Bitcoin Forum
February 20, 2018, 02:20:06 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3218 (80.4%)
Bank transfer / USD - 414 (10.3%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 371 (9.3%)
Total Voters: 4001

Pages: « 1 ... 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 [740] 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 ... 1136 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [2+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 4323890 times)
chunkyjunkie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 485
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
February 11, 2014, 12:30:32 AM
 #14781

So 37% day luck np happens, 70% week luck yeah hmm.... and 91% month.... we sure something isn't wrong?  Might have to switch soonish myself but rather support spreading out hash power.

https://www.bitcoinlanding.com - Twitter - https://twitter.com/Bitcoinlanding - Bitcoin News, Video and more!
1519093206
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1519093206

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1519093206
Reply with quote  #2

1519093206
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1519093206
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1519093206

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1519093206
Reply with quote  #2

1519093206
Report to moderator
J_Dubbs
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 11, 2014, 01:18:08 AM
 #14782

So 37% day luck np happens, 70% week luck yeah hmm.... and 91% month.... we sure something isn't wrong?  Might have to switch soonish myself but rather support spreading out hash power.

I'm never sure, but then people jump on me and say I'm a conspiracy theorist. I dunno, my opinion is our luck will improve once the database issues are resolved, just like last time it choked when we were getting close to 900TH/S. BUT, nobody wants to even consider the possibility that it's an issue backstage on the pool, which honestly is what appears to be happening. I love that "IT guy" mentality where anyone exploring potential explanations for what looks to be a pattern of "luck" is labeled as an idiot.
necro_nemesis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 01:24:27 AM
 #14783

Wow! My miner found a block. Number 285163. A first for me.

Mine found 2 a couple days ago throughout a single day and my rig is microscopic in comparison to what I see out there. Is that equivalent lightning striking twice?
darcimer
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 02:22:37 AM
 #14784

Wow! My miner found a block. Number 285163. A first for me.

Mine found 2 a couple days ago throughout a single day and my rig is microscopic in comparison to what I see out there. Is that equivalent lightning striking twice?

How do you check to see if your miner was the one that found a block?
eoakland
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 502



View Profile
February 11, 2014, 02:23:53 AM
 #14785

So 37% day luck np happens, 70% week luck yeah hmm.... and 91% month.... we sure something isn't wrong?  Might have to switch soonish myself but rather support spreading out hash power.

I'm never sure, but then people jump on me and say I'm a conspiracy theorist. I dunno, my opinion is our luck will improve once the database issues are resolved, just like last time it choked when we were getting close to 900TH/S. BUT, nobody wants to even consider the possibility that it's an issue backstage on the pool, which honestly is what appears to be happening. I love that "IT guy" mentality where anyone exploring potential explanations for what looks to be a pattern of "luck" is labeled as an idiot.

I dunno, seems very funky.  just look at when everything is going smooth how quickly the confirmations for blocks found go....but when there is a glitch, the blocks take forever to get confirmations.  one block lasts 23 hours to confirm.  how many "website under service" messages have we seen today ?  all points to issues behind the scenes.  I think during bad luck collective hashing power should be pointed to BTCGuild ...LoL.  those guys find blocks left and right...never a sad 30% dry spell for so many days.  in the past  7 days or so our month luck dropped big time.  What the feezy ?

14PzFeS53AoERv5MiWEAeWxDCvZZMT37Jf
Fuck ognasty from eoakland
Trongersoll
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500



View Profile
February 11, 2014, 02:32:39 AM
 #14786

So 37% day luck np happens, 70% week luck yeah hmm.... and 91% month.... we sure something isn't wrong?  Might have to switch soonish myself but rather support spreading out hash power.

I'm never sure, but then people jump on me and say I'm a conspiracy theorist. I dunno, my opinion is our luck will improve once the database issues are resolved, just like last time it choked when we were getting close to 900TH/S. BUT, nobody wants to even consider the possibility that it's an issue backstage on the pool, which honestly is what appears to be happening. I love that "IT guy" mentality where anyone exploring potential explanations for what looks to be a pattern of "luck" is labeled as an idiot.

I dunno, seems very funky.  just look at when everything is going smooth how quickly the confirmations for blocks found go....but when there is a glitch, the blocks take forever to get confirmations.  one block lasts 23 hours to confirm.  how many "website under service" messages have we seen today ?  all points to issues behind the scenes.  I think during bad luck collective hashing power should be pointed to BTCGuild ...LoL.  those guys find blocks left and right...never a sad 30% dry spell for so many days.  in the past  7 days or so our month luck dropped big time.  What the feezy ?

I'm not sure who you talk to, but if you look at the BTCguild thread, You'll see that they are all commenting on a bad luck streak as well.
eoakland
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 502



View Profile
February 11, 2014, 03:26:44 AM
 #14787

So 37% day luck np happens, 70% week luck yeah hmm.... and 91% month.... we sure something isn't wrong?  Might have to switch soonish myself but rather support spreading out hash power.

