Bitcoin Forum
December 06, 2016, 08:03:26 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3160 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.1%)
Total Voters: 3924

Pages: « 1 ... 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 [275] 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 ... 1105 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3928286 times)
DoomDumas
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784


Bitcoin forever !


View Profile WWW
October 01, 2012, 03:12:11 AM
 #5481

Nice job with this stratum mining stuff Smiley  Gratz Slush !

Soap for BTC - Pure, Natural, Unique..   - PDF - BTCTalk - Email
1481054606
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481054606

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481054606
Reply with quote  #2

1481054606
Report to moderator
1481054606
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481054606

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481054606
Reply with quote  #2

1481054606
Report to moderator
1481054606
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481054606

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481054606
Reply with quote  #2

1481054606
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481054606
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481054606

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481054606
Reply with quote  #2

1481054606
Report to moderator
1481054606
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481054606

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481054606
Reply with quote  #2

1481054606
Report to moderator
1481054606
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481054606

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481054606
Reply with quote  #2

1481054606
Report to moderator
hmmmstrange
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 668


View Profile
October 01, 2012, 05:50:32 AM
 #5482

I'm getting ~0.01% stale ratio. How do i fix this?
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
October 01, 2012, 09:56:44 AM
 #5483

I'm getting ~0.01% stale ratio. How do i fix this?

Hrm, you consider it as "too much"?

max in montreal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
October 01, 2012, 01:00:36 PM
 #5484

Hi Slush...smee...smee max... Cheesy

Would it be possible to add a column to the workers table on the site to show the average hash rate for each worker. I wish we could see the hash rate for each worker.

Up until now I was using GPUmax to see this information, but I would prefer to not use that site if possible...

Also would it be possible to just show the last round average for each worker?

I would like to see the hash rate for each faster than in the last 10 rounds...this way I can react faster if i see something that is not right.

Average hashrate in last 10 rounds: 14544287 Mhash/s is great as an over all view, but it would be nice if i could see the number for each worker a little faster.

I just created a worker for each of my machines, and if the information on each worker was updated faster, the info would be more usefull.

thanks Slush!

keystroke
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 824


advocate of a cryptographic attack on the globe


View Profile
October 01, 2012, 04:26:18 PM
 #5485

Great idea max in montreal. It would be nice to have average hash rate per worker. Max, do you use the site directly to monitor or do you have something that interfaces with the API? I used to use Nagios but prefer not to have remote SSH into my machines anymore.

"The difference between a castle and a prison is only a question of who holds the keys."
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
October 01, 2012, 04:29:44 PM
 #5486

There are hashrates of every workers already. Numbers are commented out in HTML code of profile page, because they're quite inaccurate for slow miners - hashrate is calculated only from current round, so it is bit off on the round beginning.

jborkl
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 234



View Profile WWW
October 02, 2012, 12:52:31 AM
 #5487

Slush,

In case you didn't know the new proxy works great.

403000 accepts, only 190 rejects.

I think that is a pretty low reject rate, good job

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
October 02, 2012, 01:11:21 AM
 #5488

Thank you! :-) I'm working hard to improve everything. Stratum is quite big project, but other changes are coming soon!

In case you didn't know the new proxy works great.
403000 accepts, only 190 rejects.
I think that is a pretty low reject rate, good job

max in montreal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
October 02, 2012, 05:28:33 PM
 #5489

There are hashrates of every workers already. Numbers are commented out in HTML code of profile page, because they're quite inaccurate for slow miners - hashrate is calculated only from current round, so it is bit off on the round beginning.

Lets discuss this...

Often in my setup somewhere there are changes, and after the changes I would like to know if these changes are working, and if they are faster.

People like me have 2 options, use GPUmax, or use another pool. after a change I do not want to wait for about 1 day to only find out something is not going well....last 10 rounds is a long time...but i understand it is more exactleave the last 10 rounds there, but it would be great if for the workers there was the last round...

I understand its not as exact as the last 10 rounds...
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
October 02, 2012, 05:37:22 PM
 #5490

There are hashrates of every workers already. Numbers are commented out in HTML code of profile page, because they're quite inaccurate for slow miners - hashrate is calculated only from current round, so it is bit off on the round beginning.

