Larsinist
Member
 Offline
Activity: 510
Merit: 31
CryptoDude
|
 |
May 30, 2019, 01:27:22 PM |
|
Where do i change the /mi settings?
bat file?? or?
|
|
|
|
|
justoiurii
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 103
Merit: 0
|
|
May 30, 2019, 04:45:49 PM |
|
After Claymore last ver. 14.6 you are not the fastest eth miner. I've got 32,3 mh/sec vs 31,5 with phoenix (RX480, bc drivers ). Your next pace, dev)
|
|
|
|
|
Larsinist
Member
Offline
Activity: 510
Merit: 31
CryptoDude
|
|
May 30, 2019, 05:05:14 PM |
|
where to write the mi settings??
|
|
|
|
|
|
laik2
|
|
May 30, 2019, 05:07:20 PM |
|
After Claymore last ver. 14.6 you are not the fastest eth miner. I've got 32,3 mh/sec vs 31,5 with phoenix (RX480, bc drivers ). Your next pace, dev)
Phoenix linux: GPU2: PCI 0000:03:00, Radeon RX 580 8 GB - BIOS: 113-BE366EU-Z46, MEMINFO: SK Hynix H5GQ8H24MJR
GFXCLK: 1239Mhz, DPM: 3, MEMCLK: 2250Mhz, PWR:84W, VLT: 0.86v, FAN: 40%, GPU TEMP: 53C, ASIC TEMP: 56C GPUs: 1: 31.264 MH/s (174) 2: 31.489 MH/s (153) 3: 33.678 MH/s (181) 4: 31.826 MH/s (197) Claymore linux: GPU2: PCI 0000:03:00, Radeon RX 580 8 GB - BIOS: 113-BE366EU-Z46, MEMINFO: SK Hynix H5GQ8H24MJR
GFXCLK: 1239Mhz, DPM: 3, MEMCLK: 2250Mhz, PWR:85W, VLT: 0.86v, FAN: 40%, GPU TEMP: 54C, ASIC TEMP: 57C ETH: GPU0 30.479 Mh/s, GPU1 30.595 Mh/s, GPU2 33.614 Mh/s, GPU3 31.638 Mh/s Are you still sure Claymore is faster? |
|
|
|
pbfarmer
Member
Offline
Activity: 340
Merit: 29
|
|
May 30, 2019, 09:13:16 PM |
|
Is it possible to set up the miner (.bat) file to mine on more then one address from a single .bat file?
Let's say i have 1 rig with 7 GPU-s and i want 4 of them to mine on one address and 3 on another?
create 2 bat files and start 2 instances. see this option -> you can point every gpu to another pool if you want, it's very simple Mining options:
...
-gpus <123 ..n> Use only the specified GPUs (if more than 10, separate the indexes with comma)
...
in a single .bat file? i mean, creating 2 bat files is not a problem, but are you saying this option can make this in a single bat file? Can i get an example? PhoenixMiner.exe -pool [pool] -wal [wallet] -pass x -gpus 123
PhoenixMiner.exe -pool [pool1] -wal [wallet1] -pass x -gpus 456 like so? You should look into the ‘start’ command in windows: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/windows/it-pro/windows-xp/bb491005(v=technet.10) Prob only use it on one of the two instances, so you only have 2, rather than 3 windows. |
|
|
|
|
|
Johny101010
|
|
May 30, 2019, 10:14:55 PM |
|
What are the chances we can add kecak to dual mining. I keep reading that ETC might go that way and it would be nice to dual mine.
|
|
|
|
NubyS
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
May 31, 2019, 09:01:15 AM |
|
Are you still sure Claymore is faster?
he is 100% correct, the new -strap settings in Claymore are the sh*t, i can mine 34.8 MH/s on my GTX 1070 with 105W. On PhoenixMiner it's about 33 MH/s. |
|
|
|
|
|
laik2
|
|
May 31, 2019, 09:31:11 AM |
|
Are you still sure Claymore is faster?
he is 100% correct, the new -strap settings in Claymore are the sh*t, i can mine 34.8 MH/s on my GTX 1070 with 105W. On PhoenixMiner it's about 33 MH/s. Whatever... |
|
|
|
rahuldel
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
May 31, 2019, 09:46:18 AM |
|
How to use Temperature Throttling?
I am trying to use
-tt 1 -tstop 68 -tstart 55 -tmax 63
Only the tstop and tstart work. How do I make throttle work on tmax 63 ?
Any help?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branko
|
|
May 31, 2019, 10:31:39 AM |
|
After Claymore last ver. 14.6 you are not the fastest eth miner. I've got 32,3 mh/sec vs 31,5 with phoenix (RX480, bc drivers ). Your next pace, dev)
Phoenix linux: GPU2: PCI 0000:03:00, Radeon RX 580 8 GB - BIOS: 113-BE366EU-Z46, MEMINFO: SK Hynix H5GQ8H24MJR
GFXCLK: 1239Mhz, DPM: 3, MEMCLK: 2250Mhz, PWR:84W, VLT: 0.86v, FAN: 40%, GPU TEMP: 53C, ASIC TEMP: 56C GPUs: 1: 31.264 MH/s (174) 2: 31.489 MH/s (153) 3: 33.678 MH/s (181) 4: 31.826 MH/s (197) Claymore linux: GPU2: PCI 0000:03:00, Radeon RX 580 8 GB - BIOS: 113-BE366EU-Z46, MEMINFO: SK Hynix H5GQ8H24MJR
GFXCLK: 1239Mhz, DPM: 3, MEMCLK: 2250Mhz, PWR:85W, VLT: 0.86v, FAN: 40%, GPU TEMP: 54C, ASIC TEMP: 57C ETH: GPU0 30.479 Mh/s, GPU1 30.595 Mh/s, GPU2 33.614 Mh/s, GPU3 31.638 Mh/s Are you still sure Claymore is faster? Thats some really good Hynix memory you have over there. Is it maybe Sapphire RX580 Nitro SE? |
|
|
|
|
lebuawu2
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 176
Merit: 2
|
|
May 31, 2019, 11:04:01 AM |
|
After Claymore last ver. 14.6 you are not the fastest eth miner. I've got 32,3 mh/sec vs 31,5 with phoenix (RX480, bc drivers ). Your next pace, dev)
Phoenix linux: GPU2: PCI 0000:03:00, Radeon RX 580 8 GB - BIOS: 113-BE366EU-Z46, MEMINFO: SK Hynix H5GQ8H24MJR
GFXCLK: 1239Mhz, DPM: 3, MEMCLK: 2250Mhz, PWR:84W, VLT: 0.86v, FAN: 40%, GPU TEMP: 53C, ASIC TEMP: 56C GPUs: 1: 31.264 MH/s (174) 2: 31.489 MH/s (153) 3: 33.678 MH/s (181) 4: 31.826 MH/s (197) Claymore linux: GPU2: PCI 0000:03:00, Radeon RX 580 8 GB - BIOS: 113-BE366EU-Z46, MEMINFO: SK Hynix H5GQ8H24MJR
GFXCLK: 1239Mhz, DPM: 3, MEMCLK: 2250Mhz, PWR:85W, VLT: 0.86v, FAN: 40%, GPU TEMP: 54C, ASIC TEMP: 57C ETH: GPU0 30.479 Mh/s, GPU1 30.595 Mh/s, GPU2 33.614 Mh/s, GPU3 31.638 Mh/s Are you still sure Claymore is faster? did you use RX Boost in Phoenix and Claymore? |
|
|
|
|
|
laik2
|
|
May 31, 2019, 11:42:55 AM |
|
It's not RX boost, thats how claymore calls it, its messing with refresh period of DRAM. And yes, it has been "rxboost"-ed without Claymore and yes it is Sapphire nitro+ SE and no, its not better than normal nitros, just the timings are good  EDIT: Regarding NVIDIA optimizations the guy was talking - yes it is the only thing that can be better as of optimization of hardware, but not miner. |
|
|
|
|
Branko
|
|
May 31, 2019, 01:21:21 PM |
|
It's not RX boost, thats how claymore calls it, its messing with refresh period of DRAM. And yes, it has been "rxboost"-ed without Claymore and yes it is Sapphire nitro+ SE and no, its not better than normal nitros, just the timings are good EDIT: Regarding NVIDIA optimizations the guy was talking - yes it is the only thing that can be better as of optimization of hardware, but not miner. Well, those cards (both Micron and Hynix versions) are rated at 2100 MHz memory instead usual 2000MHz, so I guessed that even if its nominally same memory, maybe manufacturer handpicked better chips |
|
|
|
|
|
laik2
|
|
May 31, 2019, 02:23:12 PM |
|
It's not RX boost, thats how claymore calls it, its messing with refresh period of DRAM. And yes, it has been "rxboost"-ed without Claymore and yes it is Sapphire nitro+ SE and no, its not better than normal nitros, just the timings are good EDIT: Regarding NVIDIA optimizations the guy was talking - yes it is the only thing that can be better as of optimization of hardware, but not miner. Well, those cards (both Micron and Hynix versions) are rated at 2100 MHz memory instead usual 2000MHz, so I guessed that even if its nominally same memory, maybe manufacturer handpicked better chips Illusion Same memory, same clock capabilities, just factory overclocked and colored in blue  |
|
|
|
rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
|
May 31, 2019, 04:01:25 PM |
|
