders)?
  https://www.nicehash.com/?p=faq#faqb13

Ah well, back to CKPool I guess

thanks,

-dave
Pages: « 1 ... 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 [1040] 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 ... 1105 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!