Bitcoin Forum
January 18, 2017, 08:14:25 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.2  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3167 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 408 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.1%)
Total Voters: 3932

Pages: « 1 ... 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 [276] 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 ... 1107 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [150+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3977019 times)
hmmmstrange
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 668


View Profile
October 08, 2012, 06:24:01 PM
 #5501

Just switched back to pre-statum version and current shares seem to be updating fine but estimate is not. Block 202383 seems to be not calculated correctly.
1484727265
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1484727265

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1484727265
Reply with quote  #2

1484727265
Report to moderator
1484727265
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1484727265

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1484727265
Reply with quote  #2

1484727265
Report to moderator
1484727265
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1484727265

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1484727265
Reply with quote  #2

1484727265
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1484727265
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1484727265

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1484727265
Reply with quote  #2

1484727265
Report to moderator
1484727265
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1484727265

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1484727265
Reply with quote  #2

1484727265
Report to moderator
dietwice
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58


View Profile
October 08, 2012, 06:27:36 PM
 #5502

Getting something strange...

I have a stable total hashrate being a bit more than 4 GH/s and almost stable block payout about 0.10 BTC.
But the 14206th block payout suddenly dropped to ~0.02
Next one was normal so I left it to network problems.

But now I'm observing a zero-like estimated reward whilst all others pool and my rig parameters are stable and fits theirs default ranges.

Please see below the screenshot - split into 2 parts just for not wasting space and being easy to read.

The estimate reward


Workers' stats



I wonder if it can be an issue of scoring algorithm?

Edit: Ok, all are already aware of an issue.
Hope it'll be resolved quickly and easily, as Slush always has logs of everything Smiley

Edit 2: Looks like it is fixed Smiley

Donations appreciated at 1DZ6PVjnV8zRdvtgKSqzpAYhifxP1XKhwM
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
October 08, 2012, 06:34:04 PM
 #5503

Slush is on it peeps...

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
October 08, 2012, 06:36:24 PM
 #5504

Looks like the estimated reward is back on track...

:EDIT:
and the reward for block 202383 is fixed too.

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
hmmmstrange
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 668


View Profile
October 08, 2012, 06:38:08 PM
 #5505

dietwice, how do you remove the comments in the extra fields in the worker stats?
dietwice
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58


View Profile
October 08, 2012, 06:40:50 PM
 #5506

> dietwice, how do you remove the comments in the extra fields in the worker stats?

Take the Greasemonkey script from the 1st message of this thread.

Donations appreciated at 1DZ6PVjnV8zRdvtgKSqzpAYhifxP1XKhwM
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372



View Profile WWW
October 08, 2012, 06:42:11 PM
 #5507

There was lockup in database, I recalculated rewards and it should be fine now. Now I'm watching logs for some indices what happen.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372



View Profile WWW
October 08, 2012, 06:42:56 PM
 #5508

However I strongly recommend to switch back to Stratum, it has nothing with protocol.

digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
October 08, 2012, 06:59:16 PM
 #5509

Thanks for the quick response slush.  One of the reasons why I will never leave your pool...

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
RoboCoder
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 387


Save A Life, Adopt a Pet Today!


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2012, 07:05:47 PM
 #5510

There was lockup in database, I recalculated rewards and it should be fine now. Now I'm watching logs for some indices what happen.

I got a reward considerably lower than normal (roughly half) on block 202299 after 2 hours+ full steam hashing.  It did not correct in your update, was it supposed to be that low or is possible there was another lockup or event that caused it?

RoboCoder
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372



View Profile WWW
October 08, 2012, 07:25:04 PM
 #5511

I got a reward considerably lower than normal (roughly half) on block 202299 after 2 hours+ full steam hashing.  It did not correct in your update, was it supposed to be that low or is possible there was another lockup or event that caused it?

Unfortunately there's no way how to recalculate already confirmed rounds, because these rewards has been already paid out. For now I cannot say if your lower reward for 202299 was the same issue like hour ago, but I'm optimizing some code to prevent current issue to happen next time.

max in montreal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
October 08, 2012, 07:42:55 PM
 #5512

Thanks for the quick response slush.  One of the reasons why I will never leave your pool...


+1
RoboCoder
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 387


Save A Life, Adopt a Pet Today!


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2012, 07:48:38 PM
 #5513

I got a reward considerably lower than normal (roughly half) on block 202299 after 2 hours+ full steam hashing.  It did not correct in your update, was it supposed to be that low or is possible there was another lockup or event that caused it?

Unfortunately there's no way how to recalculate already confirmed rounds, because these rewards has been already paid out. For now I cannot say if your lower reward for 202299 was the same issue like hour ago, but I'm optimizing some code to prevent current issue to happen next time.

Not a problem - thanks for being on top of this!

-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2030


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2012, 08:19:43 PM
 #5514

CGminer 2.8.0 with native Stratum support has been released today, but please DO NOT UPDATE. There's serious bug inside, hopefully it will be resolved soon in next release.
This is resolved now in 2.8.1.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372



View Profile WWW
October 08, 2012, 11:14:11 PM
 #5515

I just finished database maintenance and some code optimizations. I had to restart pool application so I'm sorry for bunch of rejected shares. However problems in reward calculations should be fixed now.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372



View Profile WWW
October 08, 2012, 11:17:59 PM
 #5516

If somebody is using latest stratum proxy (git sources/1.0.0) together with latest cgminer (2.8.1), please check your miners. They most likely crashed during recent pool restart. I'm working on bugfix right now, should be available on github in few minutes.

irritant
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420


Sodium hypochlorite, acetone, ethanol


View Profile
October 08, 2012, 11:21:48 PM
 #5517

is there a changelog for mining proxy somewhere? 1.0.0 the latest version?
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372



View Profile WWW
October 08, 2012, 11:34:38 PM
 #5518

is there a changelog for mining proxy somewhere? 1.0.0 the latest version?

https://github.com/slush0/stratum-mining-proxy/commits/master

But as I said, don't use proxy 1.0 + latest cgminer right now.

irritant
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420


Sodium hypochlorite, acetone, ethanol


View Profile
October 08, 2012, 11:39:02 PM
 #5519

i'm using bfgminer 2.8.2 , ah only source available
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2030


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
October 08, 2012, 11:40:56 PM
 #5520

is there a changelog for mining proxy somewhere? 1.0.0 the latest version?

https://github.com/slush0/stratum-mining-proxy/commits/master

But as I said, don't use proxy 1.0 + latest cgminer right now.
Latest cgminer (2.8.1) without the proxy should be fine though, right?

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Pages: « 1 ... 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 [276] 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 ... 1107 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!