Bogdan Imanaev
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
December 21, 2018, 08:09:13 PM |
|
Problem: the miner sometimes stops Reproducibility: reproduced more often with a pool difficulty of 6g than with a difficulty of 4g Connection string: PhoenixMiner.exe -pool sp.whalesburg.com:8082 -wal {wallet} -worker test -proto 2 Environment: OS: Windows 10 x64 Miner version: PhoenixMiner 4.0b GPUs: Radeon RX570 x6 System error log: The name of the failed application: PhoenixMiner.exe, version: 0.0.0.0, timestamp: 0x5bfebc7d The name of the failed module: PhoenixMiner.exe, version: 0.0.0.0, timestamp: 0x5bfebc7d Exception code: 0xc0000409 Error offset: 0x000000000030b7b8 Failure Process ID: 0xc88 Screenshot: http://prntscr.com/ly2dqf
|
|
|
|
Miner_Storm
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
December 22, 2018, 01:29:15 AM |
|
Not Fixed problem with -cvddc on Beta for Blockchain driver?
|
|
|
|
ATrump
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
December 22, 2018, 08:36:34 PM |
|
PhoenixMiner, thanks a lot for your work!
Could you move card bus number before card name? It's hard to parse log to get it. I mean change "2018.12.22:13:38:35.674: main GPU1: GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (pcie 1), CUDA cap. 6.1, 3.9 GB VRAM, 6 CUs" to "2018.12.22:13:38:35.674: main GPU1: (pcie 1) GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, CUDA cap. 6.1, 3.9 GB VRAM, 6 CUs"
Or it will be great, if you add bus numbers to API.
|
|
|
|
1.2-GIGAHASH
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
December 22, 2018, 09:27:57 PM |
|
Problem: the miner sometimes stops Reproducibility: reproduced more often with a pool difficulty of 6g than with a difficulty of 4g Connection string: PhoenixMiner.exe -pool sp.whalesburg.com:8082 -wal {wallet} -worker test -proto 2 Environment: OS: Windows 10 x64 Miner version: PhoenixMiner 4.0b GPUs: Radeon RX570 x6 System error log: The name of the failed application: PhoenixMiner.exe, version: 0.0.0.0, timestamp: 0x5bfebc7d The name of the failed module: PhoenixMiner.exe, version: 0.0.0.0, timestamp: 0x5bfebc7d Exception code: 0xc0000409 Error offset: 0x000000000030b7b8 Failure Process ID: 0xc88 Screenshot: http://prntscr.com/ly2dqfsimilarly, we have the same problem
|
|
|
|
grand96
Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 10
|
|
December 25, 2018, 01:05:34 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
joseph32
Member
Offline
Activity: 418
Merit: 21
|
|
December 25, 2018, 01:28:12 AM |
|
Run it. You will have lots of fun
|
|
|
|
FFI2013
|
|
December 25, 2018, 01:32:09 AM |
|
Run it. You will have lots of fun Ya probably get you shit hijacked, I thought that was weird seeing phoenixminer 4.5 from someone other than PhoenixMiner
|
|
|
|
evlo
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 155
Merit: 4
|
|
December 27, 2018, 06:14:32 PM Last edit: December 28, 2018, 12:43:12 PM by evlo |
|
So my reported hashrate is 353MH/s Effective is 343MH/s - it is great that this software even reports real hashrate on ethermine 0 stales in phoenix miner and 0 bad 4 (1%) stales on ethermine - maximums stales in history chart is 14 or so How to make this better? This is after 3 days running. consumption: 1650 W, day: 39.131 kWh - this seems to high to me, i'm obviously running uder volt under clock and writing about real consumption, no repoted by hwinfo and other bullshit others write HWinfo gpu 11 570s should be 1200@875, one 580 is @.925 mem 2040@.890 I did not found any working overclocking utility for linux, but it is long time since i looked so I dunno if it could be better under linux https://i.imgur.com/cVkyOC1.png
|
|
|
|
Guigs321
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
December 28, 2018, 09:36:39 AM |
|
consumption: 1650 W, day: 39.131 kWh - this seems to high to me, i'm obviously running uder volt under clock and writing about real consumption, no repoted by hwinfo and other bullshit others write
Yes it's seems a little bit high, with 6x RX470 1140@900 I get 700 at the plug. Around 117W per card, you get 137,5W per card.
|
|
|
|
evlo
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 155
Merit: 4
|
|
December 28, 2018, 11:56:46 AM Last edit: December 28, 2018, 12:41:23 PM by evlo |
|
I'm mostly worried about the difference 353 reported miner hashrate and 343 on the pool. Well now it is 344.99 on the pool. So is the dev fee in reality 2.3%? I can't test what the real rate is on ethminer: 1. it is disconnecting and not connecting back to the pool after about a week. 2. I don't know how to get the real real pool hashrate 3. I don't know if they get comparable AMD performance now. Do you get <120W for 29-30MH/s per card on linux or windows? I'm not running much external cooling so I get a lot of hot air for the house That can be even 200W just for the fans, maybe. UPDATE: it is not, fans are at about 17% (HWinfo). Well barely profitable to mine for me anyways, when I calculate with real numbers, but cards don't seem to be getting cheaper or more expensive on the used market, so whatever.
|
|
|
|
anbe2305
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
December 28, 2018, 12:56:46 PM |
|
Reported hashrate and effective hashrate on a pool a difference of 5% is normal when mining.
