dextryn
|
 |
October 24, 2013, 08:58:13 PM |
|
Crap, everyone is reporting their chips running in the 45 degree range. I have one at 48, two at 55 and one at 64. I'm hashing at a pretty stable rate of around 540-550. Should I be concerned about the temps?
|
|
|
|
Micky25
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 974
Merit: 1000
|
 |
October 24, 2013, 09:01:03 PM |
|
I have about the same and feel totaly comfortable.
|
|
|
|
dextryn
|
 |
October 24, 2013, 09:05:14 PM |
|
I have about the same and feel totaly comfortable.
Ultimately I'm feeling fine too. Hash rate is great. Heck, I remember gpu mining and having 12 of them pegged at 80 for months.
|
|
|
|
DPoS
|
 |
October 24, 2013, 09:17:43 PM |
|
I'm not sure why you need to remove this file - I would think it would just overwrite it, but if you really want to remove it:
SSH into the machine, then:
# cd /config # rm asic_test
The '#' is the command line prompt - don't type that.
Thank you. and yes, DPos, wouldn't the asic_test get overwritten one you load the new firmware?? little tired of proving everything for people... simple to do a test right? either upgrade and reboot twice with ,96 and see if it does that 1-2 min runthrough and reboots itself or add extra char or two in the file and see if it overwrites i believe there is logic somewhere that checks to see if the file is there and then skips the self test.. but i've been messing with bfgminer the past few days so i don't really remember exactly i usually rename the asic_test files to asic_testXX so I keep record of any changes
|
|
|
|
Cablez
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
I owe my soul to the Bitcoin code...
|
 |
October 24, 2013, 09:24:05 PM |
|
Is there a way to identify which physical board is being identified by the bertmod output? It says there is a board 0,2,3,4 with boards 2 and 3 being much warmer than the other two. I would assume that those would be the rear boards, correct?
|
Tired of substandard power distribution in your ASIC setup??? Chris' Custom Cablez will get you sorted out right! No job too hard so PM me for a quote Check my products or ask a question here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=74397.0
|
|
|
soy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1013
|
 |
October 24, 2013, 09:37:02 PM |
|
But I don't understand why if the warm BBB backs up Merc's why it wouldn't back up a Jupiter 4x as much.
I agree... It just doesn't make any sense... I think it's the VRM's getting cooled by playing with the cardboard, etc... as mentioned earlier.. No, in fact my arrangement probably warms the VRMs a little as I've now got a kind of wind tunnel to the ASIC module and that first passes over the BBB - note the small 120vac 3 watt at the wall fan pushing in from the far left and the two front fans. So, the ½ fan width cardboard down over the BBB might be better buy I ain't fooling with mine. ...trying to get on the dreadmill.. KnC 0: | 130.2G/135.7Gh/s | A:7589658 R:346355 HW:441631 WU:2091.4/m not sure but I may have seen a 136GH/s avg earlier. That first figure cycles up and down. about 4 mph and watching bering sea gold - gonna cash in my BTC and head up to them there hills. Stepped off the dreadmill and the internet goes down. Happened yesterday just as I got back from a jog. The local highway is being widened from 2 lane to divided highway. Fiber is run along the road. Cable was down 2 hours at least. Bummer.
|
|
|
|
soy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1013
|
 |
October 24, 2013, 09:39:38 PM |
|
just now... Just as a little test... I gently just pressed on the vrm's on the slo sat, and rocked them side to side a tad with the tip of my finger. One of the vrm's gave a little "Click". within 30 seconds, a couple cores were re-enabled in cgminer... and it has gained about 20 WU's in about 5 minutes, and 2-3 gh/s Will keep updated...
few mins later... couple more WU. 1 more gh/s
While my internet was down I shut down the miners and put a bit of cardboard between the VRMs and the ASIC cooler. I looked closely and the metal tops are epoxy'd in place with thin lines of epoxy. The snap could be one of those epoxy lines breaking. I'd like to take the tops off and see if an expensive thermal tape would help any, then re-epoxy.
|
|
|
|
soy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1013
|
 |
October 24, 2013, 09:42:23 PM |
|
soy, .90 crashed....and everything below .94 didn't work or help me...back to .95 square 1 again see what happens....
.90, knc if you are listening had great numbers for me, but not sure what why it crashed....