I'm never sure, but then people jump on me and say I'm a conspiracy theorist. I dunno, my opinion is our luck will improve once the database issues are resolved, just like last time it choked when we were getting close to 900TH/S. BUT, nobody wants to even consider the possibility that it's an issue backstage on the pool, which honestly is what appears to be happening. I love that "IT guy" mentality where anyone exploring potential explanations for what looks to be a pattern of "luck" is labeled as an idiot.

I dunno, seems very funky.  just look at when everything is going smooth how quickly the confirmations for blocks found go....but when there is a glitch, the blocks take forever to get confirmations.  one block lasts 23 hours to confirm.  how many "website under service" messages have we seen today ?  all points to issues behind the scenes.  I think during bad luck collective hashing power should be pointed to BTCGuild ...LoL.  those guys find blocks left and right...never a sad 30% dry spell for so many days.  in the past  7 days or so our month luck dropped big time.  What the feezy ?

I'm not sure who you talk to, but if you look at the BTCguild thread, You'll see that they are all commenting on a bad luck streak as well.

30% worth i think not.   don't get me wrong...like slush pool...just hate this "bad luck" streak.  i paid too much to get jalapeno paydays.

14PzFeS53AoERv5MiWEAeWxDCvZZMT37Jf
Fuck ognasty from eoakland
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1000


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
February 11, 2014, 03:39:55 AM
 #14788

So 37% day luck np happens, 70% week luck yeah hmm.... and 91% month.... we sure something isn't wrong?  Might have to switch soonish myself but rather support spreading out hash power.

I'm never sure, but then people jump on me and say I'm a conspiracy theorist. I dunno, my opinion is our luck will improve once the database issues are resolved, just like last time it choked when we were getting close to 900TH/S. BUT, nobody wants to even consider the possibility that it's an issue backstage on the pool, which honestly is what appears to be happening. I love that "IT guy" mentality where anyone exploring potential explanations for what looks to be a pattern of "luck" is labeled as an idiot.

I dunno, seems very funky.  just look at when everything is going smooth how quickly the confirmations for blocks found go....but when there is a glitch, the blocks take forever to get confirmations.  one block lasts 23 hours to confirm.  how many "website under service" messages have we seen today ?  all points to issues behind the scenes.  I think during bad luck collective hashing power should be pointed to BTCGuild ...LoL.  those guys find blocks left and right...never a sad 30% dry spell for so many days.  in the past  7 days or so our month luck dropped big time.  What the feezy ?

I don't think anyone sensible would label someone "an idiot" just for looking at 'potential explanations for what looks to be a pattern of "luck" '. What often does get one's goat is when the potential explanations are so wrong headed that they just cloud the issue.

To work out if slush's pool's "luck" is unusual or not:

1. Get an average of difficulty 1 equivalent accepted shares / expected shares (mining difficulty for each block) for the last  "n" blocks.
2. Using the Erlang distribution, calculate the CDF using x = the average you calculated, k and lambda both = number of blocks.

You can use Wolfram Alpha if you don't have access to statistical software. Here's an example using a 10 block average average accepted/expected of 1.1:

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=erlang+distribution+Pr%28x+%3C%3D+1.1%29+%2C+k%3D10%2C+lambda%3D10

In terms of bad luck, if the answer is > 0.99 then that is pretty bad and would happen only once in one hundred reruns of k blocks. Likewise, and answer of 0.9999 would happen only once in ten thousand reruns of k blocks. If you'd averaged the last one hundred blocks and you got 0.9999, there would be good grounds to think something funky is going on. Otherwise, maybe not.

Give it a try and report back, and do ask questions if I haven't been clear.

Doing this is the only way anyone will take your concerns about 'bad luck' seriously.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
eoakland
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 502



View Profile
February 11, 2014, 03:45:31 AM
 #14789


"I don't think anyone sensible would label someone "an idiot" just for looking at 'potential explanations for what looks to be a pattern of "luck" '. What often does get one's goat is when the potential explanations are so wrong headed that they just cloud the issue.

To work out if slush's pool's "luck" is unusual or not:

1. Get an average of difficulty 1 equivalent accepted shares / expected shares (mining difficulty for eachblock) for the last  "n" blocks.
2. Using the Erlang distribution, calculate the CDF using x = the average you calculated, k and lambda both = number of blocks.

You can use Wolfram Alpha if you don't have access to statistical software. Here's an example using a 10 block average average accepted/expected of 1.1:

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=erlang+distribution+Pr%28x+%3C%3D+1.1%29+%2C+k%3D10%2C+lambda%3D10

In terms of bad luck, if the answer is > 0.99 then that is pretty bad and would happen only once in one hundred reruns of k blocks. Likewise, and answer of 0.9999 would happen only once in ten thousand reruns of k blocks. If you'd averaged the last one hundred blocks and you got 0.9999, there would be good grounds to think something funky is going on. Otherwise, maybe not.

