[ANN] sph-sgminer: multi-coin multi-algorithm GPU miner | added MaruCoin

[DJstone]

On latest build I have problem with qubit, it won't accept shares and very low WU level, almost nothing come to pool. Older versions works fine.

define latest build!

Mine or PHM's?

[1715032838]

1715032838

[1715032838]

1715032838

[1715032838]

1715032838

[badman74]

On latest build I have problem with qubit, it won't accept shares and very low WU level, almost nothing come to pool. Older versions works fine.

define latest build!

Mine or PHM's?

or mine lol

[Gazza1]

Why do I get these errors

./sgminer: --gpu-engine: unrecognized option
./sgminer: --gpu-memclock: unrecognized option

also if i remove those commands it works, but fan speed and temps are blank

I'm using a config file instead and everything loads, but I don't think it's controlling gpu-engine and memclock, those settings also don't show up when I press G and why are FAN speed and temps completely blanked out?

because you didn't add the adl files before you built it
open the ADL_SDK folder and read the readme.txt

ahhh you're right on!  thanks man everything works perfect now

[mfqrs3]

On latest build I have problem with qubit, it won't accept shares and very low WU level, almost nothing come to pool. Older versions works fine.

define latest build!

Mine or PHM's?

Latest build on the first page, it's from badman74

I'm using this pool http://myr.nonce-pool.com

[badman74]

On latest build I have problem with qubit, it won't accept shares and very low WU level, almost nothing come to pool. Older versions works fine.

define latest build!

Mine or PHM's?

Latest build on the first page, it's from badman74

I'm using this pool http://myr.nonce-pool.com

that is strange...
i still think it is the way the pool is set up because the miner works fine elsewhere

[Overspeed]

Does anyone have a sgminer config (not .bat) for dual 280X's? Will be mining Hiro. Also, what kind of hash rate should I expect? Thanks!

[MinerP]

On latest build I have problem with qubit, it won't accept shares and very low WU level, almost nothing come to pool. Older versions works fine.

define latest build!

Mine or PHM's?

Latest build on the first page, it's from badman74

I'm using this pool http://myr.nonce-pool.com

i have same problem using https://hiro.suprnova.cc/

[boubou]

I assume you also have R9 290?

Comme on, it's a 60 Darkcoin bounty and some other guy propose to put Darkcoin in the pot too.

Yes, I've three rigs with 290s and each suffers from the same problem.

I checked for any option related to sleep mode, dpms, but both are disabled by default in BAMT 1.6 .

Others have the same problem with the windows 7 build of that miners...

This bug is incredible. Near all the 290 miners are stuck with poor hashrate because of that.

For bug-finders:
I have 2 others 290 on windows that did not suffer the bug (except from very rare occasion) but they are watercooled.
Is it possible that the Darkcoin algo make some part of the card too hot, or too something, and that some part of the card are disabled? Again: in scrypt/keccak/Scrypt-jane there is no problem.

Hello guys, would u mind testing my binarys for sgminer?

I've changed something and merged with the latest sgminer from veox.
Here is the commit message:

This commit is the product of merging veox latest commit (atm 1f7b7ef)…

… with sph-sgminer (atm fe522a6).

Successfully build and tested successfully on:
Quarkcoin (Fully compatible imho),
Animecoin (Fully compatible imho),
Fuguecoin (Fully compatible imho),
Darkcoin (Some problems in calculation BlockDiff and Target as well as sharediff and target imho),
Scrypt is not working at the moment.
I'll still have to check those other coins.
nFactor has to be merged.

Here is the git repo with branch pointed to the merge:
https://github.com/DJstone/sph-sgminer/commits/sph-merge-veox

Here is the Binarys:
http://ul.to/9o7ujsod


NOTE: IT IS STILL NOT STABLE!

The github address has problem, so I can't test your build to see if i fixes the 290 issue.

[sebar25]

Is this possible to use it with old 5870 gpus?

Code:

[10:39:22] Started sgminer 4.1.0-96-g983e-dirty
  __constant static const sph_u32 V_INIT[5][8] = {
             ^
/opt/miners/sph-sgminer/kernel/luffa.cl(41): error: storage-class specifiers

[10:39:28] Failed to init GPU thread 0, disabling device 0
[10:39:28] Restarting the GPU from the menu will not fix this.
[10:39:28] Try restarting sgminer.
Press enter to continue:

[xsedivy]

Yes it should. I'm mining Darkcoin with 5870

[Overspeed]

Screenshot of sgminer running dual 280x. I'm used to cgminer so this may be normal but I have my doubts. The pool diff (0.008) and WU (0.031/m) values don't make any sense. Pool mining Hiro. Thoughts?

[iikun]

Screenshot of sgminer running dual 280x. I'm used to cgminer so this may be normal but I have my doubts. The pool diff (0.008) and WU (0.031/m) values don't make any sense. Pool mining Hiro. Thoughts?

yup, that looks about the same as mine.  The pool is reporting your shares correctly yeah?

[Overspeed]

yup, that looks about the same as mine.  The pool is reporting your shares correctly yeah?

Well, for any given round, MPOS shows X valid shares and 0 invalid. I'm netting about 90 Hiro per day per 280X. Seems low. I just don't get the worker diff values. On scrypt pools my diff is between 256-512.