If they were to answer I'd guess they guess it's your power supply can't handle it.
|
|
|
|
chrono030
Member

Offline
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
|
 |
October 24, 2013, 09:46:23 PM |
|
just now... Just as a little test... I gently just pressed on the vrm's on the slo sat, and rocked them side to side a tad with the tip of my finger. One of the vrm's gave a little "Click". within 30 seconds, a couple cores were re-enabled in cgminer... and it has gained about 20 WU's in about 5 minutes, and 2-3 gh/s Will keep updated...
few mins later... couple more WU. 1 more gh/s
While my internet was down I shut down the miners and put a bit of cardboard between the VRMs and the ASIC cooler. I looked closely and the metal tops are epoxy'd in place with thin lines of epoxy. The snap could be one of those epoxy lines breaking. I'd like to take the tops off and see if an expensive thermal tape would help any, then re-epoxy. This seems to be very odd. I am guessing that pressing a VRM wouldnt fix an issue with 1 -4 cores being out. Has anyone else done this? I have 4 cores that seem to be consistently off.
|
|
|
|
mgio
|
 |
October 24, 2013, 09:48:52 PM |
|
I'm running 0.96 and I've can't get much above 500. According to eligius I am really only getting 465 or so (don't know why the big discrepancy).
Any suggestions on how to improve my hash rate? Should I try different firmware?
|
|
|
|
Cablez
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
I owe my soul to the Bitcoin code...
|
 |
October 24, 2013, 09:54:03 PM |
|
At least you guys are hitting 500. My bad Jupiter on 0.97 doesn't break 475GH with 20%HW errors and anywhere from 24-48 cores disabled.
EDIT: temps are not that bad either with the warmest being 52deg.
|
Tired of substandard power distribution in your ASIC setup??? Chris' Custom Cablez will get you sorted out right! No job too hard so PM me for a quote Check my products or ask a question here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=74397.0
|
|
|
AFox
|
 |
October 24, 2013, 10:04:24 PM |
|
All the firmware's were run at least 24 hours without any reboot. For that reason firmware 0.90 to 0.93 aren't listed. -------------------- | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.97 | Average CGminer | 270Gh/s | 274Gh/s | 280Gh/s | 284Gh/s | Average Pool | 275Gh/s | 263Gh/s | 278Gh/s (link) | 283Gh/s (link) | Consumption | 485 Watts | 305 Watts | 313 Watts | 313 Watts | Temputure | 54 & 62°C | 42 & 47°C | 42 & 47°C | 40 & 44°C | Rejected | 1.5% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.48% | HW | 2.81% | 0.79% | 1.08% | 1.47% | WU | 3975/m | 3717/m | 3933/m | 4021/m |
|
|
|
|
DPoS
|
 |
October 24, 2013, 10:19:19 PM |
|
At least you guys are hitting 500. My bad Jupiter on 0.97 doesn't break 475GH with 20%HW errors and anywhere from 24-48 cores disabled.
Well, the pool is reading ~465, so I'm going off that number. Is anyone actually getting 550+ at their pool stats? there's good modules and bad modules I put my one really good module from my troubled miner and swapped it into my good miner that had the odd 8 VRM board in it. Swapped it with the 8 VRM board now seeing solid +580 at the pool with four very good modules running .96 w/cgminer 587.63 GH/s 2004480 (99.87%) 2560 / 13824 / 0 my troubled miner has a hodgepodge of issues.. so I am running the gambit on which firmware to use with bfgminer for best case scenario
|
|
|
|
Nemo1024
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014
|
 |
October 24, 2013, 10:19:27 PM |
|
Still waiting for hosted 39xx Saturn to go into production. Status: Paid. Not even a sing of burn-in on the configured BitMinter worker. Just saw this on the list thread: Hosting started, logon details received! Hang in there people, have faith! Jupiter, order 38XX, paid for July 16th.
Here is hoping...
|
“Dark times lie ahead of us and there will be a time when we must choose between what is easy and what is right.” “We are only as strong as we are united, as weak as we are divided.” “It is important to fight and fight again, and keep fighting, for only then can evil be kept at bay, though never quite eradicated.”
|
|
|
xyzzy099
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1068
Merit: 1109
|
 |
October 24, 2013, 10:20:04 PM |
|
[ little tired of proving everything for people...