Give it a try and report back, and do ask questions if I haven't been clear.

Doing this is the only way anyone will take your concerns about 'bad luck' seriously."




+1 to whatever this guy said, it reads REALLY smart...LoL.  

14PzFeS53AoERv5MiWEAeWxDCvZZMT37Jf
Fuck ognasty from eoakland
Scyntech
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 282
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 03:48:43 AM
 #14790


"I don't think anyone sensible would label someone "an idiot" just for looking at 'potential explanations for what looks to be a pattern of "luck" '. What often does get one's goat is when the potential explanations are so wrong headed that they just cloud the issue.

To work out if slush's pool's "luck" is unusual or not:

1. Get an average of difficulty 1 equivalent accepted shares / expected shares (mining difficulty for eachblock) for the last  "n" blocks.
2. Using the Erlang distribution, calculate the CDF using x = the average you calculated, k and lambda both = number of blocks.

You can use Wolfram Alpha if you don't have access to statistical software. Here's an example using a 10 block average average accepted/expected of 1.1:

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=erlang+distribution+Pr%28x+%3C%3D+1.1%29+%2C+k%3D10%2C+lambda%3D10

In terms of bad luck, if the answer is > 0.99 then that is pretty bad and would happen only once in one hundred reruns of k blocks. Likewise, and answer of 0.9999 would happen only once in ten thousand reruns of k blocks. If you'd averaged the last one hundred blocks and you got 0.9999, there would be good grounds to think something funky is going on. Otherwise, maybe not.

Give it a try and report back, and do ask questions if I haven't been clear.

Doing this is the only way anyone will take your concerns about 'bad luck' seriously."




+1 to whatever this guy said, it reads REALLY smart...LoL.  

seriously smart stuffs
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1000


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
February 11, 2014, 04:18:25 AM
 #14791

seriously smart stuffs

I'm not really interested in kudos, I'm just keen for someone to try it and report back. I'm hoping that if a few regular posters learn how to do this it will help keep freak outs to a minimum.

Give it a try, Scyntech. If there's anything you didn't understand I'll explain it again. Anyone should be able to do this just by following the steps and using wolframalpha, but only if I explained it properly.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
eoakland
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 502



View Profile
February 11, 2014, 04:42:37 AM
 #14792

seriously smart stuffs

I'm not really interested in kudos, I'm just keen for someone to try it and report back. I'm hoping that if a few regular posters learn how to do this it will help keep freak outs to a minimum.

Give it a try, Scyntech. If there's anything you didn't understand I'll explain it again. Anyone should be able to do this just by following the steps and using wolframalpha, but only if I explained it properly.

Organofcorti,

you do realize that to many the formula you speak of, and the terms you use are a foreign language right ?   (me included)  I took a look at it, but quickly turned away because it reminds me of something I would need a TI-83 calculator for =)

14PzFeS53AoERv5MiWEAeWxDCvZZMT37Jf
Fuck ognasty from eoakland
necro_nemesis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 04:48:36 AM
 #14793

Didn't we just recently calculate how many gigawatts to expect from our flux capacitor?  We've had some luck today.  Just happens to be bad.  Tomorrow is another day.
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1000


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
February 11, 2014, 05:10:00 AM
 #14794

seriously smart stuffs

I'm not really interested in kudos, I'm just keen for someone to try it and report back. I'm hoping that if a few regular posters learn how to do this it will help keep freak outs to a minimum.

Give it a try, Scyntech. If there's anything you didn't understand I'll explain it again. Anyone should be able to do this just by following the steps and using wolframalpha, but only if I explained it properly.

Organofcorti,

you do realize that to many the formula you speak of, and the terms you use are a foreign language right ?   (me included)  I took a look at it, but quickly turned away because it reminds me of something I would need a TI-83 calculator for =)

OK, thanks for the feedback. Here's a simplified version:

1. Got to http://mining.bitcoin.cz/stats/
2. Add up all the numbers in the "Total shares" column.
3. Follow each link under "Block #" to find the difficulty at which each block was solved. (For orphaned blocks, assume the same as the last difficulty). Add up all the difficulties from each block.
4. Divide the result of step 2 by the result of step 3. Call this number "X"
5. Go to http://www.wolframalpha.com/
6. In the text box, enter the following, substituting your value for X:

erlang distribution Pr(x <= X) , k=20, lambda=20



So if you calculated X as 1.1, you'd enter:

erlang distribution Pr(x <= 1.1) , k=20, lambda=20


We use  k=20 and lambda=20 since there are twenty blocks on the basic stats page. If you were to use one hundred blocks, change the values to k=100 and lambda=100.


