|
people are a little too on edge and tend to overreact when there's a small downswing. just remember that cooler heads prevail. only a fool panics.
|
|
|
|
This is a bit silly considering anyone with access to money can put it anywhere. Gold, silver, cash ect.
This is not silly at all - it just add to the list of ways to hide money in case of divorce. yeah, pretty much. buying gold, silver, or cash takes up a lot of space.. which makes it much more difficult to hide/conceal. with bitcoin, you could have millions of dollars and no physical object to hide. |
|
|
|
|
google either doesn't vet their ads or they are complicit with it. i remember them getting sued for advertising controlled substances.
|
|
|
|
LOL, these clowns are so transparent. What losers...
What next? More bailouts for Losers?
And maybe Bonuses too, all for Failures?
These same types would have one believe that Government Bonds and debt based fiat are sound, strong stores of value. But it's not true.
NO more bailouts for LOSERS. No more bonuses for failure and to keep their key employee dummies quiet so as to not turn states evidence.
No more debt-based fiat. It's mid-evil.
did i see you at the Occupy rally? lmfao =) i side with the occupy people a lot more than i do wall street. They had some valid points but got a little extreme with some of their demands. They also failed to turn it into a political movement unfortunately. i think they were stupid enough to not organize. they probably thought that organizing leads to corruption, but you can't really get anything done when everybody is swinging in different directions. |
|
|
|
A cup and handle is gonna form soon.
that sounds like sexual harassment. |
|
|
|
You mean like the 100% turnout in heavily democratic Philadelphia precincts in 2012? Really proud day for my state right there.  Lol... the inner city areas in most of the American cities are famous for bogus voting and vote rigging. Remember the United States Senate election in Minnesota, 2008 (Norm Coleman vs Al Franken). It was epic.  it's actually just the areas where republicans are contesting. they are known for playing a dirtier/smarter game than the democrats, who act like pussies compared to them. |
|
|
|
This is actually quite amusing and now I know what to do if a divorce ever comes by in my future. Anyone on the forums pull a fast one on there ex wifey ? if you get married, would you tell the wife that you have bitcoins? you'd be starting off the marriage with some deception there though. Well thankfully i'm not married yet neither do I have any plans to ain't no body got time for that. I used to say the same thing, then a brunette bombshell hit me. I still won't share my bit coin with her. she'll tease you with sex and use the vag to get it all out of you. |
|
|
|
well the issue is that it's so pronounced that america, more than any other country, has tied money with politics. it's ridiculous how much money is spent on the campaign trails. in order for a 3 party system to work, the point of singularity needs to hit.. but they'd need billions of dollars "invested."
I don't think that the injection of any amount of money can change the system. Right now, the major parties are backed up by the powerful demographic blocks. For example, the Democrats enjoy wide-spread support from the minorities (one-third of the population), while the GOP is backed by the religious right (another 1/3rd of the population). There is simply not enough space for a third party. congress have an approval rating of something like 9%.. it is obvious that most people feel like the parties do not speak for them, and there are plenty of people who want a third party.. it's just that they don't have enough money to buy influence for one. It is obvious that most people feel like some abstract "The Man" doesn't speak for them, but oddly enough, there is no congressman with a <9% approval rating. They're often in the high 40s or 50s, often 60-85% for established candidates. If you average them all, you probably get something like a 45-60% approval rating. People are either stupid or ignorant. The only other explanation I can think of is that the US is way, way too large to be effectively governed and really needs to be sectioned off, where what's now the USG acts more like the EU (which a good many Europeans will even tell you is too much government for too much diversity). Of course, we fought a civil war over that, so the chance of the federal USG ever taking a step back and letting people be governed with laws they apparently approve of 45-60% as opposed to 9% is around 0%. What shows that politicians don't speak for the people is the very low voter turnout in the US in years when only voting for Congressmen rather than the $x billion "political Superbowl" in presidential-voting years (~37-42% in 2010, though it's usually only ~50% in pres. years), which can arguably be seen as a "none of the above" option, which the various US governments have been very active in trying to prevent, perhaps out of worry the US may look anti-American (undemocratic). I don't buy the apathy argument. Maybe people are apathetic toward voting, but that doesn't necessarily indicate apathy toward government or society. (I don't have the bandwidth to view the Rand backpeddling video - don't mean to ignore it) well, maniacal people are the ones who rule the world.. and those are the ones who know how to work gullible people. that would explain the disparity. a nice smile and a expensive suit can go a long way into convincing people to do almost anything. |
|
|
|
This is actually quite amusing and now I know what to do if a divorce ever comes by in my future. Anyone on the forums pull a fast one on there ex wifey ? if you get married, would you tell the wife that you have bitcoins? you'd be starting off the marriage with some deception there though. |
|
|
|
|
the more you focus on something, the more you put weight on its existence. if you told yourself "i will look for red cars out in the street," then you'll begin noticing more red cars.
|
|
|
|
Yeah, but do could a stash of cash under your bed too if your wife doesn't know about it  . "A number of forums devoted to Bitcoin have been filled with husbands discussing the option of using digital currencies, a London divorce lawyer has claimed." There's been a few discussions about it on here too. if you're stashing say $100,000 under your bed, i think your bed would be really big. |
|
|
|
The Vatican needs to behave more like a religious organization, then acting like a giant banking corporation like the JP Morgan Chase or the Goldman Sachs. Come back to the basic principles. i would say that, throughout the history of man, religious organizations act more like businesses than they do religious institutions. |
|
|
|
ugh, people who buy scamcoins and think it's their right to be ensured money are just plain ignorant. they are the kind of people who put in the least amount of work and expect the most returns. There is always risk when you make an investment
The exchanges have no reason to hold your hands the responsiblity and burden remains on the users
The obligation that an exchange has is to not shut down and run away with your coins (mtgox)
Or freeze assets if their coins are stolen due to bad security practices (vircurrex)
well, the problem is that people like the OP don't look at this as an investment. they look at it as a get-rich-quick scheme. |
|
|
|
Me. I am god. I have all powers. Though I am in the process of unlocking them. I am working on telepathy, telekinesis, levitation, immortality, remote viewing and xray vision, I have experienced all of them but need to do more work.
sadly, i believe you are serious in what you are saying. what are your current powers btw? |
|
|
|
|
they wouldn't call it a roller coaster ride if you didn't have downswings in addition to upswings.
|
|
|
|
|
i don't like the fact that banks and financial institutions are paying notice to bitcoin. they'll just end up pooling their money together to influence lawmakers to be against it.
|
|
|
|
LOL, these clowns are so transparent. What losers...
What next? More bailouts for Losers?
And maybe Bonuses too, all for Failures?
These same types would have one believe that Government Bonds and debt based fiat are sound, strong stores of value. But it's not true.
NO more bailouts for LOSERS. No more bonuses for failure and to keep their key employee dummies quiet so as to not turn states evidence.
No more debt-based fiat. It's mid-evil.
did i see you at the Occupy rally? lmfao =) i side with the occupy people a lot more than i do wall street. |
|
|
|
there could be false accusations that go unconfirmed.. it could be abused. Hard to prove with most accounts though, though I guess a massive change in syntax/grammar is a big giveaway, but you could get false positives so I'd be careful about quickly negbombing users. i think i should create an account name hilariousandca and send people dick pics |
|
|
|
|
i'm thinking we should wait until bitcoin hits $1,000 before even talking about $50,000. the farther you look into the future, the less accurate you are. imo, even talking about $10k/coin within this year is overdoing it.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