Lets discuss this...

Often in my setup somewhere there are changes, and after the changes I would like to know if these changes are working, and if they are faster.

People like me have 2 options, use GPUmax, or use another pool. after a change I do not want to wait for about 1 day to only find out something is not going well....last 10 rounds is a long time...but i understand it is more exactleave the last 10 rounds there, but it would be great if for the workers there was the last round...

I understand its not as exact as the last 10 rounds...


I think what slush is saying, is that if you go to your stats page, right click and choose "view source" you can then get the hash rate of each individual worker.  I know, you have to click 3 times to get it instead of just 1, but it's there.


If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
max in montreal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
October 02, 2012, 06:35:00 PM
 #5491

i see it now...thanks!
dietwice
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58


View Profile
October 02, 2012, 06:41:26 PM
 #5492

You can take the GreaseMonkey script from the 1st message of this thread.
It tweaks the pool pages and shows you the stats you need without "View Source" etc.

Donations appreciated at 1DZ6PVjnV8zRdvtgKSqzpAYhifxP1XKhwM
fourd00rgtz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 144


View Profile
October 02, 2012, 07:23:20 PM
 #5493

Wow, Stratum is working awesome. I just got it setup on my measily 5Gh, I use to run at 1.3-=1.6% rejects. Its still early but I have yet to see a single reject. Will update with some better context in a few hours.  Grin

Edit, 2 rejects in 3300 submitted, 0.061%, me like.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
October 03, 2012, 02:33:58 PM
 #5494

There's no withdrawal fee - you can set payout as small as 0.01 BTC. However, sending such small amount is not recommended, because fees will be much higher when you'll try to spend your coins from fragmented wallet. I don't know what's your hashrate, but I'll recommend at least 0.5 BTC as a threshold, to not fragment coins in your wallet.

Is there any difference in income if we chose a small payout threshold rather than large (1 btc as opposed to 10 btc). Is there a per-transaction/withdrawl fee? Trying to make as much btc as possible.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
October 07, 2012, 08:06:00 PM
 #5495

CGminer 2.8.0 with native Stratum support has been released today, but please DO NOT UPDATE. There's serious bug inside, hopefully it will be resolved soon in next release.

Hawkix
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 517



View Profile WWW
October 08, 2012, 06:10:39 PM
 #5496

Right now I am having problems with the pool. My remotely located miners are working hard (I can check on temp graphs), but some of recent blocks got many times lower fee for the block. Currently, in the round lasting more than two ours, the estimated reward is shown as cca 0.00001 BTC, while normal is about 0.04 BTC. What is going on? (I use stratum).

Donations: 1Hawkix7GHym6SM98ii5vSHHShA3FUgpV6
http://btcportal.net/ - All about Bitcoin - coming soon!
hmmmstrange
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 668


View Profile
October 08, 2012, 06:14:43 PM
 #5497

Huge problem with pool using newest poclbm here. Less then 1% of my shares are now being credited.
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
October 08, 2012, 06:16:01 PM
 #5498

Right now I am having problems with the pool. My remotely located miners are working hard (I can check on temp graphs), but some of recent blocks got many times lower fee for the block. Currently, in the round lasting more than two ours, the estimated reward is shown as cca 0.00001 BTC, while normal is about 0.04 BTC. What is going on? (I use stratum).

Yeah, something looks screwy.  My estimated reward doesn't look right either.  And the reward for block 202383 is WAY low. Although the next one, 202387, looks right.

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
October 08, 2012, 06:17:10 PM
 #5499

I would like to add that I have not updated any of my miners in at least a week.  So my problems at least don't have anything to do with the latest cgminer issue...

:EDIT:
It looks like my shares are being counted, but for some reason the scoring seems off as described above.

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358



View Profile WWW
October 08, 2012, 06:22:56 PM
 #5500

I'm aware of problems, I'll keep you updated.

It probably has nothing with poclbm/stratum.

Pages: « 1 ... 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 [275] 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 ... 1105 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!