I think if you follow that step by step you should be fine. After that you just need to understand the results, but I'll help you with that once you get this part done.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
eoakland
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 502



View Profile
February 11, 2014, 05:16:39 AM
 #14795

Didn't we just recently calculate how many gigawatts to expect from our flux capacitor?  We've had some luck today.  Just happens to be bad.  Tomorrow is another day.

yes, you are correct.  Now the only issue is how do we power that flux...plutonium is not readily available at our local Costco---you wouldn't happen to have a flyer in your pocket with the information as to when lightening will strike....would ya ?   =)


14PzFeS53AoERv5MiWEAeWxDCvZZMT37Jf
Fuck ognasty from eoakland
chopsticks
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 93
Merit: 10

*bamf!* you've just been eaten by a gr00.


View Profile WWW
February 11, 2014, 06:01:09 AM
 #14796

(pushes eoakland to the side}

Nice job, organofcorti.   Much appreciated.

This space kept free of spammage, scammage, begging and affiliate linking
eoakland
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 502



View Profile
February 11, 2014, 06:19:42 AM
 #14797

(pushes eoakland to the side}

Nice job, organofcorti.   Much appreciated.

@chopsticks, i seriously doubt you have ever pushed anyone.  you have more than likely been on the receiving end of one too many pushes and pelvic thrusts bottom boy.

14PzFeS53AoERv5MiWEAeWxDCvZZMT37Jf
Fuck ognasty from eoakland
PostMixer
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 06:36:09 AM
 #14798

seriously smart stuffs

I'm not really interested in kudos, I'm just keen for someone to try it and report back. I'm hoping that if a few regular posters learn how to do this it will help keep freak outs to a minimum.

Give it a try, Scyntech. If there's anything you didn't understand I'll explain it again. Anyone should be able to do this just by following the steps and using wolframalpha, but only if I explained it properly.

Organofcorti,

you do realize that to many the formula you speak of, and the terms you use are a foreign language right ?   (me included)  I took a look at it, but quickly turned away because it reminds me of something I would need a TI-83 calculator for =)

OK, thanks for the feedback. Here's a simplified version:

1. Got to http://mining.bitcoin.cz/stats/
2. Add up all the numbers in the "Total shares" column.
3. Follow each link under "Block #" to find the difficulty at which each block was solved. (For orphaned blocks, assume the same as the last difficulty). Add up all the difficulties from each block.
4. Divide the result of step 2 by the result of step 3. Call this number "X"
5. Go to http://www.wolframalpha.com/
6. In the text box, enter the following, substituting your value for X:

erlang distribution Pr(x <= X) , k=20, lambda=20



So if you calculated X as 1.1, you'd enter:

erlang distribution Pr(x <= 1.1) , k=20, lambda=20


We use  k=20 and lambda=20 since there are twenty blocks on the basic stats page. If you were to use one hundred blocks, change the values to k=100 and lambda=100.


I think if you follow that step by step you should be fine. After that you just need to understand the results, but I'll help you with that once you get this part done.

Thanks for the Formula's and explanation. I for one will try this. Probably not until the weekend, But I will get back to you with my results.

I won't ask for donations but I will ask for help. And I won't give donations but I will help if I can.
PostMixer
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 06:39:09 AM
 #14799

(pushes eoakland to the side}

Nice job, organofcorti.   Much appreciated.

@chopsticks, i seriously doubt you have ever pushed anyone.  you have more than likely been on the receiving end of one too many pushes and pelvic thrusts bottom boy.

@eokland, What's up with the trust warnings on your profile? Not trying to be an ass, I just have never seen that before. Extreme Caution sounds serious?

I won't ask for donations but I will ask for help. And I won't give donations but I will help if I can.
eoakland
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 502



View Profile
February 11, 2014, 06:51:44 AM
 #14800

(pushes eoakland to the side}

Nice job, organofcorti.   Much appreciated.

@chopsticks, i seriously doubt you have ever pushed anyone.  you have more than likely been on the receiving end of one too many pushes and pelvic thrusts bottom boy.

@eokland, What's up with the trust warnings on your profile? Not trying to be an ass, I just have never seen that before. Extreme Caution sounds serious?

that's funny you ask bro, click on the trust section.  i sold/fronted without payment something to someone, double-checked that they were sure, they confirmed, i shipped, next thing i know the dude refused it, and instead of sending back 2 day priority....my miner is stuck in USPS return limbo for 21 days.....the buyer did not keep his word one too many times.  so i finally left him negative feedback and he returned the favor.  

if you click on my feedback you can see the story and reference link.  


14PzFeS53AoERv5MiWEAeWxDCvZZMT37Jf
Fuck ognasty from eoakland
Pages: « 1 ... 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 [740] 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 ... 1136 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!