Meizirkki
|
|
February 12, 2012, 01:31:42 PM |
|
Wow! My prevous minerd did 1.8Kh/s per core. This new one does 3.9Kh/s per core! Thanks P.S. Core2duo SU7300
|
|
|
|
Tittiez
|
|
February 12, 2012, 05:35:06 PM |
|
Phenom ii x4 955 @ 3.6GHz
|
|
|
|
pooler (OP)
|
|
February 13, 2012, 05:37:23 PM Last edit: February 14, 2012, 01:19:31 AM by pooler |
|
Alright folks, time for a version bump. Version 2.1.3- Support for extensions "midstate" (reduces network bandwidth usage) and "submitold" (used by p2pool).
- Smart handling of long polling failures: switch to short scantime if long polling fails.
- It is now possible to specify username and password in the URL, like this: --url http://username:password@host:port/.
- Added a --version option, and (finally) cleaned up the output of the --help option.
- The miner will now complain about non-option arguments, instead of simply ignoring them.
- Minor bug fixes.
The source code is, as always, available at GitHub. No binaries yet, sorry, I couldn't find diki on IRC. Windows binaries here. Brief note on the -s/--scantime optionI have seen people suggest various values for this option in order to reduce stales when mining in pools. The funny thing is that, to my knowledge, all Litecoin pools have long polling permanently enabled (which is good), and when long polling is enabled the scantime parameter is completely ignored. For this reason, the use of this parameter only makes sense when you are mining solo.
|
BTC: 15MRTcUweNVJbhTyH5rq9aeSdyigFrskqE · LTC: LTCPooLqTK1SANSNeTR63GbGwabTKEkuS7
|
|
|
MCWey8
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
[ Poor Miner ]
|
|
February 13, 2012, 09:27:20 PM |
|
2.1.3 Linux - Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU E2180 @ 2.00GHz - 5.7 KHs
2.1.2 Windows - Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU T6400 @ 2.00GHz - 6.0 KHs
2.1.2 Windows - AMD C-50 Dual @ 1.00GHz - 1.36 KHs
2.1.3 Linux - AMD Athlon @ 700MHz - 0.4 KHs
|
|
|
|
pooler (OP)
|
|
February 14, 2012, 01:20:29 AM Last edit: February 14, 2012, 01:38:40 AM by pooler |
|
Binaries of version 2.1.3 for Windows are now available. https://github.com/pooler/cpuminer/downloadsUPDATE: A 64-bit binary for Mac OS X is now also available.
|
BTC: 15MRTcUweNVJbhTyH5rq9aeSdyigFrskqE · LTC: LTCPooLqTK1SANSNeTR63GbGwabTKEkuS7
|
|
|
stcupp
|
|
February 15, 2012, 11:59:50 PM |
|
this took my AMD AM2+ phenemon from 4 kh/s to 16 kh/s!
|
|
|
|
hangover
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
February 16, 2012, 05:57:25 AM |
|
hangover: this version should build correctly with binutils 2.15. Let me know if the assembler still complains.
pooler, everything builds correctly, thank you!
|
|
|
|
cabin
|
|
February 19, 2012, 02:37:39 PM |
|
I notice at 100% CPU it does cut into the GPU hash rate for bitcoin a little (on the same machine). I wonder if an option for 'intensity' could be added so it could be configured to use only 95% CPU?
|
|
|
|
heinz
Member
Offline
Activity: 172
Merit: 10
|
|
February 19, 2012, 04:03:08 PM |
|
use 1 less thread. Works good on my i7's
|
|
|
|
cabin
|
|
February 19, 2012, 04:05:00 PM |
|
that's what I've been doing.. but it's a little harsh when there's only 2 cores
|
|
|
|
ZedZedNova
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 475
Merit: 265
Ooh La La, C'est Zoom!
|
|
February 20, 2012, 04:34:02 AM |
|
If you are running linux or Mac OS X you can use the "nice" command to alter how the process is scheduled.
Windows has something similar, but I don't recall what it is. Probably accessible from Perfmon or Resource Monitor.
- Zed
|
No mining at the moment.
|
|
|
Remember remember the 5th of November
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1011
Reverse engineer from time to time
|
|
February 20, 2012, 10:37:32 AM |
|
Yes, in Task Manager, there is something called Priority, you can set it to whatever you like, but NEVER to real-time.
|
BTC:1AiCRMxgf1ptVQwx6hDuKMu4f7F27QmJC2
|
|
|
LoWang
|
|
February 20, 2012, 12:12:43 PM |
|
or you can use command start to launch a program with a set priority start "title" /low command
|
|
|
|
cabin
|
|
February 20, 2012, 03:06:54 PM |
|
This is on windows and the process priority is already as low as it can go. Anyways not a big deal overall.
|
|
|
|
pooler (OP)
|
|
February 20, 2012, 05:45:58 PM |
|
This is on windows and the process priority is already as low as it can go. Anyways not a big deal overall.
You may want to try out one of these free utilities, that allow you to limit the maximum CPU usage of a process: http://deztec.jp/x/05/faireal/BES-index.htmlhttp://threadmaster.tripod.com/
|
BTC: 15MRTcUweNVJbhTyH5rq9aeSdyigFrskqE · LTC: LTCPooLqTK1SANSNeTR63GbGwabTKEkuS7
|
|
|
Syke
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
|
|
February 24, 2012, 03:57:27 AM |
|
(Just looked into this "LiteCoin" thing today) Followed the instructions on pool-x for my i7-2600k, got 8.8 khash total for 4 cores. Just replaced the default files with your ones, now getting 10.5 khash, PER CORE, for a total of 42.0 khash Wow How in the world are you getting 10.5 KH/s per core?
|
Buy & Hold
|
|
|
shakti
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
|
February 24, 2012, 08:42:35 AM |
|
(Just looked into this "LiteCoin" thing today) Followed the instructions on pool-x for my i7-2600k, got 8.8 khash total for 4 cores. Just replaced the default files with your ones, now getting 10.5 khash, PER CORE, for a total of 42.0 khash Wow How in the world are you getting 10.5 KH/s per core? 4 threads on i7 2600k can give 10.5 kh/s pro thread
|
|
|
|
dishwara
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1855
Merit: 1016
|
|
February 24, 2012, 08:49:03 AM |
|
(Just looked into this "LiteCoin" thing today) Followed the instructions on pool-x for my i7-2600k, got 8.8 khash total for 4 cores. Just replaced the default files with your ones, now getting 10.5 khash, PER CORE, for a total of 42.0 khashWow How in the world are you getting 10.5 KH/s per core? 4 threads on i7 2600k can give 10.5 kh/s pro thread ?
|
|
|
|
LoWang
|
|
February 24, 2012, 05:04:28 PM |
|
(Just looked into this "LiteCoin" thing today) Followed the instructions on pool-x for my i7-2600k, got 8.8 khash total for 4 cores. Just replaced the default files with your ones, now getting 10.5 khash, PER CORE, for a total of 42.0 khash Wow I just installed 64bit Linux on core i5 2400 @3.1GHz and it runs up to 30kh/s! So I think this is possible to achieve with i7. Fuzzy did you notice if turboboost activates or not? According to Intel it can go up to 3.8GHz http://ark.intel.com/products/52214/Intel-Core-i7-2600K-Processor-(8M-Cache-3_40-GHz)Unfortunatelly I was not able to run lm-sensors on that Linux so I cannot check.
|
|
|
|
tacotime
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005
|
|
February 24, 2012, 05:23:14 PM |
|
I got 46kh/s on a 2600K @ 4.5GHz after compiling the miner on ubuntu (which was a pain in the ass).
|
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns
|
|
|
|