Bitcoin Forum
April 30, 2024, 05:09:23 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 ... 238 »
1081  Other / Politics & Society / Re: CNN national poll: Rand Paul 13%, Bush 13%, Ryan 12%, Huckabee 10%, Christie 9% on: June 22, 2014, 02:04:09 AM
FYI, futures market (predictious, which is similar to intrade) shows hilary as a heavy favorite to win the presidential elections.. almost 3x as likely than rand paul at the moment.
1082  Economy / Services / Re: [PrimeDice] [Highest Paid Signature] Earn Bitcoins Simply By Posting on: June 22, 2014, 01:57:21 AM
you know, with the new requirements.. i don't think it's really that bad. you can make .4 btc as a senior member and all you need to do is post 400 times per month. unfortunately, though, i'm still 2 months away from reaching that point.
1083  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Do you sometimes think Bitcoin will fail? on: June 22, 2014, 01:52:28 AM
It's impossible for Bitcoin to fail at this point.

If everyone in the world stopped using it right now it was still a successful experiment. That's all it was started as anyway.

this is blind thinking. there are multiple ways that bitcoin could collapse. i'm not saying that it will happen or that it won't, but there's the possibility. anyone who thinks it will definitely go one way is probably myopic.
1084  Other / New forum software / Any way to incorporate a priceticker on this forum? on: June 21, 2014, 09:41:48 PM
would be nice, instead of having to load a webpage.. at least for the people who spend a lot of time here.
1085  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Japan bans child pornography possession on: June 21, 2014, 09:40:05 PM
japanese people are weird.. they are super fetishy and into all kinds of weird shit. most of their porn that i've seen has been almost rapey.
1086  Other / Politics & Society / Re: CNN national poll: Rand Paul 13%, Bush 13%, Ryan 12%, Huckabee 10%, Christie 9% on: June 21, 2014, 07:21:46 PM
how is he all that special among other candidates if he's willing to sell out on his values (if that were even the case)? he's not.. but it's hard to blame him if he wants to be president. the problem is the republican party though, since he's going to have to prove just how conservative he is during the primaries, and if he wins, he'll have to prove how he's such a moderate during the presidential elections. he'll be labelled a flip flopper.

compound that with the unpopularity of the republican stock, and you can clearly see that republicans are at a clear disadvantage.. plus hilary is more popular than anyone that the GOP can nominate. it's too bad christie turned out to be scum though.. he was the clear favorite a year ago.
1087  Other / Politics & Society / Re: CNN national poll: Rand Paul 13%, Bush 13%, Ryan 12%, Huckabee 10%, Christie 9% on: June 21, 2014, 06:13:35 PM
so, are any of you rand paul lovers going to defend rand's decision to push toward not allowing abortion? he's either placating to the far right, or he actually believes this shit.. how can a libertarian take a "pro life" stance, and still be called a libertarian?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/20/rand-paul-abortion_n_5516219.html

Quote
WASHINGTON (AP) — Describing a nation "in a full-blown spiritual crisis," leading Republicans on Friday vowed to fight against abortion rights and protect the role of faith in public life as they courted religious conservatives with an eye on the 2016 presidential contest.

"I will stand up for unborn children as long as I'm privileged to be in office," Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul declared while addressing the Faith and Freedom Coalition, a group led by longtime Christian activist Ralph Reed hosting its annual conference in Washington.

"America is in a full-blown spiritual crisis," the tea party favorite continued. "What America needs is a revival."

Paul led a parade of ambitious Republicans on a Friday speaking program — including New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and 2012 presidential candidate Rick Santorum — that featured aggressive defenses of social conservative priorities, including opposition to abortion, gay marriage and funding for Planned Parenthood. The gathering highlights the delicate balancing act Republican leaders face as they work to bridge divisions within the party and improve the GOP's image.

Organizers said more than 1,000 evangelical Christian leaders were attending the conference, designed to mobilize religious conservative voters in advance of the upcoming midterm elections and the 2016 presidential contest. While polls suggest that social conservatives are losing their fight against gay marriage, Republican officials across the political spectrum concede that evangelical Christian voters continue to play a critical role in Republican politics.

