Bitcoin Forum
December 04, 2016, 12:09:41 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3160 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.1%)
Total Voters: 3924

Pages: « 1 ... 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 [276] 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 ... 1105 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3926685 times)
fourd00rgtz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 144


View Profile
October 02, 2012, 07:23:20 PM
 #5501

Wow, Stratum is working awesome. I just got it setup on my measily 5Gh, I use to run at 1.3-=1.6% rejects. Its still early but I have yet to see a single reject. Will update with some better context in a few hours.  Grin

Edit, 2 rejects in 3300 submitted, 0.061%, me like.

1480810181
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480810181

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480810181
Reply with quote  #2

1480810181
Report to moderator
1480810181
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480810181

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480810181
Reply with quote  #2

1480810181
Report to moderator
1480810181
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480810181

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480810181
Reply with quote  #2

1480810181
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
October 03, 2012, 02:33:58 PM
 #5502

There's no withdrawal fee - you can set payout as small as 0.01 BTC. However, sending such small amount is not recommended, because fees will be much higher when you'll try to spend your coins from fragmented wallet. I don't know what's your hashrate, but I'll recommend at least 0.5 BTC as a threshold, to not fragment coins in your wallet.

Is there any difference in income if we chose a small payout threshold rather than large (1 btc as opposed to 10 btc). Is there a per-transaction/withdrawl fee? Trying to make as much btc as possible.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
October 07, 2012, 08:06:00 PM
 #5503

CGminer 2.8.0 with native Stratum support has been released today, but please DO NOT UPDATE. There's serious bug inside, hopefully it will be resolved soon in next release.

Hawkix
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 517



View Profile WWW
October 08, 2012, 06:10:39 PM
 #5504

Right now I am having problems with the pool. My remotely located miners are working hard (I can check on temp graphs), but some of recent blocks got many times lower fee for the block. Currently, in the round lasting more than two ours, the estimated reward is shown as cca 0.00001 BTC, while normal is about 0.04 BTC. What is going on? (I use stratum).

Donations: 1Hawkix7GHym6SM98ii5vSHHShA3FUgpV6
http://btcportal.net/ - All about Bitcoin - coming soon!
hmmmstrange
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 668


View Profile
October 08, 2012, 06:14:43 PM
 #5505

Huge problem with pool using newest poclbm here. Less then 1% of my shares are now being credited.
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
October 08, 2012, 06:16:01 PM
 #5506

Right now I am having problems with the pool. My remotely located miners are working hard (I can check on temp graphs), but some of recent blocks got many times lower fee for the block. Currently, in the round lasting more than two ours, the estimated reward is shown as cca 0.00001 BTC, while normal is about 0.04 BTC. What is going on? (I use stratum).

Yeah, something looks screwy.  My estimated reward doesn't look right either.  And the reward for block 202383 is WAY low. Although the next one, 202387, looks right.

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
October 08, 2012, 06:17:10 PM
 #5507

I would like to add that I have not updated any of my miners in at least a week.  So my problems at least don't have anything to do with the latest cgminer issue...

:EDIT:
It looks like my shares are being counted, but for some reason the scoring seems off as described above.

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
October 08, 2012, 06:22:56 PM
 #5508

I'm aware of problems, I'll keep you updated.

It probably has nothing with poclbm/stratum.

hmmmstrange
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 668


View Profile
October 08, 2012, 06:24:01 PM
 #5509

Just switched back to pre-statum version and current shares seem to be updating fine but estimate is not. Block 202383 seems to be not calculated correctly.
dietwice
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58


View Profile
October 08, 2012, 06:27:36 PM
 #5510

Getting something strange...

I have a stable total hashrate being a bit more than 4 GH/s and almost stable block payout about 0.10 BTC.
But the 14206th block payout suddenly dropped to ~0.02
Next one was normal so I left it to network problems.

But now I'm observing a zero-like estimated reward whilst all others pool and my rig parameters are stable and fits theirs default ranges.

Please see below the screenshot - split into 2 parts just for not wasting space and being easy to read.

The estimate reward


Workers' stats



I wonder if it can be an issue of scoring algorithm?

Edit: Ok, all are already aware of an issue.
Hope it'll be resolved quickly and easily, as Slush always has logs of everything Smiley

Edit 2: Looks like it is fixed Smiley

Donations appreciated at 1DZ6PVjnV8zRdvtgKSqzpAYhifxP1XKhwM
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
October 08, 2012, 06:34:04 PM
 #5511

Slush is on it peeps...

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
October 08, 2012, 06:36:24 PM
 #5512

Looks like the estimated reward is back on track...

:EDIT:
and the reward for block 202383 is fixed too.

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
hmmmstrange
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 668


View Profile
October 08, 2012, 06:38:08 PM
 #5513

dietwice, how do you remove the comments in the extra fields in the worker stats?
dietwice
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58


View Profile
October 08, 2012, 06:40:50 PM
 #5514

> dietwice, how do you remove the comments in the extra fields in the worker stats?

Take the Greasemonkey script from the 1st message of this thread.

Donations appreciated at 1DZ6PVjnV8zRdvtgKSqzpAYhifxP1XKhwM
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
October 08, 2012, 06:42:11 PM
 #5515

There was lockup in database, I recalculated rewards and it should be fine now. Now I'm watching logs for some indices what happen.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
October 08, 2012, 06:42:56 PM
 #5516

However I strongly recommend to switch back to Stratum, it has nothing with protocol.

digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
October 08, 2012, 06:59:16 PM
 #5517

Thanks for the quick response slush.  One of the reasons why I will never leave your pool...

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
RoboCoder
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 387


Save A Life, Adopt a Pet Today!


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2012, 07:05:47 PM
 #5518

There was lockup in database, I recalculated rewards and it should be fine now. Now I'm watching logs for some indices what happen.

I got a reward considerably lower than normal (roughly half) on block 202299 after 2 hours+ full steam hashing.  It did not correct in your update, was it supposed to be that low or is possible there was another lockup or event that caused it?

RoboCoder
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
October 08, 2012, 07:25:04 PM
 #5519

I got a reward considerably lower than normal (roughly half) on block 202299 after 2 hours+ full steam hashing.  It did not correct in your update, was it supposed to be that low or is possible there was another lockup or event that caused it?

Unfortunately there's no way how to recalculate already confirmed rounds, because these rewards has been already paid out. For now I cannot say if your lower reward for 202299 was the same issue like hour ago, but I'm optimizing some code to prevent current issue to happen next time.

max in montreal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
October 08, 2012, 07:42:55 PM
 #5520

Thanks for the quick response slush.  One of the reasons why I will never leave your pool...


+1
Pages: « 1 ... 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 [276] 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 ... 1105 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!