[Profetu]

Hi guys, few problems I have:

1. hiro.suchpool only shows 75% of the hashrate shown in sgminer while hiro.forkpool shows around 110%
2. I have 3x7950 and for 2 of them the hashrate freezes few minute after starting. The GPU's still sent shares to pools but the hashrate are frozen while the fanspeeds and average hashrates for each GPU are updated correctly.

config:

sgminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://stratum.forkpool.com:6347 -u xx.1 -p x --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 1500 -k darkcoin -I 19 -g 1 -w 256 --lookup-gap 2

[DJstone]

Screenshot of sgminer running dual 280x. I'm used to cgminer so this may be normal but I have my doubts. The pool diff (0.008) and WU (0.031/m) values don't make any sense. Pool mining Hiro. Thoughts?

http://s24.postimg.org/ij7q80qid/sgminer.jpg

yup, that looks about the same as mine.  The pool is reporting your shares correctly yeah?

It is totally fine what ur miner is showing to u. (imho).



I'd merge the newest features (nscrypt for e.g. Vertcoin...).

These coins (and coins with same kernel/algorithm) are supported by now:
    DRK ~2.5 MH/s on R9 290
    Q2C ~5 MH/s on R9 290
    QRK ~2.1 MH/s on R9 290
    MYR ~10 MH/s on R9 290
    FC ~145 MH/s on R9 290
    INK ~45 MH/s on R9 290
    ANI ~1.8 MH/s on R9 290
    GRS ~5.5 MH/s on R9 290
*copied by PHM opening post.*

You can now assign a Name to your pools over your config or over the cmd.
example.config is given.

Scrypt is working as well (LTC/FTC/...).

Git-Source is here : https://github.com/DJstone/sph-sgminer
Binarys can be found here : http://ul.to/2p8k2de1

I would be happy about donations if you think I deserve to.
QRK address is mentioned in the singature.
LTC address is : LZREiQm2Q4hpo1f97zNpBLnv77eEd1KyHA

[sebar25]

I have 5x7970 (OC version from Gigabyte), and getting only 2,6MH/s per GPU on qubitcoin when darkcoin give me 1,3Mh/s
Is this normal? Scrypt algo give me 750Kh/s per GPU

Code:

/opt/miners/sph-sgminer/sgminer -k qubitcoin -o stratum+tcp://q2c.cpu-pool.net:3470 -u xxx -p yyy -I 16 -g 2 -w 256 
 --auto-fan --temp-target 60 --temp-overheat 65 --queue 0 --scan-time 1 --gpu-powertune 0 --gpu-engine 1100,1100,1100,1100,1100 

[badman74]

Hi guys, few problems I have:

1. hiro.suchpool only shows 75% of the hashrate shown in sgminer while hiro.forkpool shows around 110%
2. I have 3x7950 and for 2 of them the hashrate freezes few minute after starting. The GPU's still sent shares to pools but the hashrate are frozen while the fanspeeds and average hashrates for each GPU are updated correctly.

config:

sgminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://stratum.forkpool.com:6347 -u xx.1 -p x --gpu-engine 1100 --gpu-memclock 1500 -k darkcoin -I 19 -g 1 -w 256 --lookup-gap 2

try lowering the intensity some till the hash rate starts reporting again

[kskwerl]

Sorry for my ignorance but can you mine Maxcoin with this miner?

[Hippie Tech]

X11 .. where have you beeeen.. all my crypto life !

2 7870xt/ Tahiti @1100/1500, and a 7870/ Pitcairn @1100/1200, running the 14.2 beta1.3 drivers.
gpu-threads - 2
worksize - 128

[CryptoGretzky]

I have this issue with ALL my 290x BAMT 1.6 rigs too.   They drop 200k+ after a few mins.   So, max I can get it to is 2.41 Mh/s.   Do you have any fixes or workaround for this yet that you have discovered?

Could I have opinion of specialist about my Problem? I suspect a bug of the programm because that'is the only thing I had not check, someone can tell me if it's possible?

I offer on the other topic 30 Darkcoin Bounty to solve that problem, a nobody has a clue, but I get in touch with other that had the same problem.

Here is the facts:
I have 3 different R9 290, other people has 6 290 of other brand, after 10 minutes, the cards looses 10% of Hash.
That probelm happend only on R9 290 cars.
I'm on Bamt 1.6 from Bajawa, He is on windows 7, same problem.
All 290 on the same rig experiment the loss in the exact same second
if you put another card in the rigg that is not a 290, all the 290 had a loss, but not the other card
The cards are cold.
The problem happenedonly with sph-darkcoin miner, if I mine Litecoin, I'm stable.
I split the cards with 2 PSU, does not change a thing, cards crashed at the same time, no matter what psu they are plugged.
I change motherboard, does not change a thing.
I run 4 different sgminer, each one with one card activated: even I did launch them with a delay of 3 minutes, 10 minutes later, all the instance with a 290 had a 10% lossat the same time
I launched sgminer without a .conf: only intensity in the parameters: happened with I:18 and I:21 (0% rejected, cards should worked with high intensity)
Once I got the loss only a cold reboot can recover the missing hash. If I mine restart only the miner, it restart but is capped to 90% of max hashrate.

I'm getting out of hints. If the problem is in the programm, I shoud stop wasting my time. If it is not, I will keep investigate, even if I think I already get pretty far.
PS: as usual, english is not my first languagae, so if I offensed any-one, it was not intended.