Bitcoin Forum
April 24, 2024, 07:18:50 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 [182] 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 ... 499 »
  Print  
Author Topic: PhoenixMiner 6.2c: fastest Ethereum/Ethash miner with lowest devfee (Win/Linux)  (Read 784622 times)
Felis777
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 17, 2019, 03:53:09 PM
 #3621

has anyone experienced a constantly decrease in hashrate 1070 and p104 cards? P104 drops hashrate from 40 to 39 in last 2-3months, same settings. Any workaround?
1713943130
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713943130

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713943130
Reply with quote  #2

1713943130
Report to moderator
1713943130
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713943130

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713943130
Reply with quote  #2

1713943130
Report to moderator
1713943130
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713943130

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713943130
Reply with quote  #2

1713943130
Report to moderator
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally controlled networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
j2james
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 80
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 17, 2019, 03:58:05 PM
 #3622

has anyone experienced a constantly decrease in hashrate 1070 and p104 cards? P104 drops hashrate from 40 to 39 in last 2-3months, same settings. Any workaround?

Hm. I have the same problem. Two 1070 cards of 6 have decreased its hasrate. I thought it is because these cards work much time. Nothing was changed in configuration files, MSI Afterburner was not updated, Phoeninx miner was not updated too.
joaogti36
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 162
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 17, 2019, 05:10:26 PM
 #3623

has anyone experienced a constantly decrease in hashrate 1070 and p104 cards? P104 drops hashrate from 40 to 39 in last 2-3months, same settings. Any workaround?

Hm. I have the same problem. Two 1070 cards of 6 have decreased its hasrate. I thought it is because these cards work much time. Nothing was changed in configuration files, MSI Afterburner was not updated, Phoeninx miner was not updated too.


u need to increase by +150 the core of the 1070.... like power 108watt core +150 mem +550 should go to 31.2mh per card!!
Lunga Chung
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 277
Merit: 23


View Profile
September 17, 2019, 05:45:07 PM
 #3624

has anyone experienced a constantly decrease in hashrate 1070 and p104 cards? P104 drops hashrate from 40 to 39 in last 2-3months, same settings. Any workaround?

Hm. I have the same problem. Two 1070 cards of 6 have decreased its hasrate. I thought it is because these cards work much time. Nothing was changed in configuration files, MSI Afterburner was not updated, Phoeninx miner was not updated too.


u need to increase by +150 the core of the 1070.... like power 108watt core +150 mem +550 should go to 31.2mh per card!!


what about power limit?
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 253


View Profile
September 17, 2019, 05:59:21 PM
 #3625

has anyone experienced a constantly decrease in hashrate 1070 and p104 cards? P104 drops hashrate from 40 to 39 in last 2-3months, same settings. Any workaround?

Hm. I have the same problem. Two 1070 cards of 6 have decreased its hasrate. I thought it is because these cards work much time. Nothing was changed in configuration files, MSI Afterburner was not updated, Phoeninx miner was not updated too.
Maybe it happens due to DAG size growing?
joaogti36
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 162
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 17, 2019, 06:21:46 PM
 #3626

has anyone experienced a constantly decrease in hashrate 1070 and p104 cards? P104 drops hashrate from 40 to 39 in last 2-3months, same settings. Any workaround?

Hm. I have the same problem. Two 1070 cards of 6 have decreased its hasrate. I thought it is because these cards work much time. Nothing was changed in configuration files, MSI Afterburner was not updated, Phoeninx miner was not updated too.


u need to increase by +150 the core of the 1070.... like power 108watt core +150 mem +550 should go to 31.2mh per card!!


what about power limit?


power limit is 108watt
alumar
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 208
Merit: 117


View Profile WWW
September 18, 2019, 03:58:35 AM
 #3627

Performance Video in my testing so far: 481mh @ 1062w for a 8x 5700 XT rig. https://twitter.com/BitsBeTrippin/status/1174169921250631682

But probably going to settle for 474mh @ 1058, as few of the cards not showing 100% stability with settings. Once I see it clean for 24h will post how I got there in video.