Well, to be honest, making goofy claims like 'hash rate goes down when the BBB is warm' w/o any supporting facts does not do a lot for your credibility.
|
Libertarians: Diligently plotting to take over the world and leave you alone.
|
|
|
idee2013
|
 |
October 24, 2013, 10:20:15 PM |
|
All the firmware's were run at least 24 hours without any reboot. For that reason firmware 0.90 to 0.93 aren't listed. -------------------- | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.97 | Average CGminer | 270Gh/s | 274Gh/s | 280Gh/s | 284Gh/s | Average Pool | 275Gh/s | 263Gh/s | 278Gh/s (link) | 283Gh/s (link) | Consumption | 485 Watts | 305 Watts | 313 Watts | 313 Watts | Temputure | 54 & 62°C | 42 & 47°C | 42 & 47°C | 40 & 44°C | Rejected | 1.5% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.48% | HW | 2.81% | 0.79% | 1.08% | 1.47% | WU | 3975/m | 3717/m | 3933/m | 4021/m |
+1 nice review
|
|
|
|
DPoS
|
 |
October 24, 2013, 10:22:23 PM |
|
[ little tired of proving everything for people...
Well, to be honest, making goofy claims like 'hash rate goes down when the BBB is warm' w/o any supporting facts does not do a lot for your credibility. re-read my posts.. i talked about lowering the fans to the crossbars for the asic chips/boards to lower temps 5-7C.. i never spoke of what you said but why should you go back and read anything right? if someone takes something out of context and you believe it, I cant stop you
|
|
|
|
sbfree
|
 |
October 24, 2013, 10:28:26 PM |
|
soy, .90 crashed....and everything below .94 didn't work or help me...back to .95 square 1 again see what happens....
.90, knc if you are listening had great numbers for me, but not sure what why it crashed....
If they were to answer I'd guess they guess it's your power supply can't handle it. soy, doubt it, its a cool master 1200 watts...should handle multiple saturns...what I think happens is the output current showed at over 50A for all chips cores....maybe it was too much juice there, need a firmware like .90 but that takes output current to like maybe 45A....
|
|
|
|
xyzzy099
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1068
Merit: 1109
|
 |
October 24, 2013, 10:29:00 PM |
|
[ little tired of proving everything for people...
Well, to be honest, making goofy claims like 'hash rate goes down when the BBB is warm' w/o any supporting facts does not do a lot for your credibility. re-read my posts.. i talked about lowering the fans to the crossbars for the asic chips/boards to lower temps 5-7C.. i never spoke of what you said but why should you go back and read anything right? if someone takes something out of context and you believe it, I cant stop you I have read this whole thread. I can't claim to have memorized every post you've made, but I took this post:
I would be interested to hear what the theory is behind that "field experience". On the face of it, that sounds ridiculous. I have seen stranger things though, so I am not gonna call BS just yet.
which was the main reason I didn't post it to the boards for 3 days and kept it to myself.... to indicate that you stood by this claim, and felt that after 3 days of studying the problem, you were confident enough to make it public. Did I misread you?
|
Libertarians: Diligently plotting to take over the world and leave you alone.
|
|
|
DPoS
|
 |
October 24, 2013, 10:34:44 PM |
|
[ little tired of proving everything for people...
Well, to be honest, making goofy claims like 'hash rate goes down when the BBB is warm' w/o any supporting facts does not do a lot for your credibility. re-read my posts.. i talked about lowering the fans to the crossbars for the asic chips/boards to lower temps 5-7C.. i never spoke of what you said but why should you go back and read anything right? if someone takes something out of context and you believe it, I cant stop you I have read this whole thread. I can't claim to have memorized every post you've made, but I took this post:
I would be interested to hear what the theory is behind that "field experience". On the face of it, that sounds ridiculous. I have seen stranger things though, so I am not gonna call BS just yet.
which was the main reason I didn't post it to the boards for 3 days and kept it to myself.... to indicate that you stood by this claim, and felt that after 3 days of studying the problem, you were confident enough to make it public. Did I misread you? jesus you are a waste of time.. need everything spelled out in a straight line?? I was quoted above your post about what I did in another thread...I assume everyone knows about my fan mod on the crossbars so that was the part I was referring to on 'didn't post it for three days' and the reason for THAT PARTICULAR ITEM was because of tools like you ok?? now go complain to someone else about heat and the BBB ok?
|
|
|
|
|