After Claymore last ver. 14.6 you are not the fastest eth miner. I've got 32,3 mh/sec vs 31,5 with phoenix (RX480, bc drivers ). Your next pace, dev)
Phoenix linux: GPU2: PCI 0000:03:00, Radeon RX 580 8 GB - BIOS: 113-BE366EU-Z46, MEMINFO: SK Hynix H5GQ8H24MJR
GFXCLK: 1239Mhz, DPM: 3, MEMCLK: 2250Mhz, PWR:84W, VLT: 0.86v, FAN: 40%, GPU TEMP: 53C, ASIC TEMP: 56C GPUs: 1: 31.264 MH/s (174) 2: 31.489 MH/s (153) 3: 33.678 MH/s (181) 4: 31.826 MH/s (197) Claymore linux: GPU2: PCI 0000:03:00, Radeon RX 580 8 GB - BIOS: 113-BE366EU-Z46, MEMINFO: SK Hynix H5GQ8H24MJR
GFXCLK: 1239Mhz, DPM: 3, MEMCLK: 2250Mhz, PWR:85W, VLT: 0.86v, FAN: 40%, GPU TEMP: 54C, ASIC TEMP: 57C ETH: GPU0 30.479 Mh/s, GPU1 30.595 Mh/s, GPU2 33.614 Mh/s, GPU3 31.638 Mh/s Are you still sure Claymore is faster? Thats some really good Hynix memory you have over there. Is it maybe Sapphire RX580 Nitro SE? my micron 5x8 cards (sapphire nitro, se and normal) are doing 34.3mhs 1240/2250 @ 865mv no mem errors nor incorrect shares |
|
|
|
|
|
laik2
|
|
May 31, 2019, 04:26:40 PM |
|
my micron 5x8 cards (sapphire nitro, se and normal) are doing 34.3mhs 1240/2250 @ 865mv
no mem errors nor incorrect shares
It really is possible and achievable but at the same time...unless bragging... I'm not sure why will I push them so much... I'd rather prefer to not turn this thread into claymore vs others war and d*ck waving. Lets just pretend that everyone is happy |
|
|
|
rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
|
May 31, 2019, 05:13:34 PM |
|
my micron 5x8 cards (sapphire nitro, se and normal) are doing 34.3mhs 1240/2250 @ 865mv
no mem errors nor incorrect shares
It really is possible and achievable but at the same time...unless bragging... I'm not sure why will I push them so much... I'd rather prefer to not turn this thread into claymore vs others war and d*ck waving. Lets just pretend that everyone is happy with latest updates Claymore has the same speed with nVidia as Phoenix. Phoenix's AMD kernels are more "tweak-able" and are faster than Claymore's. But Phoenix doesn't work as expected with latest 19.5.1 + drivers. We need an update |
|
|
|
|
|
laik2
|
|
May 31, 2019, 05:24:45 PM
Last edit: May 31, 2019, 05:51:21 PM by laik2 |
|
my micron 5x8 cards (sapphire nitro, se and normal) are doing 34.3mhs 1240/2250 @ 865mv
no mem errors nor incorrect shares
It really is possible and achievable but at the same time...unless bragging... I'm not sure why will I push them so much... I'd rather prefer to not turn this thread into claymore vs others war and d*ck waving. Lets just pretend that everyone is happy with latest updates Claymore has the same speed with nVidia as Phoenix. Phoenix's AMD kernels are more "tweak-able" and are faster than Claymore's. But Phoenix doesn't work as expected with latest 19.5.1 + drivers. We need an update On the last part I agree, we need an update for both windows and linux latest drivers + I have contacted developer to add support for ROCm too. Lets hope they are busy doing it PS: Some phoenixminer results for last.   |
|
|
|
ManDoneKTM
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 150
Merit: 0
|
|
June 02, 2019, 12:03:29 AM |
|
After Claymore last ver. 14.6 you are not the fastest eth miner. I've got 32,3 mh/sec vs 31,5 with phoenix (RX480, bc drivers ). Your next pace, dev)
good to you , we dont care about your miner and your hashrate , i have 48.3 mh/s with all 580 8G , so  what s the point in your post ?! ROFL |
|
|
|
|
hustleman
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 155
Merit: 6
|
|
June 02, 2019, 02:45:42 AM |
|
After Claymore last ver. 14.6 you are not the fastest eth miner. I've got 32,3 mh/sec vs 31,5 with phoenix (RX480, bc drivers ). Your next pace, dev)
good to you , we dont care about your miner and your hashrate , i have 48.3 mh/s with all 580 8G , so what s the point in your post ?! ROFL sounds made up |
|
|
|
|
|