Carter - Host of BitsBeTrippin
Original Cryptomining Channel on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/bitsbetrippin
bategojko74
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 220
Merit: 12


View Profile
September 18, 2019, 05:37:23 AM
 #3628

Performance Video in my testing so far: 481mh @ 1062w for a 8x 5700 XT rig. https://twitter.com/BitsBeTrippin/status/1174169921250631682

But probably going to settle for 474mh @ 1058, as few of the cards not showing 100% stability with settings. Once I see it clean for 24h will post how I got there in video.
What about the 2 from 8 incorrect shares?
KaydenC
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 610
Merit: 265



View Profile WWW
September 18, 2019, 11:14:30 AM
 #3629

Performance Video in my testing so far: 481mh @ 1062w for a 8x 5700 XT rig. https://twitter.com/BitsBeTrippin/status/1174169921250631682

But probably going to settle for 474mh @ 1058, as few of the cards not showing 100% stability with settings. Once I see it clean for 24h will post how I got there in video.

Nice, it's more efficient that Vega VII unless the Vega runs at 0.8v, 75mh/s. Better price perf too. Never thought that can happen, since HBM has good power savings. I guess it's because the Rx 5700 can run at lower voltages, while the Vega need 0.9v for 90mh/s. So it's not savings due to architecture, but due to better core to mem bandwidth ratio, allowing for lower voltage.

It still has to run ProgPow competitively and ideally a few more algos like beam and mtp before I can consider getting it.
Quake4
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 825
Merit: 18

MindMiner developer


View Profile WWW
September 18, 2019, 11:24:22 AM
 #3630

ProgPow just ended on startup

Code:
Phoenix Miner 4.6c Windows/msvc - Release build
-----------------------------------------------

CUDA version: 10.0, CUDA runtime: 8.0
Available GPUs for mining:
GPU1: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (pcie 1), CUDA cap. 6.1, 11 GB VRAM, 28 CUs
Nvidia driver version: 430.86
PP: the pool list contains 1 pool (1 from command-line)
PP: primary pool: progpow.mine.zergpool.com:3200
Starting GPU mining
PP: Connecting to progpow pool progpow.mine.zergpool.com:3200 (proto: Stratum)
GPU1: 35C 28% 17W
GPUs power: 17.4 W
PP: Connected to progpow pool progpow.mine.zergpool.com:3200 (103.249.70.7)
PP: Subscribed to progpow pool
Listening for CDM remote manager at port 3360 in read-only mode
PP: Worker xxx authorized
PP: New job #2d81e29b from progpow.mine.zergpool.com:3200; diff: 188MH
GPU1: Starting up... (0)
GPU1: Generating ethash light cache for epoch #20
Light cache generated in 2.9 s (6.3 MB/s)
GPU1: ProgPOW seed set to 20

Run as:
Code:
PhoenixMiner.exe -pool stratum+tcp://progpow.mine.zergpool.com:3200 -wal xxx -pass c=BTC,Test -proto 1 -cdmport 3360 -nvidia -coin bci

MindMiner - miner manager programm with autoswitch between Algos&Pools.
This isnt a fork based on MultiPoolMiner (Nemos, SniffDog, Mega, NPlus & etc)
Bathmat
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 78
Merit: 3


View Profile
September 18, 2019, 08:34:02 PM
Last edit: September 18, 2019, 08:49:38 PM by Bathmat
 #3631

I've noticed an issue where at least 1 of my RX5700 will crash after switching to ETC when mining on Nicehash. The crash happens after a few minutes (less than 10) and they will crash even if it's only a brief switch to ETC then back to ETH. Mining to a regular ETC pool does not have any issues. I've tried every config setting/flag I can think of to try to prevent it (-eres 0 -rvram -1 -lidag 0 through 3), and both drivers 19.9.1 and 19.9.2. This is using version 4.6c. Any other setting I should try?
j2james
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 80
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 19, 2019, 09:27:45 AM
 #3632

has anyone experienced a constantly decrease in hashrate 1070 and p104 cards? P104 drops hashrate from 40 to 39 in last 2-3months, same settings. Any workaround?