What versions of RX 570 do you have?
|
|
|
|
evlo
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 155
Merit: 4
|
|
December 28, 2018, 01:03:47 PM |
|
"Normal" does not really explain it. I also selected my internet connection for the lowest latency possible in the locality to reduce stale shares at least that way. So maybe 1% stales, 1% dev fee, which in the end, when you really need max hashrate and max efficiency to stay even a bit profitable is notice worthy
|
|
|
|
anbe2305
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
December 28, 2018, 02:38:32 PM |
|
You should try another pool ( maxhash PPLNS) or maybe try solo mining luck with that hashrate i would try ETC solo mining for a week. With ethermine pool you want have the opurtunity because of to many miners to see what can cards do( to many stale shares)Solo pools are more optimised then PPLNS pools. Im only solo mining. You must make calculation on dificulty (TH!!!) your cards find on 24 h basis, but that you want find on ethermine. You should try solo mining pools (maxhash, 2miners,altpool,coinmining, clona).
|
|
|
|
sahbibenayed
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
December 28, 2018, 03:28:05 PM |
|
Implemented dual mining (Ethash/Blake2s) for some AMD GPUs (RX580/570/560/480/470/460 and Vega). Use the new -dpool, -dwal, -dpass, -dworker, and -dcoin options to set the Blake2s pool. You can set the secondary coin mining intensity with the -sci option. For more information see the Readme.txt file. Note that the devfee when using dual mining is 0.9% on the ethash coin (there is no devfee on the secondary coin).
==> Dual mining not working I try everything but Nada
|
|
|
|
ScalperBTC
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
December 28, 2018, 03:55:26 PM |
|
Dual mining not working... It's not true! Dual mining - working good! On my rig, now working dual mining!
|
|
|
|
hobocoe
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
December 28, 2018, 04:49:22 PM |
|
Implemented dual mining (Ethash/Blake2s) for some AMD GPUs (RX580/570/560/480/470/460 and Vega). Use the new -dpool, -dwal, -dpass, -dworker, and -dcoin options to set the Blake2s pool. You can set the secondary coin mining intensity with the -sci option. For more information see the Readme.txt file. Note that the devfee when using dual mining is 0.9% on the ethash coin (there is no devfee on the secondary coin).
==> Dual mining not working I try everything but Nada
Chances are its a driver conflict. I just recently went through the last 15 or so driver releases trying to get a vega 56 working, and I also used some drivers on 470's and 480. From driver to driver the dual mining quits working. like for me the newest beta driver doesnt dual mine but the current stable does. mess with different drivers to get the dual mining working
|
|
|
|
lesjokolat
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 3
|
|
December 28, 2018, 05:37:34 PM Last edit: December 28, 2018, 06:01:18 PM by lesjokolat |
|
Hi a few notes:
Using newer 18.2.2 or 18.2.3 AMD drivers I an not able to make clNew kernels to be used, i define them as 1 but they are set to 0.
this is for vega 64 and fury x
Also the commands -etht its lower limit is 50 but i think going to 25 might allow even faster mining.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
fluxy12
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 145
Merit: 1
|
|
December 28, 2018, 07:13:22 PM |
|
hasn't blake2s already been took by Asics ?
|
|
|
|
sahbibenayed
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
December 29, 2018, 11:12:52 AM |
|
Implemented dual mining (Ethash/Blake2s) for some AMD GPUs (RX580/570/560/480/470/460 and Vega). Use the new -dpool, -dwal, -dpass, -dworker, and -dcoin options to set the Blake2s pool. You can set the secondary coin mining intensity with the -sci option. For more information see the Readme.txt file. Note that the devfee when using dual mining is 0.9% on the ethash coin (there is no devfee on the secondary coin).
==> Dual mining not working I try everything but Nada
Chances are its a driver conflict. I just recently went through the last 15 or so driver releases trying to get a vega 56 working, and I also used some drivers on 470's and 480. From driver to driver the dual mining quits working. like for me the newest beta driver doesnt dual mine but the current stable does. mess with different drivers to get the dual mining working I m using msos with Phoenix client (linux) : my config : -eworker RigRayan -epool etc-eu1.nanopool.org:19999 -ewal 0x**.** -epsw x -dcoin blake2s -dpool xvg.blake2s.com:8888 -dwal ** -dpass c=XVG -proto (AUTO) -clgreen 1 -mode 0 -tstop 85 -tt 60 -fanmin 50 -fanmax 100 any help please because with the same config it works on Claymore
|
|
|
|
evlo
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 155
Merit: 4
|
|
December 29, 2018, 01:07:49 PM Last edit: December 29, 2018, 02:37:37 PM by evlo |
|
You should try another pool ( maxhash PPLNS) or maybe try solo mining luck with that hashrate i would try ETC solo mining for a week. With ethermine pool you want have the opurtunity because of to many miners to see what can cards do( to many stale shares)Solo pools are more optimised then PPLNS pools. Im only solo mining. You must make calculation on dificulty (TH!!!) your cards find on 24 h basis, but that you want find on ethermine. You should try solo mining pools (maxhash, 2miners,altpool,coinmining, clona).
This still does not explain the difference at all, how unexpected I suppose there is maybe some pool with less stale shares. BTW I restarted the miner and had same number effective, but after about a day, it is again about 10MH/s per rig less in effective, so seems to be caused by devfee and stales. Maybe PhoenixMiner author could explain how these numbers really work. After restart I even get incorrect shares, on all GPUs, interresting, before I did not get any. I have 0 memory errors on most GPUs.
|
|
|
|
|