|
hmmmstrange
|
 |
October 01, 2012, 05:50:32 AM |
|
I'm getting ~0.01% stale ratio. How do i fix this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
October 01, 2012, 09:56:44 AM |
|
I'm getting ~0.01% stale ratio. How do i fix this?
Hrm, you consider it as "too much"? |
|
|
|
|
max in montreal
|
|
October 01, 2012, 01:00:36 PM |
|
Hi Slush...smee...smee max...  Would it be possible to add a column to the workers table on the site to show the average hash rate for each worker. I wish we could see the hash rate for each worker. Up until now I was using GPUmax to see this information, but I would prefer to not use that site if possible... Also would it be possible to just show the last round average for each worker? I would like to see the hash rate for each faster than in the last 10 rounds...this way I can react faster if i see something that is not right. Average hashrate in last 10 rounds: 14544287 Mhash/s is great as an over all view, but it would be nice if i could see the number for each worker a little faster. I just created a worker for each of my machines, and if the information on each worker was updated faster, the info would be more usefull. thanks Slush! |
|
|
|
|
|
keystroke
|
|
October 01, 2012, 04:26:18 PM |
|
Great idea max in montreal. It would be nice to have average hash rate per worker. Max, do you use the site directly to monitor or do you have something that interfaces with the API? I used to use Nagios but prefer not to have remote SSH into my machines anymore.
|
"The difference between a castle and a prison is only a question of who holds the keys."
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
October 01, 2012, 04:29:44 PM |
|
There are hashrates of every workers already. Numbers are commented out in HTML code of profile page, because they're quite inaccurate for slow miners - hashrate is calculated only from current round, so it is bit off on the round beginning.
|
|
|
|
|
jborkl
|
|
October 02, 2012, 12:52:31 AM |
|
Slush,
In case you didn't know the new proxy works great.
403000 accepts, only 190 rejects.
I think that is a pretty low reject rate, good job
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
October 02, 2012, 01:11:21 AM |
|
Thank you! :-) I'm working hard to improve everything. Stratum is quite big project, but other changes are coming soon! In case you didn't know the new proxy works great.
403000 accepts, only 190 rejects.
I think that is a pretty low reject rate, good job
|
|
|
|
|
max in montreal
|
|
October 02, 2012, 05:28:33 PM |
|
There are hashrates of every workers already. Numbers are commented out in HTML code of profile page, because they're quite inaccurate for slow miners - hashrate is calculated only from current round, so it is bit off on the round beginning.
Lets discuss this... Often in my setup somewhere there are changes, and after the changes I would like to know if these changes are working, and if they are faster. People like me have 2 options, use GPUmax, or use another pool. after a change I do not want to wait for about 1 day to only find out something is not going well....last 10 rounds is a long time...but i understand it is more exactleave the last 10 rounds there, but it would be great if for the workers there was the last round... I understand its not as exact as the last 10 rounds... |
|
|
|
|
|
digital
|
|
October 02, 2012, 05:37:22 PM |
|
There are hashrates of every workers already. Numbers are commented out in HTML code of profile page, because they're quite inaccurate for slow miners - hashrate is calculated only from current round, so it is bit off on the round beginning.
Lets discuss this... Often in my setup somewhere there are changes, and after the changes I would like to know if these changes are working, and if they are faster. People like me have 2 options, use GPUmax, or use another pool. after a change I do not want to wait for about 1 day to only find out something is not going well....last 10 rounds is a long time...but i understand it is more exactleave the last 10 rounds there, but it would be great if for the workers there was the last round... I understand its not as exact as the last 10 rounds... I think what slush is saying, is that if you go to your stats page, right click and choose "view source" you can then get the hash rate of each individual worker. I know, you have to click 3 times to get it instead of just 1, but it's there. |
If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20 50051.100 53668.0 53788.0 53571.0 53571.0 52212.0 50729.0 114804.0 115468 78106 69061 58572 54747
|
|
|
|
|
dietwice
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
|
October 02, 2012, 06:41:26 PM |
|
You can take the GreaseMonkey script from the 1st message of this thread.
It tweaks the pool pages and shows you the stats you need without "View Source" etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
fourd00rgtz
|
|
October 02, 2012, 07:23:20 PM
Last edit: October 02, 2012, 07:50:07 PM by fourd00rgtz |
|
Wow, Stratum is working awesome. I just got it setup on my measily 5Gh, I use to run at 1.3-=1.6% rejects. Its still early but I have yet to see a single reject. Will update with some better context in a few hours.  Edit, 2 rejects in 3300 submitted, 0.061%, me like. |
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
October 03, 2012, 02:33:58 PM |
|
There's no withdrawal fee - you can set payout as small as 0.01 BTC. However, sending such small amount is not recommended, because fees will be much higher when you'll try to spend your coins from fragmented wallet. I don't know what's your hashrate, but I'll recommend at least 0.5 BTC as a threshold, to not fragment coins in your wallet. Is there any difference in income if we chose a small payout threshold rather than large (1 btc as opposed to 10 btc). Is there a per-transaction/withdrawl fee? Trying to make as much btc as possible.
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
October 07, 2012, 08:06:00 PM |
|
CGminer 2.8.0 with native Stratum support has been released today, but please DO NOT UPDATE. There's serious bug inside, hopefully it will be resolved soon in next release.
|
|
|
|
|
Hawkix
|
|
October 08, 2012, 06:10:39 PM |
|
Right now I am having problems with the pool. My remotely located miners are working hard (I can check on temp graphs), but some of recent blocks got many times lower fee for the block. Currently, in the round lasting more than two ours, the estimated reward is shown as cca 0.00001 BTC, while normal is about 0.04 BTC. What is going on? (I use stratum).
|
|
|
|
|
hmmmstrange
|
|
October 08, 2012, 06:14:43 PM |
|
Huge problem with pool using newest poclbm here. Less then 1% of my shares are now being credited.
|
|
|
|
|
|
digital
|
|
October 08, 2012, 06:16:01 PM |
|
Right now I am having problems with the pool. My remotely located miners are working hard (I can check on temp graphs), but some of recent blocks got many times lower fee for the block. Currently, in the round lasting more than two ours, the estimated reward is shown as cca 0.00001 BTC, while normal is about 0.04 BTC. What is going on? (I use stratum).
Yeah, something looks screwy. My estimated reward doesn't look right either. And the reward for block 202383 is WAY low. Although the next one, 202387, looks right. |
If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20 50051.100 53668.0 53788.0 53571.0 53571.0 52212.0 50729.0 114804.0 115468 78106 69061 58572 54747
|
|
|
|
digital
|
|
October 08, 2012, 06:17:10 PM |
|
I would like to add that I have not updated any of my miners in at least a week. So my problems at least don't have anything to do with the latest cgminer issue...
:EDIT:
It looks like my shares are being counted, but for some reason the scoring seems off as described above.
|
If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20 50051.100 53668.0 53788.0 53571.0 53571.0 52212.0 50729.0 114804.0 115468 78106 69061 58572 54747
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
October 08, 2012, 06:22:56 PM |
|
I'm aware of problems, I'll keep you updated.
It probably has nothing with poclbm/stratum.
|
|
|
|
|
hmmmstrange
|
|
October 08, 2012, 06:24:01 PM |
|
Just switched back to pre-statum version and current shares seem to be updating fine but estimate is not. Block 202383 seems to be not calculated correctly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