Hm. I have the same problem. Two 1070 cards of 6 have decreased its hasrate. I thought it is because these cards work much time. Nothing was changed in configuration files, MSI Afterburner was not updated, Phoeninx miner was not updated too.

u need to increase by +150 the core of the 1070.... like power 108watt core +150 mem +550 should go to 31.2mh per card!!

Core settings does not change hashrate for ETH significally.
I use CV +0, PL 64, CC +0, MC +600 and have 31.6 per card. That was more then 1.5 year. But last month (may be less then 30 days) 2 cards have about 31. Only two cards. Other 4 cards still have 31.6. As I said, nothing was changed. So I think that these two cards have regression because work much time. Initially I have only 2 cards. Then I have added 4 cards. But for now I do not know which cards decreased their hashrate - these 2 old cards or others. With these settings I have about 730W.
53nsk
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 19, 2019, 01:45:24 PM
 #3633

After updating drivers from 19.9.1 to 19.9.2 miner won't start, claymore works fine.
Bathmat
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 78
Merit: 3


View Profile
September 19, 2019, 03:03:52 PM
 #3634

After updating drivers from 19.9.1 to 19.9.2 miner won't start, claymore works fine.

Check that windows defender isn't blocking the process... that's what happened to me.
53nsk
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 19, 2019, 04:28:33 PM
 #3635

After updating drivers from 19.9.1 to 19.9.2 miner won't start, claymore works fine.

Check that windows defender isn't blocking the process... that's what happened to me.
Yea, i've read it. But windows defender was always turned off. I'm using 3-rd party AV and firewall, but they didn't do anything, i've tried to turn them off too, but it didn't help. Also no updates were installed, nothing else changed, only new drivers installed after DDU cleanup. Still trying to figure out what is wrong.
Semtex72
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 55
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 19, 2019, 08:46:27 PM
Last edit: September 20, 2019, 01:09:47 AM by Semtex72
 #3636

Performance Video in my testing so far: 481mh @ 1062w for a 8x 5700 XT rig. https://twitter.com/BitsBeTrippin/status/1174169921250631682

But probably going to settle for 474mh @ 1058, as few of the cards not showing 100% stability with settings. Once I see it clean for 24h will post how I got there in video.

Hi and congrats!  

Share some settings for cards?
Please sharing the settings. I'm currently @ 1215W @ the Wall for my 8x RX 5700. Miner is reporting 900W. Getting about 425 MH/S (Which is great).

For the moment I just keep my settings simple: -cvddc 750 -cclock 1300 -mclock 920 -amd -mode 1.

Geeting another card tomorow to play with. This -openclLocalWork is not easy to figure out yet; can not have these incorrect shares

However, miner is unstable. Need more testing.
jpmonster
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 20, 2019, 08:06:30 AM
 #3637

I have 8 x GTX 1050 Ti 4GB on Windows 10.
I get the the DAG creation error.
Any idea how to resolve this, the DAG is only 3.3GB I believe
My Virtual Memory is more than enough to cover all of my cards in the rig.
sirkorro
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 20, 2019, 08:42:40 AM
 #3638

I have 8 x GTX 1050 Ti 4GB on Windows 10.
I get the the DAG creation error.
Any idea how to resolve this, the DAG is only 3.3GB I believe
My Virtual Memory is more than enough to cover all of my cards in the rig.
Play with below switches:

  -eres <n> Allocate DAG buffers big enough for n epochs ahead (default: 2) to
      avoid allocating new buffers on each DAG epoch switch, which should improve DAG switch stability
  -lidag <n> Slow down DAG generation to avoid crashes when swiching DAG epochs
      (0-3, default: 0 - fastest, 3 - slowest).
jpmonster
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 20, 2019, 09:39:46 AM
 #3639

I have tried playing around with these without any success:(
Has anyone with a 4GB Nvidia card got this to work
zertor
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53
Merit: 6


View Profile
September 20, 2019, 11:46:24 AM
 #3640

got the same issue with 1050Ti 4GB
dag generation error out of memory

@PhoenixMiner
Can you please fix it?
its just 77MB used of the card from 4GB (another GPU is used for primary display)
but your miner can't find enough memory...
stopping your miner/close,
then run Claymore miner after that instead works just fine.

Pages: « 1 ... 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 [182] 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 ... 499 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!