"You can ignore them, but you do so at your own peril," said Republican operative Hogan Gidley, who worked for Santorum and for former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee during his 2008 campaign for the presidential nomination.
1088  Other / Off-topic / Re: FIFA World Cup 2014!!! on: June 20, 2014, 10:02:01 PM
i find this article on huffpo to be stupid http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/20/uruguay-player-fifa-concussions_n_5512780.html

if the guy wanted to go back in, then let him.. but in the event that something does happen, he has to take responsibility for it.
1089  Other / Politics & Society / Re: CNN national poll: Rand Paul 13%, Bush 13%, Ryan 12%, Huckabee 10%, Christie 9% on: June 20, 2014, 09:52:31 PM
I'd argue Rand's biggest opponent in 2016, especially if he gets to the GE, is going to be the Kochtopus association, which is about as popular as Dick Cheney (at least in MI, where pretty much the only TV political ads have been bashing Terri Land for months over her alleged Koch connections). Democrats, though, I really doubt have any chance of a '16 pres. victory unless maybe they do a Hail Mary with someone like Warren. A good part of Rand winning the GOP primary, I think, will be reaching out to Dems and suggesting they should switch parties in undemocratic states where you need to "pre-affiliate" yourself with a party to vote in their primary, while the chance of this happening greatly increases if traditional Dem affiliates buy the premise premise that Dems have bleak '16 odds and they need to settle with a lesser of evils within the GOP. It's going to be a very interesting year, I think.

if i knew you, i'd love to make a bet with you. democrats the underdog? i don't think so.. i'm not saying i want them to win, but objectively speaking, the republicans are getting in their own way. whether anyone likes it or not, hilary is much more popular than any republican i can think of.. it's why fox has been bashing her so much lately.

the funny thing is that.. the koch brothers are actually libertarians  Cheesy
Kochs are arguably libertarians, but I'd disagree. Maybe they were at some point, like Alan Greenspan allegedly was. There's a pretty decent and comical book going over almost all the libertarian factions - "Radicals for Capitalism." It covers everyone from the Kochs to Ayn, to my personal favorite, Robert Anton Wilson. It obviously has some libertarian bias, but it's a fun, detailed book no matter your political orientation. If I didn't lose the book in a warehouse I lived in for a while, I'd offer to ship it to you at no charge.

I'd take you up on the bet, but I'm financially strapped at the moment. How about reverse bragging rights based on the party which wins the '16 GE? I'll be sure to remind you when I win either way. Tongue

ha, you can't just cast them away as "not one of us" when they become unpopular. they are definitely right-wingish, but they also have libertarian ideals.. just like rand paul.

i'm glad there are people who think like you do, so i can win money off them. did you think romney had a chance in 2012?
I didn't follow in '11/'12 after Ron dropped (actually, I followed and participated in the Libertarian Party until they nominated Barr over Ruwart). If you asked me in early-mid '12, though, I may've said McCain was running against Obama. Cheesy What kind of libertarian ideals do you think the Kochs have? Selective tax breaks? Cheesy

mccain after 2008? that makes completely 0 sense.. has there ever been a time when a nominee lost the presidential election and came back again to win it? besides, mccain blunder 2008.. especially with picking sarah palin.

anyway, concerning the koch brothers, i believe they are ancaps.. they want complete obliteration of any form of government. and since they can't get that, they decided to meddle.

i might want to get the koch brothers book.. they sound like "interesting" people.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/20/rand-paul-abortion_n_5516219.html

Quote
Paul led a parade of ambitious Republicans on a Friday speaking program — including New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and 2012 presidential candidate Rick Santorum — that featured aggressive defenses of social conservative priorities, including opposition to abortion, gay marriage and funding for Planned Parenthood. The gathering highlights the delicate balancing act Republican leaders face as they work to bridge divisions within the party and improve the GOP's image.

and heeeeeeeeeeere we go, rand is now placating to the far right who want to control people on abortion issues. i don't know how a "true" libertarian could claim that the government should decide whether you can have an abortion or not. how are you rand paul lovers going to defend this?
1090  Other / Politics & Society / Re: CNN national poll: Rand Paul 13%, Bush 13%, Ryan 12%, Huckabee 10%, Christie 9% on: June 20, 2014, 09:31:12 PM
I'd argue Rand's biggest opponent in 2016, especially if he gets to the GE, is going to be the Kochtopus association, which is about as popular as Dick Cheney (at least in MI, where pretty much the only TV political ads have been bashing Terri Land for months over her alleged Koch connections). Democrats, though, I really doubt have any chance of a '16 pres. victory unless maybe they do a Hail Mary with someone like Warren. A good part of Rand winning the GOP primary, I think, will be reaching out to Dems and suggesting they should switch parties in undemocratic states where you need to "pre-affiliate" yourself with a party to vote in their primary, while the chance of this happening greatly increases if traditional Dem affiliates buy the premise premise that Dems have bleak '16 odds and they need to settle with a lesser of evils within the GOP. It's going to be a very interesting year, I think.

if i knew you, i'd love to make a bet with you. democrats the underdog? i don't think so.. i'm not saying i want them to win, but objectively speaking, the republicans are getting in their own way. whether anyone likes it or not, hilary is much more popular than any republican i can think of.. it's why fox has been bashing her so much lately.

the funny thing is that.. the koch brothers are actually libertarians  Cheesy
Kochs are arguably libertarians, but I'd disagree. Maybe they were at some point, like Alan Greenspan allegedly was. There's a pretty decent and comical book going over almost all the libertarian factions - "Radicals for Capitalism." It covers everyone from the Kochs to Ayn, to my personal favorite, Robert Anton Wilson. It obviously has some libertarian bias, but it's a fun, detailed book no matter your political orientation. If I didn't lose the book in a warehouse I lived in for a while, I'd offer to ship it to you at no charge.

I'd take you up on the bet, but I'm financially strapped at the moment. How about reverse bragging rights based on the party which wins the '16 GE? I'll be sure to remind you when I win either way. Tongue

ha, you can't just cast them away as "not one of us" when they become unpopular. they are definitely right-wingish, but they also have libertarian ideals.. just like rand paul.

i'm glad there are people who think like you do, so i can win money off them. did you think romney had a chance in 2012?
1091  Other / Politics & Society / Re: CNN national poll: Rand Paul 13%, Bush 13%, Ryan 12%, Huckabee 10%, Christie 9% on: June 20, 2014, 09:05:25 PM
I'd argue Rand's biggest opponent in 2016, especially if he gets to the GE, is going to be the Kochtopus association, which is about as popular as Dick Cheney (at least in MI, where pretty much the only TV political ads have been bashing Terri Land for months over her alleged Koch connections). Democrats, though, I really doubt have any chance of a '16 pres. victory unless maybe they do a Hail Mary with someone like Warren. A good part of Rand winning the GOP primary, I think, will be reaching out to Dems and suggesting they should switch parties in undemocratic states where you need to "pre-affiliate" yourself with a party to vote in their primary, while the chance of this happening greatly increases if traditional Dem affiliates buy the premise premise that Dems have bleak '16 odds and they need to settle with a lesser of evils within the GOP. It's going to be a very interesting year, I think.

if i knew you, i'd love to make a bet with you. democrats the underdog? i don't think so.. i'm not saying i want them to win, but objectively speaking, the republicans are getting in their own way. whether anyone likes it or not, hilary is much more popular than any republican i can think of.. it's why fox has been bashing her so much lately.

the funny thing is that.. the koch brothers are actually libertarians  Cheesy
1092  Other / Off-topic / Re: Favourite TV Series? on: June 20, 2014, 09:04:17 PM
you are contributing to forum spam. instead, go here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=551747.700
1093  Other / Archival / Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns on: June 20, 2014, 08:18:15 PM
UPDATE: PrimeDice campaign is now 100 post max per week

I think this is a great move by Stunna. It will not make some participants happy, but it is better for the forum. There are just too many spammers. Their worthless replies are diluting serious discussions, and burying serious comments behind pages of chit chat.


Cap the number of users and get rid of all the Newbies with their shitposts instead. I can understand capping the posts a little, but this is pretty drastic. I guess we need another pay-per-post deal to come along and offer some competition. I blame Ritz. This is all his fault for dropping out  Grin.

from a financial standpoint, there's no reason for stunna to do this though. there aint no other playa in town. i've looked through other sig campaigns, and i think he still pays the most.
1094  Economy / Services / Re: [PrimeDice] [Highest Paid Signature] Earn Bitcoins Simply By Posting on: June 20, 2014, 08:02:47 PM
Stunna:

can we cap it at .4 BTC per month maximum? and if you are a hero member, you will only need 100 posts per week for a total of 400 posts. if you are a senior member, require 700 posts to reach that point. for full members, require 1000 posts to reach .4 btc.
1095  Economy / Services / Re: [PrimeDice] [Highest Paid Signature] Earn Bitcoins Simply By Posting on: June 20, 2014, 07:57:18 PM

Longest running and most trusted signature campaign.

Payment Structure   Rates have been increased - April 2

Edit: Maximum of 100 posts per week will be counted.


Whaaaaaat? That's a bit of a drastic cut back. And why no update post to tell us of this? So are we getting paid weekly or can we do a max of 400 posts a month?

Indeed...

If someone was to do 150 posts in the first week and 50 on the second, would it count as 200 or 150 posts?
Or perhaps it means that payments will be weekly now.

This also reduced the max payout to 0.48 for Hero Members.

Well, the title was also changed from "Earn up to 2.4 BTC/Month by Posting"

was gonna say the same. that's a big nerf, but i can't complain too much. it is what it is. i was planning to do 800 posts a month, guess i can just cut back now.
1096  Other / Archival / Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns on: June 20, 2014, 07:53:06 PM
Check the OP. I thought he was trolling at first but seems not.


Longest running and most trusted signature campaign.

Payment Structure   Rates have been increased - April 2

Edit: Maximum of 100 posts per week will be counted.


That's a drastic cut back. No idea why he didn't do an update post to tell us all of this.

what, so we  can only do 400 posts per month now? damn, i'm almost at my quota. damn, that got nerfed pretty bad. you'll be getting the senior member rate.. while i still have to be a lowly full member for another 2 months.
1097  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Alien disclosure and my personal encounter on: June 20, 2014, 07:36:14 PM
Dank, send us a list of all the shit you take. Sound like you're on some next level high

i'm thinking he's a shizophrenic and the drugs did not cause that... it probably just exacerbated his symptoms. he's totally mindfucked, living in his own bubble by now.

Please read to me the definition of schizophrenia and please explain how it is at all applicable to me.

here's a quote from wikipedia.

Quote
Schizophrenia (/ˌskɪtsɵˈfrɛniə/ or /ˌskɪtsɵˈfriːniə/) is a mental disorder often characterized by abnormal social behavior and failure to recognize what is real. Common symptoms include false beliefs, auditory hallucinations, confused or unclear thinking, inactivity, and reduced social engagement and emotional expression. Diagnosis is based on observed behavior and the person's reported experiences.

btw, can you be honest with us? can you tell us whether you were diagnosed with this or not? is that why your parents had you put on prescription meds?

Thank you.  "False beliefs" - I do not believe in negativity, only love, only truth.  Nor do I experience auditory or visual hallucinations, confused or unclear thinking, inactivity, reduced social engagement or emotional expression.  I recognize what is real, and what is real a good part of population fails to see, for we have been brainwashed with negativity and delusions since youth.

I was diagnosed with it by an ignorant, corrupt doctor that didn't give a damn about his patients and only AFTER he said I could leave.  I had bags in hand ready to leave and he said "Oh wait, you have to take this 'medicine' first" and I was held down by 8 people and molested by a needle.  Those 'antipsychotics' make you way more psychotic then before you take them, they literally damage your brain.

The last time I was in a psych ward, again for doing nothing to anybody but using my free speech, I was not diagnosed as schizophrenic.  It just goes to show that A) we do not have free speech, and B) psychiatry has no scientific basis, it is subjective solely to the discretion of the practitioners.  There is not any evidence that psychiatric drugs have ever helped, let alone cure, patients from their 'illness'.

The nazi's did the same thing during WWII, wake up people.

well, thanks for the truth. now we know dank was officially diagnosed with schizophrenia, and most people here would be able to independently figure out that you are mentally ill.

so tell us more about your situation.. where are your parents now, what did they do to you that was so harmful?

Yes, put your faith in the system.  See how far it gets you.



The trillion dollar health industry cares for you so much.  Without your suffering and demise, they wouldn't be trillionaires!

i'm not arguing that prescription drugs is not a problem. it doesn't really matter what i say, since you live in your own bubble.. all i want to know is what your situation is. why do you not like your parents? what have they done to you? what made them send you to see a psychiatrist?
1098  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Wake up people! Banks are not governments. They can't make things illegal! on: June 20, 2014, 07:00:10 PM
Banks are not countries. Banks are not states.

Bolivia did not ban bitcoins. Bolivia's banks did.

Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona, etc.  are not warning against using bitcoins. Their banks are.



Saying that a country bans bitcoins when their main banks ban them is like saying that a country has banned Whoppers because McDonalds in that country has banned all Whopper sales in their restaurants.


News alert, banks do not transfer bitcoins. Banks do not hold bitcoins in their accounts. Banning their use in their banks is meaningless.

i guess we live in different worlds. maybe the situation is different in bolivia, but banks DO run countries.. especially in the USA. our politicians work for the big corporations, and banks have A LOT of money to throw at them. in spite of what happened in 2008, there have not been any major players who were arrested for the shit they pulled. do you think that's a coincidence?

It depends on the country indeed. I don't know about Bolivia, but not in all countries the banks are the most powerful;
 

yeah i don't disagree with that.. but banking is one of the most powerful instutitions in the world, and i don't think people realize that. all wars need to be funded, cartel drug lords need to be funded, terrorism, presidential elections, politicians.. they all tie back to banks. money makes the world go round, and who do you think are the brokers of money?
1099  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Alien disclosure and my personal encounter on: June 20, 2014, 06:53:36 PM
Dank, send us a list of all the shit you take. Sound like you're on some next level high

i'm thinking he's a shizophrenic and the drugs did not cause that... it probably just exacerbated his symptoms. he's totally mindfucked, living in his own bubble by now.

Please read to me the definition of schizophrenia and please explain how it is at all applicable to me.

here's a quote from wikipedia.

Quote
Schizophrenia (/ˌskɪtsɵˈfrɛniə/ or /ˌskɪtsɵˈfriːniə/) is a mental disorder often characterized by abnormal social behavior and failure to recognize what is real. Common symptoms include false beliefs, auditory hallucinations, confused or unclear thinking, inactivity, and reduced social engagement and emotional expression. Diagnosis is based on observed behavior and the person's reported experiences.

btw, can you be honest with us? can you tell us whether you were diagnosed with this or not? is that why your parents had you put on prescription meds?

Thank you.  "False beliefs" - I do not believe in negativity, only love, only truth.  Nor do I experience auditory or visual hallucinations, confused or unclear thinking, inactivity, reduced social engagement or emotional expression.  I recognize what is real, and what is real a good part of population fails to see, for we have been brainwashed with negativity and delusions since youth.

I was diagnosed with it by an ignorant, corrupt doctor that didn't give a damn about his patients and only AFTER he said I could leave.  I had bags in hand ready to leave and he said "Oh wait, you have to take this 'medicine' first" and I was held down by 8 people and molested by a needle.  Those 'antipsychotics' make you way more psychotic then before you take them, they literally damage your brain.

The last time I was in a psych ward, again for doing nothing to anybody but using my free speech, I was not diagnosed as schizophrenic.  It just goes to show that A) we do not have free speech, and B) psychiatry has no scientific basis, it is subjective solely to the discretion of the practitioners.  There is not any evidence that psychiatric drugs have ever helped, let alone cure, patients from their 'illness'.

The nazi's did the same thing during WWII, wake up people.

well, thanks for the truth. now we know dank was officially diagnosed with schizophrenia, and most people here would be able to independently figure out that you are mentally ill.

so tell us more about your situation.. where are your parents now, what did they do to you that was so harmful?
1100  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Wake up people! Banks are not governments. They can't make things illegal! on: June 20, 2014, 06:48:29 PM
Banks are not countries. Banks are not states.

Bolivia did not ban bitcoins. Bolivia's banks did.

Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona, etc.  are not warning against using bitcoins. Their banks are.



Saying that a country bans bitcoins when their main banks ban them is like saying that a country has banned Whoppers because McDonalds in that country has banned all Whopper sales in their restaurants.


News alert, banks do not transfer bitcoins. Banks do not hold bitcoins in their accounts. Banning their use in their banks is meaningless.

i guess we live in different worlds. maybe the situation is different in bolivia, but banks DO run countries.. especially in the USA. our politicians work for the big corporations, and banks have A LOT of money to throw at them. in spite of what happened in 2008, there have not been any major players who were arrested for the shit they pulled. do you think that's a coincidence?
Pages: « 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 ... 